English (and other British lower league) Football Discussion

Manchester United

4644 replies · 870,800 views
about 8 years ago

20 Legend wrote:

All this harp about Rashford getting so much game time except he spends it all in the wrong position. Rashford would be as highly rated as Mbappe if he were playing as a striker for Monaco in the french league but he isn't, he's out of form and molding into average-ness because Mourinho has decided he's a winger.

In my opinion, Martial is one of the best dribblers on earth but he needs to be through his highs and lows, and he needs to be put in situations where there aren't 5 defenders around him. We haven't seen this since LVG.

I disagree that Herrera has been playing poorly. The few games he has played this year that I recall he again, did his job.

Don't buy into this story the Mou is playing youth either. Take Gomes for example, sure he had a kick around but his chance of actually starting a game in his best position (CAM) is non-existent. Guaranteed if Mou sticks with us for a couple of years Gomes' only game time is on the wing and he too slips towards mediocrity.

McTominay is the exemption.

I'm not criticising Mourinho's performance. Meerly pointing out that from an individual players point of view the grass will be looking greener and greener on the other side.

The fact is Rashford is out of form. If Martial had another brain it would be lonely. His passing is poor and  so is his decision making.

Herrera's form has dropped but I would play him next to Matic and let Pobga push on.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago · edited about 8 years ago · History

Leggy wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Leggy wrote:

paulm wrote:

That Mctominay kid looked quite decent in the short period I saw him playing the other week. 

Those are pretty good indicators I guess. Will be interesting to see how it plays out. The rest of this season is pretty crucial to Mourinho's career at ManU I would think. 

You guys are constantly referring to his position in the league as a sign of progress, it's key he stays there really. If you end up 5th, or perhaps even 3rd/4th, and win no trophies, then it wouldn't look much like progress. 

Still, perhaps finishing above us would be enough, no one has done it since Ferguson ;)

Finishing above you would not necessarily win us anything, but we have won 3 trophies in the last couple of years-- one being a European one.:)

Careful - you'll start to sound like an Arsenal fan if you're celebrating minor cup wins!

So winning the Europa is minor?

If it was not for that we would not be in the CL

More a jab at Arsenal fans than us mate, just a joke.

Valley FC til I die?

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

I see that there was a meeting between the Supporters' Trust and The Club on how to create  game atmosphere at Old Trafford.

75k attend and they cannot create vibe.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

The modern game. 

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

whatever wrote:

I see that there was a meeting between the Supporters' Trust and The Club on how to create  game atmosphere at Old Trafford.

75k attend and they cannot create vibe.

Virtually all top clubs suffer from this. The Emirates is like a morgue on matchdays 90% of the time.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago · edited about 8 years ago · History

Yep a sad truth.

Luckily the solutions are simple:

- Standing areas

- Relaxed alcohol laws

- Most important, cheaper match day tickets

It baffles me clubs like United need to suck ticket revenue stream dry when it's a fairly small percentage of the revenue. I would take the position the cheaper tickets lead to a better atmosphere (as seen in German leagues) and a better product of football.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

So they lost to Newcastle because their fans made so much noise and put Man U off their game.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago · edited about 8 years ago · History

Offside apparently:

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Luckily it didn't cost us. Job done by United. Next.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Regardless of whether we win this or not - what on earth is Mourinho doing starting Young at LB again? And finally plays a 3 man midfield to suit Pogba, but leaves Pogba on the bench!

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

David de Gea is the best keeper I've ever seen. Ridiculous.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Groff wrote:

David de Gea is the best keeper I've ever seen. Ridiculous.

Anyone who continues to argue there is a better 'keeper in the world right now is completely bonkers and/or biased. 

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

De Gea is just ridiculous. I'd have to say I agree, best keeper in the world. 

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Groff wrote:

David de Gea is the best keeper I've ever seen. Ridiculous.

He should have caught it.. absolutely no excuse for conceding a corner ;-) 

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Theoretically, what would a goal keeper have to do in order to be talked about in the same sentence as some of the greats?

De Gea consistently influences games far beyond most keepers. I honestly believe De Gea is worth a goal a game, if a striker scored 1 goal a game....

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

His only weakness is his kicking. 

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Jose demanding a lot from his players in a tactical sense now at the crunch time of the season. Perhaps why Mata, McTominay and Young have been playing. And Rashford, Pogba, Martial are not. At the same time, a lot of big games to play and rotation is necessary

Pogba looked good when he came on but i can see Jose trying to play all these big away games in a way that puts the onus on the home team to try and win. And then when the home team takes thosr additional risks, he has the likes of Rashford, Lingard, Martial, Sanchez to make use of the extra space. 

Makes sense when you can defend properly before that happens. But looks silly when the home team scores and then United has to make things happen without there being extra space. 

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

20 Legend wrote:

Theoretically, what would a goal keeper have to do in order to be talked about in the same sentence as some of the greats?

De Gea consistently influences games far beyond most keepers. I honestly believe De Gea is worth a goal a game, if a striker scored 1 goal a game....

Are you talking about great keepers, or great players?

Keepers will never get the recognition of a striker, or any attack-minded player for that matter. That's the way football is. Probably for the best as we like to see and encourage open attacking football.

IMO as a goalkeeper someone like De Gea has every right to stake his claim for a Ballon d'Or. Won't ever happen though, unless he turns into Chilavert and starts scoring penos and free kicks.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Tekkers wrote:

Jose demanding a lot from his players in a tactical sense now at the crunch time of the season. Perhaps why Mata, McTominay and Young have been playing. And Rashford, Pogba, Martial are not. At the same time, a lot of big games to play and rotation is necessary

Pogba looked good when he came on but i can see Jose trying to play all these big away games in a way that puts the onus on the home team to try and win. And then when the home team takes thosr additional risks, he has the likes of Rashford, Lingard, Martial, Sanchez to make use of the extra space. 

Makes sense when you can defend properly before that happens. But looks silly when the home team scores and then United has to make things happen without there being extra space. 

Not sure rotation has been the thought at all with his selections. Rashford has started 2 games this year, both in the FA Cup, so fairly clear he's just not in Jose's first XI, he's a bench player getting time in the domestic cups. 

Looked to me like Pogba was dropped this morning, and that something is going on between him and Jose. In any case it backfired pretty spectacularly with Herrera getting injured so quickly. 

Giving up that many shots to a side you should be a lot better than is a real problem. Basically if not for De Gea you would've copped a hiding this morning. 

I would be worried, but as we know, things change quickly. Beat Chelsea and then put a couple of goals on Sevilla at home and all will be rosy again.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Buffon II wrote:

20 Legend wrote:

Theoretically, what would a goal keeper have to do in order to be talked about in the same sentence as some of the greats?

De Gea consistently influences games far beyond most keepers. I honestly believe De Gea is worth a goal a game, if a striker scored 1 goal a game....

Are you talking about great keepers, or great players?

Keepers will never get the recognition of a striker, or any attack-minded player for that matter. That's the way football is. Probably for the best as we like to see and encourage open attacking football.

IMO as a goalkeeper someone like De Gea has every right to stake his claim for a Ballon d'Or. Won't ever happen though, unless he turns into Chilavert and starts scoring penos and free kicks.

I think that great saves are a false sign of a great keeper sometimes. Whereas a striker/midfielder can be judged no only on his passes and shots, but also on they was they were assisted, a keeper can make some great saves but maybe the chance created was their fault.

Too few keepers are generals at the back (Liverpool are terrible in this respect) - sure, they can block a short or make the odd "world class" save but a lack of controlling their defenders and reading the game contributes to the shot being made in the first place.

"...sure beats doin' stuff."

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

LeighboNZ wrote:

Buffon II wrote:

20 Legend wrote:

Theoretically, what would a goal keeper have to do in order to be talked about in the same sentence as some of the greats?

De Gea consistently influences games far beyond most keepers. I honestly believe De Gea is worth a goal a game, if a striker scored 1 goal a game....

Are you talking about great keepers, or great players?

Keepers will never get the recognition of a striker, or any attack-minded player for that matter. That's the way football is. Probably for the best as we like to see and encourage open attacking football.

IMO as a goalkeeper someone like De Gea has every right to stake his claim for a Ballon d'Or. Won't ever happen though, unless he turns into Chilavert and starts scoring penos and free kicks.

I think that great saves are a false sign of a great keeper sometimes. Whereas a striker/midfielder can be judged no only on his passes and shots, but also on they was they were assisted, a keeper can make some great saves but maybe the chance created was their fault.

Too few keepers are generals at the back (Liverpool are terrible in this respect) - sure, they can block a short or make the odd "world class" save but a lack of controlling their defenders and reading the game contributes to the shot being made in the first place.

Yeah I think most on here realise that too mate. I certainly don't think that's the case with de Gea.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

LeighboNZ wrote:

I think that great saves are a false sign of a great keeper sometimes. Whereas a striker/midfielder can be judged no only on his passes and shots, but also on they was they were assisted, a keeper can make some great saves but maybe the chance created was their fault.

Too few keepers are generals at the back (Liverpool are terrible in this respect) - sure, they can block a short or make the odd "world class" save but a lack of controlling their defenders and reading the game contributes to the shot being made in the first place.

I completely agree but there's no point sticking Messi upfront by himself and asking him to bring down long balls. If a goalkeeper is as good as De Gea is but his weakness is being a general then you get in a defensive set up to make up for it. (I don't really buy into this general stuff at the professional level - plenty of teams out there where a goalkeeper screaming at defenders isn't a good thing).

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Saw this tweet just before:

"United may well get through to CL QF but they feel like a team going backwards not forwards at the moment. There’s just not a great deal to like. It’s joyless football. It’s not ultra defensive, it’s just a strange sort of inertia, a nothingness. Just all very underwhelming."

Pretty much agree.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Martial wrote:

Groff wrote:

David de Gea is the best keeper I've ever seen. Ridiculous.

Anyone who continues to argue there is a better 'keeper in the world right now is completely bonkers and/or biased. 

Keegan Smith



Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Only saw the second half, happy with the result. We looked lively until we scored the 2nd goal. Happy with the performance up until that, not happy with sitting in after that point. I reckon a couple more goals were on the cards (especially after Hazard was subbed)

Also fair play to Mourinho, Scott McTominay looks like a real player.

On the disallowed goal - seems to be he was onside. But, the only shots I have seen show a United player blocking the ball player. You can't really judge if he's on or off if you can't see the ball coming off the foot. And since we are now measuring offside in millimetres, the timing is extremely important. (You can't see "it's close enough" about the ball coming off the foot, say he onside by an inch)

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

20 Legend wrote:

Only saw the second half, happy with the result. We looked lively until we scored the 2nd goal. Happy with the performance up until that, not happy with sitting in after that point. I reckon a couple more goals were on the cards (especially after Hazard was subbed)

Also fair play to Mourinho, Scott McTominay looks like a real player.

On the disallowed goal - seems to be he was onside. But, the only shots I have seen show a United player blocking the ball player. You can't really judge if he's on or off if you can't see the ball coming off the foot. And since we are now measuring offside in millimetres, the timing is extremely important. (You can't see "it's close enough" about the ball coming off the foot, say he onside by an inch)

Yep, great to see McTominay getting a real go. He does the Carrick role, nothing flash but keeps the play ticking over. That's all that's required next to Pogba and with the safety of Matic in behind. Hopefully in a few years we will have a completely home grown spine to our midfield (Pogba (homegrown), McTominay, Timbo, Gomes).

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Martial wrote:

20 Legend wrote:

Only saw the second half, happy with the result. We looked lively until we scored the 2nd goal. Happy with the performance up until that, not happy with sitting in after that point. I reckon a couple more goals were on the cards (especially after Hazard was subbed)

Also fair play to Mourinho, Scott McTominay looks like a real player.

On the disallowed goal - seems to be he was onside. But, the only shots I have seen show a United player blocking the ball player. You can't really judge if he's on or off if you can't see the ball coming off the foot. And since we are now measuring offside in millimetres, the timing is extremely important. (You can't see "it's close enough" about the ball coming off the foot, say he onside by an inch)

Yep, great to see McTominay getting a real go. He does the Carrick role, nothing flash but keeps the play ticking over. That's all that's required next to Pogba and with the safety of Matic in behind. Hopefully in a few years we will have a completely home grown spine to our midfield (Pogba (homegrown), McTominay, Timbo, Gomes).

Yea everyone is wanting a Carrick replacement but United tends to bring players through so glad they can with McTominay. TFM can also be that rock in midfield. Gomes might have to be a bit like Lingard and develop from 23/24 as he is a bit slight in build. Got the skills though. 

Good to see that there was a bit more energy from the team today. I would hope this continues for the rest of the season because 2nd and semifinals in CL would be pretty good. As long as we don't lose to a English team, I will be pleased. 

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Fckn phew!

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Cracker from Matic

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

From all accounts a very poor first half performance but pleasing to see we've still got the aptitude to turn games around like that and come back. Some goal from Matic!

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Arh, bein missed the first goal.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

We've absolutely fudgeing done the whiney pricks. No shots on target in the second half. The "mighty" front 3 absolutely nullified.

Rashford needs to play more. What a shame he doesn't get to play centre forward.

Salt incoming!

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Yup, Salah gave the ball away double the times of anyone else on the pitch. We even had to bloody score their goal for them. Masterclass from Jose there, can't wait for Wednesday.

Valley FC til I die?

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Nelfoos wrote:

Yup, Salah gave the ball away double the times of anyone else on the pitch. 

Really?

Quite some feat when Alexis Sanchez is on the pitch!

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

I want to mention the penalty shouts...

1. Valencia's handball is never deliberate, not a penalty.

2. When you watch Fellaini and Mane at full speed, it's pretty clear Fellaini gets in front of Mane. When you slow it down it looks more like Fellaini trips Mane except it isn't, because Mane never has the ball. In reality Mane actually kicks Fellaini.

3. Young grappling with Salah is never a penalty. For starters, they're both holding each other. Otherwise that sort of contact happens everywhere across a football pitch. If that was a free kick in the middle of the park commentators would say it was soft. The fact Salah and Milner don't complain is telling.

When I saw them live I initially thought similar but I waited until I watched a review Sunday evening to post this - I honestly think the ref got those 3 100% correct. They're not even 50/50 decisions. In fact I will go as far to say that the ref had a good game. Liverpool fans (and pundits/Souness) are just whining. Mind you Carragher agreed with everything above.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

paulm wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Yup, Salah gave the ball away double the times of anyone else on the pitch. 

Really?

Quite some feat when Alexis Sanchez is on the pitch!

I saw a stat that Salah had 8 and the next highest was 3

Valley FC til I die?

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago · edited about 8 years ago · History

Nelfoos wrote:

paulm wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Yup, Salah gave the ball away double the times of anyone else on the pitch. 

Really?

Quite some feat when Alexis Sanchez is on the pitch!

I saw a stat that Salah had 8 and the next highest was 3

Either the wrong term being used, or you're not looking at the right stats. That's a correct number in terms of dispossessions i.e. losing the ball when dribbling, but if we're talking actually giving the ball away, then that includes passing it away too, and Sanchez is the king of that. 

And the stats show that he was at it again, with a 57% pass accuracy rating, meaning he passed the ball away 12 times, so that's 13 times he gave it away, versus Salah's 12. 

That's actually very low for Sanchez, he usually gives it away at least twice that much in games, but he didn't get the ball very much at the weekend, by his usual standards. 

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

paulm wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

paulm wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Yup, Salah gave the ball away double the times of anyone else on the pitch. 

Really?

Quite some feat when Alexis Sanchez is on the pitch!

I saw a stat that Salah had 8 and the next highest was 3

Either the wrong term being used, or you're not looking at the right stats. That's a correct number in terms of dispossessions i.e. losing the ball when dribbling, but if we're talking actually giving the ball away, then that includes passing it away too, and Sanchez is the king of that. 

And the stats show that he was at it again, with a 57% pass accuracy rating, meaning he passed the ball away 12 times, so that's 13 times he gave it away, versus Salah's 12. 

That's actually very low for Sanchez, he usually gives it away at least twice that much in games, but he didn't get the ball very much at the weekend, by his usual standards. 

Ah fair enough. Either way, Salah did absolutely nothing all game. I don't mind passing the ball away, it just depends what kind of passes aren't going to feet - are they ambitious final balls or passes back to his fullback? Makes a big difference and is part of the reason football stats are usually ass.

Valley FC til I die?

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago · edited about 8 years ago · History

paulm wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

paulm wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Yup, Salah gave the ball away double the times of anyone else on the pitch. 

Really?

Quite some feat when Alexis Sanchez is on the pitch!

I saw a stat that Salah had 8 and the next highest was 3

Either the wrong term being used, or you're not looking at the right stats. That's a correct number in terms of dispossessions i.e. losing the ball when dribbling, but if we're talking actually giving the ball away, then that includes passing it away too, and Sanchez is the king of that. 

And the stats show that he was at it again, with a 57% pass accuracy rating, meaning he passed the ball away 12 times, so that's 13 times he gave it away, versus Salah's 12. 

That's actually very low for Sanchez, he usually gives it away at least twice that much in games, but he didn't get the ball very much at the weekend, by his usual standards. 

To be fair, on Saturday he created an absolute golden opportunity for Mata (should have had an assist) and a fair wack of those times he lost the ball was probably in the last 20 minutes where he had no support / everyone was playing hopeful balls.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Nelfoos wrote:

paulm wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

paulm wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Yup, Salah gave the ball away double the times of anyone else on the pitch. 

Really?

Quite some feat when Alexis Sanchez is on the pitch!

I saw a stat that Salah had 8 and the next highest was 3

Either the wrong term being used, or you're not looking at the right stats. That's a correct number in terms of dispossessions i.e. losing the ball when dribbling, but if we're talking actually giving the ball away, then that includes passing it away too, and Sanchez is the king of that. 

And the stats show that he was at it again, with a 57% pass accuracy rating, meaning he passed the ball away 12 times, so that's 13 times he gave it away, versus Salah's 12. 

That's actually very low for Sanchez, he usually gives it away at least twice that much in games, but he didn't get the ball very much at the weekend, by his usual standards. 

Ah fair enough. Either way, Salah did absolutely nothing all game. I don't mind passing the ball away, it just depends what kind of passes aren't going to feet - are they ambitious final balls or passes back to his fullback? Makes a big difference and is part of the reason football stats are usually ass.

Yea fair call, it's not really a great stat if it's a player that crosses a lot either. You can make a great cross but unless someone scores, it's usually a ball given away. 

Sounds like Salah was nullified extremely well, not detracting from that at all, that's basically the first game for him at Liverpool when that's happened, which says a lot! 

Permalink Permalink