Its Summer! - the Fever Cricket Thread.

4313 replies · 589,651 views
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hlmphil wrote:
Will be interesting to see if we can get 20 wickets on that. Time for Dan the man to step up...
Expecting that Vettori will need to bowl 40 overs, Jeets about the same. Kane and Gup will have to share a few overs as well. and 20 Zimbabwean wickets too don't forget...

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Considering Patel got dropped by Wellington, I have no idea how he is playing in a test. Still, hopefully he does well
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
N-Bomb wrote:
Considering Patel got dropped by Wellington
Just quietly I think there is more to that than what's on the surface. Wasn't so much on playing performance.TopLeft072011-11-02 22:23:42

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
TopLeft07 wrote:
N-Bomb wrote:
Considering Patel got dropped by Wellington
Just quietly I think there is more to that than what's on the surface. Wasn't so much on playing performance.
Interesting... has he been hanging around with Ma'a?
Glad I didn't stay up to watch Zimbabwe smashing 82/1 off 40 overs... sounds like riveting viewing.
 
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
riveting viewing and the same old depressing news from the NZ camp, half our batting lineup does ok 401 - 5. then the remaining batsmen fail miserably when we are looking like scoring a dominating 500+. Bowlers will struggle to take 19 wickets for the win.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
How only one batsman in that team got 100 when all of them got starts is astounding.

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
theprof wrote:
riveting viewing and the same old depressing news from the NZ camp, half our batting lineup does ok 401 - 5. then the remaining batsmen fail miserably when we are looking like scoring a dominating 500+. Bowlers will struggle to take 19 wickets for the win.
Ha... in years past it was always the opposite. We'd stagger to 80/5 then Vettori and co would scrape is through to 350.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
bopman wrote:
How only one batsman in that team got 100 when all of them got starts is astounding.


Not really, it is the Black Caps after all.

It's more surprising that one of them actually got to a 100.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hlmphil wrote:
theprof wrote:
riveting viewing and the same old depressing news from the NZ camp, half our batting lineup does ok 401 - 5. then the remaining batsmen fail miserably when we are looking like scoring a dominating 500+. Bowlers will struggle to take 19 wickets for the win.
Ha... in years past it was always the opposite. We'd stagger to 80/5 then Vettori and co would scrape is through to 350.
Just wait till we get to playing good teams - this will be back
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
bopman wrote:
How only one batsman in that team got 100 when all of them got starts is astounding.


Not really, it is the Black Caps after all.

It's more surprising that one of them actually got to a 100.
When you give us enough of a road we do tend to go alright though, I give you the India tour last year.

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
bopman wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
bopman wrote:
How only one batsman in that team got 100 when all of them got starts is astounding.
Not really, it is the Black Caps after all. It's more surprising that one of them actually got to a 100.


When you give us enough of a road we do tend to go alright though, I give you the India tour last year.


Occasionally, yes. But the overall pattern is that our players struggle to get to three figures, even in good batting conditions. The number of hundreds each of batsmen have testifies to that.

And actually, we have been bucking that trend in this tour - 4 100s in 3 ODIs, and now a 100 in the first innings of the Test. But that has more to do with the opposition than anything else I'd say.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Stephen Fleming ios/was a classic example of that, posted multiple great starts (50+) but his conversion rate to 100's was terrible

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hlmphil wrote:
TopLeft07 wrote:
N-Bomb wrote:
Considering Patel got dropped by Wellington
Just quietly I think there is more to that than what's on the surface. Wasn't so much on playing performance.
Interesting... has he been hanging around with Ma'a?
I'm pretty sure it was due to an on-field incident involving Mark Gillespie, Jeets got punished for his reaction but it was Gillespie who instigated it. Jeets is a good c**t and I think he was hard done by tbh. He's always one of the most proffessional players on and off the pitch, I won't comment on the other guy.
 
On the test match: Ross Taylor set the tone for the day early on. Love our new captain.
TopLeft072011-11-03 11:56:38

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah, I went to school with the other guy, so that doesn't surprise me at all.
Hope Jeets can pick up some wickets in the 2nd innings, wasn't a great spell by him in the 1st.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Chris Martin got his 200th test wicket last night, well done that man. Massive fan of him, a true cult-hero for NZ test cricket tragics.

Also, Dan's 5-wicket haul took him to 350 test wickets, anyone think he has a chance of getting to 500?
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It's a pity we don't play more tests, because otherwise I think he would. As it stands he might struggle playing just 5 or 6 tests per year. He already has 4000 runs. 5000 runs (which he surely will do) + 500 wickets would put him right up there as one of the great allrounders.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I was thinking about this this morning - think 5000 runs is pretty much a given (assuming nothing bad happens in terms of injuries, etc), but I think he has a shot at 500 wickets too.

If we play around 6 tests a year (which seems to be about the norm), he needs 5-6 wickets a test over the next 5 years (when he will be 37-38) to get pretty close. And I think he's a pretty statistically driven player, and if he's body hasn't fallen apart by then I think he'd probably keep going to get there. Think a major injury is the main obstacle he's facing in getting to 500.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Mark Richardson broke it down on CGW one night about how Dan could go about reaching the 5000/500 milestone and he was pretty sure he will do it.

i think given the fact that he only plays test cricket now for us will help his body go longer. and yes, he is a very stats driven player so one would think he may already have thought about it a little bit
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Congrats to Martin on the 200!
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
I was thinking about this this morning - think 5000 runs is pretty much a given (assuming nothing bad happens in terms of injuries, etc), but I think he has a shot at 500 wickets too.

If we play around 6 tests a year (which seems to be about the norm), he needs 5-6 wickets a test over the next 5 years (when he will be 37-38) to get pretty close. And I think he's a pretty statistically driven player, and if he's body hasn't fallen apart by then I think he'd probably keep going to get there. Think a major injury is the main obstacle he's facing in getting to 500.
Personally I think both of those are optimistic, but I'd love to be proven wrong!
Currently he has 345 wickets in 105 tests so averaging a bit over 3 per test. And then there's the issue of his back...hlmphil2011-11-04 16:14:42
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
He's got 350 right after the Zimbo's first innings.

But yeah, how his back hold us up is the big issue.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I really dont want to jinx him but this is perfect chance for kane to tick up a ton. Actually i will be really disappointed if he doesn't.

If none of you had guessed i'm a huge fan of his, think he is the future of nz cricket.

Ps also hiding in here away from what i can only imagine is some severe nix angst

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Is vettori captain? I could be wrong but asuming he is i would almost think he's better off stepping back and just playing as a bowling allrounder. Think he might perform better without the extra responsibility and (even though i don't rate taylor as a captain) we might as well let the next guy start his tenure m.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Taylor is captian I thought?
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Could be, just lazy and cbf looking it up

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Also while im on the i <3 williamson crusade look at his bat, notice the red marking right in the middle of his bat? Think that indicates how well he sees the ball against these bowlers and how well he times the ball

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
He is a key player for the future, I just hope if he goes thru a lean patch he doesnt get cast aside like they have done to players in the past.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I don't think they will. Kane has been watched by nzc for a long time and i think they realise his ability. They will stick with him. Remember he is a lot younger than guys like vincent, sinclair, cumming, marshall, ingram etc when they were given up on. Kane is already performing pretty well in comparison to them when they had their chances and his age gives more reason to invest time in him. I've seen john wright working with him, you can tell wright loves him and is really keen on making sure he becomes a great batsman. All that along with kane's attitude makes me confident he will be.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
f**k it! Gutted, let me down! That will about do it for me tonight.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

One thing I really miss about not living in NZ anymore is seeing the progress of up and coming cricketers. Used to love getting down to the Basin and watching the 3 and 4 day stuff, even though there were usually only 3 men and a dog there.

Having read and heard a lot about Williamson I was interested to finally see him on TV. You could see immediatly that he has a very sound technique and likes to play in the V. Often with our young batsmen they seem to have great early promise but some quirk or flaw in their technique is ruthlessly exploited once they hit test level. From there they are in and out, in and out of the team, and finally simply out. Mighty frustrating to see so much talent fall by the wayside because they can't be coached out of playing the same old out-shot, or can't play straight bat defensive shots .
 
Watching Willaimson made me feel the same as when I first saw Marco Rojas. Both have got bags of natural talent, technical skill and, hopefully, the kind of intelligence you need to be a success long term.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
how the f**k did we manage that
 
i fell asleep about 3 balls before we got taylor out and at that stage i was lying there thinking we were headed for a pretty embarrassing loss
 
 
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Slight embarrasment while watching 3 news last night, they referred to it as "Test of the Century". Hmmmmmmm.
 
Good win though, you can only play what's in front of you.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah, I could not quite believe my ears when I heard that.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Nz media for you.

Plunket sheild under way this morning. Wellinton getting pumped in napier at the moment.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Crowe's comeback.  Surprise surprise.  Still got "injury niggles". 

Didn't like the sledging too.  LOL. 
 
Question: What line would you use when sledging Crowe?  THere's just too many.
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Gr8 bat though.  That is when the dicky knee/back/diarrhoea didn't flare up.

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
TopLeft07 wrote:
Plunket sheild under way this morning. Wellinton getting pumped in napier at the moment.
Wellington made a bit of a comeback after lunch with 19 year-old debutant Scott Kuggeleijn taking three quick wickets to kick off the CD collapse. Other than Ingram making 81 the rest of CD didn't fare too well. CD were 252 all out and Wellington will be disappointed having undone their good work in the field when they finished the day on 59 having lost three wickets. Score card.

Trent Boult (24     7 48 5), Tim Southee (12 5 34 1) and Brent Arnel (24 6 54 2) bowled well in Whangarei with Boult and Southee at one stage having bowling figures of 13 13 2 and 8 8 1 respectively. I would expect both of these two to appear in the national side at some stage this summer. Southee looked to have a lighter bowling load in his first game back from injury. Auckland finished the day on a disappointing 250/5. Score card.

Rob Nicol hit 16 fours and one six on his way to 107 off 203 balls to throw his name in the hat for a test spot after his recent good form in the one day side. Canterbury ended the day in control on 286/4. Score card.

Some more of the same names doing the business in the Plunket Shield again. The NZ selectors will feel the pressure from these guys some the Aussie tour.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The whole Crowe comeback thing is a joke. Ego maniac throwing himself back into the limelight. I reckon Crowe has been challenged by someone to put his money where his mouth is after all the criticism he has been giving the NZ players lately and he has decided to take it on because of that ego. He wants to be able to turn around and say "if I can do it at 49 what is wrong with our current crop?". Hope he get's rolled in club reserve grade.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
TBoult is better than Aldridge, who is a better option to McKay and Patel. Get him in the black caps. Good Day 1 for my ND, bit short on top-order batting though
Permalink Permalink
over 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
N-Bomb wrote:
TBoult is better than Aldridge, who is a better option to McKay and Patel. Get him in the black caps. Good Day 1 for my ND, bit short on top-order batting though
Not to mention he is a left armer too - we've been missing a decent lefty for some time now. I think that Wright and co are aware of his talent but aren't keen to rush him in to international cricket the way Moles tried to. The kid needs to get some domestic first class overs under his belt first. I agree though, he is inching his way to a selection every game and can't be far off now.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink