All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams

New Zealand U-23s - Quali Whites

5835 replies · 1,102,368 views
over 10 years ago

Fitzy wrote:
Disagree with the all the hating on Vanuatu. Imagine if the tables were turned and we knew about a players ineligibility but chose not to protest out of some misplaced sense of honour. There's a lot at stake for everyone, imagine for example if this was the WC qualifier and one of the Mexicans was ineligible but we let it slide. We'd be wild, and rightly so. Someone has fudgeed up here but it's not Vanuatu.
Is there actually a 'someone' at NZF whose job it is to check eligibility?
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Sack everyone

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Sack everyone

All international transfers went through the goalnet administrator (can't remember her name) but I do know she left NZF maybe a couple of months ago.  I think that role would be the one that checks these kind of things.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

GK wrote:

They tried to make us go to Rio, we said, no, no ,no

Gutted for the team that sweated in the hot sun for 10 days and got no reward - even having to put up with the joke that Vanautu beat us 3 nil.

 Heads up guys. IOC/FIFA sharks!!

Haha ALOL - Straight to the pool room

                                                                        COYN    

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

As I understand it all the NZ players are elegible to play in the Olympic qualifiers. This is not in doubt and they have played under these rules. However, last night a secret meeting was held between the Island nations (NZ not invited) and they decided to CHANGE the rules and specify that all players had to meet Pacific games criteria which is slightly different to the Olympics! For the Pacific games you have to be a citizen for at least 5 years and on that basis they decided that Wynne was not elegible and booted NZ out.

The semi final against Vanuatu was an Olympic semi and had nothing to do with the Pacific games. So basically they are a bunch of crooks and cheats

If this is even close to being true, we need to sue OFC to such an extent that they have to declare bnkruptcy or agree to let us leave OFC. Even if the Govt, needs to underwrite the cost, we need to put these OFC fudges away good and proper. We can't stay in such a fudgeed up condeferation.
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

UK_ALLWHITE wrote:

Wow, just wow! What a mess.

There is a slightly different rule in the UK, as England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland don't use the residency rule. If a player was in full time education for 5 years in a particular country, he would then be eligible for that national team (Jordan Rhodes of Scotland is one example).

That's why Mikel Arteta couldn't play for England.

Could this rule be used for Wynne? 

No the 5 year school rule is specific to the UK because England, Scotland, Wales & Northern Ireland are actually all the same country 

https://thejourneyfan.blogspot.co.nz/

New Zealand Football Media Association Website of the year 2015 & 2016

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

UK_ALLWHITE wrote:

Wow, just wow! What a mess.

There is a slightly different rule in the UK, as England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland don't use the residency rule. If a player was in full time education for 5 years in a particular country, he would then be eligible for that national team (Jordan Rhodes of Scotland is one example).

That's why Mikel Arteta couldn't play for England.

Could this rule be used for Wynne? 

No the 5 year school rule is specific to the UK because England, Scotland, Wales & Northern Ireland are actually all the same country 

Sort of, they are all different countries, but are a unified state under UK, so there's no individual passports etc for each individual country.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

this completely cocks up Hudsons alignment strategy and a crucial build up phase for the next World Cup. It reminds me of playing for Glen Eden midgets and myself and two players being stood down because we were a few days to old. But fudge this is an Olympic team. Someone senior needs to walk over this


Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Marto wrote:

Time for NZ to f.o. from Oceania to Asia.

problem here is that Asia doesn't want us and we'd lose our direct route into age group World Cups

https://thejourneyfan.blogspot.co.nz/

New Zealand Football Media Association Website of the year 2015 & 2016

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

As I understand it all the NZ players are elegible to play in the Olympic qualifiers. This is not in doubt and they have played under these rules. However, last night a secret meeting was held between the Island nations (NZ not invited) and they decided to CHANGE the rules and specify that all players had to meet Pacific games criteria which is slightly different to the Olympics! For the Pacific games you have to be a citizen for at least 5 years and on that basis they decided that Wynne was not elegible and booted NZ out.

The semi final against Vanuatu was an Olympic semi and had nothing to do with the Pacific games. So basically they are a bunch of crooks and cheats

If this is even close to being true, we need to sue OFC to such an extent that they have to declare bnkruptcy or agree to let us leave OFC. Even if the Govt, needs to underwrite the cost, we need to put these OFC fudges away good and proper. We can't stay in such a fudgeed up condeferation.

I think I'll go blind with rage if that allegation happens to be true. 

What I don't get about this is that we are the big fish in this crap tank that is the Oceania Football Confederation, why are we not throwing our weight around more? 

If they want to play silly buggers in order to get more international exposure, then that's fine. We should move to the AFC, and leave this cesspool that is the OFC to fold and/or become cannon fodder for preliminary WQC through the Asian Confederation. 

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

As I understand it all the NZ players are elegible to play in the Olympic qualifiers. This is not in doubt and they have played under these rules. However, last night a secret meeting was held between the Island nations (NZ not invited) and they decided to CHANGE the rules and specify that all players had to meet Pacific games criteria which is slightly different to the Olympics! For the Pacific games you have to be a citizen for at least 5 years and on that basis they decided that Wynne was not elegible and booted NZ out.

The semi final against Vanuatu was an Olympic semi and had nothing to do with the Pacific games. So basically they are a bunch of crooks and cheats
 

This is a big accusation. Sauce? 

I have an amazing ability to find my way out of mazes. I'm pathological. 
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Fitzy wrote:
Disagree with the all the hating on Vanuatu. Imagine if the tables were turned and we knew about a players ineligibility but chose not to protest out of some misplaced sense of honour. There's a lot at stake for everyone, imagine for example if this was the WC qualifier and one of the Mexicans was ineligible but we let it slide. We'd be wild, and rightly so. Someone has fudgeed up here but it's not Vanuatu.

If all above board why not comment and why hold secret little meetings.

I would have no issue with the above if it was done in a transparent manner.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

so is this final  being played In 40 mins?anyone know?


Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago
Yup


Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

let's get back to the rules for a second. He has a nz passport as well as the "close connection to nz" requirement. He is a citizen and is not dependent on residence. He is eligible and this will be overturned. My balls my word.

There is no way you need to be in a country 5 years after 18, no way at all. That is a misread of the rules.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Anyone not suspecting foul play is incredibly naive. Why have OFC not released any info or a written explanation until after the final? Complete bollocks

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

agree. If he actually has a passport (Christ I hope he does or this has been a right royal fudge up). Does anyone know with certainty that he does?


Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

time to lawyer up


Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Just as importantly for me, is how Vanuatu got the " inside oil " on Wynne's ineligibility? It's not like the rule cited is so simple to understand, that Vanatu said " aha we've got them! " Somebody, somewhere has done some extremely thorough digging...WHO?

"Self-defence is an art I cultivate"

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

james dean wrote:

let's get back to the rules for a second. He has a nz passport as well as the "close connection to nz" requirement. He is a citizen and is not dependent on residence. He is eligible and this will be overturned. My balls my word.

There is no way you need to be in a country 5 years after 18, no way at all. 

"Close connection" is defined though - that's the parent/grandparent requirement. The simple fact is that we have found a FIFA rule which seems to imply he could be ineligible ,and we can't find a rule which would definitively state he is eligible. THere could be more to it that we're not aware of but on the face of it that's the situation.

If you say the rules have been misread then point to the rules he would be eligible under

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Ray Hicks wrote:

Just as importantly for me, is how Vanuatu got the " inside oil " on Wynne's ineligibility? It's not like the rule cited is so simple to understand, that Vanatu said " aha we've got them! " Somebody, somewhere has done some extremely thorough digging...WHO?

I don't know about that. It could have been as simple as him checking into the Port Moresby Hilton with a nice green Safa passport with the Vanutau coach next in line.  


Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

james dean wrote:

let's get back to the rules for a second. He has a nz passport as well as the "close connection to nz" requirement. He is a citizen and is not dependent on residence. He is eligible and this will be overturned. My balls my word.

There is no way you need to be in a country 5 years after 18, no way at all. 

"Close connection" is defined though - that's the parent/grandparent requirement. The simple fact is that we have found a FIFA rule which seems to imply he could be ineligible ,and we can't find a rule which would definitively state he is eligible. THere could be more to it that we're not aware of but on the face of it that's the situation.

If you say the rules have been misread then point to the rules he would be eligible under

close connection test was added after Qatar started giving Brazilians passports to make hem eligible blatantly rorting the system. He lives in NZ for gods sake!!! Yes it's subjective but sorry that cannot be the answer that's he's not eligible until he's 23

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

james dean wrote:

james dean wrote:

let's get back to the rules for a second. He has a nz passport as well as the "close connection to nz" requirement. He is a citizen and is not dependent on residence. He is eligible and this will be overturned. My balls my word.

There is no way you need to be in a country 5 years after 18, no way at all. 

"Close connection" is defined though - that's the parent/grandparent requirement. The simple fact is that we have found a FIFA rule which seems to imply he could be ineligible ,and we can't find a rule which would definitively state he is eligible. THere could be more to it that we're not aware of but on the face of it that's the situation.

If you say the rules have been misread then point to the rules he would be eligible under

close connection test was added after Qatar started giving Brazilians passports to make hem eligible blatantly rorting the system. He lives in NZ for gods sake!!! Yes it's subjective but sorry that cannot be the answer that's he's not eligible until he's 23

These statutes are the April 2015 edition, and there's no mention of close connection at all: 

http://www.fifa.com/mm/Document/AFFederation/Gener...

There's only the 4 points mentioned earlier.

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

You can't be eligible for two national teams and then ineligible for one of them if your playing for the same country and within the same sport... especially when the age bracket you aren't eligible for sits in between the other two.

Its a stitch up and just goes to show we need to move into Asia.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

MetalLegNZ wrote:

You can't be eligible for two national teams and then ineligible for one of them if your playing for the same country and within the same sport... especially when the age bracket you aren't eligible for sits in between the other two.

Its a stitch up and just goes to show we need to move into Asia.

Going over this again though, he might not have been eligible earlier but no one noticed

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

My interpretation of the FIFA statutes:

(please correct me if you think I'm wrong)

http://www.fifa.com/mm/Document/AFFederation/Generic/02/58/14/48/2015FIFAStatutesEN_Neutral.pdf

pp. 63 - 65

This is entitled "The Principle" and should guide interpretation of the other clauses:

5 Principle

1.

Any person holding a permanent nationality that is not dependent on

residence in a certain Country is eligible to play for the representative teams of

the Association of that Country.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Deklan Wynne is eligible to play in the Olympic qualifiers under this clause:

6 Nationality entitling Players to represent more than

one Association

1.

A Player who, under the terms of art. 5, is eligible to represent more than

one Association on account of his nationality, may play in an international

match for one of these Associations only if, in addition to having the relevant

nationality, he fulfils at least one of the following conditions:

a) He was born on the territory of the relevant Association;

b) His biological mother or biological father was born on the territory of the

relevant Association;

c) His grandmother or grandfather was born on the territory of the relevant

Association;

d) He has lived continuously on the territory of the relevant Association for at

least two years.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

If Wynne applied to FIFA under clause 8 to change the Association for which he is eligible to play international football, and they approved, then the OFC can not override this:

8 Change of Association

1.

If a Player has more than one nationality, or if a Player acquires a new

nationality, or if a Player is eligible to play for several representative teams

due to nationality, he may, only once, request to change the Association for

which he is eligible to play international matches to the Association of another

Country of which he holds nationality, subject to the following conditions:

.....

3.

Any Player who has the right to change Associations in accordance with par. 1

and 2 above shall submit a written, substantiated request to the FIFA general

secretariat. The Players’ Status Committee shall decide on the request. The

procedure will be in accordance with the Rules Governing the Procedures of

the Players’ Status Committee and the Dispute Resolution Chamber. Once the

Player has filed his request, he is not eligible to play for any representative

team until his request has been processed.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The "five year residency" requirement in clause 7 is only for players who have already played for one Association (in a non-competitive match) and want to change to another (Wynne doesn't fall under this category):

7 Acquisition of a new nationality

Any Player who refers to art. 5 par. 1 to assume a new nationality and who

has not played international football in accordance with art. 5 par. 2 shall be

eligible to play for the new representative team only if he fulfils one of the

following conditions:

a) He was born on the territory of the relevant Association;

b) His biological mother or biological father was born on the territory of the

relevant Association;

c) His grandmother or grandfather was born on the territory of the relevant

Association;

d) He has lived continuously for at least five years after reaching the age of 18

on the territory of the relevant Association.

Big Pete 65, Christchurch

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

MetalLegNZ wrote:

You can't be eligible for two national teams and then ineligible for one of them if your playing for the same country and within the same sport... especially when the age bracket you aren't eligible for sits in between the other two.

Its a stitch up and just goes to show we need to move into Asia.

Going over this again though, he might not have been eligible earlier but no one noticed

I simply don't believe this is a real possibility. Given the amount of players "naturalised" around the world this issue surely would have been caught before. Also, before submitting team lists and after all players would have to be checked thoroughly and signed off by Fifa.

Fifa wouldn't risk something like this popping up in a tournament... could you imagine if this was a world cup final or semi etc.

To many hoops would have been jumped already for it not to have been picked up here or abroad.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

The law may be ambiguous, but OFC's actions are clear.

They have deliberately bent us over and said thank you.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago
This shark has just saved the yellowfever off season hasn't it?

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Big Pete 65 wrote:

My interpretation of the FIFA statutes:

(please correct me if you think I'm wrong)

http://www.fifa.com/mm/Document/AFFederation/Generic/02/58/14/48/2015FIFAStatutesEN_Neutral.pdf

pp. 63 - 65

This is entitled "The Principle" and should guide interpretation of the other clauses:

5 Principle

1.

Any person holding a permanent nationality that is not dependent on

residence in a certain Country is eligible to play for the representative teams of

the Association of that Country.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Deklan Wynne is eligible to play in the Olympic qualifiers under this clause:

6 Nationality entitling Players to represent more than

one Association

1.

A Player who, under the terms of art. 5, is eligible to represent more than

one Association on account of his nationality, may play in an international

match for one of these Associations only if, in addition to having the relevant

nationality, he fulfils at least one of the following conditions:

a) He was born on the territory of the relevant Association;

b) His biological mother or biological father was born on the territory of the

relevant Association;

c) His grandmother or grandfather was born on the territory of the relevant

Association;

d) He has lived continuously on the territory of the relevant Association for at

least two years.

This clause is for nationalities which entitle you to play for more than one FIFA member association though - France and Tahiti share a French passport for instance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIFA_eligibility_rul...

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Big Pete 65 wrote:

My interpretation of the FIFA statutes:

(please correct me if you think I'm wrong)

http://www.fifa.com/mm/Document/AFFederation/Generic/02/58/14/48/2015FIFAStatutesEN_Neutral.pdf

pp. 63 - 65

This is entitled "The Principle" and should guide interpretation of the other clauses:

5 Principle

1.

Any person holding a permanent nationality that is not dependent on

residence in a certain Country is eligible to play for the representative teams of

the Association of that Country.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Deklan Wynne is eligible to play in the Olympic qualifiers under this clause:

6 Nationality entitling Players to represent more than

one Association

1.

A Player who, under the terms of art. 5, is eligible to represent more than

one Association on account of his nationality, may play in an international

match for one of these Associations only if, in addition to having the relevant

nationality, he fulfils at least one of the following conditions:

a) He was born on the territory of the relevant Association;

b) His biological mother or biological father was born on the territory of the

relevant Association;

c) His grandmother or grandfather was born on the territory of the relevant

Association;

d) He has lived continuously on the territory of the relevant Association for at

least two years.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

If Wynne applied to FIFA under clause 8 to change the Association for which he is eligible to play international football, and they approved, then the OFC can not override this:

8 Change of Association

1.

If a Player has more than one nationality, or if a Player acquires a new

nationality, or if a Player is eligible to play for several representative teams

due to nationality, he may, only once, request to change the Association for

which he is eligible to play international matches to the Association of another

Country of which he holds nationality, subject to the following conditions:

.....

3.

Any Player who has the right to change Associations in accordance with par. 1

and 2 above shall submit a written, substantiated request to the FIFA general

secretariat. The Players’ Status Committee shall decide on the request. The

procedure will be in accordance with the Rules Governing the Procedures of

the Players’ Status Committee and the Dispute Resolution Chamber. Once the

Player has filed his request, he is not eligible to play for any representative

team until his request has been processed.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The "five year residency" requirement in clause 7 is only for players who have already played for one Association (in a non-competitive match) and want to change to another (Wynne doesn't fall under this category):

7 Acquisition of a new nationality

Any Player who refers to art. 5 par. 1 to assume a new nationality and who

has not played international football in accordance with art. 5 par. 2 shall be

eligible to play for the new representative team only if he fulfils one of the

following conditions:

a) He was born on the territory of the relevant Association;

b) His biological mother or biological father was born on the territory of the

relevant Association;

c) His grandmother or grandfather was born on the territory of the relevant

Association;

d) He has lived continuously for at least five years after reaching the age of 18

on the territory of the relevant Association.

Pete is that the most recent version of the statute? Your analysis looks right

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

why are we looking past 5.1 - he holds nationality based on citizenship not residence

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Big Pete 65 wrote:
If Wynne applied to FIFA under clause 8 to change the Association for which he is eligible to play international football, and they approved, then the OFC can not override this...
Perhaps someone at NZF forgot to press the send button on the fax machine.
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

If FIFA want Article 7 to only apply to players who have played non-competitive football for a member association and want to change nationality then they have done a very poor job of wording that clause. I read that as saying that any player who wants to change nationality must meet that requirement, and then submit the request to FIFA under article 8.

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Why no official update?

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

james dean wrote:

why are we looking past 5.1 - he holds nationality based on citizenship not residence

That's the principle though - not the actual specific rules on how that principle is applied.

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

james dean wrote:

why are we looking past 5.1 - he holds nationality based on citizenship not residence

I looked past it because I didn't really know what it means.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

U037 wrote:

Big Pete 65 wrote:
If Wynne applied to FIFA under clause 8 to change the Association for which he is eligible to play international football, and they approved, then the OFC can not override this...
Perhaps someone at NZF forgot to press the send button on the fax machine.

No one uses faxes anymore.

This email thing is the shizzle!

You can even send PDFs FFS!!!

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

The final is underway, could be a meaningless match if NZF win their challenge

Rosario Central, the All Whites, Waitakere United and the mighty Phoenix! speaker of engrish

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

james dean wrote:

why are we looking past 5.1 - he holds nationality based on citizenship not residence

Yes but in his case he would have got citizenship based upon residence and thereafter time criteria.

The bottom line is that if he is a citizen now he would have been living here 5 years after getting his first residence visa.

Admittedly those 5 years obviously wouldn't have been since the age of 18 however. 


Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink