Question has to be asked...
No nails on Takapuna pitch at first Sunday morning inspection, so placed on pitch sometime after that.
Was this a totally random act of mindlessness or deliberate attempt to sabotage the tie from being played on that specific pitch ? Timing would seem to indicate deliberate sabotage.
If deliberate sabotage of fixture why ? Clearly if that pitch not playable fixture would still have to be played at alternate location - or was that the intention if it was sabotage ?
Which leads us to....
Who could possibly have something to gain by having the game moved from Takapuna ?
Not neccessarily true. NZF press release said that it was more detailed pitch inspection before the came that picked it up. Nails could have been there the whole time, and the first inspection only checked to see if there was grass and no water on the pitch.


