Wellington Phoenix Men

R1 vs Newcastle Jets | 7pm Sun 11th Oct | 12pm Backbencher

646 replies · 41,506 views
over 10 years ago

I have to agree with what most people are saying. But I think the McGlinchey critisicm is a bit harsh. Yes he does turn in circles a lot, but when there's 9 white shirts in front of him and only 3 yellow ones I can't really blame him for holding the ball up and not trying a miracle ball. Last season I thought he was one of those players who you notice more when they're not there which to me shows just how important they are.

I thought in terms of the overall game there wasn't a whole lot wrong with the performance, just the lack of finishing, but I have no doubt that keep playing like that then the goals and wins will come. I reckon our away form will be pretty good again this season as opposition teams won't park the bus when they're at home, so there'll be more space to exploit and to work with in the final third. 

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Just popped in to read the match thread, sigh and shake my head a lot. Never disappoints.

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Are Nix replays available online? If so, where would I find them? Cheers.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

scribbler wrote:

Are Nix replays available online? If so, where would I find them? Cheers.

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Jag wrote:

Just popped in to read the match thread, sigh and shake my head a lot. Never disappoints.

I somehow forgot this in the off season. Must. Stay. Away.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Almost glad I wasn't able to watch the game last night by the sounds of things.


Apart from all the moaning and groaning were there any standouts apart from Roly and Riera? Do these two ever have a bad game?

Yesterday is history, today is a gift, tomorrow is mystery

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

TopLeft07 wrote:

Jag wrote:

Just popped in to read the match thread, sigh and shake my head a lot. Never disappoints.

I somehow forgot this in the off season. Must. Stay. Away.

pfft you guys love it really - people either complain about the team or the forum - because complaining is fun!

The only one who doesn't like complaining is Dairyflat, probably cos he is mashed on mushies most of the time

I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

So you guys didn't sigh/make a negative comment at the game when they scored, then?

The match thread is just a permanent transcription of that.

ballane wrote:

valeo wrote:

Junior82 wrote:

6225 or something like that

Gee that's poor..

Kinda gets hard to defend our crouds when it hits that mark for the first game of the season.

Let see some of the clubs that side of the ditch try a 7.00 pm kick off on a Sunday doubt the results would be stunning.

Same old excuses though, isn't it? There is always something on/the time isn't good enough.

Wanderers pulled 14000 on a Thursday. Even CCM pulled 8 (though they did have a better timeslot)

Unfortunately the reality of the situation is that the Wellington sporting public are largely apathetic and we haven't done a whole lot to change that.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

dbl

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

valeo wrote:

Wanderers pulled 14000 on a Thursday.

In a city of (conservatively) 1.5 million... if you compare population sizes we got 23k vs ther population... in the sharktest of timeslots.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Yep and how does 14000  the wanderers got in Sydney stack up against 6000 in Wellington. Not that bad I don't think just don't get why were are continually measured against teams in much larger cities for attendances. May be same old excuses but schedule a game in Gosford on a Sunday at 7.00 and I doubt they would do much better.


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Kyle1502 wrote:

I have to agree with what most people are saying. But I think the McGlinchey critisicm is a bit harsh. Yes he does turn in circles a lot, but when there's 9 white shirts in front of him and only 3 yellow ones I can't really blame him for holding the ball up and not trying a miracle ball. Last season I thought he was one of those players who you notice more when they're not there which to me shows just how important they are.

I thought in terms of the overall game there wasn't a whole lot wrong with the performance, just the lack of finishing, but I have no doubt that keep playing like that then the goals and wins will come. I reckon our away form will be pretty good again this season as opposition teams won't park the bus when they're at home, so there'll be more space to exploit and to work with in the final third. 

His decision making is poor, and he doesn't move the ball quickly enough, which is what is needed of him in that role. There's nothing wrong with turning, but it needs to be productive - Roly's turns invariably opened up space and drove us forward. McGlinchey's literally killed any momentum we had. At least twice in the second half Roly played the ball to McGlinchey centrally in the attacking third, looking for a quick return ball as he was running into undefended space. towards the top of the box. Both times McGlinchey firstly controlled the ball, turned away from Roly, and ended up losing it. Roly was visibly frustrated both times.

Another time he got released on the right hand side of the box, with a defender trailing him - he had two options in the box for an early low cross towards the top of the six yard box, but he went back on his left, then quite literally stopped and stood there, made a pathetic attempt to beat the defender, and I think the whole thing ended up with a throw-in for us. I was literally cringing as I watched it.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Krishna was renowned for having the hardest shot in the ASB so how come he now chooses to take the pen with a patsy side-foot pass to the corner?

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Hard News wrote:

...and laughing... cringing and laughing.

Probably, if I'd had the energy.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

Kyle1502 wrote:

I have to agree with what most people are saying. But I think the McGlinchey critisicm is a bit harsh. Yes he does turn in circles a lot, but when there's 9 white shirts in front of him and only 3 yellow ones I can't really blame him for holding the ball up and not trying a miracle ball. Last season I thought he was one of those players who you notice more when they're not there which to me shows just how important they are.

I thought in terms of the overall game there wasn't a whole lot wrong with the performance, just the lack of finishing, but I have no doubt that keep playing like that then the goals and wins will come. I reckon our away form will be pretty good again this season as opposition teams won't park the bus when they're at home, so there'll be more space to exploit and to work with in the final third. 

His decision making is poor, and he doesn't move the ball quickly enough, which is what is needed of him in that role. There's nothing wrong with turning, but it needs to be productive - Roly's turns invariably opened up space and drove us forward. McGlinchey's literally killed any momentum we had. At least twice in the second half Roly played the ball to McGlinchey centrally in the attacking third, looking for a quick return ball as he was running into undefended space. towards the top of the box. Both times McGlinchey firstly controlled the ball, turned away from Roly, and ended up losing it. Roly was visibly frustrated both times.

Another time he got released on the right hand side of the box, with a defender trailing him - he had two options in the box for an early low cross towards the top of the six yard box, but he went back on his left, then quite literally stopped and stood there, made a pathetic attempt to beat the defender, and I think the whole thing ended up with a throw-in for us. I was literally cringing as I watched it.

Fair points. I can't really remember specific moments like what you've provided. But as I said personally I notice it more when he's not playing, he's an important cog in the team in terms of linking the defense to attack, and he's always getting involved and making sure he's in positions to receive the ball. 
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

In the first half of last season yes.  Since then no.  He receives the ball in good positions but he's completely forgotten how to use it.

His drop in form co-incided with our post Asian Cup meltdown last season and based on yesterday it's still there.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

So. All that time and effort spent on getting Wee Mac from CCM and we should have left him there?


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Robin wrote:

My biggest disappointment (after not winning) last night was the yellow fever. As twelth man they were woeful. My tiny group tried to get things going and some of them gave us the finger. I assume they were taking thier frustration about the game out on us. Part of my disappointmment was that at the home show game they trialled a bunch of new chants that didn't even come out last night. I hope they "bring it" next home game

Was that you lot up the top?

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Almost glad I wasn't able to watch the game last night by the sounds of things.


Apart from all the moaning and groaning were there any standouts apart from Roly and Riera? Do these two ever have a bad game?

I thought Doyle did pretty well for a guy that nearly did not make the cut. Could do better but I did not expect him to do as well as he did, under the circumstances. 

I miss Boxall, and by now I miss Cunnigham.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

Thought McGlinchey and Roly went around incircles so much I thought they would screw themselves into the ground at onepoint.
I thought Fenton was very ineffective with his forward possession.

I was far more worried about our pop gun attack and slow predictable build up going straight at a central brick wall ofdefenders, then I was about defensive inadequacy.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Mainland FC wrote:

Almost glad I wasn't able to watch the game last night by the sounds of things.

Apart from all the moaning and groaning were there any standouts apart from Roly and Riera? Do these two ever have a bad game?

I thought Doyle did pretty well for a guy that nearly did not make the cut. Could do better but I did not expect him to do as well as he did, under the circumstances. 

I miss Boxall, and by now I miss Cunnigham.


I miss Boxall too!

End of an era.  Vinnie - It's over.

If anyone cares for my inane babbling follow @iluvnix17 on the Twitter.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Sometimes we just need someone to have a dig. When we are int he attacking third we look too determined to set something up, and by the time we do the box is full of defenders.

And one of those shots can be the difference between W-D-L

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

yeah we have lots of skill, but not much Berisha-like determination to score

I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

ForteanTimes wrote:

Robin wrote:

My biggest disappointment (after not winning) last night was the yellow fever. As twelth man they were woeful. My tiny group tried to get things going and some of them gave us the finger. I assume they were taking thier frustration about the game out on us. Part of my disappointmment was that at the home show game they trialled a bunch of new chants that didn't even come out last night. I hope they "bring it" next home game

Was that you lot up the top?

That was a good effort geeing up Rows 21-22, definitely had run out of steam .. it did actually prod us into a lusty chant... Ignore the ones who gave you the finger, they were probably just trying to remember how to pull their fingers out of their arses

IMG_0660.jpeg 950.07 KB
Rise up, Wellington!
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

well to day Upon reflection, my comments are that we certainly look good passing the ball backwads and forwards across the ground. Left side to right side and back. That we didn't make any distance with it is open to debate. I felt we needed someone to take charge or responsibility and shoot ffs. What are we waiting for? The perfect opportunity to shoot from 6 yards out? I did not think the jets offered anything in the first half and yet they scored. Their second goal in the second half was the same although it was a much more even half.

Carney is a right Twit. He shoild have gone before the first half finished. He went down quicker than a $2 hooker. Their goalie was crap, if only we had had not a striker playing for us...... wasted and lost opportunities.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

having not seen the game, I'm finding all this "why didn't we shoot?" Talk strange as we had 14 shots,10 of which were within the penalty area. Seems like we shot at goal rather a lot? Quality shots too, rather than low percentage speculators from outside the area. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Tegal wrote:

having not seen the game, I'm finding all this "why didn't we shoot?" Talk strange as we had 14 shots,10 of which were within the penalty area. Seems like we shot at goal rather a lot? Quality shots too, rather than low percentage speculators from outside the area. 

From my (admittedly drunk) memory, we would have a great shot just outside the box, but pass to the side so we could send it across the goal.  But by the time we did that we went from 1 or 2 defenders in the box to half their team there, so when we took a shot after that they were all over us.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Tegal wrote:

having not seen the game, I'm finding all this "why didn't we shoot?" Talk strange as we had 14 shots,10 of which were within the penalty area. Seems like we shot at goal rather a lot? Quality shots too, rather than low percentage speculators from outside the area. 

Not only that, but Ernie's repeatedly stated that he prefers an approach that gets you smaller number of high quality chances, rather than shoot on sight type situation which leads to lots of shots, but many of which are little more than waste of possession. This is how we've played under Ernie, sometimes with success, sometimes not so much. But that's how it is under Ernie, it ain't gonna change while he's the manager.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

The shot (?) from Blake Powell that went past the face of an empty Jets goal (in the first half) was an example of misunderstanding an opportunity, and perhaps lack of individual mettle, rather than bad luck or wayward aiming. To me it seemed he was not sure what to do with the opportunity and was still in two minds even when kicked that ball.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

Tegal wrote:

having not seen the game, I'm finding all this "why didn't we shoot?" Talk strange as we had 14 shots,10 of which were within the penalty area. Seems like we shot at goal rather a lot? Quality shots too, rather than low percentage speculators from outside the area. 

Not only that, but Ernie's repeatedly stated that he prefers an approach that gets you smaller number of high quality chances, rather than shoot on sight type situation which leads to lots of shots, but many of which are little more than waste of possession. This is how we've played under Ernie, sometimes with success, sometimes not so much. But that's how it is under Ernie, it ain't gonna change while he's the manager.

Pretty much. I wouldn't even call 14 shots (10 of which were in the box) a small number of opportunities. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

Mainland FC wrote:

The shot (?) from Blake Powell that went past the face of an empty Jets goal (in the first half) was an example of misunderstanding an opportunity, and perhaps lack of individual mettle, rather than bad luck or wayward aiming. To me it seemed he was not sure what to do with the opportunity and was still in two minds even when kicked that ball.

\

That was our clearest chance of the game (apart from Roly's) - considering he was brought in as a pure goal scorer (if he doesn't finish chances, what is he there for exactly?), you've got to be disappointed he didn't nail it.

I agree with Ernie's mentality surrounding shots from distance - it's okay once in a while, but by and large it will not work out in the long run if you constantly take pot shots from distance.

The fact is, we had far more chances than Newcastle and our build up play was far superior. Unfortunately it either slowed down in the final third, or we crossed the ball to no one half the time.

I was really suprised that Powell started over Appiah. I've liked the progress i've seen from Appiah.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Mainland FC wrote:

The shot (?) from Blake Powell that went past the face of an empty Jets goal (in the first half) was an example of misunderstanding an opportunity, and perhaps lack of individual mettle, rather than bad luck or wayward aiming. To me it seemed he was not sure what to do with the opportunity and was still in two minds even when kicked that ball.

I saw it as more him trying to chip the keeper and it hitting the wrong part of his foot rather than not being sure of what to do. Only saw it at the stadium and on big screen replays though so I could be wrong with that 
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Kyle1502 wrote:

Mainland FC wrote:

The shot (?) from Blake Powell that went past the face of an empty Jets goal (in the first half) was an example of misunderstanding an opportunity, and perhaps lack of individual mettle, rather than bad luck or wayward aiming. To me it seemed he was not sure what to do with the opportunity and was still in two minds even when kicked that ball.

I saw it as more him trying to chip the keeper and it hitting the wrong part of his foot rather than not being sure of what to do. Only saw it at the stadium and on big screen replays though so I could be wrong with that 

He should have done better, at the stadium I thought he may have hit the far upright. The ball did bobble a bit before he hit it, probably the most uneven Westpac I have seen for a while.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Tegal wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Tegal wrote:

having not seen the game, I'm finding all this "why didn't we shoot?" Talk strange as we had 14 shots,10 of which were within the penalty area. Seems like we shot at goal rather a lot? Quality shots too, rather than low percentage speculators from outside the area. 

Not only that, but Ernie's repeatedly stated that he prefers an approach that gets you smaller number of high quality chances, rather than shoot on sight type situation which leads to lots of shots, but many of which are little more than waste of possession. This is how we've played under Ernie, sometimes with success, sometimes not so much. But that's how it is under Ernie, it ain't gonna change while he's the manager.

Pretty much. I wouldn't even call 14 shots (10 of which were in the box) a small number of opportunities. 

Ernie undermined that with a statistics I can't remembered the exact data but it said something about the line that for shooting inside the box you have three times more the chance to score than from outside. So we are getting enough chances, but our converting range is off. Other teams having the same problem Germany (v Georgia) had 28 attempts (inclusive blocked shots) to get 2 goals this morning. There is hope.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Tegal wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Tegal wrote:

having not seen the game, I'm finding all this "why didn't we shoot?" Talk strange as we had 14 shots,10 of which were within the penalty area. Seems like we shot at goal rather a lot? Quality shots too, rather than low percentage speculators from outside the area. 

Not only that, but Ernie's repeatedly stated that he prefers an approach that gets you smaller number of high quality chances, rather than shoot on sight type situation which leads to lots of shots, but many of which are little more than waste of possession. This is how we've played under Ernie, sometimes with success, sometimes not so much. But that's how it is under Ernie, it ain't gonna change while he's the manager.

Pretty much. I wouldn't even call 14 shots (10 of which were in the box) a small number of opportunities. 

I wouldn't either, which is why the complaints are all the more surprising.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Mainland FC wrote:

Almost glad I wasn't able to watch the game last night by the sounds of things.


Apart from all the moaning and groaning were there any standouts apart from Roly and Riera? Do these two ever have a bad game?

I thought Doyle did pretty well for a guy that nearly did not make the cut. Could do better but I did not expect him to do as well as he did, under the circumstances. 

I miss Boxall, and by now I miss Cunnigham.

 A Doyle theory: He was great last pre-season and had a poor season. This year he had an average pre-season and will have a barn-stormer of a season.



Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

that is one shot for every 4 minutes of possession. 

Newcastle had one shot for every 5.5 minutes of possession. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink