Not sure of this being discussed elsewhere, but the quality of this morning's coverage was poor ...
- narrow screen (I got a couple of blue lines down the side on my Telly)
- poorly directed in terms of camera angles, replays etc
- poor commentary. Lot's of talk (too much), but very poor in supporting the flow of the game. And also very negative - Dewhurst was critiquing the game and players mistakes etc far too much (which follows I guess given his normal role)
- really poor sound. The crowd sound was muffled (as well as some constant prayer action in the background it seemed), and not really integrated with the commentary.
This leads to a couple of questions?
- was Dewhurst actually at the ground? Given that Harry Ngata was doing comments, it suggests not (I also cant; remember him commenting on anything out of shot).
- When Australia played there, did they have to put up with such a poor job? Maybe our Australian 'correspondents' could comment.
Maybe in this country we should just be thankful that we get such "soccer" games at all!
Correct on these two. The last All Whites game was in the 4:3 format as well for some reason?
I don't think the commentators were there to be honest. Commentary was a bit loud for the crowd noise.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone