Regional Football - powered by Park Life

Canterbury Premier League

1437 replies · 417,174 views
10 Feb 18:00

BenchWarmer wrote:

VimFuego wrote:
Any results from the Waimak tourney? I saw Parklands beat Selwyn by 6 or 7 but nothing else. Good news that BBQ was running.

Parklands was 8-0; Cash Tech Gold beat Western (not sure which of the 2 Western teams) 7-0

I'd be presuming this was Selwyns and Unis reserves or youth teams?? Same with Western, otherwise at this early stage Parklands would be the new favourites ?

10 Feb 21:25

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

10 Feb 23:36

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

11 Feb 00:18

Baba O'Riley wrote:

Waimak beat Uni 2-0 rather easily.

Hope those on the bbq got their $10 reduction in their kids subs for the coming season

I don't know about you but I kinda thought that $75 for a sausage was quite expensive though. And I'm a vegetarian.

I let my guitar speak for me

11 Feb 07:10

Subtle ......

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

11 Feb 08:54 · edited 11 Feb 10:42 · History

VimFuego wrote:

Baba O'Riley wrote:

Waimak beat Uni 2-0 rather easily.

Hope those on the bbq got their $10 reduction in their kids subs for the coming season

I don't know about you but I kinda thought that $75 for a sausage was quite expensive though. And I'm a vegetarian.

Can you 'work it off'? 

11 Feb 09:14

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

11 Feb 21:18

Mass board resignations at Waimak, four Board members including the Chairman and two of the paid staff gone late last week


"You can never get a bloody tradesman at Easter, it's a wonder Jesus got crucified" - Karl Pilkington

12 Feb 02:12

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

12 Feb 02:18

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Pot, kettle, black.

Rumours were always rife you played for money...

12 Feb 02:28

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Pot, kettle, black.

Rumours were always rife you played for money...

Will have to check my accounts from 2014 (June through till August). 

Not sure what that has anything to do with what i wrote though? But if you want my thoughts on that then if clubs are wanting to give incentives to amateur players then that's up to them.. Seems a bit strange for 3 clubs to get relegated before doing so though

12 Feb 02:30

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Pot, kettle, black.

Rumours were always rife you played for money...

Rumours rife Dan wasn't playing for Selwyn in last two preseason matches either. Something must have lured him away. 

12 Feb 02:32

10cc wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Pot, kettle, black.

Rumours were always rife you played for money...

Rumours rife Dan wasn't playing for Selwyn in last two preseason matches either. Something must have lured him away. 

Retirement :)

12 Feb 05:25

Dan Ede wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Pot, kettle, black.

Rumours were always rife you played for money...

Will have to check my accounts from 2014 (June through till August). 

Not sure what that has anything to do with what i wrote though? But if you want my thoughts on that then if clubs are wanting to give incentives to amateur players then that's up to them.. Seems a bit strange for 3 clubs to get relegated before doing so though

So your saying that there are 3 ccl clubs paying players and they have all been relegated. I'm taking it your throwing accusations then against western, halswell and united. Anything to back up your claims? And i'm not talking about joe blogs from another club told me so it must be true

12 Feb 05:31 · edited 12 Feb 05:34 · History

Who cares anyway. Clubs do what they want

12 Feb 06:14

Dan Ede wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Pot, kettle, black.

Rumours were always rife you played for money...

Will have to check my accounts from 2014 (June through till August). 

Not sure what that has anything to do with what i wrote though? But if you want my thoughts on that then if clubs are wanting to give incentives to amateur players then that's up to them.. Seems a bit strange for 3 clubs to get relegated before doing so though

So your saying that there are 3 ccl clubs paying players and they have all been relegated. I'm taking it your throwing accusations then against western, halswell and united. Anything to back up your claims? And i'm not talking about joe blogs from another club told me so it must be true

Adam Highfield signed for Halswell Mark Peers signed for Halswell yeah they leave MPL Winners where they getting paid to drop down a league for nothing.

Geoff Macintyre and Andy Tuckey playing at $$$ utd again they leave MPL Winners where they getting paid to drop down a league for nothing.

Stu 'doesn't do anything for nothing' Kelly signed for $$$ utd.

12 Feb 06:30

kiwifan90 wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Pot, kettle, black.

Rumours were always rife you played for money...

Will have to check my accounts from 2014 (June through till August). 

Not sure what that has anything to do with what i wrote though? But if you want my thoughts on that then if clubs are wanting to give incentives to amateur players then that's up to them.. Seems a bit strange for 3 clubs to get relegated before doing so though

So your saying that there are 3 ccl clubs paying players and they have all been relegated. I'm taking it your throwing accusations then against western, halswell and united. Anything to back up your claims? And i'm not talking about joe blogs from another club told me so it must be true

Adam Highfield signed for Halswell Mark Peers signed for Halswell yeah they leave MPL Winners where they getting paid to drop down a league for nothing.

Geoff Macintyre and Andy Tuckey playing at $$$ utd again they leave MPL Winners where they getting paid to drop down a league for nothing.

Stu 'doesn't do anything for nothing' Kelly signed for $$$ utd.

Again, not much proof apart from your opinion. How do you know they were even getting paid at ferrymead anyway? 

12 Feb 07:02

10cc wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Pot, kettle, black.

Rumours were always rife you played for money...

Rumours rife Dan wasn't playing for Selwyn in last two preseason matches either. Something must have lured him away. 

Pretty hard to play if you are not in NZ.

12 Feb 08:16

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Wasn't meant as a dig Dan, and we didn't expect to see the first team, definitely much bigger fish to fry nowadays :) We were probably hoping for a bit more of a physical challenge (which despite the scoreline last year we did against the team that was put out), but as you say a bit of fitness is always a start.

MPL teams have always sent reserve teams out to the tournament and it's probably now getting towards the stage that the remaining CCL teams are starting to think along similar lines, which ultimately is a shame. Maybe someone needs to look at re-introducing something like the old Rangers Tournament?

This year is definitely going to be a challenge in the CCL for the boys and hopefully will be a good competitive league

12 Feb 08:45

kiwifan90 wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Pot, kettle, black.

Rumours were always rife you played for money...

Will have to check my accounts from 2014 (June through till August). 

Not sure what that has anything to do with what i wrote though? But if you want my thoughts on that then if clubs are wanting to give incentives to amateur players then that's up to them.. Seems a bit strange for 3 clubs to get relegated before doing so though

So your saying that there are 3 ccl clubs paying players and they have all been relegated. I'm taking it your throwing accusations then against western, halswell and united. Anything to back up your claims? And i'm not talking about joe blogs from another club told me so it must be true

Adam Highfield signed for Halswell Mark Peers signed for Halswell yeah they leave MPL Winners where they getting paid to drop down a league for nothing.

Geoff Macintyre and Andy Tuckey playing at $$$ utd again they leave MPL Winners where they getting paid to drop down a league for nothing.

Stu 'doesn't do anything for nothing' Kelly signed for $$$ utd.

Create another thread for Masters leagues chat. 

Kotahitanga. We are one.

12 Feb 09:02

kiwifan90 wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Pot, kettle, black.

Rumours were always rife you played for money...

Will have to check my accounts from 2014 (June through till August). 

Not sure what that has anything to do with what i wrote though? But if you want my thoughts on that then if clubs are wanting to give incentives to amateur players then that's up to them.. Seems a bit strange for 3 clubs to get relegated before doing so though

So your saying that there are 3 ccl clubs paying players and they have all been relegated. I'm taking it your throwing accusations then against western, halswell and united. Anything to back up your claims? And i'm not talking about joe blogs from another club told me so it must be true

Adam Highfield signed for Halswell Mark Peers signed for Halswell yeah they leave MPL Winners where they getting paid to drop down a league for nothing.

Geoff Macintyre and Andy Tuckey playing at $$$ utd again they leave MPL Winners where they getting paid to drop down a league for nothing.

Stu 'doesn't do anything for nothing' Kelly signed for $$$ utd.

Hear Tuckey not at United

12 Feb 09:18

AllWhites82 wrote:

kiwifan90 wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Pot, kettle, black.

Rumours were always rife you played for money...

Will have to check my accounts from 2014 (June through till August). 

Not sure what that has anything to do with what i wrote though? But if you want my thoughts on that then if clubs are wanting to give incentives to amateur players then that's up to them.. Seems a bit strange for 3 clubs to get relegated before doing so though

So your saying that there are 3 ccl clubs paying players and they have all been relegated. I'm taking it your throwing accusations then against western, halswell and united. Anything to back up your claims? And i'm not talking about joe blogs from another club told me so it must be true

Adam Highfield signed for Halswell Mark Peers signed for Halswell yeah they leave MPL Winners where they getting paid to drop down a league for nothing.

Geoff Macintyre and Andy Tuckey playing at $$$ utd again they leave MPL Winners where they getting paid to drop down a league for nothing.

Stu 'doesn't do anything for nothing' Kelly signed for $$$ utd.

Hear Tuckey not at United

I rest my case

12 Feb 15:48

Dan Ede wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Pot, kettle, black.

Rumours were always rife you played for money...

Will have to check my accounts from 2014 (June through till August). 

Not sure what that has anything to do with what i wrote though? But if you want my thoughts on that then if clubs are wanting to give incentives to amateur players then that's up to them.. Seems a bit strange for 3 clubs to get relegated before doing so though

So your saying that there are 3 ccl clubs paying players and they have all been relegated. I'm taking it your throwing accusations then against western, halswell and united. Anything to back up your claims? And i'm not talking about joe blogs from another club told me so it must be true

I don't think i said anything about paying players, but yes "incentives" are being handed out, fact. And just for the record i have absolutely no issues with that. 

Any reason you're so defensive on this topic? 

12 Feb 17:35

Bays has a budget for every position. Fact. Tuckey Tech bound. Geoff has not signed for chch. Mostly cause chch united don't pay players that don't coach aswell. 

Enough about who pays what. Where are the transfer rumours ? Who from Tech is following Brownie? Boysy? Stanley? Coastal got any exciting imports coming to flop? Who's in goal for Bays? 

Halswell have seemed to get some good business done early. 

12 Feb 18:24

Geoff played against Selwyn a few weeks ago for utd, then for Bays against us on Sat just gone. Will let you know if he turns out for Nomads when we play them is weekend

12 Feb 18:28

Duran Duran wrote:

Bays has a budget for every position. Fact. Tuckey Tech bound. Geoff has not signed for chch. Mostly cause chch united don't pay players that don't coach aswell. 

Enough about who pays what. Where are the transfer rumours ? Who from Tech is following Brownie? Boysy? Stanley? Coastal got any exciting imports coming to flop? Who's in goal for Bays? 

Halswell have seemed to get some good business done early. 

Not that it means alot but Andy Tuckey not training a Tech as I understand it

12 Feb 18:42

Dan Ede wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Pot, kettle, black.

Rumours were always rife you played for money...

Will have to check my accounts from 2014 (June through till August). 

Not sure what that has anything to do with what i wrote though? But if you want my thoughts on that then if clubs are wanting to give incentives to amateur players then that's up to them.. Seems a bit strange for 3 clubs to get relegated before doing so though

So your saying that there are 3 ccl clubs paying players and they have all been relegated. I'm taking it your throwing accusations then against western, halswell and united. Anything to back up your claims? And i'm not talking about joe blogs from another club told me so it must be true

I don't think i said anything about paying players, but yes "incentives" are being handed out, fact. And just for the record i have absolutely no issues with that. 

Any reason you're so defensive on this topic? 

I just believe that no player should be getting paid a per game amount, no player in town is good enough to demand that. I include any canty united player in that. I dont have an issue like you with incentives. If clubs are paying players outside of this then mainland really needs to be involved in my opinion

12 Feb 20:06

We have been down this track, in fact right when this forum started, and I was given a bollocking for saying the same thing. 

Apparently there is something agreed with Mainland that clubs are able to reimburse "expenses" which essentially could be boots and petrol which in turn could then turn into a "per game" amount as they have to drive to each game/training. 

My perspective is that by paying players it changes the game in Christchurch, where players show no loyalty to their club, they are choosing their team not by the quality of coaching or facilities, but by the amount of money clubs are willing to pay them. 

Now it's happening in the MPL and CCL, I guess the women are next? 

#equality #metoo

I let my guitar speak for me

12 Feb 20:13

VimFuego wrote:

We have been down this track, in fact right when this forum started, and I was given a bollocking for saying the same thing. 

Apparently there is something agreed with Mainland that clubs are able to reimburse "expenses" which essentially could be boots and petrol which in turn could then turn into a "per game" amount as they have to drive to each game/training. 

My perspective is that by paying players it changes the game in Christchurch, where players show no loyalty to their club, they are choosing their team not by the quality of coaching or facilities, but by the amount of money clubs are willing to pay them. 

Now it's happening in the MPL and CCL, I guess the women are next? 

#equality #metoo

Completely agree Vim. There is a massive difference between being reimbursed for expenses such as petrol compared with the $$ amounts going around. That to me is taking the piss and as i said, no player in canterbury is worth it, fact

12 Feb 22:22

VimFuego wrote:

We have been down this track, in fact right when this forum started, and I was given a bollocking for saying the same thing. 

Apparently there is something agreed with Mainland that clubs are able to reimburse "expenses" which essentially could be boots and petrol which in turn could then turn into a "per game" amount as they have to drive to each game/training. 

My perspective is that by paying players it changes the game in Christchurch, where players show no loyalty to their club, they are choosing their team not by the quality of coaching or facilities, but by the amount of money clubs are willing to pay them. 

Now it's happening in the MPL and CCL, I guess the women are next? 

#equality #metoo

Completely agree Vim. There is a massive difference between being reimbursed for expenses such as petrol compared with the $$ amounts going around. That to me is taking the piss and as i said, no player in canterbury is worth it, fact

Guys this is the 21st century get with the real world it has been happening around chch for over 10 years one way or another. And there will not be a single club not doing it. Regarding transfers. How is ash welbourns coming along. Of course just over to play for nothing 

13 Feb 03:23

Duran Duran wrote:

Bays has a budget for every position. Fact. Tuckey Tech bound. Geoff has not signed for chch. Mostly cause chch united don't pay players that don't coach aswell. 

Enough about who pays what. Where are the transfer rumours ? Who from Tech is following Brownie? Boysy? Stanley? Coastal got any exciting imports coming to flop? Who's in goal for Bays? 

Halswell have seemed to get some good business done early. 

Bays has a budget for every position. Fact.

Yes and the chat around the golf course had Bays paying their GK at least $200 a game, a lot of travel time for that amount.

How much do Canterbury United pay Adam to be the GK coach.

13 Feb 04:15

fc69 wrote:

VimFuego wrote:

We have been down this track, in fact right when this forum started, and I was given a bollocking for saying the same thing. 

Apparently there is something agreed with Mainland that clubs are able to reimburse "expenses" which essentially could be boots and petrol which in turn could then turn into a "per game" amount as they have to drive to each game/training. 

My perspective is that by paying players it changes the game in Christchurch, where players show no loyalty to their club, they are choosing their team not by the quality of coaching or facilities, but by the amount of money clubs are willing to pay them. 

Now it's happening in the MPL and CCL, I guess the women are next? 

#equality #metoo

Completely agree Vim. There is a massive difference between being reimbursed for expenses such as petrol compared with the $$ amounts going around. That to me is taking the piss and as i said, no player in canterbury is worth it, fact

Guys this is the 21st century get with the real world it has been happening around chch for over 10 years one way or another. And there will not be a single club not doing it. Regarding transfers. How is ash welbourns coming along. Of course just over to play for nothing 

I'm not sure every club is doing it, but it's probably more that are than aren't. We never paid players at my time at the club, and I've been told that this hasn't changed. Great to see Ash coming back to the club that launched him to greatness, I would see that as the incentive to return to this club when he finishes his OE. 

I let my guitar speak for me

13 Feb 05:21

BenchWarmer wrote:

Dan Ede wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

10cc wrote:

BenchWarmer wrote:

Selwyn was certainly a young team and not their main team

Mix of 14-16 year olds in preparation for first U17 tounament in Auckland. They got plenty out of the game. 

Glad they did. Not sure our guys got too much out of it other than a bit of match fitness

Now now mate i'm really hoping that's not too much of a dig there. Would have thought "a bit of match fitness" would be perfect for you fellas. Seems you have quite a difficult league to prepare for this season with all the $ being converted in CCL.

Also could quite easily say clubs wont get too much out of playing Parklands (minus a few kicks here and there) during the season if you want to have a moan about pre-season games..

I actually am really enjoying seeing and hearing what you guys as a club are striving for but i hope you realize that we aren't going to be sending first or reserve teams to a tournament when we can arrange decent fixtures on decent pitches ourselves. 

Wasn't meant as a dig Dan, and we didn't expect to see the first team, definitely much bigger fish to fry nowadays :) We were probably hoping for a bit more of a physical challenge (which despite the scoreline last year we did against the team that was put out), but as you say a bit of fitness is always a start.

That's because they won't let me out on the park to bulldoze my way through people.  Apparently.. we play football now - not kick people get the ball.  - Shame I'm kinda out of a job now.

13 Feb 10:33

VimFuego wrote:

We have been down this track, in fact right when this forum started, and I was given a bollocking for saying the same thing. 

Apparently there is something agreed with Mainland that clubs are able to reimburse "expenses" which essentially could be boots and petrol which in turn could then turn into a "per game" amount as they have to drive to each game/training. 

My perspective is that by paying players it changes the game in Christchurch, where players show no loyalty to their club, they are choosing their team not by the quality of coaching or facilities, but by the amount of money clubs are willing to pay them. 

Now it's happening in the MPL and CCL, I guess the women are next? 

#equality #metoo

Completely agree Vim. There is a massive difference between being reimbursed for expenses such as petrol compared with the $$ amounts going around. That to me is taking the piss and as i said, no player in canterbury is worth it, fact

Disappointed to hear that an MPL club which has a good record in developing players and has impressed many with their style over the past couple of seasons has apparently lost 8-9 young MPL players to CCL clubs who are splashing the cash. $150-$200 per game, plus petrol, free boots, free subs. Madness!
13 Feb 19:33

Steptoe wrote:

VimFuego wrote:

We have been down this track, in fact right when this forum started, and I was given a bollocking for saying the same thing. 

Apparently there is something agreed with Mainland that clubs are able to reimburse "expenses" which essentially could be boots and petrol which in turn could then turn into a "per game" amount as they have to drive to each game/training. 

My perspective is that by paying players it changes the game in Christchurch, where players show no loyalty to their club, they are choosing their team not by the quality of coaching or facilities, but by the amount of money clubs are willing to pay them. 

Now it's happening in the MPL and CCL, I guess the women are next? 

#equality #metoo

Completely agree Vim. There is a massive difference between being reimbursed for expenses such as petrol compared with the $$ amounts going around. That to me is taking the piss and as i said, no player in canterbury is worth it, fact

Disappointed to hear that an MPL club which has a good record in developing players and has impressed many with their style over the past couple of seasons has apparently lost 8-9 young MPL players to CCL clubs who are splashing the cash. $150-$200 per game, plus petrol, free boots, free subs. Madness!

Who are the clubs you talk of steptoe, or is it one in particular

14 Feb 03:53

Steptoe wrote:

VimFuego wrote:

We have been down this track, in fact right when this forum started, and I was given a bollocking for saying the same thing. 

Apparently there is something agreed with Mainland that clubs are able to reimburse "expenses" which essentially could be boots and petrol which in turn could then turn into a "per game" amount as they have to drive to each game/training. 

My perspective is that by paying players it changes the game in Christchurch, where players show no loyalty to their club, they are choosing their team not by the quality of coaching or facilities, but by the amount of money clubs are willing to pay them. 

Now it's happening in the MPL and CCL, I guess the women are next? 

#equality #metoo

Completely agree Vim. There is a massive difference between being reimbursed for expenses such as petrol compared with the $$ amounts going around. That to me is taking the piss and as i said, no player in canterbury is worth it, fact

Disappointed to hear that an MPL club which has a good record in developing players and has impressed many with their style over the past couple of seasons has apparently lost 8-9 young MPL players to CCL clubs who are splashing the cash. $150-$200 per game, plus petrol, free boots, free subs. Madness!

Who are the clubs you talk of steptoe, or is it one in particular

It's the alphanumeric club
14 Feb 06:28

Steptoe wrote:

Steptoe wrote:

VimFuego wrote:

We have been down this track, in fact right when this forum started, and I was given a bollocking for saying the same thing. 

Apparently there is something agreed with Mainland that clubs are able to reimburse "expenses" which essentially could be boots and petrol which in turn could then turn into a "per game" amount as they have to drive to each game/training. 

My perspective is that by paying players it changes the game in Christchurch, where players show no loyalty to their club, they are choosing their team not by the quality of coaching or facilities, but by the amount of money clubs are willing to pay them. 

Now it's happening in the MPL and CCL, I guess the women are next? 

#equality #metoo

Completely agree Vim. There is a massive difference between being reimbursed for expenses such as petrol compared with the $$ amounts going around. That to me is taking the piss and as i said, no player in canterbury is worth it, fact

Disappointed to hear that an MPL club which has a good record in developing players and has impressed many with their style over the past couple of seasons has apparently lost 8-9 young MPL players to CCL clubs who are splashing the cash. $150-$200 per game, plus petrol, free boots, free subs. Madness!

Who are the clubs you talk of steptoe, or is it one in particular

It's the alphanumeric club

Who are the ccl clubs you talk of though, fc twenty obviously the mpl club you have mentioned. Personally I don't believe for a second that ccl clubs are offering 150-200 a game plus the other you have mentioned, especially for young players. If i'm wrong your right in its absolute madness

14 Feb 08:18

It's very obviously Waimak. We've gotta do something with all that money from our sub hike. A lot of new boots on display in the first 2 pre season games. And now there's no admin staff to pay we'll be in the market for a few more MPL pla

14 Feb 09:02

Gaffa wrote:

It's very obviously Waimak. We've gotta do something with all that money from our sub hike. A lot of new boots on display in the first 2 pre season games. And now there's no admin staff to pay we'll be in the market for a few more MPL pla



With all those goals we put away on Saturday too it's obvious that Parklands are paying the players with new boots too :
14 Feb 09:03

Steptoe wrote:

Steptoe wrote:

VimFuego wrote:

We have been down this track, in fact right when this forum started, and I was given a bollocking for saying the same thing. 

Apparently there is something agreed with Mainland that clubs are able to reimburse "expenses" which essentially could be boots and petrol which in turn could then turn into a "per game" amount as they have to drive to each game/training. 

My perspective is that by paying players it changes the game in Christchurch, where players show no loyalty to their club, they are choosing their team not by the quality of coaching or facilities, but by the amount of money clubs are willing to pay them. 

Now it's happening in the MPL and CCL, I guess the women are next? 

#equality #metoo

Completely agree Vim. There is a massive difference between being reimbursed for expenses such as petrol compared with the $$ amounts going around. That to me is taking the piss and as i said, no player in canterbury is worth it, fact

Disappointed to hear that an MPL club which has a good record in developing players and has impressed many with their style over the past couple of seasons has apparently lost 8-9 young MPL players to CCL clubs who are splashing the cash. $150-$200 per game, plus petrol, free boots, free subs. Madness!

Who are the clubs you talk of steptoe, or is it one in particular

It's the alphanumeric club

Who are the ccl clubs you talk of though, fc twenty obviously the mpl club you have mentioned. Personally I don't believe for a second that ccl clubs are offering 150-200 a game plus the other you have mentioned, especially for young players. If i'm wrong your right in its absolute madness

That's the $$ I was quoted, but even though the players are young they have a couple of MPL seasons under their belt.  The destination clubs mentioned were Halswell & Christchurch United, plus other players moving within the MPL. Wait until MyCoMET is up & running and track the players movements?