Really hope we do beat these guys, we've had them by the throat twice and failed to capitalise.
For those that think of forum has too much stuupid check this thread on the F-Troop site - http://forums.northqldfc.com.au/yaf_postst404_Furries-vs-Glory.aspx[/QUOTE]
We should've won the first game against them but they were by far the better team in our 2nd 1-1 draw.
[QUOTE=bigtobz]
For those that think of forum has too much stuupid check this thread on the F-Troop site - http://forums.northqldfc.com.au/yaf_postst404_Furries-vs-Glory.aspx[/QUOTE]
We should've won the first game against them but they were by far the better team in our 2nd 1-1 draw.
[QUOTE=bigtobz]
I'd see the 4-3-3 as a bit more attacking, in that we are only playing one more-defensive midfielder than the two we play in a 4-4-2.
So the 4-3-3 is more attacking than the 4-4-2 even though we are playing with an extra DM?
If you want to split fine hairs we'll call it 4-1-2-3.
Or even 4-1-2-2-1. I wasn't comparing the numbers, I was comparing the way the formations would play- Manny clearing up behind Vinnie and Timmy, which is how I've seen it in the last game atleast.

aitkenmike2010-01-12 15:00:08
"Phoenix till they lose"
and what exactly are they going to do if you do wear colours...glass you by the sounds of it,or at least threaten it? It sounds like bloods vs crips or something.

. but then again we'd probably miss a few if it does rain. catch 22. 