Kiwi Players Elsewhere

Andrew Durante (Melbourne Victory | A-Leagues)

826 replies · 165,076 views
over 7 years ago

Shark never realized our leaking goals problem was all down to him.


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

ballane wrote:

Shark never realized our leaking goals problem was all down to him.

It wasn't.
1. A teenage goalkeeper experiment
2. A centre back partner who couldn't be bothered playing
3. A constantly changing back four
4. Changes of coach

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

ballane wrote:

Shark never realized our leaking goals problem was all down to him.

It wasn't.
1. A teenage goalkeeper experiment
2. A centre back partner who couldn't be bothered playing
3. A constantly changing back four
4. Changes of coach

5. Passenger playing defensive mid. 

Durante was the Nix's best defender in 2018 IMO

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Last season conceded 46 goals and the season before 54. So where is the problem?

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago · edited over 7 years ago · History

bunter wrote:

ballane wrote:

Shark never realized our leaking goals problem was all down to him.

It wasn't.
1. A teenage goalkeeper experiment
2. A centre back partner who couldn't be bothered playing
3. A constantly changing back four
4. Changes of coach

5. Passenger playing defensive mid. 

Durante was the Nix's best defender in 2018 IMO

You spelled Fox wrong

Dura has been poor for at least 2 seasons.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

bunter wrote:

ballane wrote:

Shark never realized our leaking goals problem was all down to him.

It wasn't.
1. A teenage goalkeeper experiment
2. A centre back partner who couldn't be bothered playing
3. A constantly changing back four
4. Changes of coach

5. Passenger playing defensive mid. 

Durante was the Nix's best defender in 2018 IMO

That doesn't automatically make him an A-League quality defender though.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago · edited over 7 years ago · History

martinb wrote:

Thought he did well against Peru.

Agree, but he  had a lot  better players around him and that in itself will make a big difference.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Leggy wrote:

martinb wrote:

Thought he did well against Peru.

Agree, but he  had a lot  better players around him and that in itself will make a big difference.

He's generally been pretty good for the AWs. Decent at the confed cup too.

I don't think correlation equals causation in that Dura has played about 75% of the games in the past 2 years and our defense has been poor - Ridenton has played the same amount of games; how much blame does he carry? Tom Doyle has played 70% of the games in the past 2 seasons, is he to blame? Scapegoating one player is a bit shark.

I would argue that defensive personnel changes is a bigger issue - we went something like 20 games in a row with a change in defensive personnel last season and was similar the season before. Is Dura secretly injuring players, getting them suspended or AW call ups?

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago · edited over 7 years ago · History

Bullion wrote:

Leggy wrote:

martinb wrote:

Thought he did well against Peru.

Agree, but he  had a lot  better players around him and that in itself will make a big difference.

He's generally been pretty good for the AWs. Decent at the confed cup too.

I don't think correlation equals causation in that Dura has played about 75% of the games in the past 2 years and our defense has been poor - Ridenton has played the same amount of games; how much blame does he carry? Tom Doyle has played 70% of the games in the past 2 seasons, is he to blame? Scapegoating one player is a bit shark

Since you ask, in the 24 games where Ridenton started, the Nix collected 24% of points available. In the three where he didn't start, all vs opponents who finished in the top 6, they scored 4/9 available points, or 44% Small sample size admittedly. 

To that I'd add that the Nix looked far better in one game after he was subbed for Singh, though the result was not affected. 

I don't have stats on Doyle but IMO his touch and general play have improved in the past  2 years. 

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago · edited over 7 years ago · History

Bullion wrote:

Leggy wrote:

martinb wrote:

Thought he did well against Peru.

Agree, but he  had a lot  better players around him and that in itself will make a big difference.

He's generally been pretty good for the AWs. Decent at the confed cup too.

I don't think correlation equals causation in that Dura has played about 75% of the games in the past 2 years and our defense has been poor - Ridenton has played the same amount of games; how much blame does he carry? Tom Doyle has played 70% of the games in the past 2 seasons, is he to blame? Scapegoating one player is a bit shark.

I would argue that defensive personnel changes is a bigger issue - we went something like 20 games in a row with a change in defensive personnel last season and was similar the season before. Is Dura secretly injuring players, getting them suspended or AW call ups?

By the same token, you can't completely absolve him of the responsibility. The fact is that he's been our most senior defender and leader, and he's overseen poor defensive records for a number of years. Yes, a lot of that is due to poor structure but a lot of that has been due to poor individual defending as well; I don't think that can be ignored.

I also don't think we can ignore the fact that he's in the twilight of his career; I, for one, was surprised he didn't retire at the end of last season. I thought it was about time.

Re: Doyle - he's a full blooded defender who still has the same old positional deficiencies. I've always seen his characteristics as suiting the CB role rather than FB, personally. He constantly fails to track his runner and gets caught for pace. 

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago · edited over 7 years ago · History

valeo wrote:

Bullion wrote:

Leggy wrote:

martinb wrote:

Thought he did well against Peru.

Agree, but he  had a lot  better players around him and that in itself will make a big difference.

He's generally been pretty good for the AWs. Decent at the confed cup too.

I don't think correlation equals causation in that Dura has played about 75% of the games in the past 2 years and our defense has been poor - Ridenton has played the same amount of games; how much blame does he carry? Tom Doyle has played 70% of the games in the past 2 seasons, is he to blame? Scapegoating one player is a bit shark.

I would argue that defensive personnel changes is a bigger issue - we went something like 20 games in a row with a change in defensive personnel last season and was similar the season before. Is Dura secretly injuring players, getting them suspended or AW call ups?

By the same token, you can't completely admonish him of the responsibility. The fact is that he's been our most senior defender and leader, and he's overseen poor defensive records for a number of years. Yes, a lot of that is due to poor structure but a lot of that has been due to poor individual defending as well; I don't think that can be ignored.

I also don't think we can ignore the fact that he's in the twilight of his career; I, for one, was surprised he didn't retire at the end of last season. I thought it was about time.

Re: Doyle - he's a full blooded defender who still has the same old positional deficiencies. I've always seen his characteristics as suiting the CB role rather than FB, personally. He constantly fails to track his runner and gets caught for pace. 

The other thing is that, like you say, this isn't an issue of 2 seasons - we have been the worst defensive team in the league since Ricki's last year until now. That's six seasons, in which we made the playoffs only once (after we made them three times in the first five). Durante has been the one constant across this era, both as a member of the defensive unit, and the leadership group. 

If there's a consensus on this forum that the last 5-6 seasons have generally been a shambles, why are people so keen to absolve Durante of playing almost any part of that? It's just curious, considering the crap a number of other players have got through that time.

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

valeo wrote:

Bullion wrote:

Leggy wrote:

martinb wrote:

Thought he did well against Peru.

Agree, but he  had a lot  better players around him and that in itself will make a big difference.

He's generally been pretty good for the AWs. Decent at the confed cup too.

I don't think correlation equals causation in that Dura has played about 75% of the games in the past 2 years and our defense has been poor - Ridenton has played the same amount of games; how much blame does he carry? Tom Doyle has played 70% of the games in the past 2 seasons, is he to blame? Scapegoating one player is a bit shark.

I would argue that defensive personnel changes is a bigger issue - we went something like 20 games in a row with a change in defensive personnel last season and was similar the season before. Is Dura secretly injuring players, getting them suspended or AW call ups?

By the same token, you can't completely admonish him of the responsibility. The fact is that he's been our most senior defender and leader, and he's overseen poor defensive records for a number of years. Yes, a lot of that is due to poor structure but a lot of that has been due to poor individual defending as well; I don't think that can be ignored.

I also don't think we can ignore the fact that he's in the twilight of his career; I, for one, was surprised he didn't retire at the end of last season. I thought it was about time.

Re: Doyle - he's a full blooded defender who still has the same old positional deficiencies. I've always seen his characteristics as suiting the CB role rather than FB, personally. He constantly fails to track his runner and gets caught for pace. 

What about Rossi, he has played 72% of games and was our big foreign, ex Serie A defender. How much blame should he shoulder? What about 3 different head coaches in 2 seasons? And his performances for the AWs the past couple of years show that perhaps he is a decent defender but other issues - personnel changes, defensive transitioning of the team, defensive ability of midfield etc. are possibly a bigger factor for our defense than scapegoating Dura.

I still think Dura was an equal to Fox last season as our best CBs; Fox being able to recover due to his athleticism but let down positionally at times while Dura was better positionally and better with the ball. 

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

valeo wrote:

Bullion wrote:

Leggy wrote:

martinb wrote:

Thought he did well against Peru.

Agree, but he  had a lot  better players around him and that in itself will make a big difference.

He's generally been pretty good for the AWs. Decent at the confed cup too.

I don't think correlation equals causation in that Dura has played about 75% of the games in the past 2 years and our defense has been poor - Ridenton has played the same amount of games; how much blame does he carry? Tom Doyle has played 70% of the games in the past 2 seasons, is he to blame? Scapegoating one player is a bit shark.

I would argue that defensive personnel changes is a bigger issue - we went something like 20 games in a row with a change in defensive personnel last season and was similar the season before. Is Dura secretly injuring players, getting them suspended or AW call ups?

By the same token, you can't completely admonish him of the responsibility. The fact is that he's been our most senior defender and leader, and he's overseen poor defensive records for a number of years. Yes, a lot of that is due to poor structure but a lot of that has been due to poor individual defending as well; I don't think that can be ignored.

I also don't think we can ignore the fact that he's in the twilight of his career; I, for one, was surprised he didn't retire at the end of last season. I thought it was about time.

Re: Doyle - he's a full blooded defender who still has the same old positional deficiencies. I've always seen his characteristics as suiting the CB role rather than FB, personally. He constantly fails to track his runner and gets caught for pace. 

The other thing is that, like you say, this isn't an issue of 2 seasons - we have been the worst defensive team in the league since Ricki's last year until now. That's six seasons, in which we made the playoffs only once (after we made them three times in the first five). Durante has been the one constant across this era, both as a member of the defensive unit, and the leadership group. 

If there's a consensus on this forum that the last 5-6 seasons have generally been a shambles, why are people so keen to absolve Durante of playing almost any part of that? It's just curious, considering the crap a number of other players have got through that time.

Durante was probably the one constant across the 3 times we made the finals (playing just about every minute of those seasons) under Ricki - so its his fault from Ricki's last season onwards because he was one constant when the previous 3 we were great and he was the one constant? 
Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Bullion wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

valeo wrote:

Bullion wrote:

Leggy wrote:

martinb wrote:

Thought he did well against Peru.

Agree, but he  had a lot  better players around him and that in itself will make a big difference.

He's generally been pretty good for the AWs. Decent at the confed cup too.

I don't think correlation equals causation in that Dura has played about 75% of the games in the past 2 years and our defense has been poor - Ridenton has played the same amount of games; how much blame does he carry? Tom Doyle has played 70% of the games in the past 2 seasons, is he to blame? Scapegoating one player is a bit shark.

I would argue that defensive personnel changes is a bigger issue - we went something like 20 games in a row with a change in defensive personnel last season and was similar the season before. Is Dura secretly injuring players, getting them suspended or AW call ups?

By the same token, you can't completely admonish him of the responsibility. The fact is that he's been our most senior defender and leader, and he's overseen poor defensive records for a number of years. Yes, a lot of that is due to poor structure but a lot of that has been due to poor individual defending as well; I don't think that can be ignored.

I also don't think we can ignore the fact that he's in the twilight of his career; I, for one, was surprised he didn't retire at the end of last season. I thought it was about time.

Re: Doyle - he's a full blooded defender who still has the same old positional deficiencies. I've always seen his characteristics as suiting the CB role rather than FB, personally. He constantly fails to track his runner and gets caught for pace. 

The other thing is that, like you say, this isn't an issue of 2 seasons - we have been the worst defensive team in the league since Ricki's last year until now. That's six seasons, in which we made the playoffs only once (after we made them three times in the first five). Durante has been the one constant across this era, both as a member of the defensive unit, and the leadership group. 

If there's a consensus on this forum that the last 5-6 seasons have generally been a shambles, why are people so keen to absolve Durante of playing almost any part of that? It's just curious, considering the crap a number of other players have got through that time.

Durante was probably the one constant across the 3 times we made the finals (playing just about every minute of those seasons) under Ricki - so its his fault from Ricki's last season onwards because he was one constant when the previous 3 we were great and he was the one constant? 

That's a very generous view of Durante's role in the success years. He was far from being the 'one constant', at best he was an important cog in the team, but far from being the critical member of it. The best season we ever had, in 2009/2010, we had Jon McKain being the key man at the back with Liam Reddy in the form of his life in goal, Siggy who provided the steel, and altogether a more defensive set-up. Not to mention that Durante was a lot younger then as well. Or is that another one of his many qualities, that he doesn't age at all?

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

Bullion wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

valeo wrote:

Bullion wrote:

Leggy wrote:

martinb wrote:

Thought he did well against Peru.

Agree, but he  had a lot  better players around him and that in itself will make a big difference.

He's generally been pretty good for the AWs. Decent at the confed cup too.

I don't think correlation equals causation in that Dura has played about 75% of the games in the past 2 years and our defense has been poor - Ridenton has played the same amount of games; how much blame does he carry? Tom Doyle has played 70% of the games in the past 2 seasons, is he to blame? Scapegoating one player is a bit shark.

I would argue that defensive personnel changes is a bigger issue - we went something like 20 games in a row with a change in defensive personnel last season and was similar the season before. Is Dura secretly injuring players, getting them suspended or AW call ups?

By the same token, you can't completely admonish him of the responsibility. The fact is that he's been our most senior defender and leader, and he's overseen poor defensive records for a number of years. Yes, a lot of that is due to poor structure but a lot of that has been due to poor individual defending as well; I don't think that can be ignored.

I also don't think we can ignore the fact that he's in the twilight of his career; I, for one, was surprised he didn't retire at the end of last season. I thought it was about time.

Re: Doyle - he's a full blooded defender who still has the same old positional deficiencies. I've always seen his characteristics as suiting the CB role rather than FB, personally. He constantly fails to track his runner and gets caught for pace. 

The other thing is that, like you say, this isn't an issue of 2 seasons - we have been the worst defensive team in the league since Ricki's last year until now. That's six seasons, in which we made the playoffs only once (after we made them three times in the first five). Durante has been the one constant across this era, both as a member of the defensive unit, and the leadership group. 

If there's a consensus on this forum that the last 5-6 seasons have generally been a shambles, why are people so keen to absolve Durante of playing almost any part of that? It's just curious, considering the crap a number of other players have got through that time.

Durante was probably the one constant across the 3 times we made the finals (playing just about every minute of those seasons) under Ricki - so its his fault from Ricki's last season onwards because he was one constant when the previous 3 we were great and he was the one constant? 

That's a very generous view of Durante's role in the success years. He was far from being the 'one constant', at best he was an important cog in the team, but far from being the critical member of it. The best season we ever had, in 2009/2010, we had Jon McKain being the key man at the back with Liam Reddy in the form of his life in goal, Siggy who provided the steel, and altogether a more defensive set-up. Not to mention that Durante was a lot younger then as well. Or is that another one of his many qualities, that he doesn't age at all?

So has he become a more important cog in the team hence should be more responsible for the poor defense, what does that say about the makeup of our team? 

Is that Dura's fault that we haven't had a decent 'keeper or CB partner as good as McKain or Siggy? Or a midfield of Lia, Muscat and Brown?

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Im not in any way trying to absolving Durante for our defensive frailties.People seem pretty keen to lay most of the blame at him yet wasnt he also part of a defensive unit under Ricki that had a very good record. Just dont think its right that most of the blame is being put his way.Yep he was part of a defensive unit that worked really well,not so sure that the blame can be all his if the club hasnt provided the players to maintain that level.


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago · edited over 7 years ago · History

Bullion wrote:

valeo wrote:

Bullion wrote:

Leggy wrote:

martinb wrote:

Thought he did well against Peru.

Agree, but he  had a lot  better players around him and that in itself will make a big difference.

He's generally been pretty good for the AWs. Decent at the confed cup too.

I don't think correlation equals causation in that Dura has played about 75% of the games in the past 2 years and our defense has been poor - Ridenton has played the same amount of games; how much blame does he carry? Tom Doyle has played 70% of the games in the past 2 seasons, is he to blame? Scapegoating one player is a bit shark.

I would argue that defensive personnel changes is a bigger issue - we went something like 20 games in a row with a change in defensive personnel last season and was similar the season before. Is Dura secretly injuring players, getting them suspended or AW call ups?

By the same token, you can't completely admonish him of the responsibility. The fact is that he's been our most senior defender and leader, and he's overseen poor defensive records for a number of years. Yes, a lot of that is due to poor structure but a lot of that has been due to poor individual defending as well; I don't think that can be ignored.

I also don't think we can ignore the fact that he's in the twilight of his career; I, for one, was surprised he didn't retire at the end of last season. I thought it was about time.

Re: Doyle - he's a full blooded defender who still has the same old positional deficiencies. I've always seen his characteristics as suiting the CB role rather than FB, personally. He constantly fails to track his runner and gets caught for pace. 

What about Rossi, he has played 72% of games and was our big foreign, ex Serie A defender. How much blame should he shoulder? What about 3 different head coaches in 2 seasons? And his performances for the AWs the past couple of years show that perhaps he is a decent defender but other issues - personnel changes, defensive transitioning of the team, defensive ability of midfield etc. are possibly a bigger factor for our defense than scapegoating Dura.

I still think Dura was an equal to Fox last season as our best CBs; Fox being able to recover due to his athleticism but let down positionally at times while Dura was better positionally and better with the ball. 

Can we please stop comparing Dura's performances for the AW's (which were mediocre, lets be honest; though his last handful were better) to his Nix performances? In the All Whites setup, we're usually forced to play overly defensive football because of the opposition we are up against. In the A-League, this is not the expectation as it's a salary capped league where every team should realistically try and setup to attack the opposition.

Personally I just think Dura is a spent force who has given his all for the team. I feel a little sorry for him that he hasn't been able to experience any success with us, as his commitment could never be called into question; but his performances have largely been poor.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

"you can't completely admonish him of the responsibility"


I think he's being admonished quite a lot on here.

Anyway I absolve him.

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

harrymc wrote:

"you can't completely admonish him of the responsibility"


I think he's being admonished quite a lot on here.

Anyway I absolve him.

I read that again and shook my head at my own English. My old English teacher is sitting in the corner with a ruler, ready to slap my head.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

It's ok, he will admonish you.

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago · edited over 7 years ago · History

The easiest solution for our defence is to stop fudgeing passing the ball around the back and putting each other under unwarrented extra pressure. (We are NOT the Liverpool team of the 70's guys.) So frigged off with this constant "back to Durante, back to the keeper" crap. Play the ball forward and keep it at the other end of the park.

Added a sentence and fixed my spelling.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Lonegunmen wrote:

The easiest solution for our defence is to stop fudgeing passing the ball around the back and putting each other under unwarrented extras pressure. So frigged off with this constant "back to Durante, back to the keeper" crap. Play the ball forward and keep at the other end of the park.

All our defenders are pretty bad at opening a game, creating a danger in attack, it drives me nuts!

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Bullion wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Bullion wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

valeo wrote:

Bullion wrote:

Leggy wrote:

martinb wrote:

Thought he did well against Peru.

Agree, but he  had a lot  better players around him and that in itself will make a big difference.

He's generally been pretty good for the AWs. Decent at the confed cup too.

I don't think correlation equals causation in that Dura has played about 75% of the games in the past 2 years and our defense has been poor - Ridenton has played the same amount of games; how much blame does he carry? Tom Doyle has played 70% of the games in the past 2 seasons, is he to blame? Scapegoating one player is a bit shark.

I would argue that defensive personnel changes is a bigger issue - we went something like 20 games in a row with a change in defensive personnel last season and was similar the season before. Is Dura secretly injuring players, getting them suspended or AW call ups?

By the same token, you can't completely admonish him of the responsibility. The fact is that he's been our most senior defender and leader, and he's overseen poor defensive records for a number of years. Yes, a lot of that is due to poor structure but a lot of that has been due to poor individual defending as well; I don't think that can be ignored.

I also don't think we can ignore the fact that he's in the twilight of his career; I, for one, was surprised he didn't retire at the end of last season. I thought it was about time.

Re: Doyle - he's a full blooded defender who still has the same old positional deficiencies. I've always seen his characteristics as suiting the CB role rather than FB, personally. He constantly fails to track his runner and gets caught for pace. 

The other thing is that, like you say, this isn't an issue of 2 seasons - we have been the worst defensive team in the league since Ricki's last year until now. That's six seasons, in which we made the playoffs only once (after we made them three times in the first five). Durante has been the one constant across this era, both as a member of the defensive unit, and the leadership group. 

If there's a consensus on this forum that the last 5-6 seasons have generally been a shambles, why are people so keen to absolve Durante of playing almost any part of that? It's just curious, considering the crap a number of other players have got through that time.

Durante was probably the one constant across the 3 times we made the finals (playing just about every minute of those seasons) under Ricki - so its his fault from Ricki's last season onwards because he was one constant when the previous 3 we were great and he was the one constant? 

That's a very generous view of Durante's role in the success years. He was far from being the 'one constant', at best he was an important cog in the team, but far from being the critical member of it. The best season we ever had, in 2009/2010, we had Jon McKain being the key man at the back with Liam Reddy in the form of his life in goal, Siggy who provided the steel, and altogether a more defensive set-up. Not to mention that Durante was a lot younger then as well. Or is that another one of his many qualities, that he doesn't age at all?

So has he become a more important cog in the team hence should be more responsible for the poor defense, what does that say about the makeup of our team? 

Is that Dura's fault that we haven't had a decent 'keeper or CB partner as good as McKain or Siggy? Or a midfield of Lia, Muscat and Brown?

The problem really is that the club invested too much in him, and for too long, and that was one (but certainly not the only) of the reasons why it has been difficult to upgrade the defensive personnel over the least few years (salary capped league and all that). Now guess that that's not really his fault directly, but it doesn't mean that we can't call it out for what it was, a mistake that's been difficult to shake off for a few years.

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

lets face it, over the last 6 seasons we havent even had what anyone would consider a half decent defensive unit, including Dura. Early on he was a great leader and had a massive positive effect on the field and off. The last couple of seasons it has been clear to most that he has been very frustrated with the onfield results and his fellow defensive players and the refs. His positive influence has well and truely gone. Hopefully Rudan can reinvigorate this - assuming dura remains capt. The fault has not solely been Dura's but as the capt, senior defensive man he has to take a large part of the responsibility for the failings and conceding of goals.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Lonegunmen wrote:

The easiest solution for our defence is to stop fudgeing passing the ball around the back and putting each other under unwarrented extra pressure. (We are NOT the Liverpool team of the 70's guys.) So frigged off with this constant "back to Durante, back to the keeper" crap. Play the ball forward and keep it at the other end of the park.

Added a sentence and fixed my spelling.

And this is what Mark Rudan has said about the signing of Kurto, first and foremost it's about a keeper who can save shots, playing it out from the back is not his number one priority. 

There's a change of philosophy here, a back-to-basics of goalkeepers saving, defenders defending as their main jobs. Dura will be asked to focus on defending more, getting the ball to safety rather than trying to embrace current football trends like a keeper-sweeper. Becuase it hasn't worked for us, doing it the other way, has it?

The more I hear from Mark Rudan, the more I like.

Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

The Jam wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

The easiest solution for our defence is to stop fudgeing passing the ball around the back and putting each other under unwarrented extra pressure. (We are NOT the Liverpool team of the 70's guys.) So frigged off with this constant "back to Durante, back to the keeper" crap. Play the ball forward and keep it at the other end of the park.

Added a sentence and fixed my spelling.

And this is what Mark Rudan has said about the signing of Kurto, first and foremost it's about a keeper who can save shots, playing it out from the back is not his number one priority. 

There's a change of philosophy here, a back-to-basics of goalkeepers saving, defenders defending as their main jobs. Dura will be asked to focus on defending more, getting the ball to safety rather than trying to embrace current football trends like a keeper-sweeper. Becuase it hasn't worked for us, doing it the other way, has it?

The more I hear from Mark Rudan, the more I like.

I disagree. Not number one priority? Good keepers have to play out from the back. I thought we are going for highest standards? And I have an example, Belgium v England. Pickford cleared a ball, throw in Belgium, Courtis cleared the ball, 5 touches later, goal Belgium. This is just an extreme example, but if you rewatch the game, you'll spot the difference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_5SJPKMHAA 

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

number8 wrote:

The Jam wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

The easiest solution for our defence is to stop fudgeing passing the ball around the back and putting each other under unwarrented extra pressure. (We are NOT the Liverpool team of the 70's guys.) So frigged off with this constant "back to Durante, back to the keeper" crap. Play the ball forward and keep it at the other end of the park.

Added a sentence and fixed my spelling.

And this is what Mark Rudan has said about the signing of Kurto, first and foremost it's about a keeper who can save shots, playing it out from the back is not his number one priority. 

There's a change of philosophy here, a back-to-basics of goalkeepers saving, defenders defending as their main jobs. Dura will be asked to focus on defending more, getting the ball to safety rather than trying to embrace current football trends like a keeper-sweeper. Becuase it hasn't worked for us, doing it the other way, has it?

The more I hear from Mark Rudan, the more I like.

I disagree. Not number one priority? Good keepers have to play out from the back. I thought we are going for highest standards? And I have an example, Belgium v England. Pickford cleared a ball, throw in Belgium, Courtis cleared the ball, 5 touches later, goal Belgium. This is just an extreme example, but if you rewatch the game, you'll spot the difference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_5SJPKMHAA 


Still not number one priority though. Would be number four in my book.
1 shot stopper
2 dominate box
3 get off line properly
4 play out from the back

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

number8 wrote:

The Jam wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

The easiest solution for our defence is to stop fudgeing passing the ball around the back and putting each other under unwarrented extra pressure. (We are NOT the Liverpool team of the 70's guys.) So frigged off with this constant "back to Durante, back to the keeper" crap. Play the ball forward and keep it at the other end of the park.

Added a sentence and fixed my spelling.

And this is what Mark Rudan has said about the signing of Kurto, first and foremost it's about a keeper who can save shots, playing it out from the back is not his number one priority. 

There's a change of philosophy here, a back-to-basics of goalkeepers saving, defenders defending as their main jobs. Dura will be asked to focus on defending more, getting the ball to safety rather than trying to embrace current football trends like a keeper-sweeper. Becuase it hasn't worked for us, doing it the other way, has it?

The more I hear from Mark Rudan, the more I like.

I disagree. Not number one priority? Good keepers have to play out from the back. I thought we are going for highest standards? And I have an example, Belgium v England. Pickford cleared a ball, throw in Belgium, Courtis cleared the ball, 5 touches later, goal Belgium. This is just an extreme example, but if you rewatch the game, you'll spot the difference.

 

Yeah cool just sign Courtois then. Or Alisson while we're at it, to warm the bench behind Courtois. Definitely not Pickford though.

The comparison is nonsense - 'highest standards' and 'back to basics' are not mutually exclusive.

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Fitzy wrote:

number8 wrote:

The Jam wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

The easiest solution for our defence is to stop fudgeing passing the ball around the back and putting each other under unwarrented extra pressure. (We are NOT the Liverpool team of the 70's guys.) So frigged off with this constant "back to Durante, back to the keeper" crap. Play the ball forward and keep it at the other end of the park.

Added a sentence and fixed my spelling.

And this is what Mark Rudan has said about the signing of Kurto, first and foremost it's about a keeper who can save shots, playing it out from the back is not his number one priority. 

There's a change of philosophy here, a back-to-basics of goalkeepers saving, defenders defending as their main jobs. Dura will be asked to focus on defending more, getting the ball to safety rather than trying to embrace current football trends like a keeper-sweeper. Becuase it hasn't worked for us, doing it the other way, has it?

The more I hear from Mark Rudan, the more I like.

I disagree. Not number one priority? Good keepers have to play out from the back. I thought we are going for highest standards? And I have an example, Belgium v England. Pickford cleared a ball, throw in Belgium, Courtis cleared the ball, 5 touches later, goal Belgium. This is just an extreme example, but if you rewatch the game, you'll spot the difference.

Yeah cool just sign Courtois then. Or Alisson while we're at it, to warm the bench behind Courtois. Definitely not Pickford though.

The comparison is nonsense - 'highest standards' and 'back to basics' are not mutually exclusive.

Implying that only top keepers are able to pass out from the back and do their keeping job to a decent standard is a bit nonsense too.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

number8 wrote:

The Jam wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

The easiest solution for our defence is to stop fudgeing passing the ball around the back and putting each other under unwarrented extra pressure. (We are NOT the Liverpool team of the 70's guys.) So frigged off with this constant "back to Durante, back to the keeper" crap. Play the ball forward and keep it at the other end of the park.

Added a sentence and fixed my spelling.

And this is what Mark Rudan has said about the signing of Kurto, first and foremost it's about a keeper who can save shots, playing it out from the back is not his number one priority. 

There's a change of philosophy here, a back-to-basics of goalkeepers saving, defenders defending as their main jobs. Dura will be asked to focus on defending more, getting the ball to safety rather than trying to embrace current football trends like a keeper-sweeper. Becuase it hasn't worked for us, doing it the other way, has it?

The more I hear from Mark Rudan, the more I like.

I disagree. Not number one priority? Good keepers have to play out from the back. I thought we are going for highest standards? And I have an example, Belgium v England. Pickford cleared a ball, throw in Belgium, Courtis cleared the ball, 5 touches later, goal Belgium. This is just an extreme example, but if you rewatch the game, you'll spot the difference.

 


Still not number one priority though. Would be number four in my book.
1 shot stopper
2 dominate box
3 get off line properly
4 play out from the back

Well this is all kind of a fundamental philosophical point in football isn't it? Either your keeper is just another footballer, who happens to get to use his hands in one part of the pitch, or he's basically a handball player who also gets to use his feet. It's hard to be in-between, because that's expecting every keeper to be amazing at everything.

Permalink Permalink
about 7 years ago
I'm an optimistic pessimist. 
I'm positive things will go wrong.
Permalink Permalink
about 7 years ago

Andrew 300

Permalink Permalink
about 7 years ago

Well this thread just took a massive turn...

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
about 7 years ago

C-Diddy wrote:

Well this thread just took a massive turn...

Like the Cruyff turn: the Durante turn.

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
about 7 years ago

To be fair, he’s been very solid throughout the season and that always helps with fan opinion.



Permalink Permalink
about 7 years ago

To be fair, he’s been very solid throughout the season and that always helps with fan opinion.

Think he has really benefited this season from Kurto in goal and Taylor next to him. It's allowed him to concentrate more on his own defending when he can trust those two to do their jobs. 

I'm an optimistic pessimist. 
I'm positive things will go wrong.
Permalink Permalink
about 7 years ago

Yakcall wrote:

To be fair, he’s been very solid throughout the season and that always helps with fan opinion.

Think he has really benefited this season from Kurto in goal and Taylor next to him. It's allowed him to concentrate more on his own defending when he can trust those two to do their jobs. 

Think you need to include the 2 young guys in that. In fact probably fair to say he is probably happier with the whole environment this season than he has for a while.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
about 7 years ago

needs to bring his A game tonight  that's for sure

                                                                        COYN    

Permalink Permalink
about 7 years ago

Hopefully we can save a sub to bring on for Durante to get a big standing ovation tonight

Permalink Permalink