Wellington Phoenix Men

Contracted Players - Return of the Long Pins

7062 replies · 2,121,506 views Locked
over 11 years ago

except westpac is a council owned trust. Their mandate isn't to make money and pay a dividend but to be self sufficient and attract events to the city.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

lol, "attract events to the city". Not laughing at you but them. Bruce Sprinsgteen comes to mind, the Rolling Stones, the Eagles. Not a word from Westpac, not what apoears to be any effort in getting those acts here. Next up, the Ellerslie flower show?

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

As I alluded, Westpac are unlikely to reduce costs until it is obvious that the Nix might go [either relocate or fold].

You only need to look around the world to see how the tennant/stadium thing works. In the NFL it is not unusual for team owners to move cities on the premise of new facilities. Can you imagine the surprise on the faces of the Oakland City Council when Al Davis took the Raiders to Los Angeles? As someopne else said, it is not unusual for stadia or venues to even buy teams to ensure they play at the venue - see the Arena Football League as an example. Back to the NFL, Los angeles is their biggest TV market [might be #2] and they have no NFL team. Once upon a time they had 2 teams and they both left [to St Louis and Oakland] because they weren't getting a good enough deal from the stadium owners. The template is there and WellNix will use it if they can find a better alternative. Balls my word......

Where are they going to go? Welnix are Wellington people - they don't know about anywhere else. I imagine the stadium in Christchurch is cheaper but Auckland would probably be just as expensive. Wherever they play in NZ they are going to lose money.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago
If what you are saying [about them losing money anywhere] then they will either try and sell or not renew their license. These people didn't make their money by losing money......I don't know how many times they've said they won't continue to throw money into the club without any financial benefit. I think you might be making the same mistake as the stadium might be - thinking they won't move because...... I think you're being a bit naive on this score
Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Wow, thread drift... clicked on "Contracted Players" and had well over a page of stadium fees and operating models discussion before I saw ANYTHING about contracted players.


Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.


Phoenix fans. We have to win them over one fan at a time.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

If what you are saying [about them losing money anywhere] then they will either try and sell or not renew their license. These people didn't make their money by losing money......I don't know how many times they've said they won't continue to throw money into the club without any financial benefit. I think you might be making the same mistake as the stadium might be - thinking they won't move because...... I think you're being a bit naive on this score

I think Welnix are being naive if they truly expect to make a profit. How many football teams in the world make a profit? It would astound me that so many wealthy businessmen could be so stupid to think that the Wellington Phoenix is profitable. Does any A-League team make a profit? They all are owned by wealthy businesses or consortiums.

I accept there is a huge possibility Welnix will pull the pin but they won't be making a profit wherever in the world they decide to move. Why would a bunch of business men from Wellington bother owning an A-League franchise in Christchurch which loses money.

American sports teams make money because the business model is completely different.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Thought they wanted for it to be self sufficient? Shouldn't be too hard in a league where your salary cap is covered.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Lonegunmen wrote:

lol, "attract events to the city". Not laughing at you but them. Bruce Sprinsgteen comes to mind, the Rolling Stones, the Eagles. Not a word from Westpac, not what apoears to be any effort in getting those acts here. Next up, the Ellerslie flower show?

Well nimbys in Thorndon don't let the stadium host more than some small number of loud concerts per year. I think the number is 2 or 4..

"Yellow Fever are fantastic – I have to say that"

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

The last concert at the stadium was Bon Jovi in 2010.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Ryan54 wrote:

The last concert at the stadium was Bon Jovi in 2010.

Incorrect. Pretty sure there was at least one Dane Rumble concert more recently than that. I seem to recall some football being played before and/or after it too.

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Ryan54 wrote:

The last concert at the stadium was Bon Jovi in 2010.

Incorrect. Pretty sure there was at least one Dane Rumble concert more recently than that. I seem to recall some football being played before and/or after it too.

Was that the one where they used his sound system that sucked when they should have plugged in to the stadium one for a better effect?

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Ryan54 wrote:

The last concert at the stadium was Bon Jovi in 2010.

I so much want to negative rep this post.

Can I report it for containing offensive language? 

B*n @rsewipe J*vi.  Feckintwunts

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Ryan54 wrote:

The last concert at the stadium was Bon Jovi in 2010.

Incorrect. Pretty sure there was at least one Dane Rumble concert more recently than that. I seem to recall some football being played before and/or after it too.

Okay well I was just going off Westpac Stadium's site. It seems that concert happened before a Phoenix game.

The point is that there are very few peple who can get a decent crowd to the stadium for a concert.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Dane Rumble only got about 9k crowd according to wiki. 

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Junior82 wrote:

Dane Rumble only got about 9k crowd according to wiki. 

This region could really do with a 12,000 seat venue for concerts and such. Maybe make it a rectangle so you can play the odd football match there too.

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

tbh I thought the warm up act and the bit after Rumble's gig were much better.  Although even that was a bit sh!t from memory.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Wibblebutt wrote:


EXPIRES END OF 2014/15:

.

Michael BOXALL

Tyler BOYD (u21)

Josh BRINDELL-SOUTH

Jeremy BROCKIE

Reece CAIRA

Kenny CUNNINGHAM (f)

Andrew DURANTE

Louis FENTON (u21)

Jason HICKS

Lewis ITALIANO

Glen MOSS

Albert RIERA (f)

Ben SIGMUND

.

EXPIRES END OF 2015/16:

.

Nathan BURNS

Alejandro GORRIN (f) (+1)

Roy KRISHNA (f)

Vince LIA

Manny MUSCAT

Matthew RIDENTON (u21)

Alex RUFER (u21)

Just wanted to bump this in anticipation of an update in the near future...

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

paulm wrote:

Wibblebutt wrote:

EXPIRES END OF 2014/15:

.

Michael BOXALL

Tyler BOYD (u21)

Josh BRINDELL-SOUTH

Jeremy BROCKIE

Reece CAIRA

Kenny CUNNINGHAM (f)

Andrew DURANTE

Louis FENTON (u21)

Jason HICKS

Lewis ITALIANO

Glen MOSS

Albert RIERA (f)

Ben SIGMUND

.

EXPIRES END OF 2015/16:

.

Nathan BURNS

Alejandro GORRIN (f) (+1)

Roy KRISHNA (f)

Vince LIA

Manny MUSCAT

Matthew RIDENTON (u21)

Alex RUFER (u21)

Just wanted to bump this in anticipation of an update in the near future...

Tom Doyle?

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Ryan54 wrote:

If what you are saying [about them losing money anywhere] then they will either try and sell or not renew their license. These people didn't make their money by losing money......I don't know how many times they've said they won't continue to throw money into the club without any financial benefit. I think you might be making the same mistake as the stadium might be - thinking they won't move because...... I think you're being a bit naive on this score

I think Welnix are being naive if they truly expect to make a profit. How many football teams in the world make a profit? It would astound me that so many wealthy businessmen could be so stupid to think that the Wellington Phoenix is profitable. Does any A-League team make a profit? They all are owned by wealthy businesses or consortiums.

I accept there is a huge possibility Welnix will pull the pin but they won't be making a profit wherever in the world they decide to move. Why would a bunch of business men from Wellington bother owning an A-League franchise in Christchurch which loses money.

American sports teams make money because the business model is completely different.

How many teams do you know of that makes a profit by finishing last or near enough last for it not to matter? If we were to make the finals, or heck even win the A-League, there is a financial boost that accompanies it. Results are everything. 

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago · edited over 11 years ago · History

Djinksta wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

If what you are saying [about them losing money anywhere] then they will either try and sell or not renew their license. These people didn't make their money by losing money......I don't know how many times they've said they won't continue to throw money into the club without any financial benefit. I think you might be making the same mistake as the stadium might be - thinking they won't move because...... I think you're being a bit naive on this score

I think Welnix are being naive if they truly expect to make a profit. How many football teams in the world make a profit? It would astound me that so many wealthy businessmen could be so stupid to think that the Wellington Phoenix is profitable. Does any A-League team make a profit? They all are owned by wealthy businesses or consortiums.

I accept there is a huge possibility Welnix will pull the pin but they won't be making a profit wherever in the world they decide to move. Why would a bunch of business men from Wellington bother owning an A-League franchise in Christchurch which loses money.

American sports teams make money because the business model is completely different.

How many teams do you know of that makes a profit by finishing last or near enough last for it not to matter? If we were to make the finals, or heck even win the A-League, there is a financial boost that accompanies it. Results are everything. 

CCM have won the league a lot and aren't exactly profitable. We won't start magically packing out stadiums and turning a profit if we make the finals, in fact we already did so for a few seasons then terry went broke and the club almost folded. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Tegal wrote:

Djinksta wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

If what you are saying [about them losing money anywhere] then they will either try and sell or not renew their license. These people didn't make their money by losing money......I don't know how many times they've said they won't continue to throw money into the club without any financial benefit. I think you might be making the same mistake as the stadium might be - thinking they won't move because...... I think you're being a bit naive on this score

I think Welnix are being naive if they truly expect to make a profit. How many football teams in the world make a profit? It would astound me that so many wealthy businessmen could be so stupid to think that the Wellington Phoenix is profitable. Does any A-League team make a profit? They all are owned by wealthy businesses or consortiums.

I accept there is a huge possibility Welnix will pull the pin but they won't be making a profit wherever in the world they decide to move. Why would a bunch of business men from Wellington bother owning an A-League franchise in Christchurch which loses money.

American sports teams make money because the business model is completely different.

How many teams do you know of that makes a profit by finishing last or near enough last for it not to matter? If we were to make the finals, or heck even win the A-League, there is a financial boost that accompanies it. Results are everything. 

CCM have won the league a lot and aren't exactly profitable. We won't start magically packing out stadiums and turning a profit if we make the finals, in fact we already did so for a few seasons then terry went broke and the club almost folded. 

Oh no I agree with what you're saying, but I think you'd agree that it would be better for the club if we were making the finals more often than not. It'd be a step in the right direction that's for sure. 

Terry went broke due to other reasons?

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago · edited over 11 years ago · History

Djinksta wrote:

How many teams do you know of that makes a profit by finishing last or near enough last for it not to matter? If we were to make the finals, or heck even win the A-League, there is a financial boost that accompanies it. Results are everything. 


Oh no I agree with what you're saying, but I think you'd agree that it would be better for the club if we were making the finals more often than not. It'd be a step in the right direction that's for sure.

Terry went broke due to other reasons?

The Houston Astros have gone on one of the worst runs in MLB history in the last 4 seasons and have posted 3 consecutive 100 loss seasons which puts them very high up on the list of worst ever baseball teams. Despite all of this they were the most profitable team in 2013. Much of this has to do with the different business model I alluded to earlier. If the Astros were an English football team they would now be in League Two and making nothing. A business model like the Astros does have relevance when you support a small market team in a relegation free league. Despite those 3 100 loss seasons, the Astros are on target to do better this year and are expected to be competitive from next season. Once again, they are benefited by a business model which has a draft but then again they also have no salary cap.

Yes winning brings a financial boost but getting there also creates a financial cost. Results are important but they aren't enough by themselves. We have a poor business model; so does almost everyone else in the league. I doubt anyone makes a profit. Long term I'm hoping that the natural growth of football in this country, the increase in quality of the A-League, the establishment of a NZ derby and the Phoenix becoming more of an institution will lead to higher attendances. 

Linking it back to the thread topic, if we bought a really good marquee for 1 million dollars then at ticket prices of $30 we would need to sell another 33,000 tickets per season or about 2,500 per game. Obviously, there are shirt sales too but not all of that $30 would go to the Phoenix either. The Phoenix owners seem to think that a marquee wouldn't have that impact.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago
Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Updated:


EXPIRES END OF 2014/15:

.

Michael BOXALL

Tyler BOYD (u21)

Josh BRINDELL-SOUTH

Jeremy BROCKIE

Reece CAIRA

Kenny CUNNINGHAM (f)

Louis FENTON (u21)

Jason HICKS

Lewis ITALIANO

Glen MOSS

Albert RIERA (f)

Ben SIGMUND

.

EXPIRES END OF 2015/16:

.

Nathan BURNS

Andrew DURANTE

Alejandro GORRIN (f) (+1)

Roy KRISHNA (f)

Vince LIA

Manny MUSCAT

Matthew RIDENTON (u21)

Alex RUFER (u21)




Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Ryan54 wrote:

Djinksta wrote:

How many teams do you know of that makes a profit by finishing last or near enough last for it not to matter? If we were to make the finals, or heck even win the A-League, there is a financial boost that accompanies it. Results are everything. 

Oh no I agree with what you're saying, but I think you'd agree that it would be better for the club if we were making the finals more often than not. It'd be a step in the right direction that's for sure.

Terry went broke due to other reasons?

The Houston Astros have gone on one of the worst runs in MLB history in the last 4 seasons and have posted 3 consecutive 100 loss seasons which puts them very high up on the list of worst ever baseball teams. Despite all of this they were the most profitable team in 2013. Much of this has to do with the different business model I alluded to earlier. If the Astros were an English football team they would now be in League Two and making nothing. A business model like the Astros does have relevance when you support a small market team in a relegation free league. Despite those 3 100 loss seasons, the Astros are on target to do better this year and are expected to be competitive from next season. Once again, they are benefited by a business model which has a draft but then again they also have no salary cap.

Yes winning brings a financial boost but getting there also creates a financial cost. Results are important but they aren't enough by themselves. We have a poor business model; so does almost everyone else in the league. I doubt anyone makes a profit. Long term I'm hoping that the natural growth of football in this country, the increase in quality of the A-League, the establishment of a NZ derby and the Phoenix becoming more of an institution will lead to higher attendances. 

Linking it back to the thread topic, if we bought a really good marquee for 1 million dollars then at ticket prices of $30 we would need to sell another 33,000 tickets per season or about 2,500 per game. Obviously, there are shirt sales too but not all of that $30 would go to the Phoenix either. The Phoenix owners seem to think that a marquee wouldn't have that impact.

Not Necessarily saying we have to spend money on 'big' name players. I just feel some of our current crop aren't at the level anymore. Our youth players did a really good job last year. Yes, they may not be quite as good as the 'regulars' yet but there isn't a large gap between them. And they're all about 10 years younger. 

Comparing A MLB team to a A-League team is rather unrealistic. I see where you're coming from, but it just doesn't apply as much here. So what is our business model?

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

I see our business model being similar to CCM, no expensive players, emphasis on youth development and growing our own players over expensive recruitment, having a largely cheap squad with the rest of the cap space going to fill gaps and provide some experience and quality from overseas, eventually selling on players probably. Getting a good coach with the right tactics and recruiting to the needs of the game plan, cheap players who will function well in the system.

The whole money ball thing.

"Yellow Fever are fantastic – I have to say that"

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

asmodeus_82 wrote:

I see our business model being similar to CCM, no expensive players, emphasis on youth development and growing our own players over expensive recruitment, having a largely cheap squad with the rest of the cap space going to fill gaps and provide some experience and quality from overseas, eventually selling on players probably. Getting a good coach with the right tactics and recruiting to the needs of the game plan, cheap players who will function well in the system.

The whole money ball thing.

Fair enough, but the difference is that CCM are consistency making finals appearances, and have even won the league. I think we should be using youth more than we are now. In saying that, what Merrick has done in the last 12 months has outweighed everything Ricki did in his time at the helm. No youth development system was crazy.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

asmodeus_82 wrote:

I see our business model being similar to CCM, no expensive players, emphasis on youth development and growing our own players over expensive recruitment, having a largely cheap squad with the rest of the cap space going to fill gaps and provide some experience and quality from overseas, eventually selling on players probably. Getting a good coach with the right tactics and recruiting to the needs of the game plan, cheap players who will function well in the system.

The whole money ball thing.

I think the difficult thing in the A-League is that you develop a player like Rojas maybe for 5 years and then you get one season out of him. Obviously we didn't put that much time into Rojas but it is an example. You can't be always about the youth because transfer fees are nothing at this level and you hardly ever sign players up on long term deals. Is planning more than one season ahead even possible?

I think our strategy is like you say. The emphasis is on finding players who will do a specific role and fit well into the team dynamic.Our business model right now is to hope that rich people continue to subsidise it which is similar to almost every other team. Apparently in the 2012-13 season the Victory made a profit, Adelaide and Heart broke even and everyone else lost money. If WSW and CCM can compete in grand finals and lose money then I think that is indicative of the difficulties of running a profitable team, successful or otherwise. I'm hoping that the business model will improve over time as the Phoenix become more of an institution and the A-League grows as a football competition.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago · edited over 11 years ago · History

Djinksta wrote:

asmodeus_82 wrote:

I see our business model being similar to CCM, no expensive players, emphasis on youth development and growing our own players over expensive recruitment, having a largely cheap squad with the rest of the cap space going to fill gaps and provide some experience and quality from overseas, eventually selling on players probably. Getting a good coach with the right tactics and recruiting to the needs of the game plan, cheap players who will function well in the system.

The whole money ball thing.

Fair enough, but the difference is that CCM are consistency making finals appearances, and have even won the league. I think we should be using youth more than we are now. In saying that, what Merrick has done in the last 12 months has outweighed everything Ricki did in his time at the helm. No youth development system was crazy.

Yeah, Ricki ignored our strongest advantage which is being the only real avenue for Kiwi players, meaning we have a youth system of the entirety of NZ's domestic leagues. For some reason, despite being the national coach and having a vested interest in developing NZ talent, Ricki insisted on employing costly Australian Journeymen. Crazyness in hindsight.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

I wonder if Gorrin's +1 year option will be activated if/when we get a license extension from FFA?




Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Ryan wrote:

Djinksta wrote:

asmodeus_82 wrote:

I see our business model being similar to CCM, no expensive players, emphasis on youth development and growing our own players over expensive recruitment, having a largely cheap squad with the rest of the cap space going to fill gaps and provide some experience and quality from overseas, eventually selling on players probably. Getting a good coach with the right tactics and recruiting to the needs of the game plan, cheap players who will function well in the system.

The whole money ball thing.

Fair enough, but the difference is that CCM are consistency making finals appearances, and have even won the league. I think we should be using youth more than we are now. In saying that, what Merrick has done in the last 12 months has outweighed everything Ricki did in his time at the helm. No youth development system was crazy.

Yeah, Ricki ignored our strongest advantage which is being the only real avenue for Kiwi players, meaning we have a youth system of the entirety of NZ's domestic leagues. For some reason, despite being the national coach and having a vested interest in developing NZ talent, Ricki insisted on employing costly Australian Journeymen. Crazyness in hindsight.

And it completely ruined our 2014 WC campaign. Even the stand-in coach knew to play youth. Now we stand a chance at 2018.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Wibblebutt wrote:

I wonder if Gorrin's +1 year option will be activated if/when we get a license extension from FFA?

Maybe if/when he turns out to be decent, too

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Updated:


EXPIRES END OF 2014/15:

.

Michael BOXALL

Tyler BOYD (u21)

Josh BRINDELL-SOUTH

Jeremy BROCKIE

Reece CAIRA

Kenny CUNNINGHAM (f)

Louis FENTON (u21)

Jason HICKS

Lewis ITALIANO

Glen MOSS

Albert RIERA (f)

Ben SIGMUND

.

EXPIRES END OF 2015/16:

.

Roly BONEVACIA (f)

Nathan BURNS

Andrew DURANTE

Alejandro GORRIN (f) (+1)

Roy KRISHNA (f)

Vince LIA

Manny MUSCAT

Matthew RIDENTON (u21)

Alex RUFER (u21)




Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

With visa spots being reduced to 4 in 15/16, either Krishna needs his NZ passport or we will have to choose from Riera & Kenny if we wish to re-sign one of them.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

With visa spots being reduced to 4 in 15/16, either Krishna needs his NZ passport or we will have to choose from Riera & Kenny if we wish to re-sign one of them.

Riera

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Is Tom Doyle U-21?

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

D.O.B: 1992-06-30
Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

so if/when we get wee mac across the line. that will leave us with 1 spot? sure would be hard on boyle not to give it to him.

I have an amazing ability to find my way out of mazes. I'm pathological. 
Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago
If the get little Mac and Doyle, that's 12 kiwis in the squad. Good stuff

Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Updated:


EXPIRES END OF 2014/15:

.

Michael BOXALL

Tyler BOYD (u21)

Josh BRINDELL-SOUTH

Jeremy BROCKIE

Reece CAIRA

Kenny CUNNINGHAM (f)

Louis FENTON (u21)

Jason HICKS

Lewis ITALIANO

Glen MOSS

Albert RIERA (f)

Ben SIGMUND

.

EXPIRES END OF 2015/16:

.

Roly BONEVACIA (f)

Nathan BURNS

Tom DOYLE

Andrew DURANTE

Roy KRISHNA (f)

Vince LIA

Manny MUSCAT

Matthew RIDENTON (u21)

Alex RODRIGUEZ GORRIN (f) (+1)

Alex RUFER (u21)




Permalink Permalink

This topic is locked.