Wellington Phoenix Men

April 18th - D-Day

890 replies · 29,536 views
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
rjmiller wrote:
Doloras wrote:
  but there are many people in Wellington who don't like the Nix existing because it's not "the natural order of things" (i.e. rugby, cricket and other traditions), or are annoyed by the traditions of football fandom, and would like to see us cease to exist for that reason. It's part of human nature to fear the new and unfamiliar.[/QUOTE]
 
I really don't think this is the case. Sure there are some people in Wellington who may not like the sport but I don't think any of them has a problem with the Phoenix existing. It's even better becaue a football team is doing so much better in Wellington than it did in Auckland.
 
 
[QUOTE=some plonker from the Phoenix facebook page]
" u guys are all fags thinking u can come along and take over the hurricanes ground like u have. sometimes u should use your brains and realise rugby dominates this country!!!"
 


 
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Thank you, Matt, for fronting up - it certainly improves my personal opinion of you. As to "personal abuse", as I said elsewhere, when you put yourself up on Closeup, you became the story yourself. The personal, taunting tone of your Twitter remarks re: Terry aren't exactly self-effacing and non-controversial either. What goes around comes around. Dave Burgess has pissed a lot of us off but he hasn't made it "about him".Doloras2011-03-09 11:04:11

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mnippert wrote:
This'll be my only comment on this matter. I don't make a habit of commenting on forums, or blogs for that matter, because a) they generally descend into vitriolic abuse, and b) I have a job to do that generally has me writing in other areas.

As for Dolaras' probing questions amid her name-calling, the answer is e) none of the above.

The business affairs of Mr Serepisos are an obviously important story. The Phoenix angle is, from my perspective, mere colour. The Dominion Post obviously talks it up as an angle, but it�s peripheral for me.

Were Century City to go under it is highly likely second-tier lenders (and unsecured creditors) will lose a packet, and having $230m of Wellington real estate being put on the market in a liquidation fire sale would have serious ramifications for the city's property market.

The consequences are potentially huge, and if Mr Serepisos is relying on WGA to save him from the IRD I can�t ignore the evidence clearly suggesting he�s been scammed and the game is up and outline what will happen next.

More broadly, it appears WGA have been running a global scam for some years and I doubt Mr Serepisos is the only New Zealand victim (Allan Crafar stumped up 27,000GBP, but didn't  far along their process).

There's a public interest in exposing this - preventing others forking out money to Swiss bank accounts - and while I'm glad to have broken this story, it�s rapidly grown out of my hands.
 
Australian and Spanish media are now onto the case, and I hear the Wall Street Journal's taken an interest. I'll push it as far as I'm able, but I'm just one guy with a phone working for a New Zealand business weekly.
 
And, on a final note, the forums here are generally (with the recent exception of personal abuse directed towards myself) highly entertaining.
 
Cheers,
Matt
mnippert@nbr.co.nz
021 193 1011
 
Thanks for that. Whether I agree or not, as far as I'm concerned it took some nuts to front up and post on here, given the present circumstances.
 
My issue is not with your investigation of the whole WGA affair but more with the apparent zeal with which you now seem to be pursuing the Tery Serepisos angle. It appears that the story has become more about persecuting Terry Serepisos than exposing the WGA.

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jag wrote:
mnippert wrote:
This'll be my only comment on this matter. I don't make a habit of commenting on forums, or blogs for that matter, because a) they generally descend into vitriolic abuse, and b) I have a job to do that generally has me writing in other areas.

As for Dolaras' probing questions amid her name-calling, the answer is e) none of the above.

The business affairs of Mr Serepisos are an obviously important story. The Phoenix angle is, from my perspective, mere colour. The Dominion Post obviously talks it up as an angle, but it�s peripheral for me.

Were Century City to go under it is highly likely second-tier lenders (and unsecured creditors) will lose a packet, and having $230m of Wellington real estate being put on the market in a liquidation fire sale would have serious ramifications for the city's property market.

The consequences are potentially huge, and if Mr Serepisos is relying on WGA to save him from the IRD I can�t ignore the evidence clearly suggesting he�s been scammed and the game is up and outline what will happen next.

More broadly, it appears WGA have been running a global scam for some years and I doubt Mr Serepisos is the only New Zealand victim (Allan Crafar stumped up 27,000GBP, but didn't  far along their process).

There's a public interest in exposing this - preventing others forking out money to Swiss bank accounts - and while I'm glad to have broken this story, it�s rapidly grown out of my hands.
 
Australian and Spanish media are now onto the case, and I hear the Wall Street Journal's taken an interest. I'll push it as far as I'm able, but I'm just one guy with a phone working for a New Zealand business weekly.
 
And, on a final note, the forums here are generally (with the recent exception of personal abuse directed towards myself) highly entertaining.
 
Cheers,
Matt
mnippert@nbr.co.nz
021 193 1011
 
Thanks for that. Whether I agree or not, as far as I'm concerned it took some nuts to front up and post on here, given the present circumstances.
 
My issue is not with your investigation of the whole WGA affair but more with the apparent zeal with which you now seem to be pursuing the Tery Serepisos angle. It appears that the story has become more about persecuting Terry Serepisos than exposing the WGA.
 
And destroying the nix in the process. 
 
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
To be precise, I would say that the story was about persecuiting Terry S before it was about exposing WGA. And let's all agree, finding out the clear facts about WGA is a good thing which Matt* should be given some kind of journalistic gong for.

(* In recognition of his "nuts", as Jag puts it, I retire the childish pun I made on his surname.)

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doloras wrote:
To be precise, I would say that the story was about persecuiting Terry S before it was about exposing WGA. And let's all agree, finding out the clear facts about WGA is a good thing which Matt* should be given some kind of journalistic gong for.

(* In recognition of his "nuts", as Jag puts it, I retire the childish pun I made on his surname.)
Let's see whether the said journalistic "nuts" are big enough to have their own gravitational field; i.e. What else is this story going to attract.
The bit I can't figure out is how the owner of WGA owns Racing Santander.  He must have some dosh.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Well he has the 40 odd million he scammed aussie businessmen out of.
Edit does this mean that Racing Santander will end up being owned by a group of aussies and Terry?
rjmiller2011-03-09 11:25:02
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
edward l wrote:
The bit I can't figure out is how the owner of WGA owns Racing Santander.� He must have some dosh.


As far as I can tell, he didn't pay cash up front. The first instalment was $2 million which he paid to the Spanish taxman, coincidentally not long after Terry is said to have forked out $1.5 million in "loan fees". You might want to google "Ponzi scheme".Doloras2011-03-09 11:26:05

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
He must be spending a fair bit on chiropracter's bills, because he must be spending a helluva lot of time looking over his shoulder.

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jag wrote:
He must be spending a fair bit on chiropracter's bills, because he must be spending a helluva lot of time looking over his shoulder.


I'm sure at least some of those Aussie businessmen are linked to the underworld and they know people and they tell them things know where to hire hitmen.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Anyhoo, getting back to court. If Terry doesn't sort it out in the next 24 hours, could the judge decide to liquidate some of Terry's companies, but not - just for an example - Century City Football?

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Matt Nippert is being more than a little disingenuous whan he says this is about "public interest" and not Terry per se. I know for a fact that the editor and publisher have a personal gripe against Terry and began targeting him long before the WGA issue was even public knowledge. So fess up, Matt - who is really driving this? 
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
To be fair, once more, Matt is not necessarily responsible for the biases of his bosses. But to an unjaundiced eye those biases are clearly there. And what gets me most is the glee that Matt's tweets show in "the chase" - which would be at least prima facie evidence of not being just about dispassionately chasing a story about the Wellington property market.Doloras2011-03-09 11:49:20

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doloras wrote:
To be fair, once more, Matt is not necessarily responsible for the biases of his bosses. But to an unjaundiced eye those biases are clearly there. And what gets me most is the glee that Matt's tweets show in "the chase" - which would be at least prima facie evidence of not being just about dispassionately chasing a story about the Wellington property market.
 
^ This

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Nippert i domum!

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Agreed, Doloras. No one would deny that the NBR has a legitimate story but it is the zeal - dare I say it, glee - with which the publication is pursuing it that concerns.  
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Junior82 wrote:
Nippert i domum!


Papillam habet in faciem.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Nippert looks like that guy from 'the dove from above'.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Jag]Vic Reeves! hahahaha
 
UVAVU!

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mnippert wrote:
This'll be my only comment on this matter. I don't make a habit of commenting on forums, or blogs for that matter, because a) they generally descend into vitriolic abuse, and b) I have a job to do that generally has me writing in other areas.

As for Dolaras' probing questions amid her name-calling, the answer is e) none of the above.

The business affairs of Mr Serepisos are an obviously important story. The Phoenix angle is, from my perspective, mere colour. The Dominion Post obviously talks it up as an angle, but it�s peripheral for me.

Were Century City to go under it is highly likely second-tier lenders (and unsecured creditors) will lose a packet, and having $230m of Wellington real estate being put on the market in a liquidation fire sale would have serious ramifications for the city's property market.

The consequences are potentially huge, and if Mr Serepisos is relying on WGA to save him from the IRD I can�t ignore the evidence clearly suggesting he�s been scammed and the game is up and outline what will happen next.

More broadly, it appears WGA have been running a global scam for some years and I doubt Mr Serepisos is the only New Zealand victim (Allan Crafar stumped up 27,000GBP, but didn't  far along their process).

There's a public interest in exposing this - preventing others forking out money to Swiss bank accounts - and while I'm glad to have broken this story, it�s rapidly grown out of my hands.
 
Australian and Spanish media are now onto the case, and I hear the Wall Street Journal's taken an interest. I'll push it as far as I'm able, but I'm just one guy with a phone working for a New Zealand business weekly.
 
And, on a final note, the forums here are generally (with the recent exception of personal abuse directed towards myself) highly entertaining.
 
Cheers,
Matt
mnippert@nbr.co.nz
021 193 1011
 
Gidday Matt, thanks for posting. Wow, I could just about believe all this bullsh*t if it wasn't for everything else you have ever written in relation to Terry Serepisos in the NBR and on Twitter.
 
First of all, you're a hypocrite. You say you don't normally comment on forums or blogs but you actually wrote a piece for the NBR on 22 Feb titled "Phoenix fans doubtful WGA will save Terry" that quoted people on this forum. That was just lazy, shoddy journalism and basically, if you live by the sword you die by the sword. If you're going to quote people from here and send tweets directed at Yellow Fever then sorry, but people will talk about you here.  

Second, you try to placate us with the explanation that "the business affairs of Mr Serepisos are an obviously important story". Well yes, they are, for many reasons. But it's the completely unbalanced and unprofessional way that you've approached it that pisses me off.
 
You tweeted this on 17 Nov last year: "As one of many purveyors of journalistic smack, I consider Serepisos a tall poppy who's ripe for lopping". There's your real agenda, in a tweet that manages to be self-aggrandising, vindictive and unprofessional all at the same time. God I love Twitter. The number of people who manage to make complete dicks of themselves on there is just amazing.
 
Why don't you just be honest? You hate Terry Serepisos, you want to see him go down regardless of the damage, and everything else about the story (WGA, the Phoenix) is just window-dressing.
 
By the way, you call out Doloras for personal abuse and not me? I photoshopped a picture of a nipple onto your face ffs! I believe I deserve acknowledgement for that.
 

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Terminator just got trolled?

Central Hawkes Bay Nix
and tragic follower of Charlton Athletic 
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doloras wrote:
Junior82 wrote:
Nippert i domum!


Papillam habet in faciem.
 
Richard Cranium est.
 

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
terminator_x wrote:
mnippert wrote:
This'll be my only comment on this matter. I don't make a habit of commenting on forums, or blogs for that matter, because a) they generally descend into vitriolic abuse, and b) I have a job to do that generally has me writing in other areas.

As for Dolaras' probing questions amid her name-calling, the answer is e) none of the above.

The business affairs of Mr Serepisos are an obviously important story. The Phoenix angle is, from my perspective, mere colour. The Dominion Post obviously talks it up as an angle, but it�s peripheral for me.

Were Century City to go under it is highly likely second-tier lenders (and unsecured creditors) will lose a packet, and having $230m of Wellington real estate being put on the market in a liquidation fire sale would have serious ramifications for the city's property market.

The consequences are potentially huge, and if Mr Serepisos is relying on WGA to save him from the IRD I can�t ignore the evidence clearly suggesting he�s been scammed and the game is up and outline what will happen next.

More broadly, it appears WGA have been running a global scam for some years and I doubt Mr Serepisos is the only New Zealand victim (Allan Crafar stumped up 27,000GBP, but didn't  far along their process).

There's a public interest in exposing this - preventing others forking out money to Swiss bank accounts - and while I'm glad to have broken this story, it�s rapidly grown out of my hands.
 
Australian and Spanish media are now onto the case, and I hear the Wall Street Journal's taken an interest. I'll push it as far as I'm able, but I'm just one guy with a phone working for a New Zealand business weekly.
 
And, on a final note, the forums here are generally (with the recent exception of personal abuse directed towards myself) highly entertaining.
 
Cheers,
Matt
mnippert@nbr.co.nz
021 193 1011
 
Gidday Matt, thanks for posting. Wow, I could just about believe all this bullsh*t if it wasn't for everything else you have ever written in relation to Terry Serepisos in the NBR and on Twitter.
 
First of all, you're a hypocrite. You say you don't normally comment on forums or blogs but you actually wrote a piece for the NBR on 22 Feb titled "Phoenix fans doubtful WGA will save Terry" that quoted people on this forum. That was just lazy, shoddy journalism and basically, if you live by the sword you die by the sword. If you're going to quote people from here and send tweets directed at Yellow Fever then sorry, but people will talk about you here.  

Second, you try to placate us with the explanation that "the business affairs of Mr Serepisos are an obviously important story". Well yes, they are, for many reasons. But it's the completely unbalanced and unprofessional way that you've approached it that pisses me off.
 
You tweeted this on 17 Nov last year: "As one of many purveyors of journalistic smack, I consider Serepisos a tall poppy who's ripe for lopping". There's your real agenda, in a tweet that manages to be self-aggrandising, vindictive and unprofessional all at the same time. God I love Twitter. The number of people who manage to make complete dicks of themselves on there is just amazing.
 
Why don't you just be honest? You hate Terry Serepisos, you want to see him go down regardless of the damage, and everything else about the story (WGA, the Phoenix) is just window-dressing.
 
By the way, you call out Doloras for personal abuse and not me? I photoshopped a picture of a nipple onto your face ffs! I believe I deserve acknowledgement for that.
 
 
Post. Of. The. Year.
 
Jog on Nippert.  You've no friends here.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
There's only so long you can big yourself up as The Journo Giantslayer before you realise that, outside the NBR canteen and the posh parties you go to, your targets have supporters and friends. Hope the buzz of getting interviewed on Closeup was worth it. And, Matt - your work in The Listener was actually very good. But I'm sure you go to a better quality of party these days.

J82: you mean "mentulam capem est". Hope this helps.Doloras2011-03-09 13:27:03

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doloras wrote:
Why in blue blazes can TV3 get a $43 million loan from the Government and not us? I would love to see MediaWorks have to go to Switzerland to see dodgy Indian fellows, be dragged into court, and have Matt Nippleface on their case.



Surely this is a massive conflict of interest considering Steven Joyce, the telecoms minister involved, was the founder of Radioworks!
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
jeremiah wrote:

Surely this is a massive conflict of interest considering Steven Joyce, the telecoms minister involved, was the founder of Radioworks!



We will never fully decide who has won the football.

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
jeremiah wrote:
Doloras wrote:
Why in blue blazes can TV3 get a $43 million loan from the Government and not us? I would love to see MediaWorks have to go to Switzerland to see dodgy Indian fellows, be dragged into court, and have Matt Nippleface on their case.



Surely this is a massive conflict of interest considering Steven Joyce, the telecoms minister involved, was the founder of Radioworks!
As far as I am aware that isn't actually a loan. It is an allowance for a deferred payment on their broadcasting fees and they are being charged more than 10% interest on it.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Also, my understanding is that it applies to The Radio Network aswell. Could be wrong there however. LPF1 would know I guess?
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
what time are we in court tomorrow?
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
terminator_x wrote:
mnippert wrote:
This'll be my only comment on this matter. I don't make a habit of commenting on forums, or blogs for that matter, because a) they generally descend into vitriolic abuse, and b) I have a job to do that generally has me writing in other areas.

As for Dolaras' probing questions amid her name-calling, the answer is e) none of the above.

The business affairs of Mr Serepisos are an obviously important story. The Phoenix angle is, from my perspective, mere colour. The Dominion Post obviously talks it up as an angle, but it�s peripheral for me.

Were Century City to go under it is highly likely second-tier lenders (and unsecured creditors) will lose a packet, and having $230m of Wellington real estate being put on the market in a liquidation fire sale would have serious ramifications for the city's property market.

The consequences are potentially huge, and if Mr Serepisos is relying on WGA to save him from the IRD I can�t ignore the evidence clearly suggesting he�s been scammed and the game is up and outline what will happen next.

More broadly, it appears WGA have been running a global scam for some years and I doubt Mr Serepisos is the only New Zealand victim (Allan Crafar stumped up 27,000GBP, but didn't  far along their process).

There's a public interest in exposing this - preventing others forking out money to Swiss bank accounts - and while I'm glad to have broken this story, it�s rapidly grown out of my hands.
 
Australian and Spanish media are now onto the case, and I hear the Wall Street Journal's taken an interest. I'll push it as far as I'm able, but I'm just one guy with a phone working for a New Zealand business weekly.
 
And, on a final note, the forums here are generally (with the recent exception of personal abuse directed towards myself) highly entertaining.
 
Cheers,
Matt
mnippert@nbr.co.nz
021 193 1011
 
Gidday Matt, thanks for posting. Wow, I could just about believe all this bullsh*t if it wasn't for everything else you have ever written in relation to Terry Serepisos in the NBR and on Twitter.
 
First of all, you're a hypocrite. You say you don't normally comment on forums or blogs but you actually wrote a piece for the NBR on 22 Feb titled "Phoenix fans doubtful WGA will save Terry" that quoted people on this forum. That was just lazy, shoddy journalism and basically, if you live by the sword you die by the sword. If you're going to quote people from here and send tweets directed at Yellow Fever then sorry, but people will talk about you here.  

Second, you try to placate us with the explanation that "the business affairs of Mr Serepisos are an obviously important story". Well yes, they are, for many reasons. But it's the completely unbalanced and unprofessional way that you've approached it that pisses me off.
 
You tweeted this on 17 Nov last year: "As one of many purveyors of journalistic smack, I consider Serepisos a tall poppy who's ripe for lopping". There's your real agenda, in a tweet that manages to be self-aggrandising, vindictive and unprofessional all at the same time. God I love Twitter. The number of people who manage to make complete dicks of themselves on there is just amazing.
 
Why don't you just be honest? You hate Terry Serepisos, you want to see him go down regardless of the damage, and everything else about the story (WGA, the Phoenix) is just window-dressing.
 
By the way, you call out Doloras for personal abuse and not me? I photoshopped a picture of a nipple onto your face ffs! I believe I deserve acknowledgement for that.
 
Terminator that is absolutely amazing stuff. said perfectly!

and as for you matt muppet it is known fact that you have a personal agenda against terry. Not only that, you would be more than happy to see the phoenix fall. The fact you come on here and try to justify yourself to the hardcore fans of the very club which you are trying to destroy as to why your pieces of "journalism" aren't infact a personal attack against Terry and the phoenix is completely ridiculous. I really hope the fans on here rally up against you. Because it is people specifically like you that are the number 1 enemy of the phoenix and Terry. And this is dangerous territory for you to be treading behind in enemy lines. I really hope everybody sees and realizes what Matt Nippert is up to in trying to bring down the phoenix. and we shouldn't be taking it one bit
Phoenixlova2011-03-09 16:12:21
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Phoenixlova wrote:
Not only that, you would be more than happy to see the phoenix fall.[/quote]

I think that's unfair. Mattnipp* doesn't care if the Nix lives or dies, he just wants Terry to suffer. If we were sold to someone else he'd totally lose interest. Unless he's so aggrieved by my personal abuse that now he has determined that the Nix should die, which would be a back-handed compliment.

[quote]Because it is people specifically like you that are the number 1 enemy of the phoenix and Terry.


Again, to be fair, it could be argued that Terry is his own worst enemy, and Terry's inability to keep the Nix insulated from his other wheelings and dealings is our worst enemy. But certainly there is a lot of undeserved anti-Terry feeling out there, to go with all the deserved stuff, which in turn has a small component of racism IMHO.

* I hope this new nickname catches on.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Good on nippert for at least having the guts to come on here and respond. However much people support terry (and yes the phoenix should errect a statue of the man, whatever happens), he does have some valid points

Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doloras wrote:
Phoenixlova wrote:
Not only that, you would be more than happy to see the phoenix fall.


I think that's unfair. Mattnipp* doesn't care if the Nix lives or dies, he just wants Terry to suffer. If we were sold to someone else he'd totally lose interest. Unless he's so aggrieved by my personal abuse that now he has determined that the Nix should die, which would be a back-handed compliment.


* I hope this new nickname catches on.
 
i dont think it is unfair. I know he wants the phoenix to fall, and that is not speculation. whether or not he wants them to fall because of Terry or not is irrelevant.
And yes you may think that Matt Nipp has balls posting on this forum, but i wouldnt be surprised if the only reason he did post on here is so we would all think exactly that. its just a way for him to slightly win some respect from us for his comments
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doloras wrote:
[QUOTE=Phoenixlova]

. But certainly there is a lot of undeserved anti-Terry feeling out there, to go with all the deserved stuff, which in turn has a small component of racism IMHO.

* I hope this new nickname catches on.
As much as i hate to admit it there is also some very deserved anti feeling out there.Have spoken to a number of people who have the feeling that its about time some karma came home.
Sadly the Phoenix look like they may be on the receiving end as well.Not to sure just how much longer we can keep dodging the bullets.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Good on nippert for at least having the guts to come on here and respond. However much people support terry (and yes the phoenix should errect a statue of the man, whatever happens), he does have some valid points


This.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
[QUOTE=CboZ]what time are we in court tomorrow?[/QUOTE]
 
And what time are we likely to hear something? Anyone have that info?
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I am going to assume it's the same deal as Monday. Court starts 10am and runs through the cases in alphabetical order.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Not to panic. Terry always has one last source of funds.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Good on nippert for at least having the guts to come on here and respond. However much people support terry (and yes the phoenix should errect a statue of the man, whatever happens), he does have some valid points
 
I don't think Nippleface has "guts" or "balls" for coming on here trying to vindicate himself. If anything it shows a certain level of insecurity that he would even feel the need.
 
And I'm sorry, he may have some valid points but the overall credibility of his "reporting" is completely destroyed by his lack of journalistic integrity. I would love to think that he is being ironic or sarcastic when he says "I consider Serepisos a tall poppy who's ripe for lopping" but when you read some of his other tweets and NBR reports it's clear that he's not. He's just being another w**ker with an anti-Serepisos agenda.
 
To think that this guy went on Close Up purporting to be a journalist. I feel like ringing them and telling them they got scammed.
 
 

Permalink Permalink