Wellington Phoenix Men

vs Roar, Sun 12 Feb, 5 pm

620 replies · 4,724 views
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
patrick478 wrote:
Nope, this was the last game of 5 card suspensions, so both players are suspended. If they had of made it through this game without a yellow, the threshold would have gone to 8 and they would be safe.


Which suggests to me that the ref had an agenda concerning us, hmmm..........

"Ah yes, Gillet,This is  .......   from the FFA speaking. Now about the New Zealanders, I want you to put a stop to this nonsense!They're making our good teams look bad and our best players look ordinary.  Bad enough the bloody basketballers making us look silly, AND the leagueys, those All Black Bloody w++kers too....what's the f**kin* world coming to?? Its bloody un-Australian!!
Well its gonna stop, you hear me Gillet? Those Kiwi pricks are not gonna steal our thunder and OUR A-League too.We've worked too bloody hard for too long for that to happen...the AFC are giving us grief..Sort 'em out Gillet ....or your name will be buried in the state leagues roster running the lines.!!"

'nuff said.
RedGed2012-02-13 10:35:33

  Improving,,on the up, a work in progress from Italiano and the Nix. Bring on the bathroom bling in '24! COYN!

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
So with Durante and Brown out, who'll be captain against CCM?
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Poor refereeing performance tonight, absolutely woeful. Its a sad state of affairs when chumps like Gillett are supposed to be the very best in this part of the world. I dont think any of the bookings he gave out this evening were necessary, and just the amount of times he blew up good solid challenges was a farce. Hes most of the reason "soccer is for pussies" exists. The fact he had to leave the pitch from via an alternate exit said it all really, he knew he sucked tonight. Why are refs so sh*t?
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Revel wrote:
So with Durante and Brown out, who'll be captain against CCM?

SigmUnd
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
AJ13 wrote:
Revel wrote:
So with Durante and Brown out, who'll be captain against CCM?

SigmUnd

Not with a hammy injury he won't.

  Improving,,on the up, a work in progress from Italiano and the Nix. Bring on the bathroom bling in '24! COYN!

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
RedGed wrote:

AJ13 wrote:

Revel wrote:
So with Durante and Brown out, who'll be captain against CCM?
SigmUnd
Not with a hammy injury he won't.


It's not. Was just cramp. Will play against CCM according to Piney.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
small mercies.sweet.

  Improving,,on the up, a work in progress from Italiano and the Nix. Bring on the bathroom bling in '24! COYN!

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
if only Iffy had taken his chances like he normally does. And Lia had been Manny. And the ref hadn't been a twat.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Surely Griffiths will slot into the back 4? Not hugely experienced but he's decent enough and would be a safer option than converting someone else from their usual role.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think we set out to play a  holding pattern in the first half ,knowing as everyone did that they would have the  most possession,it almost worked with only a dubious goal from the mad Albanian seperating the teams at half time  ,I don't think it was about so showing to   much respect more an attempt at containment.
With a bit of luck we could have got a  couple back in the second half but it just wasn't our night ,no disgrace in the way we played  against a team that I watched tear us apart  in the  Dunedin pre season friendly match !
We are still in a far far better position than the majority of fans would have dared to dream of at the start of the season,still think a top four finish is realistic !

The answer to life's problems are rarely found at the bottom of a beer glass - but it's always worth a look.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
AJ13 wrote:
Poor refereeing performance tonight, absolutely woeful. Its a sad state of affairs when chumps like Gillett are supposed to be the very best in this part of the world. I dont think any of the bookings he gave out this evening were necessary, and just the amount of times he blew up good solid challenges was a farce. Hes most of the reason "soccer is for pussies" exists. The fact he had to leave the pitch from via an alternate exit said it all really, he knew he sucked tonight. Why are refs so sh*t?


cos they wear blue

" If you only have a hammer you tend to see every problem as a nail" - maslow

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Black Plague wrote:
Grandadi wrote:
I resign.Again.And I DON'T want a team of Vinnie Lias, not ever.


I agree. Can't wait to have Manny back, shame we are missing Brown and Dura though....gonna hurt


with brown out maybe sanchez will the opportunity to play the position that he did so well in earlier in the season

" If you only have a hammer you tend to see every problem as a nail" - maslow

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Leo has had bronchitis for two weeks, possibly why he was subbed. He played well, just ran out of puff.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard for a ref to be any good with two untrained muppets waving the flags on the side. They missed so much of the match that they'll probably watch the replays and enjoy the 75% they missed


Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ard Righ wrote:
I don't think we were terrible as everyone here is saying. Brisbane had majority of the ball in the first 40 minutes and did nothing, and from what I saw of the replay, first goal looked offside.

Second-half we were much better, but you are never going to get any flow when the ref keeps blowing this whistle for dives and theatrics.

Ifill normally would have buried his chances, credit on the saves, but I think we played way better than Brisbane in the second half.

Upside to the next game, expect Manny will be back, Lia to midfield with Smith. Just need to find cover for Dura.
Yeh, was actually a pretty tight game.  They finished better than we did and i thought their pressure on the ball was sensational.  Equal shots and shots on goal, but they took two, we forced a few good saves, went close but no cigar. 
 
But I am inclined to agree we let Brisbane faff around on the ball too much in the first half and failed to press, defended too deep.  Sure it was a tactic that worked well last time, but it became a joke of a half.  No penetration from one side and too much sitting back from the other.   But it was a big game with a lot on it, so I guess you expect a fair bit of cautious play.
 
The reff got more right than most are suggesting.  A couple of calls didn't go our way, but you are going to get that.  Brown was seriously hard done by for his yellow.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
paullt wrote:

with brown out maybe sanchez will the opportunity to play the position that he did so well in earlier in the season
+1
 
ricki's best decisions are forced on him
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
RedGed wrote:
patrick478 wrote:
Nope, this was the last game of 5 card suspensions, so both players are suspended. If they had of made it through this game without a yellow, the threshold would have gone to 8 and they would be safe.


Which suggests to me that the ref had an agenda concerning us, hmmm..........

"Ah yes, Gillett,This is  .......   from the FFA speaking. Now about the New Zealanders, I want you to put a stop to this nonsense!They're making our good teams look bad and our best players look ordinary.  Bad enough the bloody basketballers making us look silly, AND the leagueys, those All Black Bloody w++kers too....what's the f**kin* world coming to?? Its bloody un-Australian!!
Well its gonna stop, you hear me Gillett? Those Kiwi pricks are not gonna steal our thunder and OUR A-League too.We've worked too bloody hard for too long for that to happen...the AFC are giving us grief..Sort 'em out Gillett ....or your name will be buried in the state leagues roster running the lines.!!

'nuff said.
 
Ricki stops short of saying there's an agenda against the Nix...


Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The lino says in that story that Dura didn't say anything rude- will they appeal? I mean as HN keeps pointing out there are players swearing at the ref every game. Appealing Dura's ban might be a go...

If there was no contact with Berisha- perhaps Brown's too...martinb2012-02-13 00:40:52


Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ref had a blinder
First half we couldnt work out how to get possession and disrupt passing game.
Second half better but to much reliance n Ifill
And..why not use three subs?..and Pav earlier?
Great noise from YF...we were up in LL and it sounded great.

A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sunset Sam wrote:
The only really worthwhile part of the game was when my son won the iPhone 4S in the TAB sponsored competition.


BOOO!

Why the hell are the TAB giving away Crapple products when our MAJOR sponsor is SONY?

Poor form by the TAB in my opinion...

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
AJ13 wrote:
Why are refs so sh*t?

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
just why
NOBODY KNOWS

I LOVE LAMP

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I really don't see how the ref was at fault for our utterly unimaginative play throughout. Constant Long Ball against two very tall center backs - did we win one of those at all?

Every goal kick from Paston ended up with Roar's possession. KEEP THE BALL. DON'T HOOF.

What was ricky's instructions at half time? Same again lads? Its working so far!

It's just utterly mindless and we were punished for it by a team who know how to hold on the ball and not panic.

I'd chew my kids team out if they played like that.

For me, this game reinforced the need to find a new coach who can think outside the 'hoof it and hope' football model.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
just out of interest is Peter O'Leary still reffing A-League games?  
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
martinb wrote:
The lino says in that story that Dura didn't say anything rude- will they appeal? I mean as HN keeps pointing out there are players swearing at the ref every game. Appealing Dura's ban might be a go...

If there was no contact with Berisha- perhaps Brown's too...


I seem to remember someone saying that it is extremely difficult/impossible to appeal a yellow card, unless it's for something like mistaken identity. Red card yes, yellow card no.

Can anyone clarify?

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Interesting.... We played the same tactics in Dunedin... ie sit back and hold make sure we don't get drawn out of position and hit them on the counter attack... It worked then and Ricki was a tactical Genius, essentially same tactics this week and did not quite come off, mainly because we did not take the limited chances we had, ie Leo in first half and Ifills two second half chances in particular and yet now Ricki is apparently a tactical moron???
Brisbanes first goal was an amazing strike, albeit possibly offside and there second was fantastic finish, but at that stage we had shifted to a back three clearly chasing the game after Siggy went off.
Then again reading comments like Sub Lia and put on Daniel (A right back for an attacking left midfielder), should not really be surprised!
Thought we dominated second half for long periods and on a different day things could have been different.
With regard reffering I think most has been said, however I sometimes think we dont make it easy on ourselves. If we give away a dubious free kick we seem to surround the ref with players giving him a serve. However warrannted it may be, I do not think it helps our case.
 
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Pretty good summation there jeff.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I never said playing 9 behind the ball was the problem - it was giving the ball away long at every opportunity. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

Roar had the height to neutralise this, and you'd think after the 15th attempt we might have realised this. Our attacking chances came through the ball being run and passed on the break, with players moving together, not hoofed to a lone striker.
zonknz2012-02-13 09:43:16
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:
Interesting.... We played the same tactics in Dunedin... ie sit back and hold make sure we don't get drawn out of position and hit them on the counter attack... It worked then and Ricki was a tactical Genius, essentially same tactics this week and did not quite come off, mainly because we did not take the limited chances we had, ie Leo in first half and Ifills two second half chances in particular and yet now Ricki is apparently a tactical moron???

Brisbanes first goal was an amazing strike, albeit possibly offside and there second was fantastic finish, but at that stage we had shifted to a back three clearly chasing the game after Siggy went off.
Then again reading comments like Sub Lia and put on Daniel (A right back for an attacking left midfielder), should not really be surprised!

Thought we dominated second half for long periods and on a different day things could have been different.

With regard reffering I think most has been said, however I sometimes think we dont make it easy on ourselves. If we give away a dubious free kick we seem to surround the ref with players giving him a serve. However warrannted it may be, I do not think it helps our case.

�


Pretty much agree
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Rosco wrote:
sthn.jeff wrote:
Interesting.... We played the same tactics in Dunedin... ie sit back and hold make sure we don't get drawn out of position and hit them on the counter attack... It worked then and Ricki was a tactical Genius, essentially same tactics this week and did not quite come off, mainly because we did not take the limited chances we had, ie Leo in first half and Ifills two second half chances in particular and yet now Ricki is apparently a tactical moron???

Brisbanes first goal was an amazing strike, albeit possibly offside and there second was fantastic finish, but at that stage we had shifted to a back three clearly chasing the game after Siggy went off.
Then again reading comments like Sub Lia and put on Daniel (A right back for an attacking left midfielder), should not really be surprised!

Thought we dominated second half for long periods and on a different day things could have been different.

With regard reffering I think most has been said, however I sometimes think we dont make it easy on ourselves. If we give away a dubious free kick we seem to surround the ref with players giving him a serve. However warrannted it may be, I do not think it helps our case.

 


Pretty much agree
 
I will second that
Clearly thought out SJ
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I don't really understand all the angst - like people have said, tactically, at least in the first half, was the carbon-copy of the tactics from Dunedin, just didn't work out this time. Second-half we were forced to push up much higher up the pitch to press them, and this succeeded a few times where we managed to get the ball high up the field and have a couple of decent opportunities. But pressing that high with so many numbers is a very high-risk tactic against a good side (there was one situation I remember where we tried to box them in in one corner, and they passed their way out of trouble and the move ended with them shooting at our goal), and it is impossible to sustain over a long period of time. Like I said, we were forced into it through the circumstances, but we could not play like that for an entire game.

The bottom line is, they are just a better team. Their midfield is far superior to ours, they transitioned through the middle of the park almost at will, we could not even slow them down the whole day. Contrast that to our midfield, where we really struggled to get anything going. The best thing is just to move and write it off as a loss to a better team, and not dwell on it too much.el grapadura2012-02-13 12:10:12
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I'm not that downcast about performance, like El G said we were just beaten by a better team on the day. In saying that we gave oursevles enough chances that on another day we may have snatched a point.
 
The 20 minutes at the start of the second half I thought were outstanding, seemed to me like Sanchez tried to get into the middle of the park more and was directing a bit more traffic around him. We looked much better while doing that.
 
To win this thing we are going to have to get by Brisbane at some stage and on the balance of our three performances agains them this season I don't see any reason why we can't do that.

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Also a note on the ref, considering all the angst there.

Let me start by saying that the refereeing standard in this league is generally pretty poor. But last night, I don't think the referee was anywhere near as bad as he's made out to be here, particularly considering that his worst decisions of the night were actually in our favour.

Durante's challenge in the second half was a dead-set penalty for which he should have got carded. Also, from where I was in the first half there appeared to be a trip on Berisha near the by-line in our box in the first half which also easily could have been given as a penalty. Let's also not forget that our best chance of the game, Ifill's 1 on 1 with Theo, came after one of the most obvious attacking fouls I've ever seen - Ifill literally shoved the defender off the ball prior to his shot.

Furthermore, I see a lot of people here have stated their first goal was offside - I have to say I was very interested to check this out, as watching it live I felt it was very close and I looked towards the AR as soon as Berisha received the ball. So I've looked at some replays, which are not completely conclusive. But based on the evidence within them, I'm 99.9% certain that Berisha was on and the goal is legitimate. The replay quite clearly shows that Durante was not very alert to danger, however.

As for the bookings people are complaining about, Durante would be well advised to know that dissent does not only come in the form of words, but also in the form of actions. Waving your arms around showing everyone that you thought the ref (or his assistant) got it wrong and that you strongly disagreed with the decision is not really that different to calling the ref a blind moron. So you're just as likely to get booked for it, just like players have been carded in the past for ironically clapping refereeing decisions.

As for Brown's challenge - and I'm speaking from memory here - he pretty much played the man, and not the ball, in a promising counter-attacking move by the opposition. Even if there isn't much contact (and remember, there DOES NOT have to be contact for a referee to blow up for a foul) I can easily see why a referee would want to caution a challenge like that with a yellow card.el grapadura2012-02-13 13:58:44
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Everyones making is out to be like the loss at the end of out unbeaten run.
It wasn't like that.
We dominated large periods if not most of the second half, we spent most of it up their end, it was all they ( a better side?) could do to put it out for a throw.
All this to much passive, to much respect is bullsh*t; we played the roar the way your supposed to and were unlucky to cop a first half goal.

"Yellow Fever are fantastic – I have to say that"

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
I don't really understand all the angst - like people have said, tactically, at least in the first half, was the carbon-copy of the tactics from Dunedin, just didn't work out this time. Second-half we were forced to push up much higher up the pitch to press them, and this succeeded a few times where we managed to get the ball high up the field and have a couple of decent opportunities. But pressing that high with so many numbers is a very high-risk tactic against a good side (there was one situation I remember where we tried to box them in in one corner, and they passed their way out of trouble and the move ended with them shooting at our goal), and it is impossible to sustain over a long period of time. Like I said, we were forced into it through the circumstances, but we could not play like that for an entire game.

The bottom line is, they are just a better team. Their midfield is far superior to ours, they transitioned through the middle of the park almost at will, we could not even slow them down the whole day. Contrast that to our midfield, where we really struggled to get anything going. The best thing is just to move and write it off as a loss to a better team, and not dwell on it too much.


Agree with this, disagree with you on the ref. Offside was marginal, I think his body was offside, but can't blame the AR for not making the call when it is that close.

Berisha and Brown in the first half wasn't a penalty (assuming that is the one you are talking about), just a tangle of legs, and Berisha didn't claim a penalty and helped Brown up. I don't think Durante's one was a penalty either, was a shoulder to shoulder challenge to me.

I didn't see what Durante did to get the yellow, but it sounds like arm waving and dissent by action. I would actually love that to be cautioned more, but it seems pretty inconsistent to book Durante in this case, when previous cases go unpunished left right and centre. Browns yellow pretty clearly had no contact.

A significant number of fouls we gave away in this game (but by no means the anywhere near the majority) were never fouls but clean tackles.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
aitkenmike wrote:


Agree with this, disagree with you on the ref. Offside was marginal, I think his body was offside, but can't blame the AR for not making the call when it is that close.

Berisha and Brown in the first half wasn't a penalty (assuming that is the one you are talking about), just a tangle of legs, and Berisha didn't claim a penalty and helped Brown up. I don't think Durante's one was a penalty either, was a shoulder to shoulder challenge to me.



I'm still pretty certain (but not 100% as I don't have 'smoking gun' replay) is that it wasn't offside. The best shot I could find is Berisha half a stride in fron of Durante, with the ball some well in the air already. From the shot, it's clear Berisha is in full stride, Durante at best is flat-footed, at worst has just stepped up. Extrapolating the situation to the moment the ball was passed, I'd say at worst Berisha was level with Durante, therefore not offside. But like I said, I've had a hard time finding a really good replay I could pause at the time the ball was passed.

Interestingly, in the TWs game earlier in the day, Musa made an almost identical challenge on Slefendorfas, penalty and a yellow card, and not a single soul at the ground grumbled about it. Durante's challenge I certainly didn't see as a shoulder to shoulder, it was pretty much a full body charge/check which is legal in ice hockey, but not in football.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
aitkenmike wrote:


Agree with this, disagree with you on the ref. Offside was marginal, I think his body was offside, but can't blame the AR for not making the call when it is that close.

Berisha and Brown in the first half wasn't a penalty (assuming that is the one you are talking about), just a tangle of legs, and Berisha didn't claim a penalty and helped Brown up. I don't think Durante's one was a penalty either, was a shoulder to shoulder challenge to me.



I'm still pretty certain (but not 100% as I don't have 'smoking gun' replay) is that it wasn't offside. The best shot I could find is Berisha half a stride in fron of Durante, with the ball some well in the air already. From the shot, it's clear Berisha is in full stride, Durante at best is flat-footed, at worst has just stepped up. Extrapolating the situation to the moment the ball was passed, I'd say at worst Berisha was level with Durante, therefore not offside. But like I said, I've had a hard time finding a really good replay I could pause at the time the ball was passed.

Interestingly, in the TWs game earlier in the day, Musa made an almost identical challenge on Slefendorfas, penalty and a yellow card, and not a single soul at the ground grumbled about it. Durante's challenge I certainly didn't see as a shoulder to shoulder, it was pretty much a full body charge/check which is legal in ice hockey, but not in football.
 
The Durante shoulder to shoulder incident is a difficult one to call for me as its quite a common challenge within the A-league and Topor-Stanley seems to do it on average about 3 times a game

" If you only have a hammer you tend to see every problem as a nail" - maslow

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The one positive I took from yesterday's game was the behaviour of the portly older gentleman several rows in front of my friend and I.
 
His frequent, monosyllabic exclamations led to us nicknaming him Father Jack Hackett.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Also a note on the ref, considering all the angst there.

Let me start by saying that the refereeing standard in this league is generally pretty poor. But last night, I don't think the referee was anywhere near as bad as he's made out to be here, particularly considering that his worst decisions of the night were actually in our favour.

Durante's challenge in the second half was a dead-set penalty for which he should have got carded. Also, from where I was in the first half there appeared to be a trip on Berisha near the by-line in our box in the first half which also easily could have been given as a penalty. Let's also not forget that our best chance of the game, Ifill's 1 on 1 with Theo, came after one of the most obvious attacking fouls I've ever seen - Ifill literally shoved the defender off the ball prior to his shot.

Furthermore, I see a lot of people here have stated their first goal was offside - I have to say I was very interested to check this out, as watching it live I felt it was very close and I looked towards the AR as soon as Berisha received the ball. So I've looked at some replays, which are not completely conclusive. But based on the evidence within them, I'm 99.9% certain that Berisha was on and the goal is legitimate. The replay quite clearly shows that Durante was not very alert to danger, however.

As for the bookings people are complaining about, Durante would be well advised to know that dissent does not only come in the form of words, but also in the form of actions. Waving your arms around showing everyone that you thought the ref (or his assistant) that you strongly disagreed with the decision is not really that different to call the ref a blind moron. So you're just as likely to get booked for it, just like players have been carded in the past for ironically clapping refereeing decisions.

As for Brown's challenge - and I'm speaking from memory here - he pretty much played the man, and not the ball, in a promising counter-attacking move by the opposition. Even if there isn't much contact (and remember, there DOES NOT have to be contact for a referee to blow up for a foul) I can easily see why a referee would want to caution a challenge like that with a yellow card.
A big steaming pile of this.
Permalink Permalink