Wellington Phoenix Men

Phoenix Transfer - speculation (Part 1)

3999 replies · 1,065,247 views Locked
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Personally I am very glad they haven't just signed anybody. We have plenty of promising attacking players who we would be better off developing up front than someone average. If we can't get a top striker it would be better to sign no body and keep options open.
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
I agree and I think it's probably similar reasoning that the club is going on, they could have signed McBreen and I'm bloody glad they didn't. That we haven't been linked with every off-contract striker in the world since the Porter deal started to collapse is a good sign that the club only want players that will improve the side.
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
WillyB wrote:
Just wonder why the phoenix aren't getting in on talent like this first! Do we need to hire more scouts, some with specialised knowledge of South America or wherever?


Queensland do have a club link up with Atletico Mineiro which has given Queensland access to some promising players looking to broaden their playing CV and possibly scouting, knowledge and contacts in Brazil.

Edit: I checked it up, not Flamengo but Atletico Mineiro.
Bullion2008-06-09 12:42:32
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

all right, I'm officially sick of waiting!

So what's plan B or plan C!
I want names!

VUW AFC - Victoria University Football for life

Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
i here you brother bring on the speculation
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
C'mon Tony P!!!
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

We'd all like some news. 
 
I got "gang tackled" (I'm a big boy, I can take it!), earlier in this thread for suggesting that without one more class striker, our chances for a top 4 slot looked bleak.

 

HN reminded me "it wasn't that we didn't score enough last season, it was just that we let in too many at the other end". Oo�kay! Then how about this scenario?

 

We finish up with one of the best defences in the league this year (wouldn't be surprised with the signings so far).

 

But then Plans B and C don't come off, and we have to mix and match our attack options from the present signings. What is Smeltzy goes off the boil or gets injured? Do we really have enough quality left to put together a potent strike combo?

 

We could end up with the reverse of last season - keeping goals against to a minimum, but not scoring enough to win games.

 

Are you following this, Tony P? Does the club still have a Plan B? Or C? How about D+?

scribbler2008-06-09 18:24:27
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
We definitely have enough quality in attack (including attacking midfield) to do fine even if Smeltz gets injured for a few weeks.

Having said that I would feel more comfortable with another striker or two.

I suppose the main aim of me posting this message is that we should be sweet regardless of whether or not we get another striker.
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
if u count gao and hearfield we have 6 strikers, and even using them we have more than enough midfield, however many strikers we gain is just a bonus, we are not in the market to buy for the sake of making numbers, i'm not gonna get sucked into any doom and gloom theories if we can't find what we r looking for
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
I'm positive the club have a plan B and C as stated by Tony P earlier.  They can't announce either while negotiating and I'm sure they know better than any of us the importance of strengthening the squad upfront as well as through the midfield and in defence which they've already done - and bloody well I'd have to say!

Stay positive, by all means question some scenarios, but do you really think a club with the ambitions of our MIGHTY Phoenix would enter their second season without a good addition to both compliment and cover for Smeltz? 

I certainly don't.....and am confident we will all (well the happy ones anyway) be excited and impressed with whoever Tony P, Ricki and Terry announce as our forward signing.




Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
I'm not sure, as someone has suggested, that we currently have enough striker coverage if Smeltz gets injured. Covs is good for an hour but what would happen if we went a goal down in the second half. Ideally you would want two  strikers up front. If Costa is on for Covs....then what? Draper? Two youngsters. It would be a big ask for them.
 
If we play 433 then its no problem. We could succesfully play and score with who we have now. But its when you want to throw more attackers on to the field...that where we look a little light.
 
But apart from this we should commend Tony and Rickie for the selections they have made. They have addressed most of the glaring problems from last year. We now have quality and depth in midfield and a very solid looking defense.
 
If we had signed Porter then we would'nt be having this debate. We would all be raving on what a great looking team wev'e got!
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Personally I think Costa is up to the task of playing for the Phoenix reasonably regularly.

As I've said before, many people say he doesn't have experience and, because of that, he shouldn't play.  That doesn't cut it with me.  He clearly has enough skill to be playing and you can't get experience at that level without playing so they should let him play.
loyalgunner2008-06-09 21:48:33
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Ronaldunno wrote:
 
If we had signed Porter then we would'nt be having this debate. We would all be raving on what a great looking team wev'e got!
 
SO what you are saying is that we are one striker off having a great side?  That's exactly the point isn't it, wait for the inevitable signing and then make a decision.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
i think the thing we have to remember is we already have a very good side, a striker would make us even better, can't wait to stick it to the aussies when the season starts
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
loyalgunner wrote:
Personally I think Costa is up to the task of playing for the Phoenix reasonably regularly.

As I've said before, many people say he doesn't have experience and, because of that, he shouldn't play.  That doesn't cut it with me.  He clearly has enough skill to be playing and you can't get experience at that level without playing so they should let him play.


Thrust him in too early and he could have his confidence shot for the next few years. I think Ricki sees that. (we saw at the U17 world cup that he didn't really handle it too well. not really that suprising, though)

No player in the league as young as Costa held down a starting spot last season. Australian players have much better development, as well. (our players seem to be a couple of years behind them it seems) I really do hope he gets much more game time but the pressure should not be placed on his shoulders just yet.

I don't think Smeltz will score as many as he did last season. (will be more tightly watched) Gao has a few in him, Bertos doesn't, Daniel might. A good striker is vital and I don't think anyone can dispute that. It's not being negative saying that - it's being realistic. Saying that everything is fine and dandy when we haven't even heard about the strikers we might be signing (apart from the fact it's probably going to be a current A-League striker like Kwasnik) is a bit silly. Just because you question our approach to finding strikers doesn't mean you are a pessimistic sod who hates the club.

I'm sure they have some kind of a plan - the question still stands, though - will it be good enough? Will a striker like, say, Kwasnik really help us that much? Barely an improvement over someone like Brownlie in my opinion.

If the Porter deal went through like planned we wouldn't be having this argument. But oh well - that's football!

Though to be honest right back probably worries me more than striker. (though it's a common problem for most clubs it seems)
valeo2008-06-10 00:55:53

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Kwasnik - 62 games 15 goals and 4 assists - I'd say that makes him significantly better than Brownlie

Peoples Republik of Aucklandia

Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
I seem to remember Kwasnik played mostly out wide last season?
We seem pretty covered for wide attacking midfielders.


Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
valeo wrote:
A good striker is vital and I don't think anyone can dispute that. It's not being negative saying that - it's being realistic. Saying that everything is fine and dandy when we haven't even heard about the strikers we might be signing (apart from the fact it's probably going to be a current A-League striker like Kwasnik) is a bit silly.Just because you question our approach to finding strikers doesn't mean you are a pessimistic sod who hates the club. .....

Though to be honest right back probably worries me more than striker. (though it's a common problem for most clubs it seems)
 
Exactly right on both points.
 
If Tony and Ricki didn't think we would have benefited significantly from paying the $s required to sign Porter we wouldn't have gone after him. We missed him - we need to learn the lesson (know your targets true contractual status), dust ourselves off and go get another Porter. I'm sorry but I will be pissed off if the best we can come up with to replace Porter is another A-league clubs reject.
 
I am also worried about right back - we have only one specialist wing back in the team so if Lochead gets injured we are down to 2 makeshift wing backs. I can't fathom why we are not targeting another wing back instead of a second striker.
 
Having said that - once the season starts that is all behind us and onwards and upwards.
 
 
He dribbles a lot and the opposition dont like it - you can see it all over their faces. (Ron Atkinson)
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Whitby boy wrote:
valeo wrote:
Just because you question our approach to finding strikers doesn't mean you are a pessimistic sod who hates the club. .....
 
...we need to learn the lesson (know your targets true contractual status)...
 
I'm one who's questioned our approach in finding a striker and I'm not a pesimistic sod... I'm an Aucklander! (There is a difference.)  
 
Actually, I'm a huge Nix fan or I wouldn't be on this site. The Welllington Phoenix are the best thing to happen to NZ Football since the '82 World Cup campaign.
 
And the other point above - "know your targets true contractual status". 
 
Wow, that was a real clanger with Porter.  Someone didn't do enough homework. Not a hanging offence, but still a big dissapointment.  
 
Doubt that will happen a second time. I'm just sorry it happened once!
scribbler2008-06-10 10:22:42
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

By saying that the Nix are the best since 82 is a bit harsh.

The Nix are a product of the hardwork done by the Kingz.
 
If V3 had been a success then I think the Kingz would have been a success, there was momenteum until then.
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
I guess one of the reasons we might not be hearing anything about the plan B or C is that after we all got our hopes up on Porter they don't want to go announcing anyone else until its pretty much done, IMO we should trust in the team I'm sure they can find someone, and even if they don't there's always the marquee spot for a striker, I'm sure that between Covs and Costa we've got enough strike power for the early season.
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Two points...

1, Anyone considering posting a negative response to Dino would do well to remeber that i wield the ban stick and the delete button.

2, I don't think anyone got Porter's transfer status wrong.  The problem was he had the impression that Hartlepool weren't renewing his contract, he even had an offer on his house ready to leave and come here.  Then Hartlepool moved the goalposts.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Dino10 wrote:

By saying that the Nix are the best since 82 is a bit harsh.

The Nix are a product of the hardwork done by the Kingz.
 
If V3 had been a success then I think the Kingz would have been a success, there was momenteum until then.


The Kingz weren't bad until Sky screwed them. I remember Rufer playing really well and making some odd coaching decisions in the same game.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Hard News wrote:

 
I don't think anyone got Porter's transfer status wrong.  The problem was he had the impression that Hartlepool weren't renewing his contract...
 
Don't want to be a bush lawyer, HN, but Porter, for one,  got his transfer status wrong.
 
If he only had the impression his contract was not being renewed and then put his house on the market based on that, without actually clarifying things with his club... (??)
 
And doesn't Porter have a manager/agent or someone representing his interests?
 
Didn't that person talk to Hartlepool to clarify his clients status - maybe do it professionally and get it in writing - before entering into negotiations with the Nix?
 
 
scribbler2008-06-10 15:20:05
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Lawyers are c**ts.  Can't trust 'em.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
and agents are worse
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Massive thread...........NICE!!!

I say tackle him in the face.

Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
The thing that probably worries us the most is the lack of speculation, hence we have nothing to critique / criticise / get excited about. It does seem strange that there is a real lack of speculation and runours from such accurate media sources such as 4-4-2 and so on? Does this point to the fact that there is bugger all happening behind the scenes beacuse there are no players about worht mentioning? Surely if we were linked to another a-league striker someone in the media would have got hold of it by now or is tony p exceptionally good at playing secret squirrel?
 
fingers and toes crossed ive just booked a grands worth of flights to get to phoenix games across oz and in nz this year!
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
ssssssshhhhhhh secret squirell!
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Hard News wrote:
kilted_kiwi wrote:
... tony p exceptionally good at playing secret squirrel?





And the occasional cryptic subtle clue here and there too......
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Who was the new striker at training this morning? Wondering if its someone on trial?
I wonder if we will see him in action tonight V Wests?
nightz2008-06-11 13:37:52

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
kilted_kiwi wrote:
The thing that probably worries us the most is the lack of speculation,
 
I speculated Kilted Kiwi but nobody's bitten.

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
nightz wrote:
Who was the new striker at training this morning? Wondering if its someone on trial?
I wonder if we will see him in action tonight V Wests?
 
So, who is is this guy? Someone must know.
 
And are the Nix really going up against the legendary Western Suburbs tonight?
 
Hope someone will be kind enough to post a game report tomorrow.
 
Really rips a guy up when he wants to cheer for both teams. 
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Is he any good i wonder we have tried to get karpeh on trial and we trialled that mcbreen guy and they both are shieettt
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
just to mention something i heard super leo had offers from central coast, sydney and newcastle (i think) before he joined us
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
scribbler wrote:
Hard News wrote:

 
I don't think anyone got Porter's transfer status wrong.  The problem was he had the impression that Hartlepool weren't renewing his contract...
 
Don't want to be a bush lawyer, HN, but Porter, for one,  got his transfer status wrong.
 
If he only had the impression his contract was not being renewed and then put his house on the market based on that, without actually clarifying things with his club... (??)
 
And doesn't Porter have a manager/agent or someone representing his interests?
 
Didn't that person talk to Hartlepool to clarify his clients status - maybe do it professionally and get it in writing - before entering into negotiations with the Nix?
 
 
 
Scribbler, unless you have the inside word that's just pure speculation.  And there's already enough of that going on around here...

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
so whats the inside word james dean? seems to be a few people holding out some vital info from the core membership
Permalink Permalink
almost 18 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
james dean wrote:
 
 
Scribbler, unless you have the inside word that's just pure speculation.  And there's already enough of that going on around here...
 
Read the title of the thread....Transfers Speculation
Hard News2008-06-12 15:22:19

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink

This topic is locked.