Rest of A-League Transfer (Now with 99% RR - Love your work)

8937 replies · 1,631,226 views
3 days ago
RR wrote:
 AucklandPhoenix wrote:
The best part of that article is there was no reference to Verstraete
Given how key he has been to AFC's success, he surely gets offered a marquee level deal.

Re: Brimmer, he still has 2 years on his deal & would be on a decent wedge. They might have to try and offload him to a South East Asian side with deep pockets.
I suspect something is up with Brimmer - hope he's OK. But assuming he's on big money, surely he accepts a pay cut or they release him.

What are the rules around paying contracts out? I assume that's not included in the salary?
Permalink Permalink
3 days ago
Brimmer has a young kid (or kids) living with his ex partner in Melbourne. That would be tough.

If Western United do re enter the comp, that could be a new home for him courtesy of a release from Auckland.
Permalink Permalink
3 days ago
coochiee wrote:
Brimmer has a young kid (or kids) living with his ex partner in Melbourne. That would be tough.

If Western United do re enter the comp, that could be a new home for him courtesy of a release from Auckland.
I seem to remember a story about a death in the family as well as some what I thought were implied mental health challenges related to that, but maybe I'm just reading between the lines a bit too much.
Permalink Permalink
3 days ago
20 Legend wrote:
 RR wrote:
 AucklandPhoenix wrote:
The best part of that article is there was no reference to Verstraete
Given how key he has been to AFC's success, he surely gets offered a marquee level deal.

Re: Brimmer, he still has 2 years on his deal & would be on a decent wedge. They might have to try and offload him to a South East Asian side with deep pockets.
I suspect something is up with Brimmer - hope he's OK. But assuming he's on big money, surely he accepts a pay cut or they release him.

What are the rules around paying contracts out? I assume that's not included in the salary?
If they pay out then its in the salary cap, if its mutual termination then its not. 
Permalink Permalink
2 days ago · edited 2 days ago · History
Bullion wrote:
 20 Legend wrote:
 RR wrote:
 AucklandPhoenix wrote:
The best part of that article is there was no reference to Verstraete
Given how key he has been to AFC's success, he surely gets offered a marquee level deal.

Re: Brimmer, he still has 2 years on his deal & would be on a decent wedge. They might have to try and offload him to a South East Asian side with deep pockets.
I suspect something is up with Brimmer - hope he's OK. But assuming he's on big money, surely he accepts a pay cut or they release him.

What are the rules around paying contracts out? I assume that's not included in the salary?
If they pay out then its in the salary cap, if its mutual termination then its not. 
In the instance of a mutual termination, wouldn't the remainder of the contract have to be charged against the cap unless it was specifically negotiated otherwise?

I guess if another club came in wanting him then it would probably be negotiated to soften the blow against the cap for AFC.
Permalink Permalink
2 days ago
YoungHeartHM wrote:
 Bullion wrote:
 20 Legend wrote:
 RR wrote:
 AucklandPhoenix wrote:
The best part of that article is there was no reference to Verstraete
Given how key he has been to AFC's success, he surely gets offered a marquee level deal.

Re: Brimmer, he still has 2 years on his deal & would be on a decent wedge. They might have to try and offload him to a South East Asian side with deep pockets.
I suspect something is up with Brimmer - hope he's OK. But assuming he's on big money, surely he accepts a pay cut or they release him.

What are the rules around paying contracts out? I assume that's not included in the salary?
If they pay out then its in the salary cap, if its mutual termination then its not. 
In the instance of a mutual termination, wouldn't the remainder of the contract have to be charged against the cap unless it was specifically negotiated otherwise?
I assumed that the salary cap was applied when the squad was registered.

If you don't register a player for the season, surely their contract is irrelevant?
Permalink Permalink
2 days ago · edited 2 days ago · History
20 Legend wrote:
 YoungHeartHM wrote:
 Bullion wrote:
 20 Legend wrote:
 RR wrote:
 AucklandPhoenix wrote:
The best part of that article is there was no reference to Verstraete
Given how key he has been to AFC's success, he surely gets offered a marquee level deal.

Re: Brimmer, he still has 2 years on his deal & would be on a decent wedge. They might have to try and offload him to a South East Asian side with deep pockets.
I suspect something is up with Brimmer - hope he's OK. But assuming he's on big money, surely he accepts a pay cut or they release him.

What are the rules around paying contracts out? I assume that's not included in the salary?
If they pay out then its in the salary cap, if its mutual termination then its not. 
In the instance of a mutual termination, wouldn't the remainder of the contract have to be charged against the cap unless it was specifically negotiated otherwise?
I assumed that the salary cap was applied when the squad was registered.

If you don't register a player for the season, surely their contract is irrelevant?
That would be some mighty fine trickery.

It would also render player contracts as pretty much useless if that were the case. 

Either that or it'd just be plain nuts to have a highly paid player under contract, but not registered to the squad. 😅
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
theprof
2 days ago
Anything paid to a player registered in your Senior squad, counts towards your salary cap calculations.

Being able to deregister them from the ALM during the season but keep paying them would be a massive loophole for rich teams to exploit but no one has ever done that, so not sure it is even possible to deregister players.

Only time teams have paid guys outside the ALM squad, was for guys signed in January for ACL depth.
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
BullionSouthernixYoungHeartHM
2 days ago
RR wrote:
Anything paid to a player registered in your Senior squad, counts towards your salary cap calculations.

Being able to deregister them from the ALM during the season but keep paying them would be a massive loophole for rich teams to exploit but no one has ever done that, so not sure it is even possible to deregister players.

Only time teams have paid guys outside the ALM squad, was for guys signed in January for ACL depth.
Yes of course... but the question is if a team like Auckland has to pay out contracts for the likes of Brimmer, if Brimmer isn't registered it's not going to count against the salary cap.
Permalink Permalink
2 days ago
One post worrying about Brimmer has taken on a life of its own 😂

Maybe we need to wait until at least he appears on the departure list before speculating 😂

Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
2 days ago
20 Legend wrote:
 RR wrote:
Anything paid to a player registered in your Senior squad, counts towards your salary cap calculations.

Being able to deregister them from the ALM during the season but keep paying them would be a massive loophole for rich teams to exploit but no one has ever done that, so not sure it is even possible to deregister players.

Only time teams have paid guys outside the ALM squad, was for guys signed in January for ACL depth.
Yes of course... but the question is if a team like Auckland has to pay out contracts for the likes of Brimmer, if Brimmer isn't registered it's not going to count against the salary cap.
It will, you could otherwise stack your squad and then not reregister them and payout their contracts effectively meaning the players time registered they had a salary higher than what was reported.
Permalink Permalink
2 days ago
Bullion wrote:
 20 Legend wrote:
 RR wrote:
Anything paid to a player registered in your Senior squad, counts towards your salary cap calculations.

Being able to deregister them from the ALM during the season but keep paying them would be a massive loophole for rich teams to exploit but no one has ever done that, so not sure it is even possible to deregister players.

Only time teams have paid guys outside the ALM squad, was for guys signed in January for ACL depth.
Yes of course... but the question is if a team like Auckland has to pay out contracts for the likes of Brimmer, if Brimmer isn't registered it's not going to count against the salary cap.
It will, you could otherwise stack your squad and then not reregister them and payout their contracts effectively meaning the players time registered they had a salary higher than what was reported.
Oh I'm with ya. Sign them on a 5 year -> play them for one -> pay them out the last 4... lol 
Permalink Permalink
2 days ago
Western Sydney wants to bring Nicolas Milanovic home to the Wanderers but is facing competition from at least two other rivals clubs for the services of the former A-League star.

Meanwhile, it’s understood that Melbourne Victory has entered the race to sign former Sydney FC star Joe Lolley.
The 33-year-old English winger’s departure from the Sky Blues was confirmed on Monday, and he had previously been linked with moves to Macarthur FC and Perth Glory.

https://www.news.com.au/sport/football/wanderers-push-to-bring-home-nicolas-milanovic-being-challenged-by-aleague-rivals/news-story/baf88351bab7b89be25b58613ba9cea6
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
PK
2 days ago · edited 2 days ago · History
Off his IG account tonight it looks like Pennington is leaving Perth.
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
PK
2 days ago
YoungHeartHM wrote:
Off his IG account tonight it looks like Pennington is leaving Perth.
He had a decent run there and would still be an assett.


Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LGPK
1 day ago · edited 1 day ago · History
King isn't the same player he was before he went to Europe. He just isn't good anymore. Only played 9 games for Sydney last season.

JCP is a much better option. 
Permalink Permalink
1 day ago · edited 1 day ago · History
Sure but isn’t JCP starting for Sydney and under contarct?
 I don’t think we can compete with that?

To be fair to King he is up against Ben Gurrochio (spelling?) who is one of the best defenders in the last few years in the A league.

Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
1 day ago
AucklandPhoenix wrote:
Sure but isn’t JCP starting for Sydney and under contarct?
I don’t think we can compete with that?

To be fair to King he is up against Ben Gurrochio (spelling?) who is one of the best defenders in the last few years in the A league.

JCP is off contract & was rumours he was looking to move around January but post Uffie, he was suddenly playing again.
Permalink Permalink