I just hate having 5 players in the midfield. Its too congested and it looked like Greenacre needed someone elses helping him tonight.
Daniel and Ifill were outstanding tonight.You're kidding, right? We were attacking and pressing probably the most i've ever seen. Not all of it came off, though. Siggy and Lochhead were always pushing forward when they could - even McKain and Durante got up there with runs at times.
How frustrating is it to be a Phoenix supporter?..
Exactly. You can play defensively and still have two up front, or you can play attacking with 1. We effectively had a four man front section with Daniel, Bertos and Ifill free to attack and switch up at will rather be in set positions, and it worked well, with Brown joining them in the box when on attack. Tactics seemed pretty good to me.
Definatly agree!
CACERES ANYONE TO REPLACE HIM ON THE BENCH NEXT WEEK...



I also saw that we often had 2 players at the back in that 2nd half - Sigmund and Lochhead pushed up high and so did Hearfield when he came on.
I thought that Brown was absolutely brilliant defensively. How many times did he stop Owusu in the iar? Considering the height and size difference that is no mean feat. Unfortunately his performance was marred by him missing an easy chance and then missing another one.
Thought that the Diego signing was a mistake and still do. Was horrible coming off the bench. Caceres, Jiangchen or Costa to replace him next week. Unfortunately if this happens he will probably be a write off for the season - he doesn't seem the type of player who handles being left out of the team very well at all.
valeo2009-09-04 21:42:58
a.haak

Definatly agree!
Great performance

However the question is really whether Greenache was active to be involved with the play. And I have to confess, that he made a impeding contact with the defender who might have influenced the chances/odds on how Ifill may have scored or not scored. Technically, Greenache was involved and so technically he was offside . . . sadly.
TBH, the way that Ifill hit that shot, the defender would have not really made any insurmountable influence to it, and so on that regards, it seem harsh on a beautifully struck shot.
Great performance


That should have been 3+ 1. Caceras could prove useful, but Ricki should get Chen in there.
And FFS Ricki, grow some balls and play 4-3-3 away from home. Playing for the draw is not good enough. Same team, same game, just different cut of grass. We have shown the potential to attack, our finishing was poor. Daniel deserves to start again. Brown had his chances and was in on the action but will cop a lot of flack for not getting the ball in the net.
7500 crowd on a Fri night, what the hell is up with that!!! Loud as ever though listening on the telle
I also saw that we often had 2 players at the back in that 2nd half - Sigmund and Lochhead pushed up high and so did Hearfield when he came on.
I thought that Brown was absolutely brilliant defensively. How many times did he stop Owusu in the iar? Considering the height and size difference that is no mean feat. Unfortunately his performance was marred by him missing an easy chance and then missing another one.
Thought that the Diego signing was a mistake and still do. Was horrible coming off the bench. Caceres, Jiangchen or Costa to replace him next week. Unfortunately if this happens he will probably be a write off for the season - he doesn't seem the type of player who handles being left out of the team very well at all.
what an absolute joke. wonder if we'll do the polite thing and give him the leilei treatment..? Great performance

Agreed. A few misplaced passes but you expect that from 'flair' players. Thought he worked very hard to track back - especially in the first half.
a.haak

I just hate having 5 players in the midfield. Its too congested and it looked like Greenacre needed someone elses helping him tonight.
Daniel and Ifill were outstanding tonight.
Greenache was laying off plenty of balls. We had plenty of attackers (because of the players moving from one side to the other side through the midfield) coming from the lateral midfield crossing balls over to the box and in most occasions there were two or more players in the box looking to finish. You think it was congested but we had plenty of turnover balls and we had launched majority of our attacks from the midfield because there was plenty of players covering a larger area.
The only reason that Greenache looked as he needed help was the fact that he has been fouled plenty because the Adelaide player thought he was small enough to push him over. However he held the ball well and played a great targetman game.
My MoM is definitely Ifill with Daniel having an excellent first full game back. Everyone played well, the ref was keeping it flowing but I have felt that he was light on a couple of things. I expected a second yellow card on that Adelaide defender and Brown was a tad lucky not to pick a second as well.
BTW. it was hard for any one sub to make much of a difference because it was very open and the tempo is tricky jump into.
So it's a bit harsh to comment on Deigo's 10 minute other than the one terrible cross to empty field in which I suspect was suppose to be the usual midfield pick up but every one was pushed way up the field including the expected midfielders he wanted behind the forwards. It helps in a game and we have to move on.
I say keep him about and see how he goes by the half season stage. But I have to admit the bench is stacked with plenty of varied players with starting lineup material.AllWhitebelievr2009-09-04 22:09:59
I just hate having 5 players in the midfield. Its too congested and it looked like Greenacre needed someone elses helping him tonight.
Daniel and Ifill were outstanding tonight.
Greenache was laying off plenty of balls. We had plenty of attackers (because of the players moving from one side to the other side through the midfield) coming from the lateral midfield crossing balls over to the box and in most occasions there were two or more players in the box looking to finish. You think it was congested but we had plenty of turnover balls and we had launched majority of our attacks from the midfield because there was plenty of players covering a larger area.
The only reason that Greenache looked as he needed help was the fact that he has been fouled plenty because the Adelaide player thought he was small enough to push him over. However he held the ball well and played a great targetman game.
My MoM is definitely Ifill with Daniel having an excellent first full game back. Everyone played well, the ref was keeping it flowing but I have felt that he was light on a couple of things. I expected a second yellow card on that Adelaide defender and Brown was a tad lucky not to pick a second as well.
you're taking the piss right ?
you have to be.
I've witnessed one of the most appalling linesman decisions ever - and it wasn't a one off. He had absolutely no idea all night, couldn't even call most throw ins. Even needed his guide dog to help him at half time.
We had two shots on goal the entire night and scored two. We had one sail over from 6 yards but still only two on target in 90 minutes. If we couldn't win tonight then..........f**king linesman, git
Royal2009-09-04 22:04:51
I also saw that we often had 2 players at the back in that 2nd half - Sigmund and Lochhead pushed up high and so did Hearfield when he came on.
I thought that Brown was absolutely brilliant defensively. How many times did he stop Owusu in the iar? Considering the height and size difference that is no mean feat. Unfortunately his performance was marred by him missing an easy chance and then missing another one.
Thought that the Diego signing was a mistake and still do. Was horrible coming off the bench. Caceres, Jiangchen or Costa to replace him next week. Unfortunately if this happens he will probably be a write off for the season - he doesn't seem the type of player who handles being left out of the team very well at all.
[/QUOTE]
You expect Siggy to attack like Maicon when he usually plays CB?
I just hate having 5 players in the midfield. Its too congested and it looked like Greenacre needed someone elses helping him tonight.
Daniel and Ifill were outstanding tonight.
Greenache was laying off plenty of balls. We had plenty of attackers (because of the players moving from one side to the other side through the midfield) coming from the lateral midfield crossing balls over to the box and in most occasions there were two or more players in the box looking to finish. You think it was congested but we had plenty of turnover balls and we had launched majority of our attacks from the midfield because there was plenty of players covering a larger area.
The only reason that Greenache looked as he needed help was the fact that he has been fouled plenty because the Adelaide player thought he was small enough to push him over. However he held the ball well and played a great targetman game.
My MoM is definitely Ifill with Daniel having an excellent first full game back. Everyone played well, the ref was keeping it flowing but I have felt that he was light on a couple of things. I expected a second yellow card on that Adelaide defender and Brown was a tad lucky not to pick a second as well.
you're taking the piss right ?
you have to be.
What? the ref let a hell of a lot of things go - in any other game there would have been at least 2 send offs.
valeo2009-09-04 22:05:45
a.haak

Central Hawkes Bay Nix
and tragic follower of Charlton Athletic
ask Ricki - then again, HE might not know.
Normo's coming home
He's a decent defensive full back - you don't need to have both full backs going forward all the time to be effective. Thought that Lochy linked up with Daniel well on several occasions. The only other options were Lia and Mulligan.
a.haak

He's a decent defensive full back - you don't need to have both full backs going forward all the time to be effective. Thought that Lochy linked up with Daniel well on several occasions. The only other options were Lia and Mulligan.
Because he can and there is noone else since, Durante understands McKain in the CB and Vince Lia is ready for solid midfield action. Why do you want Mulligan at full back? Because Siggy is much better than Mulligan there. Also Siggy may be there for the AWs so it's good to see him have a run there. He only has to work on some more extensive sprints and it seems he has a reasonable right foot cross which he could develop. As long as he does not drifted to the centre on occasions, he keep their left wing ineffective.AllWhitebelievr2009-09-04 22:18:56
He's a decent defensive full back - you don't need to have both full backs going forward all the time to be effective. Thought that Lochy linked up with Daniel well on several occasions. The only other options were Lia and Mulligan.
Wellington 2 Perth 1.....
Tactics were spot on imo except for the Diego sub which was crazy. How is it Ricki's fault if we miss about 6 chances?
valeo2009-09-04 22:21:59
a.haak

Daniel was awesome. Ifill was fied up and playing well.
Quite a quiet game by bertos but he still played well.
Greenacre was the worst for me up the front.
Should have been 4-2 if Tim Brown could shoot, and the linesman wasn't a c0ck
i'm lockhead's biggest critic but he actually played some balls across the ground to feet tonight, best ive seen him play in ages. ifill was awesome, really awesome. daniel was pretty good but his final balls kinda let him down a bit. man, should have won tonight. kinda frustrating.
for those who mock greenacre... watch him live off the ball for just 5 minutes and you'll see why he's so good. Hardest worker in our team by a mile. Can't ask for anything more from the lad.