Defense looks pretty ropey and it's hard to imagine them getting much defensive support from midfield.
England World Cup thread - the thread of certain disappointment
I am actually really excited by the squad this year. Pretty much every major tournament I go into it hoping that England do well, but after about 30 minutes into the first game I start to feel sick from supporting a team that contains Cole, Terry, Lampard, Defoe and Rooney (amongst others) and start supporting on whoever is playing against them. I don't specifically want to, but it always ends up that way. This squad has very few people who make me seethe, so I might actually enjoy cheering them all the way to the inevitable group stage eliminaton.
All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight
If you should be " seething " about anything, it should be the dire anti-football served up by your mob this season...
"Self-defence is an art I cultivate"
Quite excited by the England squad and agree it's the first time in a while that it's lacking in C U Next Tuesdays. Potential for a really exciting and pacey attacking team. Back 5 picks itself but a front 6 like this could be fun:
-------Gerrard-----Wilshere
Sterling------Rooney-----Chamberlain
---------------Sturridge
Except you just know Hodgson will be over-cautious and start Gerrard, Lampard and Milner in midfield and probably Welbeck on the wing. I think we could surprise a few people. Not expected to go very far given the tough group, but we do usually seem to find a way to stumble through the group even when not we're not supposed to, so we could get through to the usual quarter final loss to one of the big sides (looks like being Brazil or Spain). Could be in trouble if any first choice defenders get injured as there's not much in reserve.
Lampard won't start alongside Gerrard. A 35 and 33 year old in midfield in those climatic conditions? NO WAY. Lampard's best chance of playing will be via the bench with 20mins to go, possibly replacing Stevie G... Given Hodgson's liking for Milner's reliability, he might be in the starting lineup though. Personally,I'd veer towards the Ox, Welbeck and Barkley before Milner. I think Hodgson's picked the correct squad: there's no " bloody hell him " players picked/omitted. Biggest weakness in my opinion is the defence: a right-back who can't defend, and the lack of a truly dominating centre-half. Perhaps it's the moment for Gary Cahill to step up, as Jags is a good premiership defender but no more.
"Self-defence is an art I cultivate"
Lampard won't start alongside Gerrard. A 35 and 33 year old in midfield in those climatic conditions? NO WAY. Lampard's best chance of playing will be via the bench with 20mins to go, possibly replacing Stevie G... Given Hodgson's liking for Milner's reliability, he might be in the starting lineup though. Personally,I'd veer towards the Ox, Welbeck and Barkley before Milner. I think Hodgson's picked the correct squad: there's no " bloody hell him " players picked/omitted. Biggest weakness in my opinion is the defence: a right-back who can't defend, and the lack of a truly dominating centre-half. Perhaps it's the moment for Gary Cahill to step up, as Jags is a good premiership defender but no more.
I agree about the RB that can't defend. He is a joke.
If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid
Worst right-back to play for England in my (fading) memory, excluding guys who got under 10 or so caps...Oh for a Paul Madeley or a Jimmy Armfield...
"Self-defence is an art I cultivate"
If you should be " seething " about anything, it should be the dire anti-football served up by your mob this season...

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight
-------Gerrard-----Wilshere
Sterling------Rooney-----Chamberlain
---------------Sturridge
Getting through the group stage will be an achievement, given the difficulty of the group. Anything past that is a bonus.
Smooth attempt to shift your argument Leggy and yet you've still failed badly.
It'a almost as if the amount of foreigners playing in England has no noticeable impact on the quality of "English football" whatsoever...
Though through the 60's and 80's (up to Italia '90) England arguably have performed better than they have since the start of the EPL.
The evidence isn't all that compelling though, is it? Especially when you consider the win was in 1966 (where I've started from here).
Before PL:
Win
SF x2
QF x 2
Second round
Group x 3
DNQ x 5
After PL:
SF
QF x 4
Second round x 2
Group
DNQ x 2
It's hard to compare DNQ when up until 1976 only 4 teams qualified for the the Euros and then that increased to 8 between '80 and '92. It's the same for the World Cup, up until 1978 only 16 teams qualified for the finals (13 European nations now qualify!) and then it increased to 24 up until the '94 WC. How many Euro's and World Cups would England have qualified for post EPL if there were only 4 spots available at the Euro's and 16 at the WC?
Not sure what difference the EPL has made. Is it just a name change and two teams less than it was in the olden days?
What factor does the influx of foreign players into the EPL have on the England team? Sides sometimes with little or no eligible England international on match day. Or does that mean that the true England internationals are making it into sides anyway and the foreign players increase the standard and therefore the abilty of the England players?
On a completely unrelated matter, for those that love the precedent of statistics, the last time a team won the FA cup final 3-2 having been two down was in 1966 when Everton beat Sheffield Wednesday. Add to that, the Everton No.3 that day was Ray Wison who also wore No.3 for England in the 66 WC. Lets hope that the current Everton No. 3 and left back Leighton Baines also wears No. 3 for England in Brazil
Also a few more for people who like that sort of thing:
Atlético Madrid won la liga in 1966
Austria won Eurovision 1966
Real Madrid won European cup 1966
Also a few more for people who like that sort of thing:
Atlético Madrid won la liga in 1966
Austria won Eurovision 1966
Real Madrid won European cup 1966
Yellow Fever - Misery loves company
Also a few more for people who like that sort of thing:
Atlético Madrid won la liga in 1966
Austria won Eurovision 1966
Real Madrid won European cup 1966
And Liverpool won the league in 1966. Liverpool have just lost England the World Cup.
And Man City ( Zabaleta, Aguerro... ) have just won it for Argentina.
"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...
I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...
Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...
Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."
Not sure what difference the EPL has made. Is it just a name change and two teams less than it was in the olden days?
What factor does the influx of foreign players into the EPL have on the England team? Sides sometimes with little or no eligible England international on match day. Or does that mean that the true England internationals are making it into sides anyway and the foreign players increase the standard and therefore the abilty of the England players?
On a completely unrelated matter, for those that love the precedent of statistics, the last time a team won the FA cup final 3-2 having been two down was in 1966 when Everton beat Sheffield Wednesday. Add to that, the Everton No.3 that day was Ray Wison who also wore No.3 for England in the 66 WC. Lets hope that the current Everton No. 3 and left back Leighton Baines also wears No. 3 for England in Brazil
Smooth attempt to shift your argument Leggy and yet you've still failed badly.
It'a almost as if the amount of foreigners playing in England has no noticeable impact on the quality of "English football" whatsoever...
Though through the 60's and 80's (up to Italia '90) England arguably have performed better than they have since the start of the EPL.
The evidence isn't all that compelling though, is it? Especially when you consider the win was in 1966 (where I've started from here).
Before PL:
Win
SF x2
QF x 2
Second round
Group x 3
DNQ x 5
After PL:
SF
QF x 4
Second round x 2
Group
DNQ x 2
It's hard to compare DNQ when up until 1976 only 4 teams qualified for the the Euros and then that increased to 8 between '80 and '92. It's the same for the World Cup, up until 1978 only 16 teams qualified for the finals (13 European nations now qualify!) and then it increased to 24 up until the '94 WC. How many Euro's and World Cups would England have qualified for post EPL if there were only 4 spots available at the Euro's and 16 at the WC?
I agree with you completely. Formats have changed over time and this is not a perfect comparison. My point is simply that one could make a case that there has been no noticeable difference in performances pre and post-PL and I believe that still stands.

The last time a team overcame a two goal defecit to win an FA Cup final without penalties was in 1966.
If England win the World Cup we know who to thank.
Three for me, and two for them.
Squad numbers have been announced. Not sure how much you can read into it as 1-11 wont necessarily be the starting lineup for the first game, although it looks pretty much like it. Lampard getting 8 may just be because that's his favoured number he's always had in his career, although Wellbeck getting 11 sounds like Hodgson may stick with him on the wing instead of Sterling/Lallana/Ox.
1 Joe Hart
2 Glen Johnson
3 Leighton Baines
4 Steven Gerrard
5 Gary Cahill
6 Phil Jagielka
7 Jack Wilshere
8 Frank Lampard
9 Daniel Sturridge
10 Wayne Rooney
11 Danny Welbeck
12 Chris Smalling
13 Ben Foster
14 Jordan Henderson
15 Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain
16 Phil Jones
17 James Milner
18 Rickie Lambert
19 Raheem Sterling
20 Adam Lallana
21 Ross Barkley
22 Fraser Forster
23 Luke Shaw
"Compared to football quantum physics is relatively straightforward." - Stephen Hawking puts his enormous brain into solving the problem of how England can win.
@ 3pm kick-off 4-3-3 x 5 X 59% X 2
____________
500
otherwise 4-3-3 x (5 - z) X 59% X 2 [where z = degrees less than 5 celsius]
____________
500 (approx)
See: www.stuff.co.nz latest.
NB If not 4-3-3 then all theories out the window.
"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...
I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...
Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...
Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."
"Compared to football quantum physics is relatively straightforward." - Stephen Hawking puts his enormous brain into solving the problem of how England can win.
@ 3pm kick-off 4-3-3 x 5 X 59% X 2
____________
500
otherwise 4-3-3 x (5 - z) X 59% X 2 [where z = degrees less than 5 celsius]
____________
500 (approx)
See: www.stuff.co.nz latest.
NB If not 4-3-3 then all theories out the window.
Saw this and it makes me sick. Hawking has never played football at any level and suddenly he's an expert!
Christ he's never even had a trial at a club! Why oh why did we not get someone like Gary Megson or Alan Shearer to give a better more informed opinion on England's chances? Everyone knows that you've had to play football to know about it - what next a Cephalopod telling us who's going to win the world cup?

Saw this and it makes me sick. Hawking has never played football at any level and suddenly he's an expert!
Christ he's never even had a trial at a club! Why oh why did we not get someone like Gary Megson or Alan Shearer to give a better more informed opinion on England's chances? Everyone knows that you've had to play football to know about it - what next a Cephalopod telling us who's going to win the world cup?
think Glen Hoddle trialled him once - but in another life.
"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...
I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...
Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...
Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/10107242/England-World-Cup-fan-flags-resemble-KKK
I never knew Asda was another term for muppet.
"Phoenix till they lose"
Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion.
Genuine opinion: FTFFA
What did people think of the England - Peru friendly?
Great goal by Sturridge made it worth watching.
Good work-out for England after three month gap since their last international against an average but competent Peru side.
Peru a pretty well - organized side even if they didn't mount much threat on England's goal.
Some of England's defensive work a bit dodgy - Henderson, Jagielka.
Rooney didn't do much to threaten Peru's goal.
Sturridge, Lallana, Baines, Cahill, Hart, Gerrard did okay.
Thought Hodgson might have given Lambert a run, even for ten minutes at the end. Might have been effective in this sort of game.
Probably was Gerrard's last Wembley appearance for England at age 34.
I was hoping to get a look at Peru substitute "George Forsyth" but it never happened. I was intrigued to see if he bore any resemblance to Bruce. Maybe he was some bloke Peru met in the local bar / park and they roped him in to make up the numbers.
The paper plane thrown by a crowd member hitting the Peru player on the back of the head near the end was a highlight. Credit to him for not falling to the ground and writhing around clutching his head...
Big Pete 65, Christchurch
What did people think of the England - Peru friendly?
Great goal by Sturridge made it worth watching.
Good work-out for England after three month gap since their last international against an average but competent Peru side.
Peru a pretty well - organized side even if they didn't mount much threat on England's goal.
Some of England's defensive work a bit dodgy - Henderson, Jagielka.
Rooney didn't do much to threaten Peru's goal.
Sturridge, Lallana, Baines, Cahill, Hart, Gerrard did okay.
Thought Hodgson might have given Lambert a run, even for ten minutes at the end. Might have been effective in this sort of game.
Probably was Gerrard's last Wembley appearance for England at age 34.
I was hoping to get a look at Peru substitute "George Forsyth" but it never happened. I was intrigued to see if he bore any resemblance to Bruce. Maybe he was some bloke Peru met in the local bar / park and they roped him in to make up the numbers.
The paper plane thrown by a crowd member hitting the Peru player on the back of the head near the end was a highlight. Credit to him for not falling to the ground and writhing around clutching his head...
"Wembley cackled with malicious joy." - The Grauniad, match report.
"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...
I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...
Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...
Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."
Pretty good hit out and a comfortable victory. Lambert will get a go in the next two warm up games, so no worries there. Biggest worry for England is their non- tackling/non-defending right back. I'm sure he'll be targeted by their group rivals. Jags a bit rusty, but he definitely needs to play these games after a long lay of with injury. He admitted himself he's not quite match fit. I'd much prefer Wilshere starting alongside Gerrrad: Henderson strikes me as a top quality work horse, whereas Wilshere has the vision to open up defences at international level. Again though, he'll get his chance to really push in the next two games.
"Self-defence is an art I cultivate"
Jag is a liability. Other than that I actually quite rate England this WC.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/27383424
Please James have a blinder and consign Johnson to being the kit man...
"Self-defence is an art I cultivate"
how is the british media looking at this world cup squad? with less pressure on people they might suprise people... as long as they don't get to penalties
Calling all fans in Japan, come down and support the mighty nix in Osaka
http://www.facebook.com/WellingtonPhoenixClubMembersSupportersGroupOsaka
England 2-2 v Ecquador. Rooney and Lambert scoring. Quite an open game, with some good moments from Barkley and the Ox. The defence however was all over the shop. Definitely the 'B' team defence (Milner, Smalling, Jones, Shaw). Probably underlines what people have been saying: defence lacks depth. My RB hopes are dashed: on that display: Milner will be the kit man, not Johnson... The Ox went off injured which doesn't look good, and Sterling was sent off after a challenge on Valencia( a rash challenge for sure, but Valencia kicked off and probably got them both reds instead of simply a booking). Versus Honduras on Sunday, in which Roy will probably reveal all( well MOST...)
"Self-defence is an art I cultivate"
Barkley is a terrific option for a spark off the bench. I thought Wilshere looked good too and could be handy against Italy where numbers in midfield will be key.
Ox played himself right into contention before being injured, poor guy.
There's no wingers on the standby list, anyone bar Ruddy and Stones could realistically replace Ox if he's ruled out. Personally I think Carrick as cover for Gerrard in the deepest midfield role would make sense, no real holding midfield players in the squad, other than the Phil Jones option.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/27383424
Please James have a blinder and consign Johnson to being the kit man...

:
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/27383424
Please James have a blinder and consign Johnson
to being the kit man...
How'd
that go?
Er...I answered my own question further down the thread. Put your Arsenal coloured specs on...
"Self-defence is an art I cultivate"
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/27383424
Please James have a blinder and consign Johnson
to being the kit man...
How'd
that go?
Er...I answered my own question further down the thread. Put your Arsenal coloured specs on...
I was going to reply something similar but knew you would. :)
If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid
