Wellington Phoenix Men

$40-45 Million Soccer Specific Stadium - Petone Phoenix

2200 replies · 653,857 views Locked
about 12 years ago
linesman wrote:


All this talk about Westpac Stadium being too expensive for the Nix is nonsense and Gareth & Co know it.

The fact is that the Nix have the best venue deal in the A League.

They pay a very small fixed hire fee plus event costs which amounts to less than $30k per home match.

They have also pocketed "marketing grants" of over $1m in cash from the WCC and the Stadium Trust since Wellnix took over the A league license.

You may well ask were this money has gone because it is clear that it has not been spent on marketing.

So effectively Wellington City via the WCC Event fund and the Stadium Trust has provided the Wellnix with a FREE stadium.

 

Typical outrageous claim - to post count - to join date ratio.
Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
TopLeft07 wrote:

  1. You may think E.P is a fuck up J.V but Westpac is on par at least, you have to admit. This on-going debate highlights that. Both venues are only perfect for two events a year and the rest are terrible events for massive stadiums.

I agree with that, Westpac was never the right stadium. (Right location, wrong shape)
When it was first proposed I was unsure why they made it round, for what equated to 1-2 cricket games a year at the stadium, when everything else there was played on a rectangle pitch. Size wise, I think they went for what they did as it would accomodate the big events and the small events at the same time. 

I wonder if it had been a rectangular 30,000 seat stadium if this debate would still be had.
Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
AJ13 wrote:

Typical outrageous claim - to post count - to join date ratio.


Aren't you vaguely interested in hearing another side to the story? Yes, he has a vested interest in it. That doesn't mean he isn't allowed to speak.
Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Junior82 wrote:
Goonertron wrote:

The Yellow fever are great.


No they're not.  The twunts can't even get "Stand Up" right after 6 seasons.

 

They got it right at Eden Park. First time ever. I was horrified.

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
JonoNewton wrote:
TopLeft07 wrote:

  1. You may think E.P is a fuck up J.V but Westpac is on par at least, you have to admit. This on-going debate highlights that. Both venues are only perfect for two events a year and the rest are terrible events for massive stadiums.

I agree with that, Westpac was never the right stadium. (Right location, wrong shape)

When it was first proposed I was unsure why they made it round, for what equated to 1-2 cricket games a year at the stadium, when everything else there was played on a rectangle pitch. Size wise, I think they went for what they did as it would accomodate the big events and the small events at the same time. 


I wonder if it had been a rectangular 30,000 seat stadium if this debate would still be had.

It has run at a profit every year since it opened. One of the few stadiums in the entire southern hemisphere to do that. It did something right. Rightly or wrongly it was built to be multipurpose at a time when having a football team in the city seemed a fanciful notion. Who knows, in 10 years time we may be looking back at this and saying why did they only build a 12,000 seat stadium?
Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
rjmiller wrote:
AJ13 wrote:

Typical outrageous claim - to post count - to join date ratio.


Aren't you vaguely interested in hearing another side to the story? Yes, he has a vested interest in it. That doesn't mean he isn't allowed to speak.


Are you familiar with AJ? It's all about post counts with him.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago · edited about 12 years ago · History
TopLeft07 wrote:

Haven't read a lot of this thread but two things:


  1. Without being able to confirm 100% as I have only heard whispers, I'm pretty sure the nix got a very good deal at E.P as well.


  2. You may think E.P is a fuck up J.V but Westpac is on par at least, you have to admit. This on-going debate highlights that. Both venues are only perfect for two events a year and the rest are terrible events for massive stadiums.

I have to be honest and tell I don't know too much about Westpac. I lived there for 4 years but I was always like 'Why does Auckland not have something like this' so I don't see it as a fuck up. If you would like to enlighten me, I am all ears. I guess they probably could have not chosen to cater to cricket but that would be the only thing as far as I can see. I should also be a bit more specific but I don't actually mean that 'Eden Park' is a fuck up but more the process around the whole thing prior to the upgrade (the decision to upgrade vs waterfront) and now the problem the council have on their hands after the fact. I'm meaning from the POV of the bureaucrats in that they made it a fuck up. As far as grounds go, it does a job but I probably would have left the cricket block configuration as it was. The long on would be shorter than Pukekura Park at a guess.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

Eden park should have been a rectangle when they built the north/ASB stand and Eden Park II turned into a cricket venue.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
rjmiller wrote:
JonoNewton wrote:
TopLeft07 wrote:

  1. You may think E.P is a fuck up J.V but Westpac is on par at least, you have to admit. This on-going debate highlights that. Both venues are only perfect for two events a year and the rest are terrible events for massive stadiums.

I agree with that, Westpac was never the right stadium. (Right location, wrong shape)

When it was first proposed I was unsure why they made it round, for what equated to 1-2 cricket games a year at the stadium, when everything else there was played on a rectangle pitch. Size wise, I think they went for what they did as it would accomodate the big events and the small events at the same time. 


I wonder if it had been a rectangular 30,000 seat stadium if this debate would still be had.

It has run at a profit every year since it opened. One of the few stadiums in the entire southern hemisphere to do that. It did something right. Rightly or wrongly it was built to be multipurpose at a time when having a football team in the city seemed a fanciful notion. Who knows, in 10 years time we may be looking back at this and saying why did they only build a 12,000 seat stadium?

Shane Harmon was telling us this the other day. Basically one of the only stadiums not to receive funding since it opened too, all costs and upgrades have come out of their profits. 

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Hard News wrote:

Loss of green space is bollocks.  There is still a huge green space there.

Although the Post site and and that end of Jackson St. always made more sense to me.


Agreed. This is a big site and parking would be no issue. Closer to train and motorway connection and within cooee of Jackson Street. And no residents living near by. Downside, a lot more cost in demolition and groundworks.
IMG_0660.jpeg 950.07 KB
Rise up, Wellington!
Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

the discussion arouind having a multipurpose stadium have been going on since day one - a lot saw Westpac stadium as the end of the Basin - clearly not the case, the current scenario is purely down to the reduction of crowd numbers - for mine this has little to do with the actual stadium, more to do with the poor performaces of the 'canes and lions over the years......not sure it would have been any different if the stadium was rectangular.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

Okay JV, we're on different pages then. I mean in terms of practicality. But I guess you get that with multi-purpose stadiums. They're going to be very good for some events and pretty damn average for others.

Ps. 68m hit straight at each end of EP (48m over the slips/keeper).

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
theprof wrote:

the discussion arouind having a multipurpose stadium have been going on since day one - a lot saw Westpac stadium as the end of the Basin - clearly not the case, the current scenario is purely down to the reduction of crowd numbers - for mine this has little to do with the actual stadium, more to do with the poor performaces of the 'canes and lions over the years......not sure it would have been any different if the stadium was rectangular.

That's a great point. If the stadium was a rectangle, would the crowds have been bigger for Hurricanes et al? I very much doubt they would have.

Points to the rise of pay tv and the views/replays and how that has helped to kill off a lot of fans going to games - the spin off being grounds charging more for entry to make their wedge etc.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

The first side (Stadium or Welnix) to provide proof of how much one is charging the other instead of making unsubstantiated claims will earn my respect. Both sides on this argument have made claims with no proof whatsoever to back them up.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

Id be pissed if the club isn't losing money, as that's what they've led us to believe and it their justification for taking home games away. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Tegal wrote:

Shane Harmon was telling us this the other day. Basically one of the only stadiums not to receive funding since it opened too, all costs and upgrades have come out of their profits. 

Yeah, All other stadiums in Australasia have received funding for an upgrade or other needs in the last 15yrs, Westpac has had none.
Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

It's been said since day 1 they are.  Would take some special orchestrated litany of lies for all involved in the club to have maintained this for 7 years now.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Hard News wrote:

It's been said since day 1 they are.  Would take some special orchestrated litany of lies for all involved in the club to have maintained this for 7 years now.

Yep I agree. Linesmans insinuations are interesting to say the least 

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Tegal wrote:

Id be pissed if the club isn't losing money, as that's what they've led us to believe and it their justification for taking home games away. 

Indeed. I'd be absolutely fuming if this was the case. Has always been their #1 Justification for road games.
Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Jag wrote:
Junior82 wrote:
Goonertron wrote:

The Yellow fever are great.


No they're not.  The twunts can't even get "Stand Up" right after 6 seasons.

 

They got it right at Eden Park. First time ever. I was horrified.


It's because Aucklanders are such big fans of the Pet Shop Boys.

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
hlmphil wrote:
linesman wrote:


All this talk about Westpac Stadium being too expensive for the Nix is nonsense and Gareth & Co know it.

The fact is that the Nix have the best venue deal in the A League.

They pay a very small fixed hire fee plus event costs which amounts to less than $30k per home match.

They have also pocketed "marketing grants" of over $1m in cash from the WCC and the Stadium Trust since Wellnix took over the A league license.

You may well ask were this money has gone because it is clear that it has not been spent on marketing.

So effectively Wellington City via the WCC Event fund and the Stadium Trust has provided the Wellnix with a FREE stadium.

 

This got interesting! Especially when people leave their names on their accounts...

http://westpacstadium.co.nz/advertising

"Staff numbers on event days 400 - 1000."  Now there's a cost!

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

What's that going to be when 1 side of the stadium is closed off though..... Most of those would be outside contracts and fixed costs I would expect based on certain variables. You would expect that to be incorporated into the cost of hiring the stadium...

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

What's that going to be when 1 side of the stadium is closed off though..... Most of those would be outside contracts and fixed costs I would expect based on certain variables. You would expect that to be incorporated into the cost of hiring the stadium...

"a very small fixed hire fee"  - doesn't compute imo

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
AJ13 wrote:
linesman wrote:


All this talk about Westpac Stadium being too expensive for the Nix is nonsense and Gareth & Co know it.

The fact is that the Nix have the best venue deal in the A League.

They pay a very small fixed hire fee plus event costs which amounts to less than $30k per home match.

They have also pocketed "marketing grants" of over $1m in cash from the WCC and the Stadium Trust since Wellnix took over the A league license.

You may well ask were this money has gone because it is clear that it has not been spent on marketing.

So effectively Wellington City via the WCC Event fund and the Stadium Trust has provided the Wellnix with a FREE stadium.

 

Typical outrageous claim - to post count - to join date ratio.


Using your logic, all your posts should be well reasoned, well written and add to the quality of the overall discussion. Clearly your logic is flawed.
Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:
AJ13 wrote:
linesman wrote:


All this talk about Westpac Stadium being too expensive for the Nix is nonsense and Gareth & Co know it.

The fact is that the Nix have the best venue deal in the A League.

They pay a very small fixed hire fee plus event costs which amounts to less than $30k per home match.

They have also pocketed "marketing grants" of over $1m in cash from the WCC and the Stadium Trust since Wellnix took over the A league license.

You may well ask were this money has gone because it is clear that it has not been spent on marketing.

So effectively Wellington City via the WCC Event fund and the Stadium Trust has provided the Wellnix with a FREE stadium.

 

Typical outrageous claim - to post count - to join date ratio.


Using your logic, all your posts should be well reasoned, well written and add to the quality of the overall discussion. Clearly your logic is flawed.

O shut up Mr 2891, clearly you don't know what you're talking about. 

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:
AJ13 wrote:
Typical outrageous claim - to post count - to join date ratio.


Using your logic, all your posts should be well reasoned, well written and add to the quality of the overall discussion. Clearly your logic is flawed.

ZING!

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
the ant wrote:
Hard News wrote:

Loss of green space is bollocks.  There is still a huge green space there.

Although the Post site and and that end of Jackson St. always made more sense to me.


Agreed. This is a big site and parking would be no issue. Closer to train and motorway connection and within cooee of Jackson Street. And no residents living near by. Downside, a lot more cost in demolition and groundworks.

And the small matter of having to purchase 2.5ha of fairly prime Industrial Land and Buildings. Would probably require re zoning as well so better get Gareth and the Council, to write a cheque for $100m give or take.
Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

mmmmm.... popcorn!

E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

Re crowd sizes. Westpac is a terrible place to watch cricket, I'm positive people don't go just because it's there. Also if you add up the costs involved to host cricket westpac vs the basin it's chalk and cheese. The vision was never met for cricket at westpac. I don't know if crowds would be much better at football codes with a rectangle stadium but I'm pretty sure cricket has lost out there. No one would be missing out if AFL stayed on the wrong side of the ditch.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Tegal wrote:
sthn.jeff wrote:
AJ13 wrote:
linesman wrote:


All this talk about Westpac Stadium being too expensive for the Nix is nonsense and Gareth & Co know it.

The fact is that the Nix have the best venue deal in the A League.

They pay a very small fixed hire fee plus event costs which amounts to less than $30k per home match.

They have also pocketed "marketing grants" of over $1m in cash from the WCC and the Stadium Trust since Wellnix took over the A league license.

You may well ask were this money has gone because it is clear that it has not been spent on marketing.

So effectively Wellington City via the WCC Event fund and the Stadium Trust has provided the Wellnix with a FREE stadium.

 

Typical outrageous claim - to post count - to join date ratio.


Using your logic, all your posts should be well reasoned, well written and add to the quality of the overall discussion. Clearly your logic is flawed.

O shut up Mr 2891, clearly you don't know what you're talking about. 


That will still be the same when I reach the dizzying heights of 13,345 posts !
Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

You kids, with your witty banter and your post counts.

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
TopLeft07 wrote:

Re crowd sizes. Westpac is a terrible place to watch cricket, I'm positive people don't go just because it's there. Also if you add up the costs involved to host cricket westpac vs the basin it's chalk and cheese. The vision was never met for cricket at westpac. I don't know if crowds would be much better at football codes with a rectangle stadium but I'm pretty sure cricket has lost out there. No one would be missing out if AFL stayed on the wrong side of the ditch.

totally agree here, cricket at the basin is amazeballs, you only need to look at the recent test attendance - the crowd may have only been 3-5k in size but the embankments looked packed and the stands well populated. Cricket at the stadium is way too uncomforatble.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

[/quote]

"Staff numbers on event days 400 - 1000."  Now there's a cost!

[/quote]

Does that include that the majority of the food and beverage staff are volunteers fundraising?

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

I'd much rather watch the Nix in a stadium, no matter what shape, which was somewhere close to 65 - 75% full as opposed to something around 80% empty. If that stadium is rectangular and I'm closer to the action, so much the better.

Whether that can happen or not remains to be seen. Nice idea though.

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Swarley wrote:

[/quote]

"Staff numbers on event days 400 - 1000."  Now there's a cost!

[/quote]


Does that include that the majority of the food and beverage staff are volunteers fundraising?


I wouldn't have thought so seeing the quote is from Westpac's facts and figures section : see link above: Stadium staff numbers.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

Here's a distance comparison for shits and giggles.

Have used the distance from Wellington Station to the Stadium as the radius, and spun a circle centered at the existing stand at PetRec. Marked in Ava and Petone train stations.

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago · edited about 12 years ago · History
Christo wrote:
Here's a distance comparison for shits and giggles.

Have used the distance from Wellington Station to the Stadium as the radius, and spun a circle centered at the existing stand at PetRec. Marked in Ava and Petone train stations.

Bazinga.

E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
SurgeQld wrote:
Christo wrote:
Here's a distance comparison for shits and giggles.

Have used the distance from Wellington Station to the Stadium as the radius, and spun a circle centered at the existing stand at PetRec. Marked in Ava and Petone train stations.

And the distance from the centre of the circle/stand to the edge is...

The same as the Wellington Station to Westpac Stadium...(Blue arrows on left hand pic)
Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
JonoNewton wrote:
SurgeQld wrote:
Christo wrote:
Here's a distance comparison for shits and giggles.

Have used the distance from Wellington Station to the Stadium as the radius, and spun a circle centered at the existing stand at PetRec. Marked in Ava and Petone train stations.

And the distance from the centre of the circle/stand to the edge is...

The same as the Wellington Station to Westpac Stadium...(Blue arrows on left hand pic)

I'm a muppet.

(sometimes).

E + R + O

Permalink Permalink

This topic is locked.