Wellington Phoenix Men

Bambang on trial

527 replies · 17,056 views
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I liked Toto...he didn't do too much and made a few mistakes but given a bit of time to settle in I think he may be great for us.

He showed some of the "flair" we're looking for. I think he was trying to show off a bit too much last night but if he tones it down I think he'd be solid.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
auskiwi wrote:

Do they get another chance?

I think all three ( esp. Pav ) showed enough for me  to want to see if they have more to offer and if they will fit in.
I hope we aren't signing players for a year or two based on a 20min show.
 
 
Yea, they have a game against Wairarapa and the U-20 team
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Have to see the replay before passing any meaningful comment, but I'd sign Pavlovic straight away.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
If we can find an Aus/Kiwi defender as a replacement for McKain at the back, then I'd sign both Toto and Shucker. We have a good team already, need a creative midfield player, so take both and the odds are that at least one of them will be a really quality addition. Take both and hedge our bets.
 
Pavlovich could be a very, very useful U21 backup striker - good size.
Paulinho2010-07-24 13:00:27
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

I was a little underwhelmed by all to be honest.

Shuker - only just off the plane so deserving of another chance most definitely. Midget though.
 
Toto - did look a bit chunky, time will tell but it looks like he'll be signed. Midget no. 2.
 
Pavlovich - looked ok without really doing that much, but still young.
 
We are a bit desperate for players - is there even anyone else that we've got an eye on??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
To be honest, I was impressed all over with these lads last night. Want to see them get a full game.

Am with Steve-O, Toto and Shucker are midgets. Shucker reminds me of the midget off jackass somewhat.

Can we get him a road cone?

We will never fully decide who has won the football.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I do think that they will all be signed, and think they will all compete well in the team.

But even though I do like these guys, I think it would be nice to leave ourselves open by having a foreign player left to sign after Aug 1st. Just to give the club that little bit more time to look at say toto.

Don't think thatll happen but could prevent a bad signing.



Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It's strange, but only Pavlovic stood out for me live at the game last night, but watching the replay on SS2 this morning I would say they all did pretty well (not much pressure then?). It would be really good to see them a bit more against quality opposition before deciding, but on last night's showing I could see merit and potential in all three. Feel the Force, Ricki.....sign all three I reckon.

Nostalgia isnt what it used to be...........

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sign Pavlovich
 
Wasnt very impressed with Toto,am I the only one who noticed he gave the ball away whenever he got it?
 
Shucker...neither good nor bad in his 10mins. Pretty harsh to judge as he only got off the plane from the UK 8 hours earlier,and we probably blinded him as it was shirts off as soon as he came on.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Toto is the new Fred.
You heard it here first.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
bigtobz wrote:
Toto is the new Fred.
You heard it here first.


The only similarity between them is that they have the same amount of letters in their nickname

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
valeo wrote:
bigtobz wrote:
Toto is the new Fred.
You heard it here first.


The only similarity between them is that they have the same amount of letters in their nickname

And they're South American.
And they have some affinity for football.
Probably both are men.
Neither are goalkeepers.

That's four more similarities for you.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Got me there.

Sign him up.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Actually thinking of that, how funny would it be to put Shucker or Toto in goal?

Or even just to get them to stand next to Pasty.

Chortle.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Grandadi wrote:
It's strange, but only Pavlovic stood out for me live at the game last night, but watching the replay on SS2 this morning I would say they all did pretty well (not much pressure then?).
 
Agreed. Toto was much better on second viewing on TV than live at the ground. Get's the  from me.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Think he'll grow in confidence over the next few weeks. And will really push for a starting berth. Hopefully Ricki won't start him from the beginning of the season as to make him work and really want it. Thats how we got the best out of our squad last year


Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The only things that stick out for me from the game re:Toto was an attempted trick with his first touch that went out of play, a first touch that went about a metre in front of him and was taken by a Boca player and the short corner to Daniel

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
^^
 
Glad I'm not the only one to have noticed.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
valeo wrote:
The only things that stick out for me from the game re:Toto was an attempted trick with his first touch that went out of play, a first touch that went about a metre in front of him and was taken by a Boca player and the short corner to Daniel


Exactly. I am suspicious of unknown South American players. All flair and tricks but at the end of the day don't get the job done.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SC03 wrote:
valeo wrote:
The only things that stick out for me from the game re:Toto was an attempted trick with his first touch that went out of play, a first touch that went about a metre in front of him and was taken by a Boca player and the short corner to Daniel


Exactly. I am suspicious of unknown South American players. All flair and tricks but at the end of the day don't get the job done.


I am suspicious of useless sweeping generalisations.
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Azevo wrote:
To be honest, I was impressed all over with these lads last night. Want to see them get a full game.

Am with Steve-O, Toto and Shucker are midgets. Shucker reminds me of the midget off jackass somewhat.

Can we get him a road cone?

 
Why is all the angst over short players, if they are good enough then they are good enough, size doesn't come into it
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah, but not many short playmakers have succeeded in the A-League - even Juninho struggled with the physical nature and he's about 20 steps above a guy like Toto

Henrique is probably the only one I can think of but he's more of an out and out wingervaleo2010-07-24 17:27:04

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
Sign Pavlovich
 
Wasnt very impressed with Toto,am I the only one who noticed he gave the ball away whenever he got it?
 

I don't think that was the case at all.  Was impressed that despite being on trial he didn't try to make the million dollar play every time he had the ball.  He was happy on several occasions to play the simple, early diagonal 10 yard pass forward when it was the right option.

Usually when he did give the ball away it seemed to me to be a case of miscommunication, something that would be improved playing with the team for longer.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Teza wrote:

Why is all the angst over short players, if they are good enough then they are good enough, size doesn't come into it


There wasn't any angst.

We will never fully decide who has won the football.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Cosimo wrote:

SC03 wrote:

valeo wrote:
The only things that stick out for me from the game re:Toto was an attempted trick with his first touch that went out of play, a first touch that went about a metre in front of him and was taken by a Boca player and the short corner to Daniel
Exactly. I am suspicious of unknown South American players. All flair and tricks but at the end of the day don't get the job done.
I am suspicious of useless sweeping generalisations.
like people thinking a player is great and skillful just because he is from sth america? yeah,i hate that too.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sign Pavloic, he held the ball up well for the other supporting players to arrive. Well done. Toto deserves another chance. The others hmmmmm. Another game without the jet lag might show something. I always remember Brian Flynn only being 5'2", this guy was about the same. Someone behind me was calling out "De Plane, De plane" .
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Stevel wrote:

Tegal wrote:
Sign Pavlovich
�

Wasnt very impressed with Toto,am I the only one who noticed he gave the ball away whenever he got it?

�

I don't think that was the case at all.� Was impressed that despite being on trial he didn't try to make the million dollar play every time he had the ball.� He was happy on several occasions to play the simple, early diagonal 10 yard pass forward when it was the right option.Usually when he did give the ball away it seemed to me to be a case of miscommunication, something that would be improved playing with the team for longer.


I really need to watch this game again because I didn't notice any of that - he gave the ball away at least 3 times because poor control or attempting a trick that didn't come off

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
We won the double last year with our tallest midfielder being 5'9"! We've also backed it up this year by replacing them with players who are smaller (LOL)
It doesn't matter as long as they can handle the niggle, it's not really the size that counts. It's really their resilience and robustness.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
Cosimo wrote:

SC03 wrote:

valeo wrote:
The only things that stick out for me from the game re:Toto was an attempted trick with his first touch that went out of play, a first touch that went about a metre in front of him and was taken by a Boca player and the short corner to Daniel
Exactly. I am suspicious of unknown South American players. All flair and tricks but at the end of the day don't get the job done.
I am suspicious of useless sweeping generalisations.
like people thinking a player is great and skillful just because he is from sth america? yeah,i hate that too.


Exactly. South American players are skillful but lazy. Yawn. It's like the weird stereotype that Mexican boxers have good chins but can't take bodyshots that is very prevalent in boxing.
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Lonegunmen wrote:
Someone behind me was calling out "De Plane, De plane" .




Well our sponsor has the slogan "Make. Believe."

Very Fantasy Island.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Cosimo wrote:
Re: short players - BigMac has a pathetic leap, he was getting out-jumped by the little Boca defenders. Tall obviously does not equal good in the air.

I though Toto looked alright, he seemed to be trying a bit hard but it must be difficult to come on with 20mins as an AM and try and impress. He was better than Daniel.


yep- Mac is a good forward, but he's ok in the air, but not a route 1 only deal... thanks for noticing. Was the same at Hamilton, but he distributes well, and can score tap ins.

My friend was bagging Greenacre last night, did play a couple of good touches, but missed a free head and a put away. I rate him because he scored in the finals, and he and D-Mac combined well at Hamilton playing one-touch, but he just has to do better with his chances this season.

I don't like Pavlovich, perhaps because he came from Newcastle and what I saw him play for them. Irrational personality thing, and was worried that they would sign him cos he didn't do too  much wrong. and that was before I realised he was a youth option.

Smeltz and Ifill scare defences, none of these 3 will.

On Cornejo, (Toto??) he looked like he didn't quite know what his role was, and the other players didn't either. He seemed quick and prepared to dribble, but his passing wasn't great (give me Daniel any day). He floated all over, but didn't really combine too well with the midfield or strikers. Perhaps the rationale with him coming on with Daniel was a bit less of a language barrier? He may be useful, but it is hard to tell from the evidence. Didn't see a shot or any real sign he had the goods, but nothing to say he couldn't work out. Especially if he doesn't cost too much and leaves room for an Elliott guest spot.

Have to watch the highlight or a replay...hanging out for it.

Bertos was Bremen good I think. 


Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
^^ - language

Daniel =Portuguese(and English some) Toto = (Spanish and ?)

I'm still hearing a barrier
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Must say I am a little underwhelmed by Shukers pedigree. 5 games as a youngster with Man City and then straight to League 1. 223 games since 2003 for 31 goals as a right midfielder/winger.

 The end of last season talk was that Ifill and Greenacre had a "list as long as your arm"  of players wanting to come from the UK to play in the A-League. I was kind of expecting another Championship level player of Ifills quality not someone who appears to be a journeyman reject from League1. I am prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt but at 5' 5" he had better be very fast with a tough mental attitude or he will find the A-League very difficult.
 
I can see the logic in Toto's recruitment....he's the mythical "playmake"r we have been searching for. But Shukers CV states that he is a right mid fielder/ winger good at crosses. We are already kind of covered in that area with Leo. i think the priority should have been an explosive skillfull attacking player to come off the bench....like Caceras. Still I will reserve my judgement until I have seen him play a couple of games.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
zinidane wrote:

�The end of last season talk was that Ifill and Greenacre had a "list as long as your arm"� of players wanting to come from the UK to play in the A-League. I was kind of expecting another Championship level player of Ifills quality not someone who appears to be a journeyman reject from League1.


But that's not realistic. Luring CCC players will be a big thing for some time yet in this league, the $$$ gap is just too big. You're relying on finding someone who is over it there, and is willing to take the pay cut for a change.

Salaries in League One are not too dissimilar to the HAL. The quality is also a lot closer. It makes sense for someone on 2000GBP per week to come out here for AUD$3k or more per week. But it doesn't make sense for someone on 4000GBP per week or more, like much of the CC.

I wouldn't be writing these players off. Unlikely to get an Ifill, but a decent League One player will often be a decent A-League player or more. With his resume, you'd think Shuker would be a sizeable step up from Ferrante.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Shuker is a right sided midfielder who can also play in the hole behind the striker, he is little fast and tricky. He doesnt score many goals but this is because he is normally setting them up. The phsical nature wont be a problem ( He has been playing in england all his career, the most  physical  leagues in world football) He will be a good signing for Wellington he is very eager to impress and see's playing in the A league as a challenge and the right move at this stage of his career.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
i like the fact that Shuker's career is the story of long stints with a couple of clubs rather than bouncing around every year bc no manager wants to hold onto him.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
[/QUOTE]
Exactly. South American players are skillful but lazy. Yawn. It's like the weird stereotype that Mexican boxers have good chins but can't take bodyshots that is very prevalent in boxing.
[/QUOTE]
That is also a stereotype though.....Romario probably biggest example. But definitely not majority of players at all...

Botafogo - Rio de Janeiro and Wellington Phoenix, my two teams til death do us part.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
i like the fact that Shuker's career is the story of long stints with a couple of clubs rather than bouncing around every year bc no manager wants to hold onto him.


Much like Ifill.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Black Plague wrote:
[/QUOTE]
Exactly. South American players are skillful but lazy. Yawn. It's like the weird stereotype that Mexican boxers have good chins but can't take bodyshots that is very prevalent in boxing.
[/QUOTE]
That is also a stereotype though.....Romario probably biggest example. But definitely not majority of players at all...


Yeah that's exactly what I mean.
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink