Its Summer! - the Fever Cricket Thread.

4313 replies · 589,610 views
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
not anymore
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
oh geez
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
44-3!
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
3 maidens on the trott, 2 of them wicket maidens 
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
   Apparently "waiting waiting" means "yes" to Styris.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
FFS, should have been another run out, Williamson has done the old "yes-no" there.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago


Downey262011-02-01 15:36:06
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
god we are terrible

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jeez, McCullums had a go at running out Franklin there but Gul has moosed it. McCullum took off as Franklin yelled waiting as the ball went straight to backward point.

We have to sort this running out - we are sh*t enough without ridiculous runouts!
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Good innings from Franklin. First bat in the series and he took responsibility and has given us something to bowl at at least, and still did it at a pretty good strike rate.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Happy for Jimmy F, top knock under pressure.

But man are we a sh*t cricket team.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Agreed. We are rubbish. Almost dreading the WC! Franklin did well though
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Happy for Jimmy F, top knock under pressure.

But man are we a sh*t cricket team.


The crazy thing is, if Ryder wasn't hurt, our best batsman in the previous series still wouldn't have had a bat by match 4 in the series.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Good total in the end considering we were 79/5.

Don't like our chances of defending it though.el grapadura2011-02-01 17:41:15
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Win or lose, the bowlers have done a very good job to make this game as competitive as it is. Pakistan should still romp home though.

Edit: Except Southee aitkenmike2011-02-01 21:58:29
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Southee you bottler.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Were looking good for the world cup
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
262 was never enough on that deck! Paki's always had it in the bag....

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Styris lost us the game IMO in that 3rd last over.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Not this????
 
New Zealand innings (50 overs maximum) R M B 4s 6s SR MJ Guptill c Younis Khan b Wahab Riaz 21 27 17 3 1 123.52 6.4 nicely taken by Younis at short midwicket. Guptill is dismissed again the run of play, in extremely soft fashion. He shakes his head in disappointment, he's missed out on a pitch full of runs. Riaz wisely lands another one short of driving length and Guptill stays back in the crease and looks to work it to the leg side. He can't keep it completely down, though, and Younis was on the move even as he played the shot, tumbling to his left to take a neat catch. 40/1
<!--<div ="lvpyrpup" id="lvpyrbat1"> <div id="lftbg"></DIV> <div ="plyerpfl"> <ul> <li><a href="" target="_blank">View profile</A></li> <li><a href="/new-zealand-v-pakistan-2010/engine/current/match/473926.html?view=hawkeye;batsman=Martin%20Guptill;innings=" target="_blank">View hawkeye</A></li> </ul> <span ="hideHwkTooltip('lvpyrbat1'); return false">x</span> </DIV> </DIV>--> JM How c Umar Akmal b Abdul Razzaq 13 33 29 2 0 44.82 7.6 How tragic! How has picked Umar Akmal at the midwicket fence with pin-point accuracy. Almost scientific precision. Short ball, it was there for the pull and How connected cleanly. That seemed headed for a flat six, but Umar was waiting with glee. 44/2
<!--<div ="lvpyrpup" id="lvpyrbat2"> <div id="lftbg"></DIV> <div ="plyerpfl"> <ul> <li><a href="" target="_blank">View profile</A></li> <li><a href="/new-zealand-v-pakistan-2010/engine/current/match/473926.html?view=hawkeye;batsman=Jamie%20How;innings=" target="_blank">View hawkeye</A></li> </ul> <span ="hideHwkTooltip('lvpyrbat2'); return false">x</span> </DIV> </DIV>--> LRPL Taylor c Younis Khan b Wahab Riaz 4 10 5 1 0 80.00 8.3 three wickets in three overs, New Zealand are disintegrating. And like the previous two, this is another wicket gifted away. Riaz explores a fuller length, lands it enticingly for the drive outside off and Taylor takes him on, attempting the big booming cover drive. He was so eager to get four, he did not get across enough and just threw his hands at it. The result was a thick outside edge that flew to Younis at slip. 44/3
<!--<div ="lvpyrpup" id="lvpyrbat3"> <div id="lftbg"></DIV> <div ="plyerpfl"> <ul> <li><a href="" target="_blank">View profile</A></li> <li><a href="/new-zealand-v-pakistan-2010/engine/current/match/473926.html?view=hawkeye;batsman=Ross%20Taylor;innings=" target="_blank">View hawkeye</A></li> </ul> <span ="hideHwkTooltip('lvpyrbat3'); return false">x</span> </DIV> </DIV>--> SB Styris run out (Umar Gul/Mohammad Hafeez) 11 39 28 2 0 39.28 16.3 Mohammad Hafeez to Williamson, Styris is run out. As if shot selection issues were not enough, New Zealand now endure a communication breakdown. This was turning into KW from wide of off stump, he shaped for the cut and played it carefully towards cover-point. Styris wanted one and charged out. KW kept asking him to wait, but clearly his plea went unheard. Styris turned back belatedly, but was caught well short before the throw from Gul came back to the bowler and the stumps were broken. 68/4
<!--<div ="lvpyrpup" id="lvpyrbat4"> <div id="lftbg"></DIV> <div ="plyerpfl"> <ul> <li><a href="" target="_blank">View profile</A></li> <li><a href="/new-zealand-v-pakistan-2010/engine/current/match/473926.html?view=hawkeye;batsman=Scott%20Styris;innings=" target="_blank">View hawkeye</A></li> </ul> <span ="hideHwkTooltip('lvpyrbat4'); return false">x</span> </DIV> </DIV>--> KS Williamson c Younis Khan b Mohammad Hafeez 15 51 36 1 0 41.66
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
tomrewi wrote:
Styris lost us the game IMO in that 3rd last over.
 
you are joking right, his bowling was one of the highlights, cramped their batting up nicely.....bowlers were never at fault in that game, our top five let us down hugely.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
theprof wrote:
tomrewi wrote:
Styris lost us the game IMO in that 3rd last over.

�

you are joking right, his bowling was one of the highlights, cramped their batting up nicely.....bowlers were never at fault in that game, our top five let us down hugely.


+1
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ouch, Tim Weston left stranded on 99n.o against my boys, ND. Gotta hurt
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
So after all this rotation, do we actually know our best team?
 
I'm thinking
 
Ryder
McCullum
Guptil
Taylor
Styris
Franklin
Vettori
Oram
McCullum N
Southee
Bennett
 
Omissions
Williamson - Has good potenial but isn't scoring quickly enough for selection to be warrented
How - Simply not a good enough player
Wouldn't have selected both players in squad. Would have picked McGlashen as keeper cover and as a lower order batsmen and Nicol as another spinning option and opening bat cover.
Woodcock - Deserves his spot in sqaud but doesn't offer enough as a batsmen which affects the balance of the XI.
Mills - Good bolwer but not better than Bennett and Southee
 
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
otagofan wrote:
So after all this rotation, do we actually know our best team?�


I'm thinking�
Ryder
McCullum
Guptil
Taylor
Styris
Franklin
Vettori
Oram
McCullum N
Southee
Bennett�

Omissions
Williamson - Has good potenial but isn't scoring quickly enough for selection to be warrented
How - Simply not a good enough player
Wouldn't have selected both players in squad. Would have picked McGlashen as keeper cover and as a lower order batsmen and Nicol as another spinning option and opening bat cover.
Woodcock - Deserves his spot in sqaud but doesn't offer enough as a batsmen which affects the balance of the XI.
Mills - Good bolwer but not better than Bennett and Southee�
Oram is not in our best 11. He shouldn't be in the squad, neither should Jamie How. Nicol for How and the next in line bowler for Oram.

My Team:
Ryder
McCullum
Guptill
Taylor
Williamson
Styris
Franklin
Vettori
McCullum N
Southee
Bennett

Batting
- One of Ryder, McCullum or Guptill have to score a big total and face 100+ balls.
- Taylor needs to score 50+ or score the big if all of the other three fail at that.
- Williamson, Styris and Franky are our run-a-ball game savers.
- Franky and Styris also have the ability to finish with big shots at the end
- Vettori and Southee also have to contribute in the same way at the end.


Bowling
- Bennett and Southee our strike bowlers with Southee bowling 4/5 overs at the death - crucial. Pressure is on these guys to take wickets early.
- Vettori and McCullum our main two spinners, will play a big role on the sub continent decks. They need to take wickets and avoid going for to many. A lot of pressure on these two as well.
- Styris, Franklin and to a lesser extent Ryder and Williamson (sub-cont. decks in mind) to soak up overs through the middle and apply pressure with tight line and length bowling - this should create chances.

I'm not convinced the selectors have come up with the best 15 but if I had to work with what we've been given that's how I'd go.

Also, I love Woody and I think he'd play a good role if selected but he doesn't fit in well with the balance of the team. N.McCullum pushes him out with his ability with the bat.TopLeft072011-02-02 22:26:19

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
TopLeft07 wrote:
- Vettori and McCullum our main two spinners, will play a big role on the sub continent decks.


It's funny because neither can spin it much at all. It's more just slow 80km/h darts.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Buffon II wrote:
TopLeft07 wrote:
- Vettori and McCullum our main two spinners, will play a big role on the sub continent decks.


It's funny because neither can spin it much at all. It's more just slow 80km/h darts.
When has NZ ever had genuine spin bowlers who can turn it? I'd put it down to the conditions here more than anything. Have to work with what we've got.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
TopLeft07 wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
TopLeft07 wrote:
- Vettori and McCullum our main two spinners, will play a big role on the sub continent decks.


It's funny because neither can spin it much at all. It's more just slow 80km/h darts.
When has NZ ever had genuine spin bowlers who can turn it? I'd put it down to the conditions here more than anything. Have to work with what we've got.


Jeets? No look i don't know i've only been following cricket since 96. Just think it's a bit funny calling them spinners when at best they are slow left/right armers. Sure, Vettori has guile, but N-Mac doesn't. I fear he might get tonked around in the WC.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Buffon II wrote:
TopLeft07 wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
TopLeft07 wrote:
- Vettori and McCullum our main two spinners, will play a big role on the sub continent decks.


It's funny because neither can spin it much at all. It's more just slow 80km/h darts.
When has NZ ever had genuine spin bowlers who can turn it? I'd put it down to the conditions here more than anything. Have to work with what we've got.


Jeets? No look i don't know i've only been following cricket since 96. Just think it's a bit funny calling them spinners when at best they are slow left/right armers. Sure, Vettori has guile, but N-Mac doesn't. I fear he might get tonked around in the WC.
Jeets has had a bad season and has paid the price for that. He's been in Woody's shadow for awhile now and they turn it about equally believe it or not. I'm as worried as you are, as I said - pressure is on these guys.

I also think the way the ship is being steered is as much of an issue as anything. I've been disappointed by Vettori lately but there's no way he'll be dropped. If he happened to get a tournament-ending injury I'd have McCullum as captain, I don't think Taylor has it.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I was a bit sad to hear about Matthew Bell retiring. he's been massive for Wellington. do you know what he's going to do next?
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Oceanic6 wrote:
I was a bit sad to hear about Matthew Bell retiring. he's been massive for Wellington. do you know what he's going to do next?
Yeah, a bit sad for Belly. You could see he'd lost the drive though so fair play to him.

He's been doing a bit of work with these guys for a while and I heard a rumour he might be getting more involved there. Unsure of that though.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
TopLeft07 wrote:
Also, I love Woody and I think he'd play a good role if selected but he doesn't fit in well with the balance of the team. N.McCullum pushes him out with his ability with the bat.
Yeah saw Woodcock in Alex earlier in the year and I liked what I saw. Was turning it on a green top, incredibly consistent, very hard to get away. In terms of bowling I thinks theres nothing between him and N Mac. But batting gets Nathan McCullum across the line.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Mills gets one early.
Come on black caps. Let's even up the series.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Why is How getting so many chances to simply confirm what everyone outside of the selectors already knew, he is not up to it!!!
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I'm a big fan of Franky, as a batsman at least, but it's funny that Afridi has bowled faster than him off three paces.TopLeft072011-02-03 21:29:45

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
What the hell is wrong with N.Z cricket.

Why would you bring Oram out at number 9 batsmen
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
BOOM, the end

http://www.yellowfever.co.nz/users/195

Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Extra one of the best players for the Black Caps, a well contributed 16, 3rd equal highest score in our innings.

NEW ZEALAND
M Guptill c U Akmal b Akhtar 65
J Ryder run out 0
J How c Hafeez b Riaz 12
R Taylor lbw b Afridi 69
B McCullum c sub (Rehman) b Afridi 9
S Styris run out 9
J Franklin b Riaz 16
N McCullum b Gul 14
J Oram c U Akmal b Gul 10
K Mills not out 4
H Bennett b Riaz 3
   Extras (8lb, 7w, 1nb) 16
   Total (46.5 overs) 227


Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
NHpeter wrote:
What the hell is wrong with N.Z cricket.Why would you bring Oram out at number 9 batsmen


Because he is in the side as a specialist bowler who, for the last few seasons, has struggled to score runs even at domestic level.
Permalink Permalink
about 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whitby fever wrote:
Why is How getting so many chances to simply confirm what everyone outside of the selectors already knew, he is not up to it!!!
 
Find it hard to disagree with this. He took 6&1/2 overs to score 12. Add those overs to the end, and we would have made it comfortably.
Permalink Permalink