West-Gone United

733 replies · 144,473 views
almost 7 years ago

theprof wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

We are the real deal and ready to spice up the A-league

O'Rourke said Western United had met all of its license payments, which translates to sending more than $15 million to FFA coffers.

oh good, should mean the FFA can prop up one of its favoured clubs again should it be required.

Like they did with WSW.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Lonegunmen wrote:

theprof wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

We are the real deal and ready to spice up the A-league

O'Rourke said Western United had met all of its license payments, which translates to sending more than $15 million to FFA coffers.

oh good, should mean the FFA can prop up one of its favoured clubs again should it be required.

Like they did with WSW.

And Brisbane.



Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LG
almost 7 years ago

Like every club except us and Victory. WSW were a 100% FFA built and run enterprise for the first two seasons, not just a bail out.


Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LGmartinb
almost 7 years ago
Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

How is it original when it's basically a poor rip-off of the Nigerian current strip (which is awful, by the way)?

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Original in context of other A-League kits I guess. But it's a razzle dazzle nightmare.

Take back what you said about the Nigerian kit though!

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Christo wrote:
 

Take back what you said about the Nigerian kit though!

Never!

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago · edited almost 7 years ago · History

Just out of interest... When they pay us a visit at Westpac would that big yellow banner be big enough to read "Since when were we a Melbourne club?" Since they have our coach and a fair few of our players.

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Better banner would be

'Shark nix in green'

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

"Since when did we wear green?"

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

"did you bring your misses Rudan?"


Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Loyalty, for me, is number one- Mark Rudan 



Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Bullioncollins.waFinkJazzy Jeff
almost 7 years ago

I found this and thought it would be an apt description of Rudan's role when the wheels start falling off in Western Melbourne... 

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Phoenix B, Phoenix B, Phoenix B - New Chant instead of Melbourne C.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Report on Western Melbourne Group proposal

From a Fan dated 13 June 2018

2500 + Kiwi's moved into the area! (Pre-Rudan Effect)

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Baiter wrote:

Like every club except us and Victory. WSW were a 100% FFA built and run enterprise for the first two seasons, not just a bail out.

In fairness though it's their comp...shouldn't they support a club/prop them up if it is strategically important to them? 

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

CrankyOldMan wrote:

Baiter wrote:

Like every club except us and Victory. WSW were a 100% FFA built and run enterprise for the first two seasons, not just a bail out.

In fairness though it's their comp...shouldn't they support a club/prop them up if it is strategically important to them? 

if that's the case shouldn't they be halping every club?

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

theprof wrote:

CrankyOldMan wrote:

Baiter wrote:

Like every club except us and Victory. WSW were a 100% FFA built and run enterprise for the first two seasons, not just a bail out.

In fairness though it's their comp...shouldn't they support a club/prop them up if it is strategically important to them? 

if that's the case shouldn't they be halping every club?

Two things 1 are we strategically important? Would the loss of the Brisbane market be as important as the loss of the Wellington market to FOX? Note fox not sky . 2 we haven't needed a bail out yet. 

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

CrankyOldMan wrote:

theprof wrote:

CrankyOldMan wrote:

Baiter wrote:

Like every club except us and Victory. WSW were a 100% FFA built and run enterprise for the first two seasons, not just a bail out.

In fairness though it's their comp...shouldn't they support a club/prop them up if it is strategically important to them? 

if that's the case shouldn't they be halping every club?

Two things 1 are we strategically important? Would the loss of the Brisbane market be as important as the loss of the Wellington market to FOX? Note fox not sky . 2 we haven't needed a bail out yet. 

Remember they kept a nz team after Auckland...they just need nz not Wellington. Why prop up a area (Wellington/ ) when another may do?

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Doloras wrote:

Don't quite know what this means
Annual finals disappointment enthusiast.

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Doloras wrote:

Don't quite know what this means

Think she is implying WUFC are not flush with cash. And share holder companies could be slow payers in the business world. ie like CCM and Roar owmers

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Jazzy JeffLG
almost 7 years ago

Phoenix B

I'm an optimistic pessimist. 
I'm positive things will go wrong.
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LachyloolaaLGOi Oi Edgecumbe
almost 7 years ago

Damn, beat me to it Matt. Or should it be a green and Black striped shirt with a Nix logo on it??

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Blew.2 wrote:

Doloras wrote:

Don't quite know what this means

Think she is implying WUFC are not flush with cash. And share holder companies could be slow payers in the business world. ie like CCM and Roar owmers

I'm intrigued by this. Are they borked already?

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LG
almost 7 years ago

Shirley usually has the finger on the pulse when it comes to Aussie football, so that's quite an interesting statement.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LG
almost 7 years ago

Remember a few months back she said something that upset a few but she was right?

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

Doloras wrote:

Don't quite know what this means

Think she is implying WUFC are not flush with cash. And share holder companies could be slow payers in the business world. ie like CCM and Roar owmers

I'm intrigued by this. Are they borked already?

There has been rumours floating around that some backers have got cold feet but the FFA have confirmed they have paid the licence fee at least. At its heart, it appears to be a property deal. They got the football team, so they could build the stadium to be an anchor tenant for their property development venture.
Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

Doloras wrote:

Don't quite know what this means

Think she is implying WUFC are not flush with cash. And share holder companies could be slow payers in the business world. ie like CCM and Roar owmers

I'm intrigued by this. Are they borked already?

There have been some rumours floating around that part of the Western Melbourne Group (BSH) that owns WU and was part of the initial bid for the license, is now no longer part of the group so a belief that the money for both the running of the club and the plan stadium build has/will dry up.

If this is the case, it potentially leaves the FFA propping up the club

I'm an optimistic pessimist. 
I'm positive things will go wrong.
Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

The FFA propping up another club?

That would take them to 11 of the 14 that have existed... guess what country two of those three are from.


Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Insert GIANT LOL here! 

So to save face, the FFA will yet again be the life blood of a broke club and possibly keep their foot in the door as a result because they will oppose the proposed independant A League and probably the Nix licence issue. 

Only in Australia and the FFA could one come up with this and allow it to happen. FIFA really do need to sort this amateurish lot out.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
scribbler
almost 7 years ago

The infrastructure to go with a new stadium like road and rail upgrades have not made the 5-10 year annual plan by local and Regional governments. (Inside football).  According to a forum a chap who works in the local council planning office has not seen any consent applications. Even for the Land for Stadium deal.   

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Lonegunmen wrote:

Insert GIANT LOL here! 

So to save face, the FFA will yet again be the life blood of a broke club and possibly keep their foot in the door as a result because they will oppose the proposed independant A League and probably the Nix licence issue. 

Only in Australia and the FFA could one come up with this and allow it to happen. FIFA really do need to sort this amateurish lot out.

a broke club before they are even a real club and the FFA will be propping them up? NO WAY!!!!?

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago · edited almost 7 years ago · History

Blew.2 wrote:

The infrastructure to go with a new stadium like road and rail upgrades have not made the 5-10 year annual plan by local and Regional governments. (Inside football).  According to a forum a chap who works in the local council planning office has not seen any consent applications. Even for the Land for Stadium deal.   

Yeah between the lack of infrastructure that now doesn't appear to be built anytime soon and that original letter outlining the problems of the bid before FFA even chose WU. Its going to be an interesting watch to see what happens, as they could be a club without a real home.

In the past week there have been new revelations about Western Melbourne Group’s (WMG) proposed Wyndham Stadium at 1160 Sayers Road, Tarneit. The Wyndham council gave the ground to the franchise to stimulate investment into the local area.

The site of the proposed stadium at 1160 Sayers Road Tarneit

When the WMG consortium was given an A-League licence in December 2018, Director Steve Horvat stated that the stadium would be privately funded. Horvat also stated that the infrastructure for the stadium, including a new train station and upgrades to Sayers Road, to accommodate the extra traffic, would be financed by the State Government. Club officials have also publicly maintained that they’ll set up house for the 2021-22 season.Now it has come to light in the past two weeks that these plans have changed, leaving the original timeline of playing at the Stadium for the 2021-2022 season unlikely to occur.

Artists impression of the new Wyndham Stadium precinct

According to the May State budget, there have been no funds allocated to the upgrades, leaving the local community scratching their heads as to how these upgrades will occur. Currently Tarneit Train station is the nearest station to the proposed stadium and is 7 kilometres away. A new station at Sayers Road is being slated to be only two kilometres away and would be easier to get to the stadium either by bus or walking.

As reported on the SBS World Game website ‘Almost six months on from winning the bid with ambitious promises of fast-tracked permits, there’s been no turning of soil, as project managers deal with on-site issues’.Western United FC CEO Maurice Bisetto stated that this is of no concern. Greg O’Rourke the Head of the A-league is not fussed by the setback stating that the FFA had originally expected the stadium not to be ready till the 2022-2023 season.

This raises questions regarding the funding, which surpassed the licencing bids of both Team 11 , Dandenong, and South Melbourne FC. The question has to be asked, if the goal posts around getting the licence are now moved, why did they get the green light in the first place?

(Taken from Insidesport forum)

I'm an optimistic pessimist. 
I'm positive things will go wrong.
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Blew.2LG
almost 7 years ago

Just to show scale

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

Stalled

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 7 years ago

I don't really want the Bitumens to stall and cease to exist before the next season even starts, if only because Dura would be unemployed.

On the plus point, Creep Rudan would be unemployed. :D


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink