Talk about Capital Football!(DIY answers)

Hey Cap Football- are you going to make a song and dance about the fact that the past three Chatham Cup winners have come from your geo-socialogical purview? Coincidence much?

[QUOTE=bobboltontawa2]can you explain the capital 1 situation? how come a game was played, result over turned, now the game dosn't even show on the results table.

Capitalfootball, question, why was miramar deducted the points for the match that was played on the incorect field when your regulations state 

 

 Where a home team does not play on its allocated ground, the game will be treated as a default to the home team."

 

Was miramar not the home team?, if so, then why the points not awarded to the "home" team as per reg 2 4.8, if the wording was "against the home team" then I can understand. Miramar losing the points.

What the CF regulations state is now not relevant. NZF has ruled that the game be treated as though it was abandoned. This is how that game has�been recorded on the table.

 

Whats the story with the games on Saturday night at Wakefield?  Our game (Cap 7/8 Final) Keeps changing between 7.15 and 5.15.  Could Cap Footy please confirm the correct times?  Are they as per the paper or the website?

Is there any reason why the refs in lower grades (div 6) are not allowed to having rolling subs?  Every team in the grade wants it as it's a social grade but refs are being very pedantic about it.  They say that it's a CF directive and that the clubs have been saying they want it.  Obviously in the higher grades you don't have it, but I find it hard to find a reason not to have it when both teams agree to it.  Is this something that can be looked at for next year (or even better this weekend).  All the teams are social and want to give everyone a decent run.  Most people are pretty keen for a rest or two during the game and if you only have 1 sub it's often a big ask for 10 players to play a full game.  The old legs dont carry people as far as they used to!

This is particularly interesting when you consider that rolling subs are allowed for all women's grades other than Central League... why is that?  You'd think it would be more appropriate to have rolling subs for Cap 5/6 men than it is for Women's Prem?

Yeah, that what I thought.  But we are now back at 5.15 according to the paper (apparently, haven't seen it myself), and are we not supposed to go by the paper? 

didnt think Prem had rolling subs? Pretty sure they dont in the Regs. Good if they do though.

This is particularly interesting when you consider that rolling subs are allowed for all women's grades other than Central League... why is that?  You'd think it would be more appropriate to have rolling subs for Cap 5/6 men than it is for Women's Prem?

Is there any reason why the refs in lower grades (div 6) are not allowed to having rolling subs?  Every team in the grade wants it as it's a social grade but refs are being very pedantic about it.  They say that it's a CF directive and that the clubs have been saying they want it.  Obviously in the higher grades you don't have it, but I find it hard to find a reason not to have it when both teams agree to it.  Is this something that can be looked at for next year (or even better this weekend).  All the teams are social and want to give everyone a decent run.  Most people are pretty keen for a rest or two during the game and if you only have 1 sub it's often a big ask for 10 players to play a full game.  The old legs dont carry people as far as they used to!

What the CF regulations state is now not relevant. NZF has ruled that the game be treated as though it was abandoned. This is how that game has�been recorded on the table.

So the game was played, 90 mins completed? Yet it's down as abandoned? I don't know how this is possible.

Does the fact it was "abandoned" mean the game has to be replayed?

What a shambles CF.

who knows whats going on - but looks like WU to Prem and Wests out at this stage doesnt it?

Only if we win the CL play off tomorrow AND if Mar don't end up third in Capital 1.

2)     At the end of the normal season, the following will determine promotion from Capital 1 and relegation from Capital Premier:

a)     If the top two teams in Capital 1 are eligible for promotion, the top two teams in Capital 1 will be automatically promoted and the bottom two teams in Capital Premier will be automatically relegated.

b)     If the top team in Capital 1 is not eligible for promotion:
(i)     The team finishing second in Capital 1 (if eligible for promotion) will be automatically promoted
(ii)   The team finishing bottom in Capital Premier will be automatically relegated
(iii)   The team finishing third in Capital 1 (if eligible for promotion) will play-off with the ninth-placed team in Capital Premier

c)     If the second-placed team in Capital 1 is not eligible for promotion:
(i)     The team finishing top in Capital 1 (if eligible for promotion) will be automatically promoted
(ii)    The team finishing bottom in Capital Premier will be automatically relegated
(iii)     the team finishing third in Capital 1 (if eligible for promotion) will play-off with the ninth-placed team in Capital Premier

d)     If, in either of the situations described in (b) and (c) above, the third placed team in Capital 1 is not eligible for promotion, there will only be one promoted team from Capital 1 and the ninth-placed team in Capital Premier will not be relegated.

e)     If neither of the teams finishing first and second in Capital 1 is eligible for promotion, the third placed team in Capital 1 will be automatically promoted and the team placed bottom in Capital Premier will be automatically relegated.

f)     When more than two teams are required to be relegated from Capital Premier, the principle of promotion outlined in Paragraph 1(a) will be followed.

so are you gonna celebrate double promo tomoz when you win?

Depends whether CF will answer these questions by then.