Straya - A-League and State Leagues

Ufuk Talay - Ufuked off to Sydney FC

1247 replies · 274,675 views
26 May 00:58 · edited 26 May 00:58 · History

OzNix wrote:

i don't mind being boring if we win the A-League.

The path to the GF winners' podium is littered with teams that played entertaining football.

Just ask Melbourne Victory.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

27 May 00:01

Royz wrote:

So Ufuk wants us to play like SFC, very boring and become thugs. 

He did say that he wants us to play an attacking style of football, but also said it will be like the smurfs. So a bit of an oxymoron there.

Part of the reason why nothing he said re: style made any sense. I suspect any style will be dictated by what players we bring in.

a.haak

27 May 05:17

Really curious to see what formation Talay wants to play have a feeling it'll be a 4 four at the back and formation that doesn't involve wingers.

27 May 05:46

Would have been nice to get something in the press conference. Except we get a rather inane 'compact at the back, but attacking'. Does that mean three at the back is his preference? Or perhaps a four at the back with two screening DM's? Who fudgeing knows!

Ernie said he liked to play with two wide forwards, Rudan said he liked an attacking midfield pivot (or two). We don't really know what Talay prefers to play like.

27 May 06:27

Just watched the interview.

Playing style is clear, play attacking and try to score, be compact when defending, avoid getting goals and try to win back the ball fast as possible to attack again.

27 May 06:33 · edited 27 May 06:36 · History

Not sure if this is '/s' or not.

Still unclear to me what formation, what key tactical or player strength he tries to impose on the game.

FFS, I would be okay with catenaccio. If he said that then at least we would know if recruitment was making sense!

27 May 06:43 · edited 27 May 06:44 · History

liberty_nz wrote:

Not sure if this is '/s' or not.

Still unclear to me what formation, what key tactical or player strength he tries to impose on the game.

FFS, I would be okay with catenaccio. If he said that then at least we would know if recruitment was making sense!

Why on earth would he ever publicly say any of that? He isn't an idiot. 

Any coach will tell you that all of those things depend as much on the players as the coach. No matter what shape/style Uffie wants to play he has to have then right players for it. Why make public statements now, before he even know who he is trying to fit in?

What a ridiculous thing to gripe about.

Valley FC til I die?

27 May 06:45

Also, going by the highlights of Talay in charge of Oz U20, he likes plan A to be 'winning pens and missing them', with plan B being 'swing it in to the big man in the box'.

27 May 06:46

Nelfoos wrote:

liberty_nz wrote:

Not sure if this is '/s' or not.

Still unclear to me what formation, what key tactical or player strength he tries to impose on the game.

FFS, I would be okay with catenaccio. If he said that then at least we would know if recruitment was making sense!

Why on earth would he ever publicly say any of that? He isn't an idiot. 

Any coach will tell you that all of those things depend as much on the players as the coach. No matter what shape/style Uffie wants to play he has to have then right players for it. Why make public statements now, before he even know who he is trying to fit in?

What a ridiculous thing to gripe about.

Presumably he convinced someone at the club that he has a preferred playing style. Not sure why that should be a secret.

27 May 06:56 · edited 27 May 07:04 · History

liberty_nz wrote:

Also, going by the highlights of Talay in charge of Oz U20, he likes plan A to be 'winning pens and missing them', with plan B being 'swing it in to the big man in the box'.

TBH the way that Australian U20 team development went in contrast to the U20 AWs, maybe we need Buckingham not Talay.  Mind you he handed the baton over to Ante Milicic a while ago.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

27 May 07:06

liberty_nz wrote:

Not sure if this is '/s' or not.

Still unclear to me what formation, what key tactical or player strength he tries to impose on the game.

FFS, I would be okay with catenaccio. If he said that then at least we would know if recruitment was making sense!

maybe he wont play just one shape, he'll adjust according to the opposition and the squad he has - you know have a plan b and c.

Queenslander 3x a year.

27 May 07:28

The picture that the press is trying to paint is that he's a tactical genius. So maybe he's going for flexibility.

27 May 09:30

FFS he has hardly had time to put his feet under the desk.Hardly has any players signed think most of the guys arnt due back for a few weeks and some of you are bitching about how he is going to play. Lets get a team signed then some of you genus's might ne able to work what its going to look like. Fark its going to be another looooonnnnnggggg off season.


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

27 May 09:34

I wonder if any other A League team has been so gutted so soon at the end of a season? Not talking about the peripheral  players but first team regulars.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

27 May 10:55 · edited 27 May 10:58 · History

Rufer was ostracized and the previous management team tried to drive him out not develop him. I think his own determination and Rudan’s obvious influence made him the player he was this year. Funny how ‘fans’ on here now think he like Fenton are some of the best local players. They both would have been lost to the club if not for Rudan. Ernie, Greenacre, Buckingham et al didn’t do much development as far as I see it.

27 May 11:11

I thought Rufer had issues with Merrick too

27 May 12:18

Ryan wrote:

I thought Rufer had issues with Merrick too

It's possible Rufer just grew up and his unsuccessful attempts to get a place o'seas made him realise he needed to buck up his attitude. 

27 May 20:47

liberty_nz wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

liberty_nz wrote:

Not sure if this is '/s' or not.

Still unclear to me what formation, what key tactical or player strength he tries to impose on the game.

FFS, I would be okay with catenaccio. If he said that then at least we would know if recruitment was making sense!

Why on earth would he ever publicly say any of that? He isn't an idiot. 

Any coach will tell you that all of those things depend as much on the players as the coach. No matter what shape/style Uffie wants to play he has to have then right players for it. Why make public statements now, before he even know who he is trying to fit in?

What a ridiculous thing to gripe about.

Presumably he convinced someone at the club that he has a preferred playing style. Not sure why that should be a secret.

Very few coaches publicly speak about those things, given they're reasoonably important to their success. You're gonna have to take that up with more than just the Fever Forums.

Valley FC til I die?

27 May 21:14

Hopefully Ufuk knows what an opportunity he's got with these kids coming through.

I hope we don't regret not picking Buckingham.

07 Jun 03:30

Interesting listening to him talk to piney yesterday. He's pretty tight lipped on information about signings which is fair enough, but he did say that the positions he was looking at for imports was a striker, another centre back and another 10. Perhaps this means he wants to set up in a similar formation to what Sydney deployed, with two 10s drifting wide. He also said that we are talking to McCowatt and a number of others from the u-20s, which is promising

Annual finals disappointment enthusiast.

07 Jun 09:17

Interesting listening to him talk to piney yesterday. He's pretty tight lipped on information about signings which is fair enough, but he did say that the positions he was looking at for imports was a striker, another centre back and another 10. Perhaps this means he wants to set up in a similar formation to what Sydney deployed, with two 10s drifting wide. He also said that we are talking to McCowatt and a number of others from the u-20s, which is promising

Thought he came across very well.  Quietly optimistic.

07 Jun 09:52

Link? 

tried to find it but no luck

07 Jun 21:39

Interesting listening to him talk to piney yesterday. He's pretty tight lipped on information about signings which is fair enough, but he did say that the positions he was looking at for imports was a striker, another centre back and another 10. Perhaps this means he wants to set up in a similar formation to what Sydney deployed, with two 10s drifting wide. He also said that we are talking to McCowatt and a number of others from the u-20s, which is promising

So maybe we would play something like a 3-4-2-1, similar to the game where Willo got his hatty?



12 Jun 04:10

Talay looking to be more of a doer than talker so far...



12 Jun 06:42

Interesting listening to him talk to piney yesterday. He's pretty tight lipped on information about signings which is fair enough, but he did say that the positions he was looking at for imports was a striker, another centre back and another 10. Perhaps this means he wants to set up in a similar formation to what Sydney deployed, with two 10s drifting wide. He also said that we are talking to McCowatt and a number of others from the u-20s, which is promising

So maybe we would play something like a 3-4-2-1, similar to the game where Willo got his hatty?

potentially, but I can't see him using a back three, not when we don't need to anymore now that Dura has gone. Could probably see him going for a more standard 4-2-3-1 or a narrow 4-4-2
Annual finals disappointment enthusiast.

12 Jun 10:15

martinb wrote:

Talay looking to be more of a doer than talker so far...

Hasn't done a whole lot yet 

a.haak

13 Jun 03:13

Made more signings than Rudan had at this point.



13 Jun 20:23

valeo wrote:

martinb wrote:

Talay looking to be more of a doer than talker so far...

Hasn't done a whole lot yet 

His season just finished, I expected he is in vacation (like many other players), planning a move, getting the club organized etc

He signed already some players, for me looks like he is working. Not sure what people expect? Send us his weekly timesheet?

13 Jun 22:23

number8 wrote:

valeo wrote:

martinb wrote:

Talay looking to be more of a doer than talker so far...

Hasn't done a whole lot yet 

His season just finished, I expected he is in vacation (like many other players), planning a move, getting the club organized etc

He signed already some players, for me looks like he is working. Not sure what people expect? Send us his weekly timesheet?

I am happy to give him lots of leeway to get his family move properly sorted.

If his kids are of school age this alone is a bit of work.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

14 Jun 00:23

There is lots going on with recruitment.

14 Jun 02:45

tonya wrote:

There is lots going on with recruitment.

Sauce?

14 Jun 04:15

scribbler wrote:

tonya wrote:

There is lots going on with recruitment.

Sauce?

Tonya is the sauce....

"It will be hosted in Wellington. My balls my word"

3/7/2013

"McGlinchey is ours ! My balls my word."

5/8/2014

14 Jun 04:26

tonya wrote:

There is lots going on with recruitment.

Classic vague Tonya post
Annual finals disappointment enthusiast.

14 Jun 07:49

would live to compare his time sheet to the all whites coach


Auckland will rise once more

14 Jun 10:49

Rebuild, better, faster, stronger, in Talay we trust

Ya can’t beat Wellington on Good day

15 Jun 17:32

tonya wrote:

There is lots going on with recruitment.

I love you.

Adelaide's resident Nix supporter
16 Jun 09:54

number8 wrote:

valeo wrote:

martinb wrote:

Talay looking to be more of a doer than talker so far...

Hasn't done a whole lot yet 

His season just finished, I expected he is in vacation (like many other players), planning a move, getting the club organized etc

He signed already some players, for me looks like he is working. Not sure what people expect? Send us his weekly timesheet?

I don't expect him to have much done; I'm just saying how can you say he's a 'doer' when he hasn't really 'done' anything?

a.haak