All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams

AWs v Jamaica Mt Smart Feb 29th 7:30pm

817 replies · 46,228 views
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
2ndBest wrote:
Thank f**k we are locking in Keat before he plays for the US.
I'm waiting for the 'Where's Daniel and Lia' calls to start.
 
Thats a very strong team. Other than the Elliott and Moss injuries, you have to argue that he has picked the strongest squad available. Fallon might have a whinge but is he setting the Scottish Premier League alight? Probably form was against him...
 
 
Well it's two of either Killen, Wood and Fallon and it's pretty easy to cut Fallon out of that.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
A-League players: 9 (inc. 5 Nix)
England: 4
US: 2
NZFC: 1
Other: 2 (Kosta and Killen)

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The other two MLS players Boyens and Boxall will de disappointed.  
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
George Kostanza wrote:
The other two MLS players Boyens and Boxall will de disappointed.  
Boyens has never showed much class for the All Whites other than against Wales. Maybe Boxall, but looking at the squad we've picked, I can't see who we would drop for him ..other than Ivan Vicelich.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Pretty happy with that. Only thing I really disagree with is Vicelich over Boxall although his lack of gametime probably counted against him. Don't recall ever seeing Keat play so looking forward to see if he can fill the glaring hole we have in the middle of the field. I though Tommy Smith came out publicly saying he wanted to skip this, I would have let him as we have plenty of cover at the back and it would be a good opportunity to try something different. But is also good to see Ricki is taking this game seriously.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Given that squad here's the lineup I'd like to see:


                                 Gleeson

SigmUnd            Reid           Nelsen         Lochhead

              Vicelich                          Keat

                             McGlinchey

       Smeltz                Wood              Barbarouses


In my imagination the front three can swap places around to confuse defenders and create more width if need be. Keat gets a chance to show what he's got and whether he can play as a holding midfielder, with Vicelich beside him to take a bit of pressure off. Gleeson to start to get experience in a friendly game so he doesn't get thrown in the deep end in a competitive game due to injury or suspension later. Siggy at right back just because his form has been so good this season he deserves a start, and there's no natural RB in the squad (of course that probably means Ricki's planning on playing 3 at the back, but this is what I want to see)

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Given that squad here's the lineup I'd like to see:


                                 Gleeson

SigmUnd            Reid           Nelsen         Lochhead

              Vicelich                          Keat

                             McGlinchey

       Smeltz                Wood              Barbarouses


In my imagination the front three can swap places around to confuse defenders and create more width if need be. Keat gets a chance to show what he's got and whether he can play as a holding midfielder, with Vicelich beside him to take a bit of pressure off. Gleeson to start to get experience in a friendly game so he doesn't get thrown in the deep end in a competitive game due to injury or suspension later. Siggy at right back just because his form has been so good this season he deserves a start, and there's no natural RB in the squad (of course that probably means Ricki's planning on playing 3 at the back, but this is what I want to see)
I still think Ricki will go with Paston for this game. I don't want to see SigmUnd at right back against the 11x100m Jamaican relay team.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
                 Paston
         Reid Nelsen Smith

    Leo Vicelich  Brown Lochy

               McGlinchey

              Smeltz Wood
Not necessarily my pick, but would think Ricki will go for something like that

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:
                 Paston
         Reid Nelsen Smith

    Leo Vicelich  Brown Lochy

               McGlinchey

              Smeltz WoodNot necessarily my pick, but would think Ricki will go for something like that

 

Probably right, but I really hope not. Having a back 3 means you need fast fit wingbacks to provide attacking width AND cover the defence. Bertos and Lochhead can't quite manage that so they just end up pinned back in thier own half and our attacks deteriorate into long balls up the middle. Ok against much better teams to try and absorb pressure and snatch goal, but vs the likes of Jamaica at home I would hope that we would play with a back 4 so our attacks can be more multi-dimensional

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
You also have to question whether the 3-4-3 is the best formation to use in the oceania matches. I got the impression it was mainly used against superior teams to try and circumvent our problems with transitioning the ball through the midfield while trying to take advantage of the height of our strikers.
 
Against the oceania teams though, I think it just invites attacks down the flanks too much and stretches our wide midfielders. It worked pretty well but I don't think we should get locked into it.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Also, pretty much every club side plays with a back 4 so players are used to what those roles require. A back 3 requires slightly different positioning from the central defenders which might not come intuitively to them if they have been playing in a back 4 week in week out, and this can create confusion in the backline. Not saying that this is a huge issue but playing as the left or right central defender in a back 3 is different to playing as one of a central defensive partnership in a back 4, or as a fullback for that matter. By the same token goalkeepers are used to organising a back 4 not a back 3. If the AWs played more often this might not be an issue as players could adjust to it but it seems like an unnecessary burden to place on a squad which only gets a few days together before a game. Play a back 4 and everyone is familiar with their role before they even turn up.

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
rjmiller wrote:
Pretty happy with that. Only thing I really disagree with is Vicelich over Boxall although his lack of gametime probably counted against him. Don't recall ever seeing Keat play so looking forward to see if he can fill the glaring hole we have in the middle of the field. I though Tommy Smith came out publicly saying he wanted to skip this, I would have let him as we have plenty of cover at the back and it would be a good opportunity to try something different. But is also good to see Ricki is taking this game seriously.
he was talking about Olympic qualifiers.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
2ndBest wrote:
rjmiller wrote:
Pretty happy with that. Only thing I really disagree with is Vicelich over Boxall although his lack of gametime probably counted against him. Don't recall ever seeing Keat play so looking forward to see if he can fill the glaring hole we have in the middle of the field. I though Tommy Smith came out publicly saying he wanted to skip this, I would have let him as we have plenty of cover at the back and it would be a good opportunity to try something different. But is also good to see Ricki is taking this game seriously.
he was talking about Olympic qualifiers.
I'm pretty sure it was this game. Soon after he got back into the starting lineup talking about how Ipshwich is his day job blah blah. It's understandable particularly being off contract soon. However couldn't find the article with the quote in it and did find this from Chris Wood...
 
"We've got a good base of players now. There's over 30 of us at clubs around the world now and there seems to be more and more coming through from New Zealand age group teams. I was speaking to Tommy Smith and Jeremy Brockie recently and we're all waiting and hoping for that call up for the Jamaica match.''
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
2ndBest wrote:
Thank f**k we are locking in Keat before he plays for the US.


Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
rjmiller wrote:
Pretty happy with that. Only thing I really disagree with is Vicelich over Boxall although his lack of gametime probably counted against him. Don't recall ever seeing Keat play so looking forward to see if he can fill the glaring hole we have in the middle of the field. I though Tommy Smith came out publicly saying�he wanted to skip this, I would have let him as we have�plenty of�cover at the back and it would be a good opportunity to try something different. But is also good to see Ricki is taking this game seriously.


I think it was the Olympic qualifiers he said he wanted to miss (which is fair enough as they are not in FIFA window.)

Edit: sorry 2B, you beat me to it. Although it looks like it may need some reinforcing anyway

Edit Again - proof: tommy smith happy to hold off olympic dream to help ipswich

In that article he also says "�We have got a friendly with the All Whites first team on February 29 (against Jamaica) and I hope to be selected."aitkenmike2012-02-09 12:19:37
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I posted this in the Ryan Nelson link, but probably really belongs here . . .

Bit worried now that Capello has gone from the England coaching role, and that 'Arry has been cleared of tax evasion and is being tipped as a possible England Coach, that things could get a bit tricky for Ryan.

Much as i would love him to come back for the Jamaica game, I wonder whether it might be best for him to stay and try and cement a role in the Spurs squad?
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
3-4-3 doesn't need to be defensive

against honduras and paraguay ricki opened things up a bit by playing bertos and brockie as wide midfielders as opposed to the wing backs that were deployed at the world cup

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Luis Garcia wrote:
George Kostanza wrote:
The other two MLS players Boyens and Boxall will de disappointed.  
Boyens has never showed much class for the All Whites other than against Wales. Maybe Boxall, but looking at the squad we've picked, I can't see who we would drop for him ..other than Ivan Vicelich.
This. Boyens made his All Whites name off that one game against Wales. Other times, he has been a liability in an NZ shirt. Boxall for Vicelich would be the only one but I think when you look he is bringing back, he's picked his strongest team.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Given that squad here's the lineup I'd like to see:


                                 Gleeson

SigmUnd            Reid           Nelsen         Lochhead

<snip> 
Reid at RB and SigmUnd in the middle. Reid has far better ball skills than SigmUnd.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:
                 Paston
         Reid Nelsen Smith

    Leo Vicelich  Brown Lochy

               McGlinchey

              Smeltz Wood
Not necessarily my pick, but would think Ricki will go for something like that

I still do not like this concept of using a winger and defender as a wing back. Leave Leo forward and leave Lochhead back because those roles are not their natural game.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I am not a fan either, but it has brought sucess and it is Ricki we are talking about
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It depends if Ricki goes with a 4-4-2 or a 3-4-3 or 4-3-3. I think based on what he has, the 4-4-2 is a better fit
                4-4-2
               Paston
Reid SigmUnd Nelsen Smith
McGlinchy Brown Vicielich ?
          Wood Smeltz
 
              3-4-3
WC line up with Wood for Fallon? as much as I don't like that...
 
               4-3-3
               Paston
Reid SigmUnd Nelsen Smith
          Vicelich Brown
            McGlinchy
     Wood Killen Smeltz

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
It depends if Ricki goes with a 4-4-2 or a 3-4-3 or 4-3-3. I think based on what he has, the 4-4-2 is a better fit
                4-4-2
               Paston
Reid SigmUnd Nelsen Smith
McGlinchy Brown Vicielich ?
          Wood Smeltz
 
              3-4-3
WC line up with Wood for Fallon? as much as I don't like that...
 
               4-3-3
               Paston
Reid SigmUnd Nelsen Smith
          Vicelich Brown
            McGlinchy
     Wood Killen Smeltz
 
Sort of like that but really leaves us with NOTHING  CREATIVE OUTSIDE OF WEE mAC.
 
Would have either Kost or Marco, probably Marco in place of Killen
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
reg22 wrote:

aitkenmike wrote:
2ndBest wrote:
Thank f**k we are locking in Keat before he plays for the US.


someone please explain!


Dates back to heated discussions trying to explain to people that friendlies don't 'lock' players into playing for that country.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Challenge is how to fit creative midfielders into a defensive lineup.....can say Kosta or Marco be left out till its to late to recover from a deficicit?.  If ts its 4-3-3 I would leave out Killen.

A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Was Daniel Lins really available for selection vs jamaica? Because he only signed for the phoenix in May 2007 so I am not sure that he reached the 5 years residency required by the FIFA...

Daniel is also off contract at the end of the season and, after a long stint as a specialist benchwarmer, the 32-year-old seems to have a new lease of life playing alongside Sanchez.

The left-footed midfielder is one of five survivors from the inaugural Phoenix season in 2007-08, along with Mark Paston, Tony Lochhead, Tim Brown and Vince Lia, and, already a New Zealand passport holder, becomes eligible to play for the All Whites next month.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
It depends if Ricki goes with a 4-4-2 or a 3-4-3 or 4-3-3. I think based on what he has, the 4-4-2 is a better fit
                4-4-2
               Paston
Reid SigmUnd Nelsen Smith
McGlinchy Brown Vicielich ?
          Wood Smeltz
 
              3-4-3
WC line up with Wood for Fallon? as much as I don't like that...
 
               4-3-3
               Paston
Reid SigmUnd Nelsen Smith
          Vicelich Brown
            McGlinchy
     Wood Killen Smeltz
Sort of like that but really leaves us with NOTHING  CREATIVE OUTSIDE OF WEE mAC.
 
Would have either Kost or Marco, probably Marco in place of Killen
Agree, thats why I think the 4-4-2 works better and you can put someone on the left. McGlinchy plays on the right for CCM but if you use Vicelich and Brown as anchors, then him and whomever is on the left can roam a little. The obvious one is Rojas I think but I'm not 100% on that either.
Jeff Vader2012-02-09 14:48:06

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
sthn.jeff wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
It depends if Ricki goes with a 4-4-2 or a 3-4-3 or 4-3-3. I think based on what he has, the 4-4-2 is a better fit
                4-4-2
               Paston
Reid SigmUnd Nelsen Smith
McGlinchy Brown Vicielich ?
          Wood Smeltz
 
              3-4-3
WC line up with Wood for Fallon? as much as I don't like that...
 
               4-3-3
               Paston
Reid SigmUnd Nelsen Smith
          Vicelich Brown
            McGlinchy
     Wood Killen Smeltz
Agree, thats why I think the 4-4-2 works better and you can put someone on the left. McGlinchy plays on the right for CCM but if you use Vicelich and Brown as anchors, then him and whomever is on the left can roam a little. The obvious one is Rojas I think but I'm not 100% on that either.
Sort of like that but really leaves us with NOTHING  CREATIVE OUTSIDE OF WEE mAC.
 
Would have either Kost or Marco, probably Marco in place of Killen
 
At least Marco will be fresh, would bring all that knowledge playing training with top class players old has beens at fantastic training facilities.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Very impressed with that squad...now if only we can uncover a handy right back thats convieniently been eligible to play for the AWs all along....


Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Highly unlikely Abris. Traunmeuller however...
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
             Paston
               1
Reid    Nelsen   SigmUnd    Smith
   4           6          2           18
               Brown
Bertos          8             Brockie
   7          McGlinchey        11   
                    14
       Wood     Smeltz
        13            9
12 Gleeson
5 Vicelich
3 Lochhead
16 Keat
15 Rojas
17 Barbarouses
10 Killen

I'd like to see something like this, with lots of time for Keat, Marco and Kosta. Second half to Gleeson perhaps.Oska2012-02-09 16:49:37
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ricki sticks with what works, and for him and NZ thats three at the back.
 
Which will be a shame as it will probaly mean a couple of our younger players being on the bench and not starting.
 
                    Paston
         Reid    Nelsen   SigmUnd (shouldn't start - great for NIX, but League is not the strongest)
 
Brockie   Brown      Keat         Lochead
 
                       McG
 
                Wood Smeltz
 
Although i suspect Vicelich will get ahead of Keat.
 
I would love to see the following though...
 
                           Gleeson
Brockie           Reid         Nelsen         Smith
 
Marcos           Keat         McG             Barbs
 
                      Wood       Smeltz
 
A nice young attacking team (except Nelsen, Smeltz). But Brown will start and probaly SigmUnd as well.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
no way we should be playing jeremy brockie at right back.


Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Starting XI:
                         Gleeson
        SigmUnd, Reid, Nelsen, Smith
            Brown, McGlinchey, Brockie
                            Rojas
                      Wood, Smeltz

Subs:
Paston
Lochhead
Vicelich
Bertos
Keat*
Barbarouses*
Killen*

*These substitutes should get some good game time, especially Keat. The others should get a run out too even if just the last 15-20 mins.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
tripvincent wrote:
no way we should be playing jeremy brockie at right back.

This

What rationale is there for playing an A League striker at RB?????

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Oska wrote:
              Paston
               1
Reid    Nelsen   SigmUnd    Smith
   4           6          2           18
               Brown
Bertos          8             Brockie
   7          McGlinchey        11   
                    14
       Wood     Smeltz
        13            9
12 Gleeson
5 Vicelich
3 Lochhead
16 Keat
15 Rojas
17 Barbarouses
10 Killen

I'd like to see something like this, with lots of time for Keat, Marco and Kosta. Second half to Gleeson perhaps.

This is probably closest. If we are going to play with a psuedo-DM in Brown, you've got to cover that with Nelsen and SigmUnd in the middle to allow for an attacking front sector. The widemen roles are probably the only real spots up for debate. I think if it's Brockie, he is on the right. I think Rojas is on the left purely cause he can play both wings where as none of the others can. Leo did at one point play the maverick role but those days are gone.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
tripvincent wrote:
no way we should be playing jeremy brockie at right back.

This

What rationale is there for playing an A League striker at RB?????


Quite right, there isnt. He has played his way in by being up front, needs to be further up.


Permalink Permalink