Wellington Phoenix Men

AFC President message to FFA: no NZ teams by 2011

621 replies · 9,179 views
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The(O)Dor wrote:

Been away for a few days so just skimmed over the pages. I honestly don't think it matters hugely if we only have 5 NZers (or 3 competing in the ACL) if we are playing good, attractive football with overseas players I wouldn't mind and maybe even a few of the players would have Aussie passports. Exactly the same with the Breakers and Warriors.
From the Warriors last year, the following first grade players were of Kiwi origin.Patrick Ah VanSonny FaiLance HohaiaWairangi KoopuEpalahame Lauaki (played for Tonga at the World Cup but has capped for NZ in 2007)Simon ManneringBen MatulinoRussell PackerSam RapiraJerome RopatiRyan ShortlandMalo SolomonaLogan SwannEvarn TuimavaveManu VatuveiRuben Wiki16 players.  Add 8 Australians and 1 Scotsman.  The Warriors tend to get a bad wrap from various people, even their own fans, but it's a fairly good percentage of players being home grown.  If the Warriors were down to 3-4 or 5 players, I'd suggest a lot of Warriors fans would be fairly peeved and struggle to support them out of Auckland.
Yes but how do people who don't even start or aren't on the bench add quality to the team playing week in week out. Of those players 5-6 would start every week if there were no injuries.


Because the NRL season is a what 24 round competition in an intensely physical competition?  Having depth is extremely important.

The wrap the Warriors get for not having enough Kiwis, especially given the constraints of the salary cap, is extremely unfair and has no foundation whatsoever.  A lot of those players named are under the age of 25 and most are being put through the Vulcans or the NYC team to get them prepared for first grade.  They seem to be taking a good long term view of their roster particularly their New Zealand component.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Thank god for Sepp Blatter.

Down down with the Qatari.  Poor form pal.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
bopman wrote:
Torne wrote:

He also said they needed to get a promotion/relegation system, we all know that will never happen.
Yeah, unless you want to have 2 leagues with 8 teams in them each....


It can be done like what they do with J-league and J-league 2. Certain J2 clubs that prove they have infrastructure, financial backing and sporting presence on the field as well as adequate crowd numbers can be promoted into J1. Some of the J2 clubs are never going to be J1 clubs but are happy to just playing in J2 level of competition and so are not eligible to be promoted.

.
 
You really do see the world through rose tinted glasses dont ya mate? The difference between the Australian and Japanese economy is absolutely massive and with the resource boom beginning to die off it will only get bigger
The other big difference between the J League and the A League is geography. Aussie (+ NZ) is a much bigger area and I'm sure that the FFA would be worried that a promotion/relegation system could reduce the geographic spread should say Perth or the Nix get relegated to be replaced by teams from the areas with more depth (Vic, NSW, QLD).
 
So I'm sure (I hope) they would take that into consideration as well. Not that we'll need it  but Perth might be worried.
 
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
bopman wrote:
Torne wrote:
He also said they needed to get a promotion/relegation system, we all know that will never happen.[/QUOTE]Yeah, unless you want to have 2 leagues with 8 teams in them each....
It can be done like what they do with J-league and J-league 2. Certain J2 clubs that prove they have infrastructure, financial backing and sporting presence on the field as well as adequate crowd numbers can be promoted into J1. Some of the J2 clubs are never going to be J1 clubs but are happy to just playing in J2 level of competition and so are not eligible to be promoted. .

�

You really do see the world through rose tinted glasses dont ya mate? The difference between the Australian and Japanese economy is absolutely massive and with the resource boom beginning to die off it will only get bigger


Sigh, you are really ignorant about J-league and I never mention it would be the same financial bracket. I am just pointing to similarities and expected growth. This has been mention in other forums and frankly we are over six months behind on this forum.

Let me fill in the gaps (I mainly cut and pasted wikipedia excepts but I have the actual main contributor's permission to use it on any blogs and forum [plus it has glu common licence anyway] but that is another story)

The J-league started 1993 with 10 professional teams, prior to that there was no professional football teams. It boomed with the best ever season in 1994 with the highest average attendance of 19,598. However that has not been broken since. The boom dissipate after 1995. By early 1996 as the league attendance declined rapidly. In 1997 the average attendance was 10,131, compared to 19,598 in 1994. A total of eight clubs were added in the four year span from 1994 to 1998. With high paychecks (which we have a salary cap to prevent this) and low attendance, money was bleeding from the clubs, and the league sponsors were becoming very worried.

So what happen next?

The league's management finally realized that they were heading in the wrong direction. In order to solve the problem, the management came out with two solutions.

1.) Announced the J.League Hundred Year Vision, in which they aim to make 100 professional football clubs in the nation of Japan by 2092, the hundredth season. encouraged the clubs to promote football or non-football related sports and health activities, to acquire local sponsorships, and to build good relationship with their hometowns at the grass-root level. The league believed that this will allow the clubs to bond with their respective cities and towns and get support from local government, companies, and citizens. In other words, clubs will be able to rely on the locals, rather than major national sponsors. (something that A-league has learnt and encouraged)

2.) The league acquired nine clubs from the semi-professional JFL (former) and one club from J.League to create a two division system. The topflight became the J.League Division 1 (J1) with 16 clubs while J.League Division 2 (J2) was launched with ten clubs in 1999. The criteria for becoming a J2 club was not as strict as the top division. This allowed smaller cities and towns to maintain a club successfully without investing as much as clubs in J1. In fact, clubs like Mito HollyHock only draw an average of 3,000 fans a game and receive minimal sponsorship, yet still field fairly competitive teams in J2. (Obviously A-league will have different club numbers and many of the top existing state league sides will start in the second division)

Other notes;

3.)The topflight became the J.League Division 1 (J1) with 16 clubs while the new J.League Division 2 (J2) was launched with ten clubs in 1999. The second-tier Japan Football League (former), now became third-tier Japan Football League.

4.)The criteria for becoming a J2 club was not as strict as the top division. This allowed smaller cities and towns to maintain a club successfully without investing as much as clubs in J1.

5.)J2 Clubs took time to build their teams for J1 promotion as they also tried to gradually improve the youth systems, the home stadium, the financial status, and the relationship with their hometown.Clubs such as Oita Trinita, Albirex Niigata, and Kawasaki Frontale accomplished the scheme successfully. All these clubs originally started as J2 in 1999 and were comparatively small, but they eventually earned J1 promotion in 2002, 2003, and 2004 respectively. Now they are all well established in the topflight.

6.) By 2005, J1 had 18 clubs and so the number of relegated clubs also increased to 2.5 from 2, with the third-from-bottom club going into promotion/relegation playoffs with the third-placed J2 club.

7.) J. League Division 2 started to expand to fulfill the demands of lower-level clubs becoming professional. At the end of 2004 two clubs were promoted from the Japan Football League (semi-pro league).

8.)At the beginning of the 2006 season, the league took a survey to figure out the number of non-league clubs interested in joining the professional league. As it turned out, about 40-60 clubs in Japan plan to be professional in the next 30 years. (well ahead than expected, however it may stop at that number)

9.)The league management formed a committee and looked at two practical options; either expand the second division or form a third division. In other words, the league had a choice between letting the non-league clubs catch up to the J2 standard or form a third division with non-league clubs where these clubs can prepare for J2.

10.)Professional assessment that it is the best interest of the league to expand the J2 to 22 clubs before forming a third division.

Reasons;

a.)Japan Football League, the third-tier in Japanese football league system was already serving the purpose of preparing the non-league clubs.
b.)At the time, most non-league club interested becoming professional were in the regional leagues or Prefectural leagues, two to four level below J2.
c.)Twenty-two clubs is the perfect number as it allows enough number of home games for annual revenue, while keeping the competition at fair double-round robin format.
d.)Most European leagues have similar football pyramids where there is more clubs in 2nd- and 3rd-tier leagues than the top flight.

11.) Committee also reintroduced Associate Membership System to identify and assist such non-league clubs. The membership is exclusively given to non-league clubs that have intention to joining the J.League and also fulfill most of the criteria for J2 promotion.

12.) Associate members finishing top 4 of JFL will be promoted to J2.

The league believe this strict system will prevent financially unstable clubs and also allow the league to maintain certain standard as a professional league without having to adopt the "closed shop" franchise system like their baseball.

For the A-league, they have salary capping and reduce the club numbers to mantain the league attendance at an adequate number to work with. Their progress will follow very similar to what J-league is doing especially when they will introduce the promotion and relegation. The promotion and relegation will happen, the FFA has originally announced their intention, it's just the details to release. It was suppose to have been released at end of 2008 but with the Nix problems with the AFC, it has thrown a cat among the pigeons.

There is no real reason not to have a budget semi-pro national league with less strict criteria to build the clubs up into A-League material. I don't like having different semi-pro state league and much prefer to match them up in a national set-up to stimulate interest in get into the A-League.

That should at least be happening.

The old NSL survived without the correct set up for years and without clear off-field objectives. With the A-League criteria as an objective and the high interest in the country for the last 4 years, It's not a horrible idea to have another national league under the A-league at a budget/testing/building stage, surely there are very solid clubs in the VPL and NSWPL etc that could cover their traveling expenses at least?

The second division can easily have semi-pro teams like in the J2 and the USL which can travel on a nationwide basis and have only half the crowd we presently have in the A-league.

This has been discussed in another soccer forum among other Australian posters and in fact Edgar was the one that started a thread related to an article.

Anyway; here a bit of the latest back on 28th October. . .

[quote]"We said to the AFC we would get back to them by October this year as to what our plan is via promotion-relegation,'' Buckley said.

"They understand our situation and they've accepted that we will have a plan in place by October this year and that will be for an implementation for a promotion-relegation system, not at this point in time but for some years to come.

''It's something that will be assessed over time. After we've got through the next phase of expansion then we'll be looking to a promotion and relegation system.''AAP

It's October and...

A-League �will meet criteria� according to Rob Abernethy.

Speaking to the-afc.com on the sidelines of the AFC General Managers� Seminar, Rob Abernethy said the A-League would go flat out to make the grade for the continental showcase which will sport a new look in 2009.

�We are very confident that we can meet it (the criteria),� Abernethy said.

�We have engaged in several meetings with officials of the AFC Pro-League Committee and we will satisfy the criteria.�


Promotion and relegation will go ahead after we get the four expansion teams and it should be at a lower criteria than what it is at A-league. Afterall, they should have plenty of bids by then that will fullfill the second division criteria.

. . . It will be more than just 8 teams in each division. As you can see, there is an infrastructure that allows a flow down effect to create professionalism in lower clubs. of course Australia will not have as many clubs due to population but they will have more than what everyone on this forum is saying. The main estimation is that A-league would have 12 teams and then A-league2 will have start with 8 teams. It is expected that A-league2 will be actually bigger in club numbers than A-league, so it should be 12 teams at least with extra bids because of the lower criteria to play in A-league2 and that only half of those teams will be able to have applications for promotion to A-league each year.

Take what you will from this, but the template is drawn up but not released to the public. I only know bit of it but heard enough to know that it would not be just 16 teams split in two division. That is just too laughable because it might as well be one division which is not equate to anyone's plans.AllWhitebelievr2008-12-25 17:11:11
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Geez AWB how do you know all of that stuff and how do you find time to write up all of that?
 
Could promotion/relegation basically mean dressing up the state leagues as B-Leagues or whatever with the possibility that state league clubs could potentially be promoted if they meet relevant criteria? I know very little about Australian state leagues so forgive me if that sounds stupid...
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The(O)Dor wrote:
Thank god for Sepp Blatter.

Down down with the Qatari.  Poor form pal.
 
 
Its great that you believe Sepp so much; on an unrelated topic ,you can now buy our harbour bridge ,just send all your cash to me , quickly now!
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
AWB plans generally don't include the fact that there is not unlimited amounts of money.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Posted: Yesterday at 4:57pm
AWB
 
Some way to spend xmas huh?

ive got a song that wont take long, Adelaide are rubbish.. the second verse is same as the first.. ADELAIDE ARE RUBBISH

Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Scottishbhoy wrote:
Posted: Yesterday at 4:57pm
AWB
 
Some way to spend xmas huh?



Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
AWB
 
Excelent post and shows someone is willing to put in some hard yards with research.
 
Just before I start (will keep to under 10, 00 words promise) be under no doubt the FFA will do what Asia if it comes down to Asian support for the WCB or an extra ACL spot & the Nix well its no contest.
 
In summary FIFA say if FFA want you you are in MBH says if you stay in in must be in our format. FIFA could force the existing set up doesFrank lowy want the fight when your in with the NZ imports.
 
Accordingly AWB .. you as in NZ & Ocenian have two things the AFC woul like, first support in FIFA forums with votes and second the Ocenian spot in FIFA touranments .
 
No is time to work out what you can achieve and what you guys want with what you have to bargin with... BTW getting more media would help to show you are moving forward at least.
 
Over ... and as promised under 10, 000 words 

Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei

Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
[Finally, what we've all been waiting to hear - Sepp steps in!!!]
 
GOOD NEWS FOR PHOENIX...
By FRED WOODCOCK - The Dominion Post | Friday, 02 January 2009
 
The Wellington Phoenix could have been delivered to kick off 2009, and it's got nothing to do with any on-field happenings.

The view of Mohamed Bin Hammam, the president of the Asian Football Confederation, that the Phoenix should be kicked out of the A-League after 2011 is potentially devastating for both the Phoenix and professional football in this country.

Bin Hammam wants the Kiwi-based side out because New Zealand is a part of the Oceania confederation, while Australia is in Asia.

There has been much uncertainty about what Bin Hammam's comments mean for the Phoenix post-2011, and all sorts of scenarios have been speculated, but the club now appears to have the most important ally in football Fifa president Sepp Blatter.

In an interview aired on Australia's SBS late last year, Blatter said: "It is not the matter of the confederation, it is the matter of the Fifa executive committee if Wellington will go on and play on in Australian league.

"As long as [the] Australian league wants to have them and Wellington wants to stay [and] both associations in this case, New Zealand Australian football, are happy with that, then we will give them the blessing. The confederation cannot interfere with that."

Phoenix chief executive Tony Pignata welcomed Blatter's comments but said there was still plenty of work required to secure the long-term future of New Zealand's only fully professional club.

"It's refreshing to hear Blatter's view," Pignata said. "We believe that we should be part of the A-League in the long term ... We want to make sure we get an extension of our contract, like every other A-League club. And given that we do play in the A-League, we should get all the other benefits as well, including the Asian Champions League."

Pignata and club owner Terry Serepisos are to meet FFA chief executive Ben Buckley next week to discuss their long-term future, including licence renewal and the possibility of playing in the Asian Champions League.

Pignata wants a quick end to the uncertainty. "We're still in the midst of signing players and renewing our sponsorship with Sony, so we'd like to know exactly where we stand."

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4807712a1823.html
scribbler2009-01-02 10:39:32
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
scribbler wrote:
[...]
 
"We believe that we should be part of the A-League in the long term ... We want to make sure we get an extension of our contract, like every other A-League club. And given that we do play in the A-League, we should get all the other benefits as well, including the Asian Champions League."
 
Don't push your luck Tony
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Mr Blatter hasn't done NZ many favours (what with denying Oceania an automatic FIFA WC place, and considering leaving Oceania out of the FIFA Club WC) but he's stepped up to the mark here. I suppose it helps that NZ is back in the top 70 or so rankings. 

Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Our hosting of the WC probably helped a little to. I think he probably just isn't an arsehole.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
good news
 
lets hope slippery Sepp, holds onto his marbles and his position for some time to come
 
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Quoting Death Cab at the start of a football blog..dear god.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Reason #148 why the Nix should stay in the A-League: Wellington seem the only A-League club capable of producing a playing surface worthy for a professional football fixture.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Stevo wrote:
Reason #148 why the Nix should stay in the A-League: Wellington seem the only A-League club capable of producing a playing surface worthy for a professional football fixture.
It's also amazing that we probably host the biggest range of sports as well.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Michael wrote:
Our hosting of the WC probably helped a little to. I think he probably just isn't an arsehole.
 
No, your'e missing  either the word "perfect "or "complete"
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
timmymadden wrote:
I suppose it helps that NZ is back in the top 70 or so�rankings.�


Not anymore.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
timmymadden wrote:
I suppose it helps that NZ is back in the top 70 or so rankings. 



Not anymore.
Yeah that loss to Fiji won't have helped us there, what a disgrace
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Now Tahiti has qualified for a world cup we might find Oceania will not be quite so happy for a 'move' to Asia.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tahiti will fall over at the U20 WC. The OFC need to merge with Asia to grow all the OFC nations. More international matches at both national and club level can only be benificial.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
timmymadden wrote:
Tahiti will fall over at the U20 WC.
 
Maybe so, but it will give them a financial boost and a taste of football at the top level. Then tell them to give all of this opportunity away so NZ football can get to play senior WC qualifiers against Asian teams - yeah right.....
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Once the OFC is absorbed into AFC it should not necessarily just be NZ who play Asian teams. In order to keep costs to a reasonable level there should be an Oceania sub group first, but then two or three teams should join the second round of qualifying, to play the likes of Singapore, Thailand etc. It would be prohibitively expensive to have all island nations even playing a home and away (which is what first round Asian qualifying is), but surely something could be arranged where a couple of island nations get an occasional game against an Asian side.
 
Anyway, back to the 'Nix, surely this might help?
 
 
Sure we can provide training bases Mr Lowy, as long as the 'Nix are still in the A-League in 2018 football will still exist here so no problem!
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
That article will be very useful but once again we can't vote for them if they are going to kick the Nix out of the A-league.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
These a very good articles for us because remember Sepp Blatter said that the FFA would have the final say although MBH could twist their arm...
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think if Australia needs NZ training infrastructure then that changes the game a bit. If they need to keep MBH happy to get AFC approval as Asia's bid then that is what they'll do, but if they also need NZ support then the FFA somehow need to keep both happy. The main danger would then be FNZ committing suicide by supporting Australia without tying the 'Nix into the deal. Would they be dumb enough?
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I would never underestimate the stupidity of NZF.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
yea i could so see nzf supporting the bid even after the ffa boot the phoenix
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
NZF are not the people who choose to support it, its OFC together that have one vote to choose who we support.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
WPF, they're talking about NZF teaming up with FFA to use NZ as a training base for teams during the WC, not the vote for who hosts it.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
clark007e wrote:
yea i could so see nzf supporting the bid even after the ffa boot the phoenix
Lemon it says bid there so doesn't he mean the world cup bid? It could be a mistake and he probably meant about hosting a team.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
i was meaning hosting a team 
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
clark007e wrote:
i was meaning hosting a team�
Ok cleared up by the man himself. You used bid so I presumed you meant their World Cup bid instead because we don't need to bid to host a team.
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
yea it was my mistake i put the wording wrong but all good
Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Guys the training facility is a way NZF can prove the value of football what it can bring in dollars etc to NZ. 
 
It will help promote football generally ... please look at what it can do for football in general .. access to fields, media, sponsors , government support , business etc ...
 
Where is AWB to do some research when you need him.
 

Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei

Permalink Permalink
about 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Santa Sepp's Phoenix Gift
Tony P is going to meet with Ben Buckley ahead of the sydney game to discuss our license and the ACL

timmy2009-01-06 23:27:25
Permalink Permalink