Wellington Phoenix Men

Nix Transfer Speculation 2019-20

3516 replies · 612,669 views
about 6 years ago

MetalLegNZ wrote:

So no Lewis then.

Tbh Lewis would be better served by staying in the Handy Prem for the rest of the season anyways. If the Nix signed him, he would be playing for the WeeNix.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

does that mean no more player resigning too?

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

Surely we need a replacement for Hooper? Some1 that can play the full 90min and is not injury prone and comes cheaper then a marquee that goes off the sight of a scratch.

Mr Positive

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago · edited about 6 years ago · History

Royz wrote:

Surely we need a replacement for Hooper? Some1 that can play the full 90min and is not injury prone and comes cheaper then a marquee that goes off the sight of a scratch.

...Sigh.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

cfeint wrote:

Does anyone know what his behavioural issues are, sorry if it hasn’t already been mentioned.

Fairly funny comment that.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

Royz wrote:

Surely we need a replacement for Hooper? Some1 that can play the full 90min and is not injury prone and comes cheaper then a marquee that goes off the sight of a scratch.

2 games, 2 goals.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago · edited about 6 years ago · History

talayvision wrote:

does that mean no more player resigning too?

No, we will still try to re-sign players we want. Talay spoke about wanting to have 14-15 committed for next season so he didn't have to start from scratch again. We currently have 14 signed and I would expect we would look to secure De Vere's signature asap but after that it might be quiet on the contract front for awhile.
Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

Lonegunmen wrote:

Royz wrote:

Surely we need a replacement for Hooper? Some1 that can play the full 90min and is not injury prone and comes cheaper then a marquee that goes off the sight of a scratch.

2 games, 2 goals.

8 games, 2 goals.

2 starts, 2 goals is what you meant.

I'm not even sure why you bother replying to Royz, he's just a troll.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago · edited about 6 years ago · History

Hooper's got a goal every 110 minutes he's played - Davila, who has an incredible 10 in 12, has scored every 107 minutes by comparison. Royz mate

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

Can someone please also look up how many goals we score on average with Hooper on the field, then off, as I think this would be more telling.

I imagine Ridenton will be looking for a contract next year... based on form, and where we are at currently, I don't think he is what we need or good enough to get a gig... but he could be seen as a similar signing to Sotorio, good squaddie??

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

MetalLegNZ wrote:

Can someone please also look up how many goals we score on average with Hooper on the field, then off, as I think this would be more telling.

Hooper has played 196 minutes (out of a total of 1080). In that time we have scored 8 goals. So a goal every 24.5 minutes.

In the other 884 minutes, we have scored 10 goals. A goal every 88.4 minutes. 

So despite only playing 18.1% of minutes, we have scored 44.4% of our goals while he has been on the field. 

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

MetalLegNZ wrote:

Can someone please also look up how many goals we score on average with Hooper on the field, then off, as I think this would be more telling.

Hooper has played 196 minutes (out of a total of 1080). In that time we have scored 8 goals. So a goal every 24.5 minutes.

In the other 884 minutes, we have scored 10 goals. A goal every 88.4 minutes. 

So despite only playing 18.1% of minutes, we have scored 44.4% of our goals while he has been on the field. 

Boom. There it is. 

Now we can all shut the fudge up about his input

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

The key Quote 

"But Talay said he would like to keep the former Hamburg product at the club beyond this season and suggested the ball was in Steinmann's court regarding an extension.

"Matti Steinmann is one of those ones we'll still continue on, he's done a fantastic job for us this season and I've had a chat with him on what he wants to do," Talay said."

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

Blew.2 wrote:

The key Quote 

"But Talay said he would like to keep the former Hamburg product at the club beyond this season and suggested the ball was in Steinmann's court regarding an extension.

"Matti Steinmann is one of those ones we'll still continue on, he's done a fantastic job for us this season and I've had a chat with him on what he wants to do," Talay said."

and that Matti is waiting til end of season to decide.
Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

Royz wrote:

Surely we need a replacement for Hooper? Some1 that can play the full 90min and is not injury prone and comes cheaper then a marquee that goes off the sight of a scratch.

Yawn.

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

keefy_NZ wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

The key Quote 

"But Talay said he would like to keep the former Hamburg product at the club beyond this season and suggested the ball was in Steinmann's court regarding an extension.

"Matti Steinmann is one of those ones we'll still continue on, he's done a fantastic job for us this season and I've had a chat with him on what he wants to do," Talay said."

and that Matti is waiting til end of season to decide.

I think we will have to wait until the end of the season to find out what is happening with Steinmann, Hooper & McCowatt. I'm sure the club will wanna retain them but they will want to keep their options open.
Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

MetalLegNZ wrote:

Can someone please also look up how many goals we score on average with Hooper on the field, then off, as I think this would be more telling.

Hooper has played 196 minutes (out of a total of 1080). In that time we have scored 8 goals. So a goal every 24.5 minutes.

In the other 884 minutes, we have scored 10 goals. A goal every 88.4 minutes. 

So despite only playing 18.1% of minutes, we have scored 44.4% of our goals while he has been on the field. 

Cracking stat. Our morale went up when he signed and some pressure was lifted off Bally and Davila, which has helped them imo.



Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

MetalLegNZ wrote:

Can someone please also look up how many goals we score on average with Hooper on the field, then off, as I think this would be more telling.

Hooper has played 196 minutes (out of a total of 1080). In that time we have scored 8 goals. So a goal every 24.5 minutes.

In the other 884 minutes, we have scored 10 goals. A goal every 88.4 minutes. 

So despite only playing 18.1% of minutes, we have scored 44.4% of our goals while he has been on the field. 

Boom. There it is. 

Now we can all shut the fudge up about his input

Not all ,there have been some who realized what his contribution was.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

MetalLegNZ wrote:

Can someone please also look up how many goals we score on average with Hooper on the field, then off, as I think this would be more telling.

Hooper has played 196 minutes (out of a total of 1080). In that time we have scored 8 goals. So a goal every 24.5 minutes.

In the other 884 minutes, we have scored 10 goals. A goal every 88.4 minutes. 

So despite only playing 18.1% of minutes, we have scored 44.4% of our goals while he has been on the field. 

Knew it would be telling, but not that much. Awesome stats. Thanks for putting together.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

In this 6 sub appearances:

  • the result has stayed the same 4 times (1 x loss, 2 x draw, 1 x win)
  • we've won the game once when it was a draw when he came on
  • we've won the game once when we were losing when he came on

In his 2 starts, we've been losing once when he came off, and winning once.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

RR wrote:

keefy_NZ wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

The key Quote 

"But Talay said he would like to keep the former Hamburg product at the club beyond this season and suggested the ball was in Steinmann's court regarding an extension.

"Matti Steinmann is one of those ones we'll still continue on, he's done a fantastic job for us this season and I've had a chat with him on what he wants to do," Talay said."

and that Matti is waiting til end of season to decide.

I think we will have to wait until the end of the season to find out what is happening with Steinmann, Hooper & McCowatt. I'm sure the club will wanna retain them but they will want to keep their options open.

With Macarthur starting to poach players, and the Aussie talent starting to be spread very thinly amoung the other 11 teams, you'd expect the Nix with exactly the same squad (with improvements to the ability of the young players) would be an even more serious contender next season.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

djtim3000 wrote:

RR wrote:

keefy_NZ wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

The key Quote 

"But Talay said he would like to keep the former Hamburg product at the club beyond this season and suggested the ball was in Steinmann's court regarding an extension.

"Matti Steinmann is one of those ones we'll still continue on, he's done a fantastic job for us this season and I've had a chat with him on what he wants to do," Talay said."

and that Matti is waiting til end of season to decide.

I think we will have to wait until the end of the season to find out what is happening with Steinmann, Hooper & McCowatt. I'm sure the club will wanna retain them but they will want to keep their options open.

With Macarthur starting to poach players, and the Aussie talent starting to be spread very thinly amoung the other 11 teams, you'd expect the Nix with exactly the same squad (with improvements to the ability of the young players) would be an even more serious contender next season.

DeVere, Piscopo, Devlin, Wilson, Sotirio....

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago · edited about 6 years ago · History

Mainland FC wrote:

djtim3000 wrote:

RR wrote:

keefy_NZ wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

The key Quote 

"But Talay said he would like to keep the former Hamburg product at the club beyond this season and suggested the ball was in Steinmann's court regarding an extension.

"Matti Steinmann is one of those ones we'll still continue on, he's done a fantastic job for us this season and I've had a chat with him on what he wants to do," Talay said."

and that Matti is waiting til end of season to decide.

I think we will have to wait until the end of the season to find out what is happening with Steinmann, Hooper & McCowatt. I'm sure the club will wanna retain them but they will want to keep their options open.

With Macarthur starting to poach players, and the Aussie talent starting to be spread very thinly amoung the other 11 teams, you'd expect the Nix with exactly the same squad (with improvements to the ability of the young players) would be an even more serious contender next season.

DeVere, Piscopo, Devlin, Wilson, Sotirio....

Not exactly sure what your point is, but only two of those players (Piscopo and Devlin) would be any cause for concern if they were playing against the Nix. As the Aussie playing stocks are spread thin, the inherent advantage of only the Nix being able to sign the best NZ talent as locals becomes a pretty large advantage.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

valeo wrote:

aitkenmike wrote:

Doloras wrote:

Plenty banged on about how terrible Ball was at the start of the season and thats been proven to be very wrong 

... and Davila, based on his first game

I was horrendously wrong about Davila based on his first game. But having said that, he was appalling in his first game, and Ufuk immediately shifted his position to a CAM which massively reduced his defensive responsibilities and gave him the option to float in between the lines and set up our attacks.  I still think he would be not great out wide in our system.

He played out wide v CCM until Ball went off

Agreed and I thought his impact on the game in the first half was massively reduced.  Who knows about his defensive responsibilities, CCM barely touched the ball in the first half, only the Ball.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago · edited about 6 years ago · History

djtim3000 wrote:

Mainland FC wrote:

djtim3000 wrote:

RR wrote:

keefy_NZ wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

The key Quote 

"But Talay said he would like to keep the former Hamburg product at the club beyond this season and suggested the ball was in Steinmann's court regarding an extension.

"Matti Steinmann is one of those ones we'll still continue on, he's done a fantastic job for us this season and I've had a chat with him on what he wants to do," Talay said."

and that Matti is waiting til end of season to decide.

I think we will have to wait until the end of the season to find out what is happening with Steinmann, Hooper & McCowatt. I'm sure the club will wanna retain them but they will want to keep their options open.

With Macarthur starting to poach players, and the Aussie talent starting to be spread very thinly amoung the other 11 teams, you'd expect the Nix with exactly the same squad (with improvements to the ability of the young players) would be an even more serious contender next season.

DeVere, Piscopo, Devlin, Wilson, Sotirio....

Not exactly sure what your point is, but only two of those players (Piscopo and Devlin) would be any cause for concern if they were playing against the Nix. As the Aussie playing stocks are spread thin, the inherent advantage of only the Nix being able to sign the best NZ talent as locals becomes a pretty large advantage.

My point was that it is not just the other teams. The Nix are not as 'unattractive' to Australian players as we used to be in the past. We can - now - seriously compete for them based on our financial stability and on a more secure licence basis. Having Australian coaches able to scout for them also helps.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago · edited about 6 years ago · History

And with Global Warming Wellington summers will become muy bonita.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

coochiee wrote:

And with Global Warming Wellington summers will become muy bonita.

I look forward to the HAL announcement that due to climate change the next new franchises will be from New Zealand, with Tasmania a backup option.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

We should be all in for Rojas if he is available. Make room, guest slots, marquee $$ whatever it takes. He fits into this structure perfectly.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

jellyfish wrote:

We should be all in for Rojas if he is available. Make room, guest slots, marquee $$ whatever it takes. He fits into this structure perfectly.

Most likely going to City

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago · edited about 6 years ago · History

and left Welly because we weren't a big enough club for him - city can have him.

besides Talay has already said he was not interested in chasing Rojas.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

Rojas is over rated anyway.

Mr Positive

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

MetalLegNZ wrote:

Can someone please also look up how many goals we score on average with Hooper on the field, then off, as I think this would be more telling.

Hooper has played 196 minutes (out of a total of 1080). In that time we have scored 8 goals. So a goal every 24.5 minutes.

In the other 884 minutes, we have scored 10 goals. A goal every 88.4 minutes. 

So despite only playing 18.1% of minutes, we have scored 44.4% of our goals while he has been on the field. 

Yes well, you can prove anything with facts.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago · edited about 6 years ago · History

harrymc wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

MetalLegNZ wrote:

Can someone please also look up how many goals we score on average with Hooper on the field, then off, as I think this would be more telling.

Hooper has played 196 minutes (out of a total of 1080). In that time we have scored 8 goals. So a goal every 24.5 minutes.

In the other 884 minutes, we have scored 10 goals. A goal every 88.4 minutes. 

So despite only playing 18.1% of minutes, we have scored 44.4% of our goals while he has been on the field. 

Yes well, you can prove anything with facts.

better to prove things with facts that assert things with unsupported opinions.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

theprof wrote:

and left Welly because we weren't a big enough club for him - city can have him.

besides Talay has already said he was not interested in chasing Rojas.

The club is quite different now though, he left because of the facilities but now we have a purpose training centre.

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

jellyfish wrote:

We should be all in for Rojas if he is available. Make room, guest slots, marquee $$ whatever it takes. He fits into this structure perfectly.

Gilding the lilly, that's what it would be.  

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

Mainland FC wrote:

jellyfish wrote:

We should be all in for Rojas if he is available. Make room, guest slots, marquee $$ whatever it takes. He fits into this structure perfectly.

Gilding the lilly, that's what it would be.  

Would we need to give his father a job as well?

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

theprof wrote:

harrymc wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

MetalLegNZ wrote:

Can someone please also look up how many goals we score on average with Hooper on the field, then off, as I think this would be more telling.

Hooper has played 196 minutes (out of a total of 1080). In that time we have scored 8 goals. So a goal every 24.5 minutes.

In the other 884 minutes, we have scored 10 goals. A goal every 88.4 minutes. 

So despite only playing 18.1% of minutes, we have scored 44.4% of our goals while he has been on the field. 

Yes well, you can prove anything with facts.

better to prove things with facts that assert things with unsupported opinions.

Wooooosh!

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

A-League Hub reporting that City have pulled out and Victory or Wellington are likely destinations for Rojas now.

Given that Uffie said we won't be signing anyone else in January would be hard to see him going anywhere except Victory now.

Valley FC til I die?

Permalink Permalink
about 6 years ago

I'd be very surprised if he ended up here, though I wouldn't complain.

Just look at Saturday, what a massive difference it would have made to have someone of his caliber in the team when we were missing Ball and Piscopo..

It won't happen though.


VUW AFC - Victoria University Football for life

Permalink Permalink