Wellington Phoenix Men

Halberg Awards

631 replies · 15,589 views
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
djtim3000 wrote:
Jag wrote:
I'm starting to get really pissed off hearing the phrase .."but they didn't win a game"


I'm already pissed off at the idiot journalists and the ignorant general public who don't seem to realise the point of the Halbergs is to:

"honour those whose personal performances (now extended to teams and coaches), or example, has had the most beneficial effect on the advancement of sport in the country"

Surely people should know this by now, it stuns me that for example the article in the Herald; the journalist in question says in his opening "The Halbergs recognise excellence..." no they f*cking don't, you useless p.o.s journalist.
 
I don't see "honour those whose personal performances (now extended to teams and coaches), or example, has had the most beneficial effect on the advancement of sport in the country" and "recognise excellence" as mutually exclusive.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Indeed, but I'm not quite sure what the following line from the Halberg site means
... "Years later, this was amended by The Halberg Trust to be more in keeping with the manner in which the Trust applied the presentation of the Award".

Is there an amended set of criteria?

If so, they are a little elusive.Turfmoore2011-02-11 10:02:55

I know, I know, its serious!

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
djtim3000 wrote:
Jag wrote:
I'm starting to get really pissed off hearing the phrase .."but they didn't win a game"


I'm already pissed off at the idiot journalists and the ignorant general public who don't seem to realise the point of the Halbergs is to:

"honour those whose personal performances (now extended to teams and coaches), or example, has had the most beneficial effect on the advancement of sport in the country"

Surely people should know this by now, it stuns me that for example the article in the Herald; the journalist in question says in his opening "The Halbergs recognise excellence..." no they f*cking don't, you useless p.o.s journalist.
 
I don't see "honour those whose personal performances (now extended to teams and coaches), or example, has had the most beneficial effect on the advancement of sport in the country" and "recognise excellence" as mutually exclusive.


Well they're not mutually exclusive; "honour those whose personal performances (now extended to teams and coaches), or example, has had the most beneficial effect on the advancement of sport in the country" would be a subset (generally) of "recognise excellence".

But the description of recognising excellence can cover a lot of other facets of sporting excellence not just providing most beneficial effect on the advancement of sport in the country.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
djtim3000 wrote:
djtim3000 wrote:
Jag wrote:
I'm starting to get really pissed off hearing the phrase .."but they didn't win a game"


I'm already pissed off at the idiot journalists and the ignorant general public who don't seem to realise the point of the Halbergs is to:

"honour those whose personal performances (now extended to teams and coaches), or example, has had the most beneficial effect on the advancement of sport in the country"

Surely people should know this by now, it stuns me that for example the article in the Herald; the journalist in question says in his opening "The Halbergs recognise excellence..." no they f*cking don't, you useless p.o.s journalist.
 
I don't see "honour those whose personal performances (now extended to teams and coaches), or example, has had the most beneficial effect on the advancement of sport in the country" and "recognise excellence" as mutually exclusive.


Well they're not mutually exclusive; "honour those whose personal performances (now extended to teams and coaches), or example, has had the most beneficial effect on the advancement of sport in the country" would be a subset (generally) of "recognise excellence".

But the description of recognising excellence can cover a lot of other facets of sporting excellence not just providing most beneficial effect on the advancement of sport in the country.
 
I completely agree - the pedant in me just saw you saying that the awards don't recognise excellence and I couldn't hold back...
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Turfmoore wrote:
Indeed, but I'm not quite sure what the following line from the Halberg site means
... "Years later, this was amended by The Halberg Trust to be more in keeping with the manner in which the Trust applied the presentation of the Award".

Is there an amended set of criteria?

If so, they are a little elusive.


Yeah, I spent a bit of time last night trying to find the formal criteria, and only found the kind of vague statements on the website. There must surely be a nomination form or some such that has the criteria on it? It really would be good to be able to quote from it and to be able to reference it quite formally.

Mind you, wont change the minds of those who are obsessed by "winning" - no matter how minor internationally the sport is-as being the only measure of success.

It is also worth looking at who the judges are for the Halbergs- I would not have thought they were necessarily a particularly pro-football bunch, but clearly understood the significance of the All White's achievements last year. 2009/2010 will be remembered by future generations of sports fans in a way that, amazing though the game was, the netball wont be; and fine though the achievement was, the rugby wont be either. Neither had the impact on the sporting psyche the way the football did.

Ok, preaching to the converted!
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
if it was winning only, surely the black ferns would have cleaned up everyone having won their respective world cup and going the season unbeaten?
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
yea I hit that thing with some comments of my own too :)
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
So much negativity and vitriol going around.
Isn't it supposed to be a celebration of sporting achievement?
Pathetic behaviour by some.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The only way to satisfactorily shut the oafish mouths of losers like Deaker is for the "AB's" to lose in the quarter final of the World Cup.  Again.  I will laugh so much I will vomit.  There is nothing like the boorish rugby "establishment" being shat on from a great height.
Selhurst Park, 25 January 1995
What else could he have done?
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I am a fan of all sports, and have always enjoyed my rugby immensely. My family are all rugby-mad (season tix holders, old man is chairman of the local club etc etc) but they appreciate football for what it is, they watch it as nz sports fans, and they were happy for the AWs last night. Why can't other people be like that?
 
I desperately wanted us to win the rugby world cup this year, but to be honest the attitude of some of the rugby supporters has now sickened me to the point where I'm wondering if I would rather have us lose just so i can rub it in their faces
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
paulm wrote:
I am a fan of all sports, and have always enjoyed my rugby immensely. My family are all rugby-mad (season tix holders, old man is chairman of the local club etc etc) but they appreciate football for what it is, they watch it as nz sports fans, and they were happy for the AWs last night. Why can't other people be like that?
 
I desperately wanted us to win the rugby world cup this year, but to be honest the attitude of some of the rugby supporters has now sickened me to the point where I'm wondering if I would rather have us lose just so i can rub it in their faces


First para is good, but c'mon we should really get away from a them and us attitude.

http://www.yellowfever.co.nz/users/195

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The worst part is the All White haters think the All Blacks should've got it...

The Kiwis did a far better job than the ABs, and, if not them, the Netball.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
linds2 wrote:

paulm wrote:
I am a fan of all sports, and have always enjoyed my rugby immensely. My family are all rugby-mad (season tix holders, old man is chairman of the local club etc etc) but they appreciate football for what it is, they watch it as�nz sports fans,�and they were happy for the AWs last night. Why can't other people be like that?
�

I desperately wanted us to win the rugby world cup this year, but to be honest the attitude of some of the rugby supporters has now sickened me to the point where I'm wondering if I would rather have us lose just so i can rub it in their faces
First para is good, but c'mon we should really get away from a them and us attitude.
That's paulm's very point.

With all the 'anti' sentiment, even a rugby watcher like paulm is being driven into the world of schadenfreude.

I have to say I feel very much the same way (although I'll probably still be supporting the All Blacks come RWC time).

I have to say that much of the rugby community just don't get it. More fools them.

I know, I know, its serious!

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Dick Taylor has just resigned from the judging panel in protest at the All Whites winning the supreme award.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Perennial strugglers Liverpoolfan1 wrote:
Dick Taylor has just resigned from the judging panel in protest at the All Whites winning the supreme award.

That is pathetic.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
What a Dick.
 
Taylor is the epitome of green eyed boofhead old school rugby heads that still exist in 2011.
 
 
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago


It boggles the mind how a judge on a panel thinks that resigning because his vote didn't win, is a good idea. ScoobyD2011-02-11 12:24:02
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Turfmoore wrote:
linds2 wrote:

paulm wrote:
I am a fan of all sports, and have always enjoyed my rugby immensely. My family are all rugby-mad (season tix holders, old man is chairman of the local club etc etc) but they appreciate football for what it is, they watch it as nz sports fans, and they were happy for the AWs last night. Why can't other people be like that?
 

I desperately wanted us to win the rugby world cup this year, but to be honest the attitude of some of the rugby supporters has now sickened me to the point where I'm wondering if I would rather have us lose just so i can rub it in their faces
First para is good, but c'mon we should really get away from a them and us attitude.
That's paulm's very point.

With all the 'anti' sentiment, even a rugby watcher like paulm is being driven into the world of schadenfreude.

I have to say I feel very much the same way (although I'll probably still be supporting the All Blacks come RWC time).

I have to say that much of the rugby community just don't get it. More fools them.
 
Thanks turfmoore, you got me perfectly
I am overreacting a tad - come world cup time im sure I'll be behind the boys through and through. It just annoys me that a lot of these rugby fans are not sports fans (although bizarrely a number of them claim to like all sports, yet bash the all whites at any opportunity... not sure how that works)
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
P.S. Dick Taylor seriously dude that's just whacked
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hes a dick.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Angst on Twitter is incredible.

Nice to see celebs like Andy Mulligan getting amongst the AW's support though.

Unfortunately this kind of reaction facilitates the us and them mind set. I love watching the AB's, why does supporting one mean you don't support the other? Celebrate both and stop acting like jock d*ckheads.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
What, is he still alive???
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Interesting concept - 'I'll only be on the panel if everyone else agrees with what I want"
 
Mr Taylor should maybe take a leaf out of Brendan Telfer's book. Haven't really got much time for Telfer but, as I mentioned earlier in this thread, this morning he openly admitted he didn't vote for the AWs but was heaping congratulations on them for winning it.
 
What a huge fuss over f**k all
 

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The whole debate makes me laugh for several reason, as people seem determined NOT to celebrate the fact we do well globally for such a small country.
 
if the ab's won the roundball people would have been up in arms, and likewise the footballers won so everyone else is having a crack.
 
The douche award though goes to the guy who thinks that the rugby world cup final is the 3rd highest watched sporting event.
 
haha, the 2011 superbowl was watched by 111 million people in america alone. through in opening ceremonies of olympics, football world cups, baseball world series in the us, even things like grand prix, and it would be WELL down the charts.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
paulm wrote:
P.S. Dick Taylor seriously dude that's just whacked


Dick is the President of the Canterbury Rugby Supporters Club, so maybe it is to be expected.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
CboZ wrote:
Hes a dick.
And as noted in Stuff.co.nz, he is also the President of the Canterbury Rugby Supporters Club.

Truly pathetic behaviour. Blotted his copybook well and truly.

I was at QE2 when Tayler won his gold in 1974. Fantastic performance and I'll always remember it.

But, I'll also always remember Winston's goal (for the elation of the moment) and how NZ defied the odds at the 2010 World Cup.

Both worthy winners.

I know, I know, its serious!

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
How pathetic .  There were 28 judges on the panel.  Doesn't Dick Tayler believe in democracy?






Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Oh for crying out loud...
 
Halberg judge quits in protest
 
<!-- -->
The outcome of last night's Halberg Awards has caused a huge stir.

Distance running champion Dick Tayler has resigned from the judging panel over the decision to award the supreme honour to the All Whites.

Tayler is furious at the decision and feels he needs to put a line in the sand.

Tayler's most famous athletic achievement was winning gold in the 10,000m at the 1974 Commonwealth Games.

Arthritis ended his athletic career a year later.

He currently lives in Christchurch, where he is chair of the Canterbury Rugby Supporters Club

- Newstalk ZB, NZ Herald staff.

 
The last line says a lot, methinks.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bit of an insult to all the other judges as well.
 
Obviously thinks he is a wee bit more important than some of the other highly decorated people.
 
 
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Perennial strugglers Liverpoolfan1 wrote:
Dick Taylor has just resigned from the judging panel in protest at the All Whites winning the supreme award.
 
If thats the case then he is acting like a spoilt child and has gone down in my estimation
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Has Eric Young waded in yet?
 
(He wasn't going to support football after Rory Fallon's comments after 14 Nov v Bahrain)
 
Fairfax will be loving this.
 
 

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
brumbys wrote:
Angst on Twitter is incredible.

Nice to see celebs like Andy Mulligan getting amongst the AW's support though.

Unfortunately this kind of reaction facilitates the us and them mind set. I love watching the AB's, why does supporting one mean you don't support the other? Celebrate both and stop acting like jock d*ckheads.

Mate, I had the same debate, this morning, with that Mikeysmokes guy that you are having now. We should invite him on here and ask him to make a reasoned argument that is more than it is about winning.

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
martinb wrote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=10705483

Biggest dick award.

Someone should buy him a ticket so he can go to a country other than NZ. what a plonker.
 
For me, this sentence blew away any pretence about where this guy's coming from:
 
"Why did Richie McCaw - the right decision, incidentally - beat out Benji Marshall and Ryan Nelsen...."

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
 

He currently lives in Christchurch, where he is chair of the Canterbury Rugby Supporters Club


The last line says a lot, methinks.


Fairly typical behaviour down here. See it almost daily
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jag wrote:
martinb wrote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=10705483Biggest dick award. Someone should buy him a ticket so he can go to a country other than NZ. what a plonker.



�

For me, this sentence blew away any pretence about where this guy's coming from:

�

"Why did Richie McCaw - the right decision, incidentally - beat out Benji Marshall and Ryan Nelsen...."


This bit cracked me up from the article:
"There are holes in this approach. First, the assumption that great sportsmen and women have a broad knowledge across a range of sports is flawed. Those that have lived within the bubble of a single sport rarely have the time or the inclination to look outwards."

Unlike SOME in our sporting media that live in the bubble of a single sport and rarely have the inclination to look past rugby. The clown can't even see his own hypocrisy!
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
not sure if it's been mentioned elsewhere but who else loved ricki's terry plug last night! That was awesome
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Permalink Permalink