The media and some fans are a bit up Rudan's backside as well, though.
I think he has been pretty good overall, and his passion and general man-management have had a lot to do with getting the team to play a bit better than the sum of their parts. However, in the first 6 games there was one win, two draws, three losses, the football was truly dreadful, and I thought Rudan was tactically incompetent. In the last 7 games there have been 1 win, 3 draws, and 3 losses. In between there was that 7 game stretch where there were 5 wins and 2 draws, and I think a lot of people are still judging Rudan and the team far more on that run than on the other 13 games they've played.
Teams have figured out that if you defend deeper then most of the threats are dissipated, and the defence has been ripped apart several times in just about every game. Kurto is probably worth 6 or 7 of the team's 28 points by himself.
A lot of this is down to the poor managerial transitions and thus the player recruitment left to people like David Dome over the last couple of seasons, but I think a lot of people are assuming a lot of upside to Rudan pretty much because he is passionate and has been successful relative to the last 3 seasons. I think the club should absolutely be trying to keep him, and he is so very, very right about the Nix and NZF, but you'd think we're in first place the way some people talk about him.