Wellington Phoenix Men

Angst please.

492 replies · 23,467 views
over 13 years ago

terminator_x wrote:

I agree with some of what you say JD but essentially if you are arguing for putting together an entertaining team at the expense of results then that's not going to work. The Brazilians in season 1 were good entertainment but they didn't win very much. You also failed to mention Serepisos. That guy was great, a lot more fun than this dour bunch of accountants we now have running things. The only use Terry had for a business plan was to snort a line off*. But just the like the Brazilians in season 1 it wasn't a sustainable (yawn) approach.

I think the best marketing tool ever would be to win the league. That may seem obvious and winning the league would clearly create a lot of excitement and interest in and of itself. But my point is I think a lot of people simply need to believe it can be done, and if we win it once it would set up better crowds for years afterwards.

Can the current team do it? I think they are still a definite chance but they do need to go on a run soon and really gel as a team. That will gradually lift the crowds and if we can get deep into the play-offs nobody will even care about a few poor crowds in December.


*Please understand that this is a joke playing on the idea that Terry is/was some kind of millionaire playboy.


I've thought about this a bit more in the context of your comment T-X.  Where I'm getting to is if we're going to play this style which lacks entertainment value we have to challenge for the title, i.e. top 2 for most of the season.  We look better than we did 2 or 3 weeks ago but still not up there with Melbourne or CCM and 4th place is the bare minimum now with this Herbert style, not some great achievement.
Personally I don't believe we'll ever win the league with Herbert in charge because we'll never take enough points away from home.  If we're just going to finish 4-6th again then I'd rather have some entertainment along the way.  Maybe other people have gotten to that stage as well?

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

terminator_x wrote:

I agree with some of what you say JD but essentially if you are arguing for putting together an entertaining team at the expense of results then that's not going to work. The Brazilians in season 1 were good entertainment but they didn't win very much. You also failed to mention Serepisos. That guy was great, a lot more fun than this dour bunch of accountants we now have running things. The only use Terry had for a business plan was to snort a line off*. But just the like the Brazilians in season 1 it wasn't a sustainable (yawn) approach.

I think the best marketing tool ever would be to win the league. That may seem obvious and winning the league would clearly create a lot of excitement and interest in and of itself. But my point is I think a lot of people simply need to believe it can be done, and if we win it once it would set up better crowds for years afterwards.

Can the current team do it? I think they are still a definite chance but they do need to go on a run soon and really gel as a team. That will gradually lift the crowds and if we can get deep into the play-offs nobody will even care about a few poor crowds in December.


*Please understand that this is a joke playing on the idea that Terry is/was some kind of millionaire playboy.


I've thought about this a bit more in the context of your comment T-X.  Where I'm getting to is if we're going to play this style which lacks entertainment value we have to challenge for the title, i.e. top 2 for most of the season.  We look better than we did 2 or 3 weeks ago but still not up there with Melbourne or CCM and 4th place is the bare minimum now with this Herbert style, not some great achievement.
Personally I don't believe we'll ever win the league with Herbert in charge because we'll never take enough points away from home.  If we're just going to finish 4-6th again then I'd rather have some entertainment along the way.  Maybe other people have gotten to that stage as well?

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

I think JD (as per usual) is partly right but also way too doom and gloom for me.

I think he's spot on that if we're not going to be fun to watch, then we need to win. I don't think we need to win the league...we just need to "be winning" for people to come. If we're not winning, people will either watch it on tele or not at all.

I also think Term X is on the money when he says we lack an interesting figure head. It used to be Tony P - who loved to be in the paper, so gave interviews all the time. But he was engaging and interesting, so he came over okay. The spokespeople we have today are not in the same class. So...why not get the more interesting people in the team to speak out more...

And there has already been an exciting game this year...the opening game against Sydney was a cracker. Fenton's goal was magic, and people left buzzing. Then we went flat and the football went to shit as we sought to stabilise. But there is hope that in this squad there is entertainment. We've seen it already this year. So I still have hope.

Last of all - why is none of this reflecting on us? The Zone was shit all day Sunday. We can't blame the team for that. Don't we have some responsibility as fans? Patrick and a few others have been busting themselves trying to promote the Phoenix on a Friday before home games. They're getting fewer than 20 people. 

So maybe we all just don't give a fuck any more? That's how it seems. Maybe it's not the just the Phoenix that need to buck their ideas up?

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Can someone please tell me what entertaining football is exactly?

For me - goals/attempts (to either side) are what makes a game entertaining.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Smithy wrote:
I also think Term X is on the money when he says we lack an interesting figure head. It used to be Tony P - who loved to be in the paper, so gave interviews all the time. But he was engaging and interesting, so he came over okay. The spokespeople we have today are not in the same class. So...why not get the more interesting people in the team to speak out more...


This is a really good point and something I've also noticed a bit recently too.  It always seems to be Ricki or Manny and neither gives good copy.  It's really hard to get a sound bite out of Ricky and Manny just isn't comfortable in front of the microphone.  

Also, there seems to be some good articles in the Herald from a guy Daniel Richardson.  They're a lot more interesting than Sam Worthington's stuff, he seems to meet the definition of phoning it in.  His preview of the game today has nothing from the Phoenix camp or the Phoenix players and is basically just about del Piero but recycles quotes from an article in the Sydney Morning Herald into about 150 words.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Yeah at least Terry was always in the media. (that's not meant to sound sarcastic)

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Feverish wrote:

Can someone please tell me what entertaining football is exactly?

For me - goals/attempts (to either side) are what makes a game entertaining.

Just on this, Westpac Stadium has the 2nd highest goals per game at each A-league venue.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

entertaining footy i= winning footy = entertaining footy (end of)

on a more angsty note, why are we not more angsty about this "lets take the nix on the road" theme that is coming out in the media - doing well in the league isn't drawing the crowds, our brand of footy isn't, we won't bring in a marquee bname to attract fans, instead lets take it to Auckland and Chch and someohter centres and become the NZ Nix - this irks me a lot and yet noone else seems to be upset by it?

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

theprof wrote:

entertaining footy i= winning footy = entertaining footy (end of)


Even though what is entertaining is subjective, that's demonstrably rubbish.


If we won every game 1-0 in the 20th minute with an own goal and there were no other shots on target vs a 4-4 draw with 4 bicycle kicks which do you think would be the more entertaining game?

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

JD - that kinda proves my point, fuindamentally we want/need to win right? at this point in the club's existance noone really cares how we win, right? if we'd been consistantly winning and top of the league or at least top four for 10 years then we might have reason to say "winning with a single own goal is not how we want to win". simple fact we don't have that luxury, so for my money winning = enertaining = me happy!

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

theprof wrote:

on a more angsty note, why are we not more angsty about this "lets take the nix on the road" theme that is coming out in the media - doing well in the league isn't drawing the crowds, our brand of footy isn't, we won't bring in a marquee bname to attract fans, instead lets take it to Auckland and Chch and someohter centres and become the NZ Nix - this irks me a lot and yet noone else seems to be upset by it?

Maybe because it comes out every year when the crowds go down. Boy who cried wolf kind of thing?

 

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

theprof wrote:

entertaining footy i= winning footy = entertaining footy (end of)

on a more angsty note, why are we not more angsty about this "lets take the nix on the road" theme that is coming out in the media - doing well in the league isn't drawing the crowds, our brand of footy isn't, we won't bring in a marquee bname to attract fans, instead lets take it to Auckland and Chch and someohter centres and become the NZ Nix - this irks me a lot and yet noone else seems to be upset by it?

Really? Have you been living in a hole?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

james dean wrote:

theprof wrote:

entertaining footy i= winning footy = entertaining footy (end of)


Even though what is entertaining is subjective, that's demonstrably rubbish.


If we won every game 1-0 in the 20th minute with an own goal and there were no other shots on target vs a 4-4 draw with 4 bicycle kicks which do you think would be the more entertaining game?

JD you are talking about entertaining footy yet seems you don't even know what you mean?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

He wants us to concede 4 goals every game. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

I wasn't in my normal spot in the FZ on the weekend and sat with some friends in aisle 28. A lot of very frustrated people around us when the Phoenix didn't shoot when they were about 30m-40m from goal. 

When we get a decent stretch of weather it may be a better indicator at how many fans are fair weather fans. 
If we had Brisbane Roar's record from the past two seasons and their style of play, how many fans do you think would turn up to watch us?
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

james dean wrote:

Smithy wrote:
I also think Term X is on the money when he says we lack an interesting figure head. It used to be Tony P - who loved to be in the paper, so gave interviews all the time. But he was engaging and interesting, so he came over okay. The spokespeople we have today are not in the same class. So...why not get the more interesting people in the team to speak out more...


This is a really good point and something I've also noticed a bit recently too.  It always seems to be Ricki or Manny and neither gives good copy.  It's really hard to get a sound bite out of Ricky and Manny just isn't comfortable in front of the microphone.  

Also, there seems to be some good articles in the Herald from a guy Daniel Richardson.  They're a lot more interesting than Sam Worthington's stuff, he seems to meet the definition of phoning it in.  His preview of the game today has nothing from the Phoenix camp or the Phoenix players and is basically just about del Piero but recycles quotes from an article in the Sydney Morning Herald into about 150 words.



I'd also like to hear more from the Welnix guys - and I mean positive stuff, not just threats about taking games away. Haven't heard anything from Gareth recently, except related to the Hurricanes. These are all meant to be successful, connected guys, they should be out there boosting for their team, their investment.



Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Feverish wrote:

theprof wrote:

entertaining footy i= winning footy = entertaining footy (end of)

on a more angsty note, why are we not more angsty about this "lets take the nix on the road" theme that is coming out in the media - doing well in the league isn't drawing the crowds, our brand of footy isn't, we won't bring in a marquee bname to attract fans, instead lets take it to Auckland and Chch and someohter centres and become the NZ Nix - this irks me a lot and yet noone else seems to be upset by it?

Really? Have you been living in a hole?

hole, not sure what you mean. I've been questioning wverone I can even GM on facebook, he's clearly stated that he's anti marquee player to bring in more fans and is obviously letting David Dome talk to the papers to spread the word that the nix will travel to bring the numbers in. I've not seen a lot of other angst from YF or oterhs. It may eb an idle threat, but regardless it doesn't look or sound good.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago · History

Stealing this from 442 forums in regards to Fred's article about taking more games away from Wgtn:

KiwiChick1 wrote:
Yep, one or two "away" home games max, otherwise you can't really call them the Wellington Phoenix anymore.
Had a good laugh at this comment: 
dadada wrote:
But lastly, the style of football played is, to be frank, boring. The Phoenix are great when they are very direct at goal...it creates way more opportunities and is more exciting to watch. This flash passing game they are trying to play is just horrible. I would love to know the stats of how many passes go backwards against how many passes go forwards, and how many times the keeper touches the ball from a back pass against from an opposition player. I think they would make interesting reading. The two teams I most dislike watching, when they are in a holding pattern, are Brisbane and the Victory. It seems the Phoenix are trying to emulate them...which is a shame.
Total football FTL. :lol:
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

same old...

A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Nobody wants the Nix to travel more than they do. 1 or 2 games a year as it is, is probably quite an ask for the players given the travel hours they already endure. Personally I'd rather they concentrate on winning but like has been discussed in the past, taking the odd game away does have some financial incentive. Also nobody wants them to become the NZ Phoenix because it pretty well closes the door on another kiwi side in the future.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Smithy wrote:

I think JD (as per usual) is partly right but also way too doom and gloom for me.

I think he's spot on that if we're not going to be fun to watch, then we need to win. I don't think we need to win the league...we just need to "be winning" for people to come. If we're not winning, people will either watch it on tele or not at all.

I also think Term X is on the money when he says we lack an interesting figure head. It used to be Tony P - who loved to be in the paper, so gave interviews all the time. But he was engaging and interesting, so he came over okay. The spokespeople we have today are not in the same class. So...why not get the more interesting people in the team to speak out more...

And there has already been an exciting game this year...the opening game against Sydney was a cracker. Fenton's goal was magic, and people left buzzing. Then we went flat and the football went to shit as we sought to stabilise. But there is hope that in this squad there is entertainment. We've seen it already this year. So I still have hope.

Last of all - why is none of this reflecting on us? The Zone was shit all day Sunday. We can't blame the team for that. Don't we have some responsibility as fans? Patrick and a few others have been busting themselves trying to promote the Phoenix on a Friday before home games. They're getting fewer than 20 people. 

So maybe we all just don't give a fuck any more? That's how it seems. Maybe it's not the just the Phoenix that need to buck their ideas up?

 

Reading this thread I notice more than usual angst. Sure Ricki can grind out results and even have one or two good wins but he doesn't build exciting teams. Rojas is the evidence of this. Clearly the boy was special but Ricki couldn't keep hold of him. Now he's lighting up Melbourne Victory performances. How much of Rojas decision to cross the ditch was down to the Phoenix's playing style. The likes of Manny, Smith and Lochhead don't get the juices flowing. They're solid but uninspiring. Huysegems is a good pro, as is Durante, but they don't bring in the punters. Fenton is one of the few showing any flashes of inspiriation but he's young and raw. Totori running at defenders at least is exciting, even if he often tries too much without looking for better options. 

Football teams need excitiment as well as work horses. For most fans it is entertainment competing with all the other forms of entertainment on offer. I don't think the current Phoenix can win the A league so just what are you offering.

I know I'm biased but I find watching ACFC more exciting than the Phoenix because of the infusion of Latin flair and the competitiveness of knowing we can win the ASBP and the O League. You also don't know what you're going to get from game to game and with the Club World Cup on offer players are really trying. In their hearts what do the Phoenix players really feel - that they can win the A League or just fill in the numbers. You definitely need someone to inspire the fair weather supporters and the fickle media. Ricki is too dour. At least Serepisos was interesting. Above all you need some exciting players.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Our playing style in 09/10 was a lot more suited to Marco than the style that Victory were playing last season.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

maybe a double step-over, flick-flack, or dummy backheel should be compulsory every time a player receives the ball.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago · History

Here's my question:

we have a lot of attacking talent and I don't think we have used it to its full potential this season so far. Much more than in previous years.

Which coaches in the league would be sure to get more out of this bunch of players, particularly in our attack, than Ricki?

I think Ange, maybe Popovic- otherwise I think that Ricki is at least as good- or the other coaches are just as poor. 


And HECK YES people come to see Dura, Siggie and Huysegems! They have to know they are in the team- but yes I think these guys are crowd pullers and loyalty creators for sure.


Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago



Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Feverish wrote:

maybe a double step-over, flick-flack, or dummy backheel should be compulsory every time a player receives the ball.

 

Well we are missing Daniel's backheels.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago · History

martinb wrote:

Here's my question:

we have a lot of attacking talent and I don't think we have used it to its full potential this season so far. Much more than in previous years.

Which coaches in the league would be sure to get more out of this bunch of players, particularly in our attack, than Ricki?

I think Ange, maybe Popovic- otherwise I think that Ricki is at least as good- or the other coaches are just as poor. 


And HECK YES people come to see Dura, Siggie and Huysegems! They have to know they are in the team- but yes I think these guys are crowd pullers and loyalty creators for sure.

 

Die hards sure, but I really don't think fair weather supporters are pulled into Westpac stadium by the likes of Sigmund, Durante and Huyssegems. The media certainly aren't much interested. The first two seasons of the Kingz were the most successful because of the pulling power of seeing Wynton Rufer finishing his playing career. The drop off since Del Piero featured in that opening game has been noticeable and it's not just down to the weather.

I admire your loyalty but you don't think of excitement and the Phoenix in the same breath. There's a flatness this year that's down to a lot of things but if you're not going to win anything then you have to entertain. We don't have the deep loyalties and traditions of European football to pull in punters despite results. I think you guys have done well in normally staid New Zealand but The Phoenix is an ambitious project and needs to step up a level. If ACFC didn't have its NZ/Croatian base who turn out no matter what, it would have small crowds like other ASBP teams too.

It's all about what you put out there. Look at the Breakers. A few years ago they got crowds in the hundreds. Now as two time champions they can draw upwards of 7,000 to big games at the Vector arena. They're winners and the crowds love it, so do the fickle media. We're talking about boring basketball! There's something wrong if the biggest most exciting sport in the world can't do better than that here.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

Feverish wrote:

maybe a double step-over, flick-flack, or dummy backheel should be compulsory every time a player receives the ball.

 

Well we are missing Daniel's backheels.

The crowd use to cheer whenever he did something tricky, (usually) no matter how effective it was. Probably some merit in this theory. 

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Don't forget the arm flapping to rev the crowd up.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

Don't forget the arm flapping to rev the crowd up.

The league needs more pantomime villains and heroes.
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

james dean wrote:

- work out what the Facebook and Twitter advertising actually is supposed to do.  Currently it seems to be aimed at 12 year olds


Anyone go see the Nix players are New World Metro this evening? Did anyone actually know it was on?

I don't see the point of sending out messages from the Nix twitter account just as you have turned up somewhere for a promo. If they don't give people advance notice of the events, do they really expect many people to go out of their way to see the players?

Sorry to use you as an example Ard Righ, but he tweeted that he didn't know it was on and walked straight past. Only to find out that it was on when he was on the train.
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Bullion wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

Don't forget the arm flapping to rev the crowd up.

The league needs more pantomime villains and heroes.

Oh No They Don't !

We're the WELLINGTON Phoenix

And this is our Home

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

Our playing style in 09/10 was a lot more suited to Marco than the style that Victory were playing last season.

let's be realistic here, the major reason he left was because of this club's unsettled financial future...


Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

Our playing style in 09/10 was a lot more suited to Marco than the style that Victory were playing last season.

let's be realistic here, the major reason he left was because of this club's unsettled financial future...


That's exactly what I am trying to say. 

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

james dean wrote:

- work out what the Facebook and Twitter advertising actually is supposed to do.  Currently it seems to be aimed at 12 year olds



Anyone go see the Nix players are New World Metro this evening? Did anyone actually know it was on?

I don't see the point of sending out messages from the Nix twitter account just as you have turned up somewhere for a promo. If they don't give people advance notice of the events, do they really expect many people to go out of their way to see the players?

Sorry to use you as an example Ard Righ, but he tweeted that he didn't know it was on and walked straight past. Only to find out that it was on when he was on the train.

No and yes..but only cos I saw a little sign inside NW when I shopped there Tuesday..drove into work today tho!

A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

Our playing style in 09/10 was a lot more suited to Marco than the style that Victory were playing last season.

let's be realistic here, the major reason he left was because of this club's unsettled financial future...


Don't forget the superb training facilities at Fictree

We're the WELLINGTON Phoenix

And this is our Home

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

Don't forget the arm flapping to rev the crowd up.


True. There are no passionate arm flappers in the current squad.



Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago · History

it's pretty obvious what JD is saying about entertainment - how often after we win do people comment along the lines of "shit game, but at least we won"? If we won, why was it still a shit game if it's all about winning?

I'd take a boring win over an exciting game any day, but the average punter pays money to be entertained unless they have a large emotional stake in the team.

For many of us, the entertainment comes from the struggle to win, but it's not like that for the more fickle fans.

I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Jesus let's not turn this into another thread about Marco

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

I am enjoying the A-League as a whole a lot more this year. There are some pretty exciting players.

I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink