Wellington Phoenix Men

Phoenix Ownership - Rob says FTFFA (Part 1)

3999 replies · 993,112 views Locked
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Feverish wrote:
james dean wrote:
Feverish wrote:
but how do we know a new owner won't take it up to Akld for example, like a Giltrap? I agree with News in that I wouldn't follow just anyone.
 
Well of course that's where the fans come in - but people have argued a lot that the owner can do what he likes with the club which I disagree with, and this type of example is exactly why.
the owner CAN do whatever what he wants with the club. For example I could turn YF into a knitting club tomorrow, or sell it to an online porn company, or shut it down. Theres fk all anyone could do about it apart from Frankie Mac making a few grumpy tweets. Much like if some new owner wanted to take the club out of Wgtn there is fk all us Welli fans could do. Only an example, but its a reason why people on here should be a bit more cautious with their wishes.



Cautious with their wishes ? Are you just making this up. I cant see anyone on her saying take it to Auckland or take it round the country. Where are you getting this from?

People can see that we wont have a team with Terry crashing and burning, and they are very pleased that someone else has stepped in and also that there have been indications that it will stay in Wellington. Thats all.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
yes I did make it up - as I have no clue about what any potential new owners stand for - probably neither do you??

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
At this stage, continuation of a team in the A League and continuing to base it in Wellington. Thats what I have read in the papers. And I'm tending to believe them as they have been right so far in this saga.

Also FFA has guaranteed we will have a team in the A League this season and I'm pretty sure, without looking it up, they have said it will be in Wellington.

Youre in the know with YF, is this some sort of advanced warning that something else is going to happen ?? Or  a late night panic ??

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
The truth is that there are a million rumors out there.

one says ther are two separate groups, another says one. One says John Morrison is one of the five, some say he isn't. One says the Chow brothers are, one says Colin Giltrap is. One has the DomPost being manipulated by the parties involved to put the skids under Terry, other souces say this is rubbish. One has John Dow heavily involved, one is explicit that he's not. One has the coaching staff being changed as part of the package, two ir three others say not. One says CEO change, others don't. Some have both Morgan's involved some don't.

If two different parties are involved it could all be true.

Truth is some of the rumors concern me and I'd like an idea of what I'm endorsing before I embrace it blindly as the panacea for all ills.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
very interesting - agree that some cards will need to go on the table at some point.  Surprised there haven't been any leaks if the dompost angle was true - if you wanted to put the skids the first thing you'd do is leak your plans and get the fans onside.  Morgan's quotes about giving Terry "every chance" is really the opposite of that

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
I heard it was James Dean taking over. Every player signing from hereon is going to be through fan plebiscite, while accounts are to be audited by whoever is sitting in a randomly selected seat at each home game. Furthermore, the new manager will have a permanent ustream channel running, so the fans can keep up to date with what is happening.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
The one thing I would add is that this is not an opportunity to make money unless you run the club really well i.e. increase crowds and income massively.  There has to be some kind of altruistic desire to get involved because this is not really a money making venture at this stage.
 
If the club is run really well and people can in fact make money then that is a good thing isn't it?  There are no assets to strip, I'm not sure what "unfavourable" agenda owners could take - other than moving a load of games out of wellington or the club altogether, but I think a wholesale move is extremely unlikely.  The whole point of this exercise seems to be keeping the club in Wellington

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Arsenal wrote:
I heard it was James Dean taking over.
 
One day...

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Well  I have a different perspective, being in Auckland and not enough in the know to hear any of the rumoured possibilities. So to an extent any continuation will be a panacea as far as I am concerned.

I cant see the point in worrying about those rumours now that they are more visible either because so much is going on behind the scenes that cant be influenced. I would like to know sooner rather than later exactly what is going to happen, and frankly I will endorse it, because I  love the game and having a professional team to support. I say bring it on and worry about the complications later. Who knows, they might not happen.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
There are plenty more, linking coaches, CEOs, investors who might or might not be part of the five. I could easily give you thirty rumors but those were the ones that first came to mind and none of those cover Terry's position or future which of course is the subject o another setof rumors.

Like I said some of what's out there could be great. If all the positive rumors are true then great, but that strikes me as the sort of luck I don't usually have.

I don't expect rival bidders to start gaining our 'votes' with promises of ever more outrageous signings (we're not Barca) but I'd like some genuine facts on what we're being asked to endorse and I'd like them from someone who isn't making sure that he gets votes in the next council election after he 'saved' the Phoenix from Auckland.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Feverish wrote:
  For example I could turn YF into a knitting club tomorrow, or sell it to an online porn company, or shut it down. Theres fk all anyone could do about it apart from Frankie Mac making a few grumpy tweets.
 
If this became a porn site, there would be very few grumpy tweets from me.

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Hard News wrote:
Tomorrow...
 
Did I miss it?

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
james dean wrote:
zinidane wrote:
Doloras...you have been regularly slagging people off for being "negative" and "always looking at the worst scenario". Then you have the gall to say the potential new owners are "chickensh*t" for not putting their names forward and having "zero faith" in their ability to run a football club"
 
So what are you basing these assumptions on?
 
Why would anyone embarking in a new business proposal put their name out in the public arena before any deal is done? There is no reason to play this transaction out in public until a contract is signed and delivered. you know how rabid the press have been been, why put yourself in the media limelight before anything is settled. There is plenty of activity going on in the background....it will all be revealed in due course.
 
As for saying you have know faith in the new owners running a football club.....thats just stupid. We don't know who all these people are yet!!! The club will be run by the people appointed in senior roles....like the CEO etc. The names being banded about like the Morgans and Morrison are very succesful experianced Wellington businessmen. Their ownership will enhance the brand.....they will bring in the advantage of all their business contacts. this will provide potentially more sponsorship, more revenue oportunities for the Nix. IMO this will have a lot of positives for the club. Believe me Terry has burnt a lot of bridges, business wise.
 
I suggest you engage your brain before considering making further posts!!!
 
Huge amount of naivety from a load of people on here who clearly have never been involved in a commercial or business transaction of this sort.
 
 
Was that you sticking up for Doloras, JD?
 
You feeling okay?
 

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Hard News wrote:
james dean wrote:
Did I miss it?

�

Maybe it's not there.� I suspect they lost some content late yesterday, maybe tomorrow?


They actually had "content" for their article?

What a novel idea...

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
[QUOTE=Frankie Mac] - working for a living sucks donkey's balls.[/QUOTE]
 
Better than sucking donkey's balls for a living.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Hard News wrote:
There are plenty more, linking coaches, CEOs, investors who might or might not be part of the five. I could easily give you thirty rumors but those were the ones that first came to mind and none of those cover Terry's position or future which of course is the subject o another setof rumors.

Like I said some of what's out there could be great. If all the positive rumors are true then great, but that strikes me as the sort of luck I don't usually have.

I don't expect rival bidders to start gaining our 'votes' with promises of ever more outrageous signings (we're not Barca) but I'd like some genuine facts on what we're being asked to endorse and I'd like them from someone who isn't making sure that he gets votes in the next council election after he 'saved' the Phoenix from Auckland.
 
As is so often the case, News speaks words of wisdom.
 
Here are the facts:
 
1. Terry is short of cash.
2. John Morrison has been in the paper saying he "knows people".
3. Gareth Morgan has been in the paper saying he has been approached by two groups.
4. He said he "had not been approached to invest yet". 
5. John Morrison says a rescue package of 5 x $400k has been "formulated". 
6. Lyall Gorman has said the FFA is committed to the Phoenix for the 11/12 season and "will work closely with Terry Serepisos to ensure stability for the Phoenix players and staff..." 
 
So from that we can draw only few conclusions:
 
Gareth Morgan hasn't been approached to invest yet.  So he's only been asked if he's interested.  Yawn.
 
Nobody else is prepared to be named.
 
And there are more questions:
 
What does formulated mean?  Formulated could mean he wrote "5x400k=2m=Feenix4Life" on a napkin.  
 
What is John Morrison's role in the formulation?  Is the council directly involved, or not?  Morrison has previously said that he is "not directly involved" but that his position on council puts him "in a pivotal position".  What does that mean?
 
Everything else is just supposition and us putting our own individual spin on the statements and sources.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Frankie Mac wrote:
Feverish wrote:
  For example I could turn YF into a knitting club tomorrow, or sell it to an online porn company, or shut it down. Theres fk all anyone could do about it apart from Frankie Mac making a few grumpy tweets.
 
If this became a porn site, there would be very few grumpy tweets from me.
 
You don't tweet while watching porn?  You should try it.
 

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Smithy wrote:
Hard News wrote:
There are plenty more, linking coaches, CEOs, investors who might or might not be part of the five. I could easily give you thirty rumors but those were the ones that first came to mind and none of those cover Terry's position or future which of course is the subject o another setof rumors. Like I said some of what's out there could be great. If all the positive rumors are true then great, but that strikes me as the sort of luck I don't usually have. I don't expect rival bidders to start gaining our 'votes' with promises of ever more outrageous signings (we're not Barca) but I'd like some genuine facts on what we're being asked to endorse and I'd like them from someone who isn't making sure that he gets votes in the next council election after he 'saved' the Phoenix from Auckland.



�
As is so often the case, News speaks words of wisdom.

�

Here are the facts:

�

1. Terry is short of cash.

2. John Morrison has been in the paper saying he "knows people".

3. Gareth Morgan has been in the paper saying he has been approached by two groups.

4. He said he "had not been approached to invest yet".�

5. John Morrison says a rescue package of 5 x $400k has been "formulated".�

6. Lyall Gorman has said the FFA is committed to the Phoenix for the 11/12 season and "will work closely with Terry Serepisos to ensure stability for�the Phoenix players and staff..."�

�

So from that we can draw only few conclusions:

�

Gareth Morgan hasn't been approached to invest yet.� So he's only been asked if he's interested.� Yawn.

�

Nobody else is prepared to be named.

�

And there are more questions:

�

What does formulated mean?� Formulated could mean he wrote "5x400k=2m=Feenix4Life" on a napkin.��

�

What is John Morrison's role in the formulation?� Is the council directly involved, or not?� Morrison has previously said that he is "not directly involved" but that his position on council puts him "in a pivotal position".� What does that mean?


�

Everything else is just supposition and us putting our own individual spin on the statements and sources.


The most likey scenario is that the FFA will wait to see what comes of Terry's issues. If they deem him fit to carry on as owner they will allow him to proceed as normal, otherwise they will revoke the licence and take control of the club (eg Brisbane, Adelaide, Newcastle etc etc) until suitable arrangements can be made for new owners to step in.

Not really a major news story in that so i'm not sure why the DoomPost continue to believe that us football fans are as stoopid and gullible as our rugby counterparts and believe EVERYTHING that is printed...

C-Diddy2011-09-13 09:40:40

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Smithy wrote:
Frankie Mac wrote:
Feverish wrote:
  For example I could turn YF into a knitting club tomorrow, or sell it to an online porn company, or shut it down. Theres fk all anyone could do about it apart from Frankie Mac making a few grumpy tweets.
 
If this became a porn site, there would be very few grumpy tweets from me.
 
You don't tweet while watching porn?  You should try it.
 
But I wouldn't recommend eating twisties.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Can I just say at this point that the rumour that one of the "consortia" has a SACK RICKI agenda scares the willies out of me. The only good thing about the recent drama is that it has brought the team together as a tight unit.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Hard News wrote:
james dean wrote:
Did I miss it?

�

Maybe it's not there.� I suspect they lost some content late yesterday, maybe tomorrow?


No news can be good news!

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Doloras wrote:
The only good thing about the recent drama is that it has brought the team together as a tight unit.


and you know that how?

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Yeah, but News, if I say it it must be crap. 

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
If it was printed in the DoomPost then it must be 100% True!!!

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
james dean wrote:
The one thing I would add is that this is not an opportunity to make money unless you run the club really well i.e. increase crowds and income massively.  There has to be some kind of altruistic desire to get involved because this is not really a money making venture at this stage.
 
If the club is run really well and people can in fact make money then that is a good thing isn't it?  There are no assets to strip, I'm not sure what "unfavourable" agenda owners could take - other than moving a load of games out of wellington or the club altogether, but I think a wholesale move is extremely unlikely.  The whole point of this exercise seems to be keeping the club in Wellington


i think there could be other reasons for them to get involved for 11 days a season wellington now has income it did not before the Nix, backpackers, hotels, motels, food outlets and of course don't forget pubs (i have a niggling feeling the the Thistle did not even open on Sundays unless there was a stadium thing on, on game day it is packed)  also the money sucking hole that is tranzmetro has extra income for these events helped by (IMO) the Nix being more of a regional team than a Wellington City team.

so if the investors own these types of properties there is extra incentive to invest, it may not cover their whole investment but in the long run it might

of course away games in some ways also count as its much more fun to get together with your mates at the pub to watch the game than sit around at home alone which also gets more people on public transport (especially if we win!!)
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
i did a little math if 6000 fans come to game and each spent $20 on food/drink and there are 11 home games that is $1.32 million coming in a season and personnally i think my $20 is on the low side i spend about $40
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
I suspect little if any of that goes to the club.  I think things like that are the stadiums profit from the game - and you kind of ignore cost as well.
 
Also, there are some people who won't go near the stadium food.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
You forgot to add the extra revenue the Council earns off Parking Infringement Notices!!!



"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Hard News wrote:
I suspect little if any of that goes to the club.  I think things like that are the stadiums profit from the game - and you kind of ignore cost as well.
 
Also, there are some people who won't go near the stadium food.


these were costs at pubs/food outlets in town not stadium re: my comment on which people might have been asked into consortia and how they could recoup some of the money. 
Robin2011-09-13 11:06:35
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Robin wrote:
i did a little math if 6000 fans come to game and each spent $20 on food/drink and there are 11 home games that is $1.32 million coming in a season and personnally i think my $20 is on the low side i spend about $40
 
 
The stadium licences a catering company to run the food stalls in the venue.  The stadium gets revenue from that, and the catering company, but I don't think the hirer of the stadium would get any. 
 
The only revenue streams directly into Phoenix coffers as far as I know are:
 
1. Ticket sales
2. Merchandise sales (they get a percentage I believe)
3. Television rights revenue
4. Sponsorship revenue
5. Transfer market revenue
 
Any other money they need to spend has to come from the owner(s).

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Smithy wrote:
Robin wrote:
i did a little math if 6000 fans come to game and each spent $20 on food/drink and there are 11 home games that is $1.32 million coming in a season and personnally i think my $20 is on the low side i spend about $40
 
 
The stadium licences a catering company to run the food stalls in the venue.  The stadium gets revenue from that, and the catering company, but I don't think the hirer of the stadium would get any. 
 
The only revenue streams directly into Phoenix coffers as far as I know are:
 
1. Ticket sales
2. Merchandise sales (they get a percentage I believe)
3. Television rights revenue
4. Sponsorship revenue
5. Transfer market revenue
 
Any other money they need to spend has to come from the owner(s).


but if they, in the last seasons, have been getting extra money coming in via their other investments which they will lose if the Nix fold or move that would be a reason to invest
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Robin wrote:
Smithy wrote:
Robin wrote:
i did a little math if 6000 fans come to game and each spent $20 on food/drink and there are 11 home games that is $1.32 million coming in a season and personnally i think my $20 is on the low side i spend about $40
 
 
The stadium licences a catering company to run the food stalls in the venue.  The stadium gets revenue from that, and the catering company, but I don't think the hirer of the stadium would get any. 
 
The only revenue streams directly into Phoenix coffers as far as I know are:
 
1. Ticket sales
2. Merchandise sales (they get a percentage I believe)
3. Television rights revenue
4. Sponsorship revenue
5. Transfer market revenue
 
Any other money they need to spend has to come from the owner(s).


but if they, in the last seasons, have been getting extra money coming in via their other investments which they will lose if the Nix fold or move that would be a reason to invest
 
Oh right I see your point.  Yes I agree, they would all have some sort of incentive to invest.
 
But, for the catering company example, that incentive would be to invest an amount of money that did not massively alter their profit.  Their margin on Phoenix games probably isn't huge, so the amount of money they might be prepared to invest to keep earning that margin is likely to be quite small.
 
Every little helps of course.
 

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
I believe that the Phoenix benefit from beer sales at the stadium as part of their sponsorship deal promoting Export 33 on their kit.

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
C-Diddy wrote:
I believe that the Phoenix benefit from beer sales at the stadium as part of their sponsorship deal promoting Export 33 on their kit.

i am afraid that even knowing that isnt enough to make me drink it
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
NBR
Serepisos has six days to save his Phoenix

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

Terry Serepisos has six days to find $2 million to retain control of his Wellington Phoenix football club.

Well-places sources told the National Business Review Football Federation Australia has reached the limit of its patience with Mr Serepisos and his claims shady lender Western Gulf Advisory will deliver much-needed financial stability.

The FFA has given Mr Serepisos until September 19 to settle outstanding wage issues with the club, including more than $100,000 owed to coach Ricki Herbert and post a $2 million bond proving his financial ability to continue backing the club, or ownership will transfer to a consortium of Wellington businessmen known as the Phoenix Five.

The NBR understands the Phoenix Five includes developer Mark Dunajtschik. The Austrian-born property  developer had a falling out with Mr Serepisos earlier this year after he had considerable trouble trying to get repayment of a $4 million loan to the Phoenix owner. That loan was used to settle liquidation action brought by the IRD.

NBR understands that, as part of the security for this loan, Mr Serepisos signed share transfer forms giving Mr Dunajtschik 55% of the Phoenix. These forms not yet been filed with the Companies Office.

Mr Dunajtschik was unwilling to comment on his involvement.  �Go back to the people who told you that and ask them because I don't answer to the media,� he says.

The Dominion Post has reported the Phoenix Five also includes Kiwibank director Rob Morrison.

Concern from players
Chief executive of the Professional Footballer�s Association Brendan Schwab was unwilling to comment specifically on any unpaid wages that might be owed to Phoenix players.

�I don�t want to comment on specifics,� he says.  �We have direct dialogue with the FFA and the club, and we�re content they�re addressing our concerns.�

He says repeated court appearances by Mr Serepisos over defaults on debts and claims by the Wellington developer that he will be saved by alleged fraudster WGA had taken their toll.

�That�s a matter for the FFA, and the FFA is on top of the need to ensure any A-League franchise has the requisite financial backing � and that is thoroughly verified,� Mr Schwab says.

Mr Schwab says �very sensitive discussions� were taking place involving the Phoenix but did not elaborate.

Mr Serepisos told NBR the reports of a FFA deadline were wrong: "As usual your information is incorrect,"  he says

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Hmmmmmm
Permalink Permalink

This topic is locked.