Wellington Phoenix Men

R4 vs Victory Monday 9:30pm SS3

764 replies · 32,187 views
over 12 years ago
asmodeus_82 wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
asmodeus_82 wrote:

I still like Stein but placing him in the first 11 is problematic. His work rate is great and he usually has a good pass but I don't think we will see our best 11 in our ideal formation until he isn't in it. Unfortunately I don't see him as much of an impact player...

Can you elaborate on this a bit more? I am not sure I follow you. I want to but I need more info. Whats our best 11/formation?

I haven't worked our best formation/11. I think it may involve one striker and that one striker may not be Stein. I also like the sound of two 10s


Would make it very confusing in regards to bookings

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Fenton got hung out to dry in the first 20 (which is all I watched before work) - he was completely isolated one on one which is crazy when you have three sitting midfielders one of them has to cover and help him out.  Back 4 looked so square as well.  Nevertheless he also looked worryingly easy to knock off the ball.  Really bad defending for the first goal as well, if there's one guy you always track it's Archie

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Whats your guys thoughts on brockie and ifill up front??

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:


A valid point that the commentators mentioned is that our schedule has been a nighmare. 2 home games on the road, players out because of the AWs. The only way it could have been worse was a trip to Perth thrown in. In that respects, I do feel for Ernie because no other team has had to go through this and he can see for himself how much love the FFA do no have for the Phoenix.


Yeah, it is really shit the FFA make us play our home games in Napier and Christchurch

ok concede the fair point but is one of them not designated as our regional round? Roar no AWs at home, WSW away, Jets in Napier, Victory away, Perth in Chr (and we just managed to keep our AWs). They could have had some mercy for the FIFA windows at least.

You must admit, thats a tough start to the season regardless who is to blame.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
WangChung wrote:

Whats your guys thoughts on brockie and ifill up front??

With all due respect, Ifill looks at his best as a super sub.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
WangChung wrote:

Whats your guys thoughts on brockie and ifill up front??

I like it! Ifill can't play the fill 90 though so Stein or Boyd have to fill in either before Ifill or after and so far before is looking like the preferred option.

"Yellow Fever are fantastic – I have to say that"

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
james dean wrote:

Fenton got hung out to dry in the first 20 (which is all I watched before work) - he was completely isolated one on one which is crazy when you have three sitting midfielders one of them has to cover and help him out.  Back 4 looked so square as well.  Nevertheless he also looked worryingly easy to knock off the ball.  Really bad defending for the first goal as well, if there's one guy you always track it's Archie

I thought he got caught out of position too much in the first half because he was too far forward helping attack.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jtoml3 wrote:
james dean wrote:

Fenton got hung out to dry in the first 20 (which is all I watched before work) - he was completely isolated one on one which is crazy when you have three sitting midfielders one of them has to cover and help him out.  Back 4 looked so square as well.  Nevertheless he also looked worryingly easy to knock off the ball.  Really bad defending for the first goal as well, if there's one guy you always track it's Archie

I thought he got caught out of position too much in the first half because he was too far forward helping attack.


The defensive midfielders are there to cover that though

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jtoml3 wrote:
james dean wrote:

Fenton got hung out to dry in the first 20 (which is all I watched before work) - he was completely isolated one on one which is crazy when you have three sitting midfielders one of them has to cover and help him out.  Back 4 looked so square as well.  Nevertheless he also looked worryingly easy to knock off the ball.  Really bad defending for the first goal as well, if there's one guy you always track it's Archie

I thought he got caught out of position too much in the first half because he was too far forward helping attack.

Thats how I saw it too.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
WangChung wrote:

Whats your guys thoughts on brockie and ifill up front??

With all due respect, Ifill looks at his best as a super sub.

+1
If you're playing two up front it should be Brockie and Huysegems starting. Ifill has more impact on the game if he plays the last 30-35 minutes when he can run at tired defenders than if he plays the first 60-65 minutes. Conversely, Huysegems has more impact on the game if he plays the first 60-65 minutes when the Phoenix can make use of his ability to hold up the ball and link up with other players than if he plays the last 30-35 mintes. The question has to be seriously asked if we should be playing with two up front through.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

stein for me is too slow. looks like he runs at one speed! need someone with abit more agile 

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

How often is it though that full back gets caught "too far forward" purely as a result of the ball being given away by someone else cheaply?

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
james dean wrote:
Jtoml3 wrote:
james dean wrote:

Fenton got hung out to dry in the first 20 (which is all I watched before work) - he was completely isolated one on one which is crazy when you have three sitting midfielders one of them has to cover and help him out.  Back 4 looked so square as well.  Nevertheless he also looked worryingly easy to knock off the ball.  Really bad defending for the first goal as well, if there's one guy you always track it's Archie

I thought he got caught out of position too much in the first half because he was too far forward helping attack.


The defensive midfielders are there to cover that though

Our DMs are struggling to hold their own area and you want them to cover the FBs as well? I agree thats what DMs *should* do but that would be a stretch too far for current personnel. I think Manny, Lia et al need to get their own jobs executed right first. That fact alone would stop the FBs getting the crap and the backline under the pump.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

Double post

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
Frankie Mac wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:


A valid point that the commentators mentioned is that our schedule has been a nighmare. 2 home games on the road, players out because of the AWs. The only way it could have been worse was a trip to Perth thrown in. In that respects, I do feel for Ernie because no other team has had to go through this and he can see for himself how much love the FFA do no have for the Phoenix.


Yeah, it is really shit the FFA make us play our home games in Napier and Christchurch

ok concede the fair point but is one of them not designated as our regional round? Roar no AWs at home, WSW away, Jets in Napier, Victory away, Perth in Chr (and we just managed to keep our AWs). They could have had some mercy for the FIFA windows at least.

You must admit, thats a tough start to the season regardless who is to blame.

The owners are to blame for messing this up. We will have effectively played 7 away games in a row. It is terrible terrible management and decision making of the owners/board of the Phoenix. The travel schedule has been ridiculous and this could have been drastically curtailed through keeping our home games where they belong. It is clear that moving our home games away from Wellington is unsettling for the players and it is alienating local fans. It is a great way to destroy the fan base that matters the most. Nz sports fans are fickle and 2000-3000 people who would regularly go to Nix games will have probably lost interest by the time the games are back in Wellington. Not to mention the fact that half the city will be away on holiday around the country. Why did we not have the Napier game during the holiday period? The crowd would have been twice as big. We are the WELLINGTON Phoenix, not the New Zealand football travelling circus club. It's a joke. 
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
james dean wrote:
Jtoml3 wrote:
james dean wrote:

Fenton got hung out to dry in the first 20 (which is all I watched before work) - he was completely isolated one on one which is crazy when you have three sitting midfielders one of them has to cover and help him out.  Back 4 looked so square as well.  Nevertheless he also looked worryingly easy to knock off the ball.  Really bad defending for the first goal as well, if there's one guy you always track it's Archie

I thought he got caught out of position too much in the first half because he was too far forward helping attack.


The defensive midfielders are there to cover that though

Our DMs are struggling to hold their own area and you want them to cover the FBs as well? I agree thats what DMs *should* do but that would be a stretch too far for current personnel. I think Manny, Lia et al need to get their own jobs executed right first. That fact alone would stop the FBs getting the crap and the backline under the pump.

I think it's simple.  You want Fenton to get forward and support the attack (the point of playing him there), you have three central midfielders playing defensively not pushing forward.  The player closest to the ball pushes out to help defend out wide, that still leaves two players centrally.  If you're not doing that the guy out wide is going to get roasted.  

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Part of the reason we are playing home and away games is that the RoF is being re grassed

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:

Part of the reason we are playing home and away games is that the RoF is being re grassed


Really?  Or perhaps they're taking the opportunity because we're playing away

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Brockie hard working all 90 minutes, good taken goal and unlucky 92 minutes miss. Midfield need to be more creative.

Norwich City supporter since 1992, New Zealand supporter since 2010 but without Rory Fallon's winning goal against Bahrain, I won't know about New Zealand Football.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

Again, I think this game was completely lost in midfield - the balance still doesn't quite look right and that's affecting the rest of the team.


I think the really disappointing thing from a defensive point of view is that even with three guys central we really struggled to put pressure on the ball.  


If you look at the stats each of Lia, Muscat and Riera were about the same.  Attempted about 50 passes and 80-85% accuracy - which is ok.  But in the end none of them is at all creative, it's all pretty basic possession so burden of making play in the final third falls entirely on Hernandez.  It's a bit predictable and a bit like last season unless we can improve the midfield then we're going to find it difficult to break teams down (but for a different reason)


I think after 4 games as well one thing has struck me and that's a bit of a lack of mobility across the team.  There aren't any really good athletes (say Ifill in his pomp in 08/09).  Hopefully Cunningham will be that player - we really do need him to start making an impact if we're going to do anything.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I blame l;ia - his effecton everyone in the midfield is to drag them down......I'm only partially serious on this but god the three DM's were terrible, at key moments they were caught out of position, gave the ball away. However the first two goals came from defensive errors. The first one Dura should have got across but I'm pretty sure Siggy was not tracking back, second was just a weak header back to the keeper.....could have been two all.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
james dean wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
james dean wrote:
Jtoml3 wrote:
james dean wrote:

Fenton got hung out to dry in the first 20 (which is all I watched before work) - he was completely isolated one on one which is crazy when you have three sitting midfielders one of them has to cover and help him out.  Back 4 looked so square as well.  Nevertheless he also looked worryingly easy to knock off the ball.  Really bad defending for the first goal as well, if there's one guy you always track it's Archie

I thought he got caught out of position too much in the first half because he was too far forward helping attack.


The defensive midfielders are there to cover that though

Our DMs are struggling to hold their own area and you want them to cover the FBs as well? I agree thats what DMs *should* do but that would be a stretch too far for current personnel. I think Manny, Lia et al need to get their own jobs executed right first. That fact alone would stop the FBs getting the crap and the backline under the pump.


I think it's simple.  You want Fenton to get forward and support the attack (the point of playing him there), you have three central midfielders playing defensively not pushing forward.  The player closest to the ball pushes out to help defend out wide, that still leaves two players centrally.  If you're not doing that the guy out wide is going to get roasted.  

I absolutely agree with you. How is it then for something that we agree is so simple, they just cannot execute. That's the frustrating part

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I'd just like to point out how eerily similar the game last night was to the first game we played in Melbourne last season.

Who says that history doesn't repeat itself?

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

I'd like to see Bertos in the midfield next week. Not as a wide Man Leo but a short passing ball player Leo. 

Let's face it, he no longer has the pace to play out wide, but he does possess a good pass (but ordinary cross) he is still mobile but not super speedy. I see parallels to Giggs. He came on and had some nice interplay in the midfield and with Hicks, we started to look like a midfield. I think you can afford to leave 2 DMs where they are as absolutely screeners and ball winners and all you ask Leo to do is be the link between those two and Hernandez. He is mobile and will chase the ball still but he has better on the ball skills than the 3 DMs that started so we can get get something out of the midfield. As JD said, nothing creatively (which is kinda what you expect for 3 DMs) and Carlos has to do it by himself. Hicks would probably do the same job but I would prefer experience right now. Leo has learned some defensive skills from being at RB and I thought last year when Greenie moved him into the midfield, he played that exact role and we looked much better (as did he) for his move there. I guess he could almost be the box to box guy but less grunt.

(Oh and I'd like to say so far Riera has not proved me wrong as being an A League DM. Not as bad as I thought but not worth an import slot)

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
el grapadura wrote:

I'd just like to point out how eerily similar the game last night was to the first game we played in Melbourne last season.

Who says that history doesn't repeat itself?

Yeah a few have mentioned it. Ernie gets a massive brickbat for that but it's his 3rd tactical fuck up in 4 games....

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
el grapadura wrote:

I'd just like to point out how eerily similar the game last night was to the first game we played in Melbourne last season.

Who says that history doesn't repeat itself?

Split Enz

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

5 star thread

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Cant agree re Bertos JV simply for the fact we have so many midfielders now. Manufacturing Leo into something he is not will take another year. We have Rufer Ridenton Hicks to name but three who have been brought into club to fill that type of role

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

So has anyone pushed the panic button yet? I think the angst button is half-way down.


In better news last night I played Heart vs Nix on FIFA 13 (player career mode) and beat the Jam Tards 0-3 away (could have been AAMI Park, could have been Napier).

Ernie - sign this Junior82 guy.  He scored the opening goal and provided an assist.


"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:

Cant agree re Bertos JV simply for the fact we have so many midfielders now. Manufacturing Leo into something he is not will take another year. We have Rufer Ridenton Hicks to name but three who have been brought into club to fill that type of role

Yup I agree we have those kids, but they are not A League ready. Hicks is a mile a head of those two. I'm not sure it would be manufacturing Leo as such he has the skill set, just comes in from the wing to apply it. I thought he played that role similarly under Greenie and last night so I think he is doing it already. I do accept my opinion on it is in the minority and open to ridicule though so fire away.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Junior82 wrote:

So has anyone pushed the panic button yet? I think the angst button is half-way down.

I don't think it is. Far from it in fact. I think it's recognised the schedule is not helpful, and Ernie is finding our best team still. A win is needed for sure but there are signs there of a side trying to play football under his system. It's just retention and moving the ball out of the deep midfield is our issue. Sigmund is far removed from being the long ball merchant he has always been and is looking and finding the option in the midfield in front of him as an example of this new found football system of Ernie's that he is implementing.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

shame about the monkeying around in the first 20 minutes. 

I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

My 2c. Fenton: got pwned at right back. I actually think Leo was better but I'm hesitant for more chopping and changing. Still, I think Fenton should be a substitute winger running at tired people from 60mins on.

Hernandez: not a great game. Tried multiple defense-splitting passes and most of them were never on. Still, one of them was I suppose.

Iffy: earned a start, but then again, he's looking best running at tired defenders. Conflicted about this a bit.

Durante: ack. Everyone gets one brain-fade a season I guess.

Riera: looked really good.

Boxall: I'd start him over Fenton as RB at this point, and Leo over both of them.

Overall I think the MV pundits saying that they "let us back into the game" aren't giving us enough credit, we basically forced our way back in and I was gutted / encouraged at the same time, I can definitely see what Ernie's trying to do, and for most games so far, we've done exactly that for ~60 mins of the game, it's just those 20-30 mins where we concede 1-2 goals that are killing us.

Given the schedule it was always going to be a slow start, I can see us hovering around 7-9th until Xmas and then making a late run into 5-6th later in the season. Unfortunately I don't think that's going to inspire the fans to the point where Welnix start breaking even this season.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
el grapadura wrote:

I'd just like to point out how eerily similar the game last night was to the first game we played in Melbourne last season.

Who says that history doesn't repeat itself?

Yeah a few have mentioned it. Ernie gets a massive brickbat for that but it's his 3rd tactical fuck up in 4 games....

I think it's more what you said elsewhere that with three DMs and Carlos in the middle they still failed to do the job screening for FBs getting high, which we know is Ernies game plan.  I think blaming Fenton is harsh and saying Ernie got his game plan wrong is also harsh.  His players did not execute.  But they are developing a new system and still seeking the best combos and formations.  So I think we have to give them some time.


2-3 v one of the top 4 sides, and easily could have been 2-1 in our favour without the offside goal and Dura's blooper.  And the side is still finding it's best combos and FBs still developing in their roles.  Not a great start to the season, but some pretty good signs of life.  I don't entirely go with the theory we only got into it with Melbourne backing off.  They did, but when we came back at them they tried to lift their game again and we kept playing through them.    


I hear on the radio this morning that Ernie is saying he got it wrong playing two FBs that are midfield oriented.  But who else has he got? They will eventually get it together.  And he's said he wants them getting forward.  So I think he is just putting his hand up to protect the team from too much criticism.

My key concern is still we are still a lot of old men in the attacking third, lacking pace.  But they are a skillful bunch and have shown they can conjure goals.  Ifill was mixed I thought.  Ran into a couple of blind alleys and gave the ball away.  A dumb foul.  But anyone who can get you a goal in a 20min or so sub cameo is valuable and he is obvious class, if slower than he was so getting caught on the ball more. Cunningham without an ankle injury could still make a difference.  
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

My 2c. Fenton: got pwned at right back. I actually think Leo was better but I'm hesitant for more chopping and changing. Still, I think Fenton should be a substitute winger running at tired people from 60mins on.

Hernandez: not a great game. Tried multiple defense-splitting passes and most of them were never on. Still, one of them was I suppose.

Iffy: earned a start, but then again, he's looking best running at tired defenders. Conflicted about this a bit.

Durante: ack. Everyone gets one brain-fade a season I guess.

Riera: looked really good.

Boxall: I'd start him over Fenton as RB at this point, and Leo over both of them.

Overall I think the MV pundits saying that they "let us back into the game" aren't giving us enough credit, we basically forced our way back in and I was gutted / encouraged at the same time, I can definitely see what Ernie's trying to do, and for most games so far, we've done exactly that for ~60 mins of the game, it's just those 20-30 mins where we concede 1-2 goals that are killing us.

Given the schedule it was always going to be a slow start, I can see us hovering around 7-9th until Xmas and then making a late run into 5-6th later in the season. Unfortunately I don't think that's going to inspire the fans to the point where Welnix start breaking even this season.

Agree with this. Think I'd start Boxall ahead of Siggy tbh. He is leaving Durante cold a lot of the time and his passing just isnt good enough in the system Ernie wants to play.

We havent been playing bad football at all. Our defence needs to be sorted asap
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Hahaha JV you shiuld know by now I am not one to ridicule sensible views. I get what you are saying about Leo. He looked ok ladt night ince the game had opened right up but to throw him into the fire against the likes of Burns and McGarry, that is where my doubt rests. Yes would be a big call to the hrow a Rufer in there but perhaps Hicks?. I would just like to see us getting a lot closer to settled side and formation just ahead of our 5th match which is around 20% into the season

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Second half we flattered to deceive as Victory backed off. Stein and Brockie doesnt work.  Needs Cunningham to get over what he has and get some pace into our play.  Short passing is okay and Hernandez can thread good ball but it aint going to work thru just him.

Moss(Spoonley)

Bertos Siggy Durante Caira
Reira(Hicks) Manny

Cunningham(Ifill) Hernandez Fenton(Rufer)

Brockie(Stein)

A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Oh, and Brockie, MOM, great energy all game,  at no point did he do his usual disappearing act. Very, very close to getting a point for us with that last cross from Ifill, who was also awesome.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

IMO I think we played pretty good on the attack. The extra man in midfield really helped our mids confidently make short sharp passes.

However for all the midfield, they were pretty poor on defence. They needed to help cover the fullbacks as someone mentioned, but this didn't happen often.

I'm also not sure Stein + Brockie is going to work long term up top. But hard to judge again with a completely new shape.


Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

For me the best team would be

Moss

Bertos Boxall Durante Caira

Reira Manny

Ifill Stein Hernandez

Brockie

Fenton to replace Ifill @ 60mins

Cunningham on for Stein @ 65

Siggy on for Boxall at 88mins to waste time when we're 5-0 up.


Permalink Permalink