Just a thought on the VAR. Sorry if it's a bit off topic, but is surely relevant to us based on what occurred this evening.
If the VAR is in place to correct and overturn clear and obvious errors from on field, then shouldn't those in the hot seat be only limited to one, normal speed, look at any incident in question? This should apply to the ref reviewing any incidents on the sidelines too.
My reasoning for this would be that the guy in charge only gets one look at any initial incident. For mine, It's not exactly a clear and obvious error if you have to look at several different camera angles, slow motion replays, & zooming in for close ups in order to make a decision that should be, well, 'clear and obvious' upon first sight. I don't know, maybe I'm just being too rational? Would love to get a few thoughts on this though.
Exactly right!
