Kiwi Players Elsewhere

Andrew Durante (Melbourne Victory | A-Leagues)

826 replies · 165,076 views
almost 13 years ago


so i read lots and concluded that this could take ages to sort out or if complained about could be a short time but no exact time

I LOVE LAMP

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Dura on Live sport radio at the moment


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Dura on Live sport radio at the moment


What did he talk about? Any coach clues?

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

HE'S THE COACH !!!!!




Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

 Dura and Ifill traiing down at Miramar at the mo for fitness etc.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

here's hoping he gets selected to play against Jordan for the NZA team. Would be good for him to get some game time in the national team prior to the big playoff game.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

theprof wrote:

here's hoping he gets selected to play against Jordan for the NZA team. Would be good for him to get some game time in the national team prior to the big playoff game.



I'm sure he will. Probably Dura and Siggy as long as they keep fit.
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Kiwi Hatter wrote:
Sackofspuds wrote:
TopLeft07 wrote:

Why does Dura have an apparent connection with Seattle Sounders?

http://espnfc.com/player/_/id/68888/andrew-durante?cc=3436



Clearly bullshit as it also says he played for Guyana...


Also claims he weighs in at 160kg!



Will never be a new Zealander as long as his arse points to the ground.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Jason Pine @pineyzb

FIFA has opened disciplinary proceedings against New Zealand Football for allegedly fielding an ineligible player v Solomon Islands in March

The issue is the 3 months Andrew Durante spent in Sydney in 2011 and whether that affects his five year residency #allwhites #FIFA

Really would suck for Dura if those 3 months ruled him out, he didn't even play a game!

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Jason Pine @pineyzb

FIFA: "NZ will proceed to the inter-continental play-off regardless of the result of the disciplinary proceedings."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Is that really the issue?? So how does it work travelling to and from Australia then for football and when they stay for two weeks at a time as the Phoenix do? Doesn't affect the fact that he is a resident of this country.

If that's the deal then that would be a banana skin NZF did not count on I suspect as they were only looking at it from a 'sitting on the Socceroo bench' perspective of whether he is eligible or not.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

Is that really the issue?? So how does it work travelling to and from Australia then for football and when they stay for two weeks at a time as the Phoenix do? Doesn't affect the fact that he is a resident of this country.

If that's the deal then that would be a banana skin NZF did not count on I suspect as they were only looking at it from a 'sitting on the Socceroo bench' perspective of whether he is eligible or not.

Whilst he is travelling with the Phoenix, he is still residing in NZ. For those 3 months, he was residing in Sydney. El Grap has mentioned that will be the issue for awhile.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

(d) He has lived continuously for at least five years after reaching the age of 18 on the territory of the relevant Association.

How they interpret that, is what it will boil down too.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

(d) He has lived continuously for at least five years after reaching the age of 18 on the territory of the relevant Association.

How they interpret that, is what it will boil down too.

There are two possible scenarios.
1 - They rule that the three months he spent in Sydney mean that he was not residing in Wellington for 5 consecutive years, and he is ineliegible.
2- They rule that despite spending three months overseas, he was still residing in NZ over that period, and is eligible.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

But presumably it won't matter for future All Whites games in any case, right?

He can still be eligible for the All Whites from now onwards?

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

No. This will determine where he can play for the AWs or not. Well until he does 5 years here after that stint in Sydney.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Bevan wrote:

But presumably it won't matter for future All Whites games in any case, right?

He can still be eligible for the All Whites from now onwards?

If he was ineligible in March, he's ineligible now (and any point up until 5 years from Sydney).

EDIT: 2B got in first...


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Surely there must be precedent for this though? I can't imagine that every foreign-born player in every international team didn't spend a few months back in his home country 5 years prior to taking the field for his adopted country. I think under NZ law you only have to be here 184 days a year to be considered residing here, so would FIFA accept that as well? If not, do they have any definition of what they mean by the terms "residing" and "continuously"?

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago


Technically surely he was still employed by the Phoenix.

It surely would be like if an employee of an NZ company was succonded to another company in Aussie for a period. You are still surely a resident/employee of NZ/NZ company ??????

Perhaps thats too logical/illogical.

But then I'm not a FIFA offical and some of them dont appear to be that flash either.

Just my thoughts I am prepared to be shot down on this !!!!!!!

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Surely there must be precedent for this though? I can't imagine that every foreign-born player in every international team didn't spend a few months back in his home country 5 years prior to taking the field for his adopted country. I think under NZ law you only have to be here 184 days a year to be considered residing here, so would FIFA accept that as well? If not, do they have any definition of what they mean by the terms "residing" and "continuously"?


Yes, residence in a country doesn't necessarily equate to continuous physical presence in that country. You basically have to demonstrate that even if you're not physically present in the country, you continue to reside there, so things like maintaining a residential property/address, normally discharging your duties/obligations as resident of that country (rates/taxes/etc) would need to be demonstrated.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

A lot of talk about this potentially only affecting the result of the game he played in, but doesn't anyone think it could be worse?

Looks to me that the FIFA rules have been breached.  NZ's own residency rules haven't, because you need to spend at least 6 months in NZ in each of the 5 years prior to applying for citizenship so presumably he's done that.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
UHfan wrote:


Technically surely he was still employed by the Phoenix.

It surely would be like if an employee of an NZ company was succonded to another company in Aussie for a period. You are still surely a resident/employee of NZ/NZ company ??????

Perhaps thats too logical/illogical.

But then I'm not a FIFA offical and some of them dont appear to be that flash either.

Just my thoughts I am prepared to be shot down on this !!!!!!!

No loans between A-League clubs. We released him to sign for Sydney but we knew he would re-sign after the ACL was over.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Surely there must be precedent for this though? I can't imagine that every foreign-born player in every international team didn't spend a few months back in his home country 5 years prior to taking the field for his adopted country. I think under NZ law you only have to be here 184 days a year to be considered residing here, so would FIFA accept that as well? If not, do they have any definition of what they mean by the terms "residing" and "continuously"?



I can't imagine too many precedents where these players have actually gone 'home' and worked in those countries though?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Steve-O wrote:

A lot of talk about this potentially only affecting the result of the game he played in, but doesn't anyone think it could be worse?


The whole appeal has been instigated by NZF to clarify the lingering uncertainty ahead of the November playoffs.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Steve-O wrote:

A lot of talk about this potentially only affecting the result of the game he played in, but doesn't anyone think it could be worse?

Looks to me that the FIFA rules have been breached.  NZ's own residency rules haven't, because you need to spend at least 6 months in NZ in each of the 5 years prior to applying for citizenship so presumably he's done that.

We only face losing 3 qualifying points & maybe a fine. It has been confirmed that we are still in the play off.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Steve-O wrote:

A lot of talk about this potentially only affecting the result of the game he played in, but doesn't anyone think it could be worse?


The whole appeal has been instigated by NZF to clarify the lingering uncertainty ahead of the November playoffs.



He really should not have played in that last game to be honest, given there was obviously still uncertainty. 

What I was getting at with the point I quoted, is don't the AW's now risk being kicked out altogether?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Steve-O wrote:

A lot of talk about this potentially only affecting the result of the game he played in, but doesn't anyone think it could be worse?

Looks to me that the FIFA rules have been breached.  NZ's own residency rules haven't, because you need to spend at least 6 months in NZ in each of the 5 years prior to applying for citizenship so presumably he's done that.

We only face losing 3 qualifying points & maybe a fine. It has been confirmed that we are still in the play off.


FIFA have confirmed that?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Steve-O wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
Steve-O wrote:

A lot of talk about this potentially only affecting the result of the game he played in, but doesn't anyone think it could be worse?


The whole appeal has been instigated by NZF to clarify the lingering uncertainty ahead of the November playoffs.



He really should not have played in that last game to be honest, given there was obviously still uncertainty. 

What I was getting at with the point I quoted, is don't the AW's now risk being kicked out altogether?

No, they would just lose the points from that game, which was a dead-rubber.
Which is exactly why Durante was played in that game, as losing those points would be immaterial if Durante was found to be ineligible (and he was played also precisely so that this appeal against his eligibility could be put through).
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Steve-O wrote:

A lot of talk about this potentially only affecting the result of the game he played in, but doesn't anyone think it could be worse?

In all other cases where countries have been found guilty of fielding ineligible players, they have been docked competition points earned in the  game where the player was fielded, and no other non-monetary punishment was handed down, as per FIFA regulations.


Also, Gourdie stated on twitter than in FIFA's release, they stated that this does NOT put the result of Stage 3 in doubt, NZ will play the intercontinenal playoff whatever the outcome of this process is.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Fair enough.  Was quite risky still IMO!  Not entirely sure it was worth it either.  Alas, sounds like you'll be ok.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Steve-O wrote:

Not entirely sure it was worth it either.

The payoff is quite substantial, as we will know for sure if Dura is eligible or not. If we didn't find out, and then played him in November, qualified for the World Cup, and then got kicked out for fielding an ineligible player, the consequences would be much worse.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
patrick478 wrote:
Steve-O wrote:

Not entirely sure it was worth it either.

The payoff is quite substantial, as we will know for sure if Dura is eligible or not. If we didn't find out, and then played him in November, qualified for the World Cup, and then got kicked out for fielding an ineligible player, the consequences would be much worse.



Would've been funny though.

Jokes ;-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
patrick478 wrote:
Steve-O wrote:

A lot of talk about this potentially only affecting the result of the game he played in, but doesn't anyone think it could be worse?

In all other cases where countries have been found guilty of fielding ineligible players, they have been docked competition points earned in the  game where the player was fielded, and no other non-monetary punishment was handed down, as per FIFA regulations.


Yep, Ethiopia and Togo lost points for fielding ineligible players in their World Cup qualifiers just this week, which has shaken things up a bit in the CAF qualifying path, especially for South Africa (in a good way) and Libya (in a bad way).

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
UHfan wrote:


Technically surely he was still employed by the Phoenix.

It surely would be like if an employee of an NZ company was succonded to another company in Aussie for a period. You are still surely a resident/employee of NZ/NZ company ??????

Perhaps thats too logical/illogical.

But then I'm not a FIFA offical and some of them dont appear to be that flash either.

Just my thoughts I am prepared to be shot down on this !!!!!!!

No loans between A-League clubs. We released him to sign for Sydney but we knew he would re-sign after the ACL was over.


i'm pretty sure the no loan's thing is an A-League rule - so not in effect for the ACL - could be wrong though.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Steve-O wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Durante

Wikipedia says loan.  Case closed.

The Wellington Phoenix have let go of Captain Andrew Durante to join A League rivals Sydney FC, but there's a catch. Durante will play for last years Champions in the upcoming Asian Champions League,before retuning in June, after inking a temporary deal with the club last night. Durante admits it may look a little confusing, but FFA rules mean he'll have to chop and change between the clubs rather than do a straight loan. The Wellington Phoenix have approved the arrangement with coach Ricki Herbert more than happy for his captain to take advantage of the opportunity. RadioLIVE's Willy Nicholls caught up with Andrew before he flies out to Sydney today.

http://www.radiolive.co.nz/Durante-to-leave-Phoenix/tabid/441/articleID/18772/Default.aspx [Video doesn't exist anymore]
Permalink Permalink