A skim read is quite an experience.
Jesus that's a terrible piece.
I'm sure I remember midfielder showing stats showing our team not being the lowest viewed team in Aus,
We don't get the lowest crowds any more, especially in relation to our size, hell last year the worst attendance in our piddly little town still wasn't the lowest. It was CCM vs Melbourne, the FFA's favorite.
Foxtel said they didn't mind a team in Tasmania despite low numbers and low subscribers to mix up the league, keep it from getting stale. That's the Nix, having a NZ team is exactly that. Replacing us with a Melbourne or Sydney team is being as boring as they can be as they already have multiple in those areas.
We pay our players on time, and don't make much noise except when the FFA has a whinge about the NZ team not doing enough by being above Aus teams. That would be fixed with a 20 year licence so that's FFA self inflicted pain.
I just don't get how anyone can see us as the team for the axe. Hell I don't think any of the current teams need the axe, but if its anyone it would be the team that has consistently struggled to pay their players.
The only metric I see us failing is members, but who cares if more people are turning up than other teams?
Hell the thing they are whinging about now is the results. We haven't been last for 4 seasons, and we aren't last now. Yea we aren't first but if you are going to cut a team for poor results wouldn't that be last place?
That article just drips of an anti-nix person taking advantage of someone else saying something. Saying that YF aren't showing decency by admitting we shouldn't have a team in the league is total BS, and just smacks of arrogance. He finishes saying he hopes the words lit a fuse, if it did its the explosion that gets rid of NZ's only pro football club.
I just don't understand how football "fans" in NZ can be so against NZ having a pro football club, where kiwis are paid to be full time footballers. How is that anything but a good thing?
Sorry for the rant, just had to get it out.