Wellington Phoenix Men

Ernie Merrick - former Phoenix manager

3094 replies · 671,649 views
almost 13 years ago

martin o'neil is available

" If you only have a hammer you tend to see every problem as a nail" - maslow

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago


Neil Warnock is available.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Jerzy Merino wrote:


Neil Warnock is available.


Would probably result in Ifill retiring! 
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

sthn.jeff wrote:

Jerzy Merino wrote:


Neil Warnock is available.


Would probably result in Ifill retiring! 

 

Warnock & K Fallon - a pairing from Hell. Scare the shit out of everyone, for and against.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Warnock is a messiah at getting the best out of average teams. Well, except for Leeds.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Lonegunmen wrote:

Warnock is a messiah at getting the best out of average teams. Well, except for Leeds.

\
Certianly had success over the years, but the number of clubs he has been at as a Manager tends to suggest he must be "difficult" to work with, especially when you factor in his success.
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

sthn.jeff wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

Warnock is a messiah at getting the best out of average teams. Well, except for Leeds.

\
Certianly had success over the years, but the number of clubs he has been at as a Manager tends to suggest he must be "difficult" to work with, especially when you factor in his success.
Funny you say this. When I shouted down others over Kris Brights call for the AWs, apparently the number of clubs he has played at has ZERO to do with his real talent....

Quality people stick...

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

Warnock is a messiah at getting the best out of average teams. Well, except for Leeds.

\
Certianly had success over the years, but the number of clubs he has been at as a Manager tends to suggest he must be "difficult" to work with, especially when you factor in his success.
Funny you say this. When I shouted down others over Kris Brights call for the AWs, apparently the number of clubs he has played at has ZERO to do with his real talent....

Quality people stick...

Agreed. Same thing when looking at someones CV.. Lots of jobs ok where there is a clear progression each time, but bouncing around for the sake of it??
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

sthn.jeff wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

Warnock is a messiah at getting the best out of average teams. Well, except for Leeds.

\
Certianly had success over the years, but the number of clubs he has been at as a Manager tends to suggest he must be "difficult" to work with, especially when you factor in his success.
Funny you say this. When I shouted down others over Kris Brights call for the AWs, apparently the number of clubs he has played at has ZERO to do with his real talent....

Quality people stick...

Agreed. Same thing when looking at someones CV.. Lots of jobs ok where there is a clear progression each time, but bouncing around for the sake of it??


i think that's unfair re: bright especially when you don't know all the circumstances behind it. a lot of times he was probably offered one year deals/short term deals and he just wanted to seek out a better club/deal. nothing wrong with that IMO. would you rather he stayed at the same Hungarian club for 5 years. i think actually you have to admire someones determination to stay a professional footballer. i say back off

Kris Bright - 9 clubs in 7 years

Shane Smeltz/Chris Killen - 7 clubs in 7 years




Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

We need an Aussie coach who has the contacts and personal credibility to attract a couple of above-average Aussie players in key positions, either from overseas or other A-League clubs.

This is the A-League and knowledge/understanding of the Aussie (and in our case Kiwi) player pool is paramount.



Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

tripvincent wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

Warnock is a messiah at getting the best out of average teams. Well, except for Leeds.

\
Certianly had success over the years, but the number of clubs he has been at as a Manager tends to suggest he must be "difficult" to work with, especially when you factor in his success.
Funny you say this. When I shouted down others over Kris Brights call for the AWs, apparently the number of clubs he has played at has ZERO to do with his real talent....

Quality people stick...

Agreed. Same thing when looking at someones CV.. Lots of jobs ok where there is a clear progression each time, but bouncing around for the sake of it??


i think that's unfair re: bright especially when you don't know all the circumstances behind it. a lot of times he was probably offered one year deals/short term deals and he just wanted to seek out a better club/deal. nothing wrong with that IMO. would you rather he stayed at the same Hungarian club for 5 years. i think actually you have to admire someones determination to stay a professional footballer. i say back off

Kris Bright - 9 clubs in 7 years

Shane Smeltz/Chris Killen - 7 clubs in 7 years




One of the key attributes of a pro footballer is the ability to stick it out when times get tough. Several times Kris has left because "not getting enough gametime". Sometimes in life you just have to back yourself, knuckle down and get on with it. 

Smeltzy and Killen are different altogether. they have finished contracts and moved on (with the exception of Smeltz's China move, and the reasons for him backing out on that are fairly clear, so It is not really fair to make the comparison. 
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

sthn.jeff wrote:

tripvincent wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

Warnock is a messiah at getting the best out of average teams. Well, except for Leeds.

\
Certianly had success over the years, but the number of clubs he has been at as a Manager tends to suggest he must be "difficult" to work with, especially when you factor in his success.
Funny you say this. When I shouted down others over Kris Brights call for the AWs, apparently the number of clubs he has played at has ZERO to do with his real talent....

Quality people stick...

Agreed. Same thing when looking at someones CV.. Lots of jobs ok where there is a clear progression each time, but bouncing around for the sake of it??


i think that's unfair re: bright especially when you don't know all the circumstances behind it. a lot of times he was probably offered one year deals/short term deals and he just wanted to seek out a better club/deal. nothing wrong with that IMO. would you rather he stayed at the same Hungarian club for 5 years. i think actually you have to admire someones determination to stay a professional footballer. i say back off

Kris Bright - 9 clubs in 7 years

Shane Smeltz/Chris Killen - 7 clubs in 7 years




One of the key attributes of a pro footballer is the ability to stick it out when times get tough. Several times Kris has left because "not getting enough gametime". Sometimes in life you just have to back yourself, knuckle down and get on with it. 

Smeltzy and Killen are different altogether. they have finished contracts and moved on (with the exception of Smeltz's China move, and the reasons for him backing out on that are fairly clear, so It is not really fair to make the comparison. 


i was simply highlighting two examples of players who have moved around over the years. but i mean you could argue (based on what you're saying) that chris killen should have stuck it out in the UK rather than taking the money in China? how can you expect bright to knuckle down at the club if its just a short term contract or a one year deal which is what he's been working with? makes no sense. i think you're both being rather harsh on the guy. 



Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

tripvincent wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

tripvincent wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

Warnock is a messiah at getting the best out of average teams. Well, except for Leeds.

\
Certianly had success over the years, but the number of clubs he has been at as a Manager tends to suggest he must be "difficult" to work with, especially when you factor in his success.
Funny you say this. When I shouted down others over Kris Brights call for the AWs, apparently the number of clubs he has played at has ZERO to do with his real talent....

Quality people stick...

Agreed. Same thing when looking at someones CV.. Lots of jobs ok where there is a clear progression each time, but bouncing around for the sake of it??


i think that's unfair re: bright especially when you don't know all the circumstances behind it. a lot of times he was probably offered one year deals/short term deals and he just wanted to seek out a better club/deal. nothing wrong with that IMO. would you rather he stayed at the same Hungarian club for 5 years. i think actually you have to admire someones determination to stay a professional footballer. i say back off

Kris Bright - 9 clubs in 7 years

Shane Smeltz/Chris Killen - 7 clubs in 7 years




One of the key attributes of a pro footballer is the ability to stick it out when times get tough. Several times Kris has left because "not getting enough gametime". Sometimes in life you just have to back yourself, knuckle down and get on with it. 

Smeltzy and Killen are different altogether. they have finished contracts and moved on (with the exception of Smeltz's China move, and the reasons for him backing out on that are fairly clear, so It is not really fair to make the comparison. 


i was simply highlighting two examples of players who have moved around over the years. but i mean you could argue (based on what you're saying) that chris killen should have stuck it out in the UK rather than taking the money in China? how can you expect bright to knuckle down at the club if its just a short term contract or a one year deal which is what he's been working with? makes no sense. i think you're both being rather harsh on the guy. 


Again, Killen decision quite different, bloke coming towards end of career, looking to make some dosh. 

I am not saying Kris does not move for what he believes to be the right reason, but there must be a time when he has to stick it out and make it work..... Finish a season as top scorer somewhere have a good year or two and get himself noticed that way.
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

terminator_x wrote:

We need an Aussie coach who has the contacts and personal credibility to attract a couple of above-average Aussie players in key positions, either from overseas or other A-League clubs.

This is the A-League and knowledge/understanding of the Aussie (and in our case Kiwi) player pool is paramount.



Cant go along with that thinking.So we take what just any Aussie coach just for the sake of it,because lets face it the best of them are not likely to head our way unless a truck load of money is thrown their way and that dosnt seem likely.

We have no idea of the quality of those who have applied and frankly if the best candidate comes from somewhere other than Aussie then i dont see why we wouldnt get him.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago · edited almost 13 years ago · History

terminator_x wrote:

We need an Aussie coach who has the contacts and personal credibility to attract a couple of above-average Aussie players in key positions, either from overseas or other A-League clubs.

This is the A-League and knowledge/understanding of the Aussie (and in our case Kiwi) player pool is paramount.

Interesting. Is this necessarily the case though? I'm kinda looking to be swayed either way on this point. In relation to that, do Moss, Stubbins and Trani (the Aussie names that seem to be getting flung around) have that credibility you speak of? I know Moss has been Arnold's right hand man and Trani has been between here and Adelaide. I profess to being a bit unfamiliar with all their backgrounds so they could well have that clout already. I guess the current benchmarkers really are Ange and Arnold but they are wrapped up tight but they ain't available any time soon.
You would think surely that you had done some research on the team and landscape before you chucked your name in the hat for the job. A good coach worth his salt would have surely done that. Thats why I find these 15 or so high quality European based candidates interesting because they will not come cheap and realistically, how much research have they done on a league on the other side of the world with all the various parameters that we have (salary cap and import restriction) that they do not have in Europe. Not saying its not true, just saying I am a bit of a skeptic on this point. I thought it was generally understood that Ricki was on around 200k with a top up from NZF...

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

sthn.jeff wrote:

tripvincent wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

tripvincent wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

Warnock is a messiah at getting the best out of average teams. Well, except for Leeds.

\
Certianly had success over the years, but the number of clubs he has been at as a Manager tends to suggest he must be "difficult" to work with, especially when you factor in his success.
Funny you say this. When I shouted down others over Kris Brights call for the AWs, apparently the number of clubs he has played at has ZERO to do with his real talent....

Quality people stick...

Agreed. Same thing when looking at someones CV.. Lots of jobs ok where there is a clear progression each time, but bouncing around for the sake of it??


i think that's unfair re: bright especially when you don't know all the circumstances behind it. a lot of times he was probably offered one year deals/short term deals and he just wanted to seek out a better club/deal. nothing wrong with that IMO. would you rather he stayed at the same Hungarian club for 5 years. i think actually you have to admire someones determination to stay a professional footballer. i say back off

Kris Bright - 9 clubs in 7 years

Shane Smeltz/Chris Killen - 7 clubs in 7 years




One of the key attributes of a pro footballer is the ability to stick it out when times get tough. Several times Kris has left because "not getting enough gametime". Sometimes in life you just have to back yourself, knuckle down and get on with it. 

Smeltzy and Killen are different altogether. they have finished contracts and moved on (with the exception of Smeltz's China move, and the reasons for him backing out on that are fairly clear, so It is not really fair to make the comparison. 


i was simply highlighting two examples of players who have moved around over the years. but i mean you could argue (based on what you're saying) that chris killen should have stuck it out in the UK rather than taking the money in China? how can you expect bright to knuckle down at the club if its just a short term contract or a one year deal which is what he's been working with? makes no sense. i think you're both being rather harsh on the guy. 


Again, Killen decision quite different, bloke coming towards end of career, looking to make some dosh. 

I am not saying Kris does not move for what he believes to be the right reason, but there must be a time when he has to stick it out and make it work..... Finish a season as top scorer somewhere have a good year or two and get himself noticed that way.


Yeah well I guess we will see what happens in Finland this season. 


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Every single other club has got rid of their foreign coaches somehow, and have all hired Australian coaches. I don't think that is a coincidence, there must be a reason for it. 


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

Every single other club has got rid of their foreign coaches somehow, and have all hired Australian coaches. I don't think that is a coincidence, there must be a reason for it. 

Really?!?!?

Now I think about it, thats strangely true. You have to wonder why that is. Cultural perhaps?

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

Every single other club has got rid of their foreign coaches somehow, and have all hired Australian coaches. I don't think that is a coincidence, there must be a reason for it. 

Really?!?!?

Now I think about it, thats strangely true. You have to wonder why that is. Cultural perhaps?


Or is it the foreign managers cost more and when the clubs get a look at what they bring to the table decide they can get something local just as good for less money?
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

Every single other club has got rid of their foreign coaches somehow, and have all hired Australian coaches. I don't think that is a coincidence, there must be a reason for it. 

Isnt that as much to do with the quality of coach they hired,its not as if anyone with incredible credentials has been employed and then sacked.
Its also not as if the league is filled with outstanding Aussie coaches so its not as if they have all been succesful.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

Every single other club has got rid of their foreign coaches somehow, and have all hired Australian coaches. I don't think that is a coincidence, there must be a reason for it. 

Really?!?!?

Now I think about it, thats strangely true. You have to wonder why that is. Cultural perhaps?



I think it's dead simple.

This is a salary capped league with relatively tight import restrictions. The bulk of squads are made up of Aussies (and at the Nix, Kiwis). A coach has to be familiar with the Aussie talent pool and able to attract the best of that pool to his club. Due to the salary cap the money won't always be there so some of the attraction has to be "I like that coach and I want to play for him".

At the Nix we only have one import spot left but we still have serious issues in a number of positions around the field which will have to be fixed using Aussies/Kiwis.

The more I think about it the more I'm convinced we need an Aussie coach with a good enough reputation that a few above-average Aussie players will seriously consider signing for him.

In fact, if I was interviewing the candidates I would be asking them to name a specific short-list of players they will be targeting and why.

Another question I would be asking them is which of our off-contract players they would consider re-signing and why.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

We should see if we can hire this guy. He sounds like he knows how to turn a club around.

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

terminator_x wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

Every single other club has got rid of their foreign coaches somehow, and have all hired Australian coaches. I don't think that is a coincidence, there must be a reason for it. 

Really?!?!?

Now I think about it, thats strangely true. You have to wonder why that is. Cultural perhaps?



I think it's dead simple.

This is a salary capped league with relatively tight import restrictions. The bulk of squads are made up of Aussies (and at the Nix, Kiwis). A coach has to be familiar with the Aussie talent pool and able to attract the best of that pool to his club. Due to the salary cap the money won't always be there so some of the attraction has to be "I like that coach and I want to play for him".

At the Nix we only have one import spot left but we still have serious issues in a number of positions around the field which will have to be fixed using Aussies/Kiwis.

The more I think about it the more I'm convinced we need an Aussie coach with a good enough reputation that a few above-average Aussie players will seriously consider signing for him.

In fact, if I was interviewing the candidates I would be asking them to name a specific short-list of players they will be targeting and why.

Another question I would be asking them is which of our off-contract players they would consider re-signing and why.

I agree with everything you just said. Another great post termy.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

We should see if we can hire this guy. He sounds like he knows how to turn a club around.


He'd certainly help us raise our profile in North Korea, which is a vital market.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Buffon II wrote:

We should see if we can hire this guy. He sounds like he knows how to turn a club around.


He'd certainly help us raise our profile in North Korea, which is a vital market.
Maybe with his political clout he could get us eligibility for the ACL too?

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago · edited almost 13 years ago · History

patrick478 wrote:

Every single other club has got rid of their foreign coaches somehow, and have all hired Australian coaches. I don't think that is a coincidence, there must be a reason for it. 

I don't know. Similar things have been said about marquees in the past (the ones who come here are just after cash, or cr*p and never work out etc), but I think the tide has turned on that this year a bit with Ono, ADP & Heskey.

So do I think we should be hoping for an overseas messiah to come and coach? No. But do I think we should be ruling anyone from further off, just because others haven't worked before? Definitely no.

Edit - didn't see some of the other replies before posting this. In regards to reputation of Aus coach drawing Aus players. I'm not sure it's quite as simple as that. And that would really only work in the short term anyway. After the first season, the reputation is going to be made on results, team culture etc, and not on where they've come from.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Frankie Mac wrote:

terminator_x wrote:

I think it's dead simple.

This is a salary capped league with relatively tight import restrictions. The bulk of squads are made up of Aussies (and at the Nix, Kiwis). A coach has to be familiar with the Aussie talent pool and able to attract the best of that pool to his club. Due to the salary cap the money won't always be there so some of the attraction has to be "I like that coach and I want to play for him".

[/quote]

you don't think that aussie players (which is what we are really talking about here as I don't think that there is currently enough talent kicking around NZ to include) will want to play for a good international manager?

terminator_x wrote:

At the Nix we only have one import spot left but we still have serious issues in a number of positions around the field which will have to be fixed using Aussies/Kiwis.

The more I think about it the more I'm convinced we need an Aussie coach with a good enough reputation that a few above-average Aussie players will seriously consider signing for him.

or an international coach with a good enough reputation that a few above average Aussie players will seriously consider playing for him.

[quote=terminator_x]

 

In fact, if I was interviewing the candidates I would be asking them to name a specific short-list of players they will be targeting and why.

why is it the coaches job to arrive on day 1 with a list of signings he intends to try and make?  I mean, most will have an idea and I believe it would come up in interviews but clubs providing scouting networks - coaches can bring in their physio, assistant coach, etc, but none of them bring a scout with them.  If I was manager being interviewed by the Morgan's et al, I would be asking them who the club is targetting.

[quote=terminator_x]

Another question I would be asking them is which of our off-contract players they would consider re-signing and why.

the way a number of key players fucked off for most of the season until Herbert was sacked, I would imagine that a coach of any nationality would say that they would be happy to get rid of the the majority of the squad.

 

ah fuck, I knew my trying to use multiple quotes was going to nadger the whole thing.  Mods, take control

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Fuck knows what you're on about Frankie. I'll just answer some questions I think you might have asked.


"Termy X - as one of the most intelligent and insightful posters on the forum surely you're not saying that decent Aussie players won't want to play for a good international manager?"

No, I'm not saying that. But I am saying:

a) that an Aussie coach might do a better job of targeting Aussies who give us what we need

b) that an Aussie possibly has a better chance of attracting some of those players through personal contacts

c) that we are unlikely to be able to afford the kind of international coach whose reputation would supersede points a) and b)

And I definitely think that appointing someone like Hugo Sanchez would be a fucking train-wreck. Just not what we need at all.


"Why is it the coaches job to arrive on day 1 with a list of signings he intends to try and make?  Surely the club does the scouting?.  If I was manager being interviewed by Welnix, I would be asking them who the club is targetting"

I'm inclined to agree. However, I do think it is a damn good interview question for a candidate - who would you target and why? Get a feel for how much they understand the club's current playing stocks, the issues, and how much knowledge they have of potential Aussies who could provide remedies, because you are right that we will need to recruit Aussies in those key positions.


"Why ask the candidates which off-contract players they might re-sign? The way a number of key players fucked off for most of the season until Herbert was sacked, I would imagine that a coach of any nationality would say that they would be happy to get rid of the the majority of the squad"

Much the same answer as the previous question really. Just a good line of inquiry in an interview to find out how much research they've done. Yes, they might say "get rid of them all" or they might say "definitely keep Bertos, he would fit with my plans". Either way, it would be good to know what these prospective coaches think. Personally I hope the new coach comes in and cleans house.


"Thanks for answering my questions Termy X, you're awesome"

It's a pleasure.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Do you have a particular person in mind for the role?

A fan is a fan.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Hard to see us getting a proven coach from overseas... not sure we can conjure up enough cash.

If we do get one, hopefully he has links to other clubs with players we can loan. Australia NZ should be an appealing prospect for a player (decent league and will help deveop thei English if not his first language).

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Neil Warnock is available.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

terminator_x wrote:

Fuck knows what you're on about Frankie. I'll just answer some questions I think you might have asked.


"Termy X - as one of the most intelligent and insightful posters on the forum surely you're not saying that decent Aussie players won't want to play for a good international manager?"

No, I'm not saying that. But I am saying:

a) that an Aussie coach might do a better job of targeting Aussies who give us what we need

b) that an Aussie possibly has a better chance of attracting some of those players through personal contacts

c) that we are unlikely to be able to afford the kind of international coach whose reputation would supersede points a) and b)

And I definitely think that appointing someone like Hugo Sanchez would be a fucking train-wreck. Just not what we need at all.


"Why is it the coaches job to arrive on day 1 with a list of signings he intends to try and make?  Surely the club does the scouting?.  If I was manager being interviewed by Welnix, I would be asking them who the club is targetting"

I'm inclined to agree. However, I do think it is a damn good interview question for a candidate - who would you target and why? Get a feel for how much they understand the club's current playing stocks, the issues, and how much knowledge they have of potential Aussies who could provide remedies, because you are right that we will need to recruit Aussies in those key positions.


"Why ask the candidates which off-contract players they might re-sign? The way a number of key players fucked off for most of the season until Herbert was sacked, I would imagine that a coach of any nationality would say that they would be happy to get rid of the the majority of the squad"

Much the same answer as the previous question really. Just a good line of inquiry in an interview to find out how much research they've done. Yes, they might say "get rid of them all" or they might say "definitely keep Bertos, he would fit with my plans". Either way, it would be good to know what these prospective coaches think. Personally I hope the new coach comes in and cleans house.


"Thanks for answering my questions Termy X, you're awesome"

It's a pleasure.

Hard to fault that logic.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

terminator_x wrote:

Fuck knows what you're on about Frankie. I'll just answer some questions I think you might have asked.


"Termy X - as one of the most intelligent and insightful posters on the forum surely you're not saying that decent Aussie players won't want to play for a good international manager?"

No, I'm not saying that. But I am saying:

a) that an Aussie coach might do a better job of targeting Aussies who give us what we need

b) that an Aussie possibly has a better chance of attracting some of those players through personal contacts

c) that we are unlikely to be able to afford the kind of international coach whose reputation would supersede points a) and b)

And I definitely think that appointing someone like Hugo Sanchez would be a fucking train-wreck. Just not what we need at all.


"Why is it the coaches job to arrive on day 1 with a list of signings he intends to try and make?  Surely the club does the scouting?.  If I was manager being interviewed by Welnix, I would be asking them who the club is targetting"

I'm inclined to agree. However, I do think it is a damn good interview question for a candidate - who would you target and why? Get a feel for how much they understand the club's current playing stocks, the issues, and how much knowledge they have of potential Aussies who could provide remedies, because you are right that we will need to recruit Aussies in those key positions.


"Why ask the candidates which off-contract players they might re-sign? The way a number of key players fucked off for most of the season until Herbert was sacked, I would imagine that a coach of any nationality would say that they would be happy to get rid of the the majority of the squad"

Much the same answer as the previous question really. Just a good line of inquiry in an interview to find out how much research they've done. Yes, they might say "get rid of them all" or they might say "definitely keep Bertos, he would fit with my plans". Either way, it would be good to know what these prospective coaches think. Personally I hope the new coach comes in and cleans house.


"Thanks for answering my questions Termy X, you're awesome"

It's a pleasure.

If the fucking quote shizzle worked on this manky forum, some (obviously not all) of what I wrote would have made some sense. 

While someone like Hugo Sanchez would most likely be a traincrash, I think we are in no position to rule out quality coaches from other parts of the world because they do not know the Aussie market.  Player recruitment is one part of management role, but I am not sure how important it really is for us - in a salary capped league the theory is that every squad should be (realitively) even in terms of ability, experience, etc.  Reality shows us that this is not the case, but with the peanuts we are most likely going to be offering for players I cannot see an Aussie manager being able to work a huge amount of magic when it comes to recruitment. I think that whoever we have in charge, we will end up with a squad of a pretty similar level (and Aussie manager may get us a few better local squad players, while an overseas manager may get us a better final import).  What then becomes the key thing is what the manager can get out of the squad of players, so the person who has the highest quality when it comes to tactics, motivation, coaching, etc should most definitely be considered, irrelevant of their nationality.

Look, I am not one of those people who think that European or whatever experience means that they are automatically better, but I don't think we should be ruling out people for a current lack of knowledge of the NZFC for example.

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Also on the attracting players angle, an international might also have a better chance of attracting 3 "top class" imports at the end of the 2013/14 season when Stein, Paul & Benji come off contract. 

I'm with Frankie, I wouldn't write off any candidate based on a lack of knowledge of Aussie players

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Frankie Mac wrote:

If the fucking quote shizzle worked on this manky forum, some (obviously not all) of what I wrote would have made some sense. 

While someone like Hugo Sanchez would most likely be a traincrash, I think we are in no position to rule out quality coaches from other parts of the world because they do not know the Aussie market.  Player recruitment is one part of management role, but I am not sure how important it really is for us - in a salary capped league the theory is that every squad should be (realitively) even in terms of ability, experience, etc.  Reality shows us that this is not the case, but with the peanuts we are most likely going to be offering for players I cannot see an Aussie manager being able to work a huge amount of magic when it comes to recruitment. I think that whoever we have in charge, we will end up with a squad of a pretty similar level (and Aussie manager may get us a few better local squad players, while an overseas manager may get us a better final import).  What then becomes the key thing is what the manager can get out of the squad of players, so the person who has the highest quality when it comes to tactics, motivation, coaching, etc should most definitely be considered, irrelevant of their nationality.

Look, I am not one of those people who think that European or whatever experience means that they are automatically better, but I don't think we should be ruling out people for a current lack of knowledge of the NZFC for example.



Trying to split a post into multiple quotes to give multiple answers is just a waste of time. You will drive yourself crazy trying to make that shit work.

Of course there are international managers out there who could be great for us. I'm just saying that without knowing who all the candidates are I think a well-connected Aussie might be the best chance of success. But yeah, it really does depend on who's actually applied and how they stack up against each other individually.

I do think that our recruitment of (what will have to be) Aussies and Kiwis into a few key positions is a very significant piece of the jigsaw though. You simply could not play certain tactics with some of our current squad. Herbert took a hell of a lot of shit in here for poor recruitment so I don't see why that shouldn't be an important measure of performance for the new coach also (particularly if the club delays recruiting in order to get his input). If we get an international coach he will definitely need to have done his homework on the A-League and Aussies/Kiwis based overseas.


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

terminator_x wrote:

Frankie Mac wrote:

If the fucking quote shizzle worked on this manky forum, some (obviously not all) of what I wrote would have made some sense. 

While someone like Hugo Sanchez would most likely be a traincrash, I think we are in no position to rule out quality coaches from other parts of the world because they do not know the Aussie market.  Player recruitment is one part of management role, but I am not sure how important it really is for us - in a salary capped league the theory is that every squad should be (realitively) even in terms of ability, experience, etc.  Reality shows us that this is not the case, but with the peanuts we are most likely going to be offering for players I cannot see an Aussie manager being able to work a huge amount of magic when it comes to recruitment. I think that whoever we have in charge, we will end up with a squad of a pretty similar level (and Aussie manager may get us a few better local squad players, while an overseas manager may get us a better final import).  What then becomes the key thing is what the manager can get out of the squad of players, so the person who has the highest quality when it comes to tactics, motivation, coaching, etc should most definitely be considered, irrelevant of their nationality.

Look, I am not one of those people who think that European or whatever experience means that they are automatically better, but I don't think we should be ruling out people for a current lack of knowledge of the NZFC for example.



Trying to split a post into multiple quotes to give multiple answers is just a waste of time. You will drive yourself crazy trying to make that shit work.

Of course there are international managers out there who could be great for us. I'm just saying that without knowing who all the candidates are I think a well-connected Aussie might be the best chance of success. But yeah, it really does depend on who's actually applied and how they stack up against each other individually.

I do think that our recruitment of (what will have to be) Aussies and Kiwis into a few key positions is a very significant piece of the jigsaw though. You simply could not play certain tactics with some of our current squad. Herbert took a hell of a lot of shit in here for poor recruitment so I don't see why that shouldn't be an important measure of performance for the new coach also (particularly if the club delays recruiting in order to get his input). If we get an international coach he will definitely need to have done his homework on the A-League and Aussies/Kiwis based overseas.


Agree. You can't slam Ricki for poor recruitment then give the new guy a free ride. That would just show a Ricki bias and nothing else.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

terminator_x wrote:

Frankie Mac wrote:

If the fucking quote shizzle worked on this manky forum, some (obviously not all) of what I wrote would have made some sense. 

While someone like Hugo Sanchez would most likely be a traincrash, I think we are in no position to rule out quality coaches from other parts of the world because they do not know the Aussie market.  Player recruitment is one part of management role, but I am not sure how important it really is for us - in a salary capped league the theory is that every squad should be (realitively) even in terms of ability, experience, etc.  Reality shows us that this is not the case, but with the peanuts we are most likely going to be offering for players I cannot see an Aussie manager being able to work a huge amount of magic when it comes to recruitment. I think that whoever we have in charge, we will end up with a squad of a pretty similar level (and Aussie manager may get us a few better local squad players, while an overseas manager may get us a better final import).  What then becomes the key thing is what the manager can get out of the squad of players, so the person who has the highest quality when it comes to tactics, motivation, coaching, etc should most definitely be considered, irrelevant of their nationality.

Look, I am not one of those people who think that European or whatever experience means that they are automatically better, but I don't think we should be ruling out people for a current lack of knowledge of the NZFC for example.



Trying to split a post into multiple quotes to give multiple answers is just a waste of time. You will drive yourself crazy trying to make that shit work.

Of course there are international managers out there who could be great for us. I'm just saying that without knowing who all the candidates are I think a well-connected Aussie might be the best chance of success. But yeah, it really does depend on who's actually applied and how they stack up against each other individually.

I do think that our recruitment of (what will have to be) Aussies and Kiwis into a few key positions is a very significant piece of the jigsaw though. You simply could not play certain tactics with some of our current squad. Herbert took a hell of a lot of shit in here for poor recruitment so I don't see why that shouldn't be an important measure of performance for the new coach also (particularly if the club delays recruiting in order to get his input). If we get an international coach he will definitely need to have done his homework on the A-League and Aussies/Kiwis based overseas.


Agree. You can't slam Ricki for poor recruitment then give the new guy a free ride. That would just show a Ricki bias and nothing else.

Ricki had 5 years of poor recruitment - the new guy (wherever he comes from) will arrive and be in a very difficult position initially.  Ricki got a free ride in season 1 (George, Cleberson, etc) and the new guy will get a bit more leeway as he starts, but will ultimately be judged on the same things (results, improvement, entertainment, and yes, recruitment).

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

He's talking about establishing a yearly series of performances by the visiting Vienna Boys Choir.

A fan is a fan.

Permalink Permalink