Regional Football - powered by Park Life

Olympic/Naenae

221 replies · 9,549 views
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Olympic/Naenae
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The big news on the street is that the Olympic/Naenae promo relegation result has been overturned by NZF due to Ryan Edwards playing when he had been graded as a Central league player.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
where and when did this come from?
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I heard same.  Announced today apparently.  Check with Da Boss for confirmation and let us know. Smithy2009-10-21 15:34:22

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Hard luck

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Presume that will have a trickle-down effect.  Lord knows how that works.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wouldn't think so.  They just don't swap surely.

(Not offering a view or an opinion on this decision or actions that lead to it).

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Oh yeah, good point.
 
Will shut up now.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Smithy wrote:
Presume that will have a trickle-down effect.  Lord knows how that works.
 
you talking league spots or something else?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:

Hard luck

Not sure luck had anything to do with it.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
If this is true then you have to feel a bit sorry for Olympic. He had played for the second team (and captaining them I believe) all year, and even when he was playing for the Central league side he still was playind second team. So its not like he was dropped just for the playoff.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Agree.
 
Also, I think Olympic might have sought (and received) Capital Football's approval for him to play, although I'm not 100% on that.
 
Lastly, what about Naenae.  They appealed the result of the game after being absolutely minging all year and comfortably losing in the playoff.  They deserved to go down, and they knew it.  And Olympic deserved to go up and haven't, purely on a technicality.
 
Naenae will now waste another few thousand dollars of gaming machine/their members' money bringing out Poms to try and survive another year. 
 
Very. Poor.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Smithy wrote:
Agree.
 
Also, I think Olympic might have sought (and received) Capital Football's approval for him to play, although I'm not 100% on that.
 
Lastly, what about Naenae.  They appealed the result of the game after being absolutely minging all year and comfortably losing in the playoff.  They deserved to go down, and they knew it.  And Olympic deserved to go up and haven't, purely on a technicality.
 
Naenae will now waste another few thousand dollars of gaming machine/their members' money bringing out Poms to try and survive another year. 
 
Very. Poor.
 
potentially disagree - but depends on the context. If Bubbles thought Ryan had every right to play (and if it was endorsed by CF) then there is some truth in that. If not you can hardly blame Nae for lodging an appeal that was supported by NZF.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Do you disagree or agree?  You have all the context you need.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I DISAGREE!!

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Here is the facts.

Capital Football is a f**king joke.

New Zealand Football is a f**king joke.

How can you appoint governing bodies to make authoritative decisions and over-rule them?

Id like to see this explained...but good luck charlie.

Down...yes.

But not out.

FML.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
So what is the confirmed decision? 
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
US, have you been caught with your pants down? You should know the rules. Bending the rule is one thing but breaking the rule is another. Have you guys broken the rules? Isn't it good that our local and national football organsiations still uphold rules and regulations to enforce Fairplay?
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
AngusBeef, the grading of players issue is really not that straight forward.  On one hand you have had the systematic regrading that teams have used to get teams promoted, or to stave off relegation.  Then you have the natural up and down that occurs between clubs for form, injury etc.  I don't know the details but the rules have never been particularly clear or well understood, or fair.  And I say that from someone who has manipulated the rules in the past to favour my own side, which I probably shouldn't have done.
 
I've said for a long time that clubs should have to name separate squads at the beginning of the season for their first and second teams, and they should be run separately, maybe a one in, one out arrangement.  The rules usually favour second teams, in a first team v second team scenario.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Here are the facts as I have been told from someone in the know!!
 
Naenaes protest has been upheld by NZF
RE played as an illegible player according to NZF
CF gave permission in writing prior to the game that RE could play, if permission wasn't granted that said play would not have taken the field
We all know that the interpretation of the rule has been a joke for sometime with everyone having a differing opinion of it hence why Olympic got permission from the governing body to play RE
 
What does this mean going forward it means the the governing body of Wellington Football does not know what they are doing and are incompetent and how can any club take what they say as being correct.
It is not Naenaes fault here and it is not Olympics fault here it is Capital Footballs inability to know what they are doing. The fairest thing to do is actually replay the game I am sure Naenae wouldn't want to do this an Olympic do as they are the team that has lost out but surely in the spirit of the game this would be the fairest way to resolve an issue that wasn't created by either team.
 
The interesting thing with all this is that Olympic lose the game 2 nil and get fined for playing an illegal player, that said fee is payable to Capital Football for their spending how ironically is that?
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Out of interest � can someone say what games Ryan played in leading up to this game?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
so I take it he played the last Cap1 game, then was playing CL, then played for some low div team prior to the play-off?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
cant not comment 100% but believe that was the case.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
surely this means the Ktown Dreamers should play Naenae

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
oldbutwise wrote:
cant not comment 100% but believe that was the case.
 

The rules state that a team in a play-off game can�t have players regarded to it though don�t they?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
oldbutwise wrote:
Here are the facts as I have been told from someone in the know!!
 
Naenaes protest has been upheld by NZF
RE played as an illegible player according to NZF
CF gave permission in writing prior to the game that RE could play, if permission wasn't granted that said play would not have taken the field
We all know that the interpretation of the rule has been a joke for sometime with everyone having a differing opinion of it hence why Olympic got permission from the governing body to play RE
 
What does this mean going forward it means the the governing body of Wellington Football does not know what they are doing and are incompetent and how can any club take what they say as being correct.
It is not Naenaes fault here and it is not Olympics fault here it is Capital Footballs inability to know what they are doing. The fairest thing to do is actually replay the game I am sure Naenae wouldn't want to do this an Olympic do as they are the team that has lost out but surely in the spirit of the game this would be the fairest way to resolve an issue that wasn't created by either team.
 
The interesting thing with all this is that Olympic lose the game 2 nil and get fined for playing an illegal player, that said fee is payable to Capital Football for their spending how ironically is that?
 

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
In all seriousness, what the f**k is going on at Capital Football?
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ok just found out about this...

Think its a little sad...
Heres my point of view
I have played in more 2nd team games this season than anyother player at olympic this year (all but 1)as well as been captain since the start of season and was also 2ND team PotY...surely that counts as me been a 2nd team player...

I only played for the 1st team due to an injury to a 1st team player.

I played 2 games a weekend as I wanted to remain part of the 2nd team to help ensure promotion.

But did not want to turn down a first team opportunity, As it got close to the end of the season I was told that I may have to miss the promo game if i continued to play for the 1st team...I accepted that I would miss the promo game if that was the case.

However, capital football said if I played cap 4 before hand that I could play in the naenae game. Had they not made this clear and not allowed me. I simply would not have played...

But The decisions been made, not much can be done, so I guess another year in capital one. Naenae fair enough to complain no grudges there. I only think its sad that NZF/capital footabll have now made it that my decision to play has meant that all my team mates hardwork and good preformances have gone to waste.

Does anyone from naenae think it was actually unfair that I played? Based on facts not rules? Rematch prehaps...I'll bring along my beers and watch from sideline, promise!
Redwards2009-10-22 18:50:29
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Rematch won't happen chaps - no ones been training, no gurantee player availability it would just make a farcical situation more ridiculous.

As for the whole thing, based on Olympic they deserve to be in Prems and Naenae don't. Naenae were terrible. It sucks, CF should be strung up from their bollocks, and I think Olympic deserve a damn good explanation from them

Did I just say all that... this is what it feels like to be nice to Olympic
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

keep olympic and naenae bth champs prem...

drop wellington united to cap 1 they simply awful bobboltontawa22009-10-22 19:56:35
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah, it seems CF have made a big stuff up here (unless NZF have, I don't even pretend to understand these regrading rules).

But ffs, why should CF even be in this position? There's such a thing as sportsmanship and it doesn't seem like Naenae are demonstrating much of that here.

I hate hearing these types of stories about clubs running off to mummy when they don't get what they want. Yes, rules are rules but there's also such a thing as just doing the right thing (I'm talking to you Ufuk Talay!).

terminator_x2009-10-22 20:28:28

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I guess if you're being forgiving (not my strong suit tbf) then you have to say Naenae are just playing by the rules, and Olympic didn't.
 
Again if you're being forgiving you have to give Grant Herman a bit of slack.  He'd only been in the job 5 minutes so I guess you can understand him misinterpreting a rule.
 
There is also a funny side to this, if you're not from Olympic anyway:-
 
Capital Football rule your player can play.
NZF rule your player can't play.
You have to pay a fine...to...Capital Football.
 
It's only 50 bucks so hardly massive money, but quite funny that Capital Football can make money by c*cking this up.
 
Here's hoping they do the right thing and lose the fine paperwork in the mail (the rules don't give them any discretion to waive the fine I don't think).
 
Also worth mentioning is this:
 
The last time Capital Football made an error in interpreting a rule like this was back in 2000.  When NZF overruled them Capital Football (rather than see a club punished for their mistake) ran an 11 team league (I think it was Fed Prem?) to compensate.
 
Any chance of an 11 team Capital Premier next year you think?
Smithy2009-10-23 10:43:26

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Smithy wrote:
I guess if you're being forgiving (not my strong suit tbf) then you have to say Naenae are just playing by the rules, and Olympic didn't.
 
Again if you're being forgiving you have to give Grant Herman a bit of slack.  He'd only been in the job 5 minutes so I guess you can understand him misinterpreting a rule.
 
There is also a funny side to this, if you're not from Olympic anyway:-
 
Capital Football rule your player can play.
NZF rule your player can't play.
You have to pay a fine...to...Capital Football.
 
It's only 50 bucks so hardly massive money, but quite funny that Capital Football can make money by c*cking this up.
 
Here's hoping they do the right thing and lose the fine paperwork in the mail (the rules don't give them any discretion to waive the fine I don't think).
 
Also worth mentioning is this:
 
The last time Capital Football made an error in interpreting a rule like this was back in 2000.  When NZF overruled them Capital Football (rather than see a club punished for their mistake) ran an 11 team league (I think it was Fed Prem?) to compensate.
 
Any chance of an 11 team Capital Premier next year you think?

Gentlemen

Ok, to set the record straight. Here are some of the facts:

Olympic AFC had the approval of CF to play RE in this game.

RE was the captain of the Div 1 team

He also played some games for our Central L team due to some injuries. Olympic went to great lengths in making sure that the appropriate clearance was given.

In saying this Every club is allowed to appeal and clearly Naenae have done that, and that is their right to do so.

However that leaves a lot of unanswered questions not only within the �spirit of the game� but also within the �gentlemen�s agreement� (during one of the CF meetings in recent years) as to the interpretation of the rules.

Olympic AFC are extremely disappointed with this decision but we fully understand and accept that Naenae had every right to appeal.

Olympic AFC will look at the decision over the next few weeks and will certainly take the appropriate steps to ensure that its Div 1 Team player�s efforts on the field will not be in vain.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
This is why quite simply the reason no 2nd teams should be in the premier league. Debacles like this just show how much of a joke Capital football and NZF are. They don't even seem to use the same rule book. Fact.....Olympic will struggle in the premier league just like Naenae. Unless they resort to West's tactics which is bollocks. Wests have struggled for the past two years in the premier league and I think it is much better for Wellington football to have a struggling Naenae than another struggling 2nd team.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I felt sorry Olympic brieftly. That was untill I remembered how they stacked their 2nd team at the end of the 2008 season.

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Nightz i think if you knew anything about the club you can see we have changed for the good.

@ andyace: So you think that clubs who have proven themselves better than the teams in the Prems still shouldn't deserve a shot?

This imo, is ridiculous.

I think Naenae had the right to put in a appeal, but the matter that it was done - was very un-gentlemanly like.

RE is a second team player, and was not the sole reason for our victory on the day, It was a team effort and it kills me to see all the hard work the boys put in, the ups and downs, all for nothing cause NZF are a f**king joke.

I think NZF has dug them self a hole on this one, and would LOVE to see their explnation on their decision.
uncle steve2009-10-26 18:11:11
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
NZF ?

All they did was read the rules.  Try CF.


Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
UC, you are an intelligent man explaining your club teams situation very nicely. Have you realised that you guys have brokenbthe rule about eligibility of a player? Your club team had been found guilty and the punishment was handed out. The best thing for you to do now is to accept the decision, stop moaning and get on with it. Hopefully you will be much wiser after this! Yeah right.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
AngusBeef wrote:
UC, you are an intelligent man explaining your club teams situation very nicely. Have you realised that you guys have brokenbthe rule about eligibility of a player? Your club team had been found guilty and the punishment was handed out. The best thing for you to do now is to accept the decision, stop moaning and get on with it. Hopefully you will be much wiser after this! Yeah right.
if you had a look you will realise they are not compaining about being caught. they are complaining because they gained clearance from CF to play the player, and have now been told he is ineligible. i think its fair enough and im sure anyone else would be complaining if something similar had happened to their club.
Permalink Permalink