Wellington Phoenix Men

Darije Kalezić: We hardly knew ye.

1359 replies · 364,597 views Locked
about 8 years ago

theprof wrote:

so here's my take on it - for what it's worth.

All along the coach has said that this team does not have what it takes to win the league - certain players are not up to it and natural selection will take place come the end of the season. My bet is that DK has presented to the management with his plans to change the squad dramatically and may have even requested more funds to do it and has probably met with strong resistance from the board. Agreement cannot be reached hence he leaves.

Question - why hire an agent of change if you aren't willing to change? This, as I've said all along, is basically going to repeat what we did this season, re-sign a whole bunch of players before we get the coach so we actually have a squad come next season.

Yep. it seems like this is what likely happened. To be fair, Darije has been backed all throughout the season (we even fired a coach and one of our best players for him) and he hasn't been able to deliver anything resembling progress.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago · edited about 8 years ago · History

...or he could be a raging sharkcod that the players can't stand and won't play for?

While we're throwing out baseless conjecture and pretending it's viable.


Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Photomac wrote:

Just as a note, Ramon doesn't have a pro-licence.  He needs one to come into the Nix.  A-League rule.  So any speculation around him is moot until he gets that

No the club can apply for a dispensation until he gets it

also he is due to get it in May which means he would have it in time for next season

but despite that don't think he will be the next Nix coach

My point is correct then.  The club can 'apply' to get it under the rule designed to get young Aussie's into the league.  The FFA can easily say no. 

But that is again moot if he gets his pro in May.


And all of this is irrelevant if:
1. He doesn't want the job, and
2. He has a bad relationship with the Nix

Lots of hypotheticals.  The only definite is he doesn't currently have a pro-licence and he needs one to coach in the A-League

(Whether that is a good thing or not and whether I think he should be given the job are both different discussions to this one)

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Baiter wrote:

...or he could be a raging sharkcod that the players can't stand and won't play for?

While we're throwing out baseless conjecture and pretending it's viable.

It's almost as if a forum is used for discussion.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

valeo wrote:

Baiter wrote:

...or he could be a raging sharkcod that the players can't stand and won't play for?

While we're throwing out baseless conjecture and pretending it's viable.

It's almost as if a forum is used for discussion.

There's a difference between discussion and throwing out baseless "facts" and then forming an argument against the clubs behaviour based on those "facts".

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Photomac wrote:

Photomac wrote:

Just as a note, Ramon doesn't have a pro-licence.  He needs one to come into the Nix.  A-League rule.  So any speculation around him is moot until he gets that

No the club can apply for a dispensation until he gets it

also he is due to get it in May which means he would have it in time for next season

but despite that don't think he will be the next Nix coach

My point is correct then.  The club can 'apply' to get it under the rule designed to get young Aussie's into the league.  The FFA can easily say no. 

But that is again moot if he gets his pro in May.


And all of this is irrelevant if:
1. He doesn't want the job, and
2. He has a bad relationship with the Nix

Lots of hypotheticals.  The only definite is he doesn't currently have a pro-licence and he needs one to coach in the A-League

(Whether that is a good thing or not and whether I think he should be given the job are both different discussions to this one)

I hear this line a bit, but I'm yet to see any information to substantiate it. Does anyone have a sauce or information which they can back this point up with?

I have an amazing ability to find my way out of mazes. I'm pathological. 
Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

kwlap wrote:

Photomac wrote:

Photomac wrote:

Just as a note, Ramon doesn't have a pro-licence.  He needs one to come into the Nix.  A-League rule.  So any speculation around him is moot until he gets that

No the club can apply for a dispensation until he gets it

also he is due to get it in May which means he would have it in time for next season

but despite that don't think he will be the next Nix coach

My point is correct then.  The club can 'apply' to get it under the rule designed to get young Aussie's into the league.  The FFA can easily say no. 

But that is again moot if he gets his pro in May.


And all of this is irrelevant if:
1. He doesn't want the job, and
2. He has a bad relationship with the Nix

Lots of hypotheticals.  The only definite is he doesn't currently have a pro-licence and he needs one to coach in the A-League

(Whether that is a good thing or not and whether I think he should be given the job are both different discussions to this one)

I hear this line a bit, but I'm yet to see any information to substantiate it. Does anyone have a sauce or information which they can back this point up with?

That's a fair question and why I prefaced the point with an 'if'.  It's unlikely anyone who knows for sure would put their name to it in public

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Two Auckland games means Ramon can get a good look at who to keep for next season..

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

whatever wrote:

This guy simply is a clown. The Nix management need to take a hard look at themselves how they could hire someone so poor.

It was obvious to all of us from one look at his record that this was the likely outcome.  How the custodians of the club came to a different view is baffling.

And now there is talk about Vidmar, whose record is not much better!  Last coached in the A-League 8 years ago when his Adelaide team finished bottom.  Pardon me if I don't rush out and purchase a season membership for 2018-19 based on that appointment if it happens.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Sancho wrote:

Two Auckland games means Ramon can get a good look at who to keep for next season..

It’s all part of Domey’s master plan. 



Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

nufc_nz wrote:

Sancho wrote:

Two Auckland games means Ramon can get a good look at who to keep for next season..

It’s all part of Domey’s master plan. 

Oh, Domey has a master plan?  When did that happen? ;)

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Baiter wrote:

I think he MAY be able to do the job but it would be a massive gamble from a club that is already perceived to be a complete mess by everyone who deals with them.  If that gamble didn't play off can you imagine the whining on here just based on what we see here even when we win a game?

Is it any more of a gamble than

a)insert random 'failed' (I acknowledge most coaching roles end in some sort of failure) A-league coach a few years out of coaching and maybe has done some TV punditry

b)former assistant coach of A-league team or upcoming coach of Aussie State league side.

c)random low level journeyman foreign coach with no knowledge of Australasian football.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

New coach is

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Baiter wrote:

How about I play Devil's advocate here then seeing as I see the media darlings have already saddled the horses to the front of the same "sign Ramon" and "Tribulietx In" bandwagons they only put away a couple of days ago after the All Whites gig was announced.

Let's be brutally honest.  Ramon's experience is coaching a semi-professional team in a glorified social grade level of football.  He has a significant level of backing for an amateur team and has built an excellent record on that but it's still amateur football.  It's not dealing with full time players and the full raft of what is needed for a full time job.

There is a significant difference between getting a side up for a week long tournament in the WCC vs a 10 month of the year full time competition including recruitment, physical conditioning, mental conditioning, running a reserve team and a myriad of other things that he requires little experience of in his current role.

I'd feel a lot happier if he had spent some time, any time working within a professional environment.  If he'd put his hand up for an assistant gig somewhere, played at one or at any point spent a long period of time where he has an understanding of football at that level I'd be more inclined to be on the bangbus.

The next question is, does he want the gig? Are people screaming for him to be appointed having not even checked if he wants it? He's on a pretty good deal at City and let's be honest has not gone out of his way to move on from his comfort zone there.

I think he MAY be able to do the job but it would be a massive gamble from a club that is already perceived to be a complete mess by everyone who deals with them.  If that gamble didn't play off can you imagine the whining on here just based on what we see here even when we win a game?

Is it though? Has the club changed so drastically from the time Ifill said how impressed he was with the professionalism of the club?

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

ForteanTimes wrote:

Baiter wrote:

How about I play Devil's advocate here then seeing as I see the media darlings have already saddled the horses to the front of the same "sign Ramon" and "Tribulietx In" bandwagons they only put away a couple of days ago after the All Whites gig was announced.

Let's be brutally honest.  Ramon's experience is coaching a semi-professional team in a glorified social grade level of football.  He has a significant level of backing for an amateur team and has built an excellent record on that but it's still amateur football.  It's not dealing with full time players and the full raft of what is needed for a full time job.

There is a significant difference between getting a side up for a week long tournament in the WCC vs a 10 month of the year full time competition including recruitment, physical conditioning, mental conditioning, running a reserve team and a myriad of other things that he requires little experience of in his current role.

I'd feel a lot happier if he had spent some time, any time working within a professional environment.  If he'd put his hand up for an assistant gig somewhere, played at one or at any point spent a long period of time where he has an understanding of football at that level I'd be more inclined to be on the bangbus.

The next question is, does he want the gig? Are people screaming for him to be appointed having not even checked if he wants it? He's on a pretty good deal at City and let's be honest has not gone out of his way to move on from his comfort zone there.

I think he MAY be able to do the job but it would be a massive gamble from a club that is already perceived to be a complete mess by everyone who deals with them.  If that gamble didn't play off can you imagine the whining on here just based on what we see here even when we win a game?

Is it though? Has the club changed so drastically from the time Ifill said how impressed he was with the professionalism of the club?

well the ownership has changed so that is a fairly drastic change

https://thejourneyfan.blogspot.co.nz/

New Zealand Football Media Association Website of the year 2015 & 2016

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

reg22 wrote:

theprof wrote:

so here's my take on it - for what it's worth.

All along the coach has said that this team does not have what it takes to win the league - certain players are not up to it and natural selection will take place come the end of the season. My bet is that DK has presented to the management with his plans to change the squad dramatically and may have even requested more funds to do it and has probably met with strong resistance from the board. Agreement cannot be reached hence he leaves.

Question - why hire an agent of change if you aren't willing to change? This, as I've said all along, is basically going to repeat what we did this season, re-sign a whole bunch of players before we get the coach so we actually have a squad come next season.

I think you're right. 

However, I do think the board have shown they are willing to change and have backed their 'agent for change' to the hilt and have been disappointed with the results.

I think they want to change and they have realised that he is not the man to do it

I hope you're right.

And if so, I hope that the Board recognise and address that this isn't just about the coach.  How we signed this guy and why Ernie left are major questions that, it seems to me, go much more closely to the heart of the club's - and the Board's - problems.

My guess?  We have a Board that despite their generosity and desire to support football are not steeped in football.  They lack the contacts and football experience to easily get this right.

How they are trying to compensate for that isn't working.  

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

thatguynz wrote:

nufc_nz wrote:

Sancho wrote:

Two Auckland games means Ramon can get a good look at who to keep for next season..

It’s all part of Domey’s master plan. 

Oh, Domey has a master plan?  When did that happen? ;)

You mean the football committee and/the board
Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Baiter wrote:

How about I play Devil's advocate here then seeing as I see the media darlings have already saddled the horses to the front of the same "sign Ramon" and "Tribulietx In" bandwagons they only put away a couple of days ago after the All Whites gig was announced.

Let's be brutally honest.  Ramon's experience is coaching a semi-professional team in a glorified social grade level of football.  He has a significant level of backing for an amateur team and has built an excellent record on that but it's still amateur football.  It's not dealing with full time players and the full raft of what is needed for a full time job.

There is a significant difference between getting a side up for a week long tournament in the WCC vs a 10 month of the year full time competition including recruitment, physical conditioning, mental conditioning, running a reserve team and a myriad of other things that he requires little experience of in his current role.

I'd feel a lot happier if he had spent some time, any time working within a professional environment.  If he'd put his hand up for an assistant gig somewhere, played at one or at any point spent a long period of time where he has an understanding of football at that level I'd be more inclined to be on the bangbus.

The next question is, does he want the gig? Are people screaming for him to be appointed having not even checked if he wants it? He's on a pretty good deal at City and let's be honest has not gone out of his way to move on from his comfort zone there.

I think he MAY be able to do the job but it would be a massive gamble from a club that is already perceived to be a complete mess by everyone who deals with them.  If that gamble didn't play off can you imagine the whining on here just based on what we see here even when we win a game?

Reading that it seems we could do with a DoF just as much as a head coach
Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

ForteanTimes wrote:

Is it though? Has the club changed so drastically from the time Ifill said how impressed he was with the professionalism of the club?

I did say perceived. 

The impression I have is that we have a stable ownership group that is well respected among the other A-League ownership groups who have been the victim of some bad choices and some bad circumstances. 

They certainly aren't the incompetent buffons that many (mostly non-Wellington) media and social media warriors would have you believe.

I would hope they have learnt/are learning from these choices and circumstances.


Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

The two guys who sit behind us on match day must be first choice.   ;-)

Profile pic. Should you be interested. Lakhsen, on the right, lost touch with him.
Mohammed, on the left, I'm still in touch with. He's now living in Agadez, Niger. More focused on his animals now as tourism has dried up. Is active with a co-op promoting local goods, leather work and bijouterie, into Europe. 
20/5/20

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

So with Kalezic gone, how many of our foreign football players will follow him? I'm predicting that only Krishna will be left. 

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

I really hoped DK would work out for us - he had the credentials and the start of the campaign was looking good, at least in terms of the game plan we tried to execute.

I like the way he tried to approach games at first and also how he tried to change formation to suit the players he had.

However, I'm not heartbroken (or surprised) that he's now on his way - at the end of the day, he failed miserably and it appears he is not averse from finding himself in high-conflict situations which isn't great for someone in his position.


Now I just hope we can sign a replacement ASAP, before the end of the season ideally, and certainly by the start of pre-season.  This new coach must have full powers and the ability to shape his team however he sees fit, and within our budget of course.


Not sure how I feel about Vidmar personally, sure he knows the A-League but apart from a good season with the Pissants, I'm not sure he's got a great track record.  Anyway, move fast WelNix - get us a new coach and plan a team that can win next season, not one to develop from scratch and which might bring results in a few years.


VUW AFC - Victoria University Football for life

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

I would need some convincing that that would be a bad thing but I'm also not convinced that they have any loyalty (beyond shared representation possibly) to Kalezic.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

thatguynz wrote:

nufc_nz wrote:

Sancho wrote:

Two Auckland games means Ramon can get a good look at who to keep for next season..

It’s all part of Domey’s master plan. 

Oh, Domey has a master plan?  When did that happen? ;)

Think he knows at least 4 NZ premier league coachs who have out foxed Ramon over the past 4 years with on paper a lot less quality of player. So no master plan!

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Baiter wrote:

...or he could be a raging sharkcod that the players can't stand and won't play for?

While we're throwing out baseless conjecture and pretending it's viable.

I wouldn't have used the terms "raging sharkcod", but I really liked the things Darije was saying, at at the same time they had no bearing on what happened on the field. Total disconnect between players and managers was the issue I identified ages ago.


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Doloras wrote:

...liked the things Darije was saying, at at the same time they had no bearing on what happened on the field....

Suspect he watched it work for Hudson and thought he'd try it as well.


Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

feel a bit sorry for DK tbh. 

Almost certainly he will have stuffed up in some capacity; however that’s true for all coaches and the rest of us. Almost certainly some of our players are not up to it. What I cannot believe though is that abject failure this season is not the result of a combination of factors and/or a sequence of unfortunate events triggered by what at the time might seemed relatively innocuous events. . . eg the odd injury, a personality conflict, run of bad luck in games, dip in confidence etc etc etc. Sometimes unexplainably these things combine in such a way that you can ride your way through them, sometimes they compound and you end up in the crap.

So yes DK may not have all the attributes of a great coach and his team has not delivered on the pitch, but let’s not crucify him.

He’s also a human being whose own future in the game is probably very uncertain now. Getting fired by the Phoenix is not exactly a great line on his cv.

Meanwhile Dura’s biography whenever it comes out will make for very interesting reading. As well as being the Phoenix’s best ever player  (sorry Paul I) he’s a very astute bloke who will be best informed of anybody to adjudicate on the crap that we’ve experienced in recent years.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

valeo wrote:

Baiter wrote:

...or he could be a raging sharkcod that the players can't stand and won't play for?

While we're throwing out baseless conjecture and pretending it's viable.

It's almost as if a forum is used for discussion.

There's a difference between discussion and throwing out baseless "facts" and then forming an argument against the clubs behaviour based on those "facts".

Thank you Patrick for restoring some common sense here

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Dura would have been one of the players on the chopping block - maybe the player power base saw their time was up and made a move to oust the coach?

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

couple of paragraphs in this article say it all really.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/a-league/10...

"We've been talking to Darije for the last few weeks about what he wanted to do next year and we came to the conclusion that there was no way the club and Darije were going to agree on a few important aspects that Darije wanted to continue with or changes at the club he wanted to make. So we agreed it was best for both that we go our separate ways."

In terms of the decision to appoint Kalezic in the first place - a coach who had been sacked from four clubs in five years before arriving at the Phoenix - Dome said, in hindsight, it may have been a mistake."It's one of those things. You don't always get all these decisions right. We'll take that on the chin and say it didn't work out in this particular instance and we have to look forward now.

same old rhetoric with no substantial indication they will make the right changes.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

IronNix fan wrote:

feel a bit sorry for DK tbh. 

Almost certainly he will have stuffed up in some capacity; however that’s true for all coaches and the rest of us. Almost certainly some of our players are not up to it. What I cannot believe though is that abject failure this season is not the result of a combination of factors and/or a sequence of unfortunate events triggered by what at the time might seemed relatively innocuous events. . . eg the odd injury, a personality conflict, run of bad luck in games, dip in confidence etc etc etc. Sometimes unexplainably these things combine in such a way that you can ride your way through them, sometimes they compound and you end up in the crap.

So yes DK may not have all the attributes of a great coach and his team has not delivered on the pitch, but let’s not crucify him.

He’s also a human being whose own future in the game is probably very uncertain now. Getting fired by the Phoenix is not exactly a great line on his cv.

Meanwhile Dura’s biography whenever it comes out will make for very interesting reading. As well as being the Phoenix’s best ever player  (sorry Paul I) he’s a very astute bloke who will be best informed of anybody to adjudicate on the crap that we’ve experienced in recent years.

No Paul is our best ever player followed by Felipe and then Dave Mulligan. 

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

wanted Kalezic to stay as he is a better coach than Hudson and I would have liked to see a season on his terms. Seems that Krishna s terms were no Kalezic though. 

Dunno if Ive got the reserves to start over. 

Pick Brett Angell or whoever.  If we have to live in interesting times lets make them homegrown



Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

martinb wrote:

wanted Kalezic to stay as he is a better coach than Hudson and I would have liked to see a season on his terms. Seems that Krishna s terms were no Kalezic though. 

Dunno if Ive got the reserves to start over. 

Pick Brett Angell or whoever.  If we have to live in interesting times lets make them homegrown

Does Bromley count as homegrown? We have Bromley in Christchurch so it sounds local.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

martinb wrote:

wanted Kalezic to stay as he is a better coach than Hudson and I would have liked to see a season on his terms. Seems that Krishna s terms were no Kalezic though. 

Dunno if Ive got the reserves to start over. 

Pick Brett Angell or whoever.  If we have to live in interesting times lets make them homegrown

Why would you think Krishna had those terms?

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

martinb wrote:

wanted Kalezic to stay as he is a better coach than Hudson and I would have liked to see a season on his terms. Seems that Krishna s terms were no Kalezic though. 

Dunno if Ive got the reserves to start over. 

Pick Brett Angell or whoever.  If we have to live in interesting times lets make them homegrown

Why do you think Krishnas terms were no Kalezic?

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

martinb wrote:

wanted Kalezic to stay as he is a better coach than Hudson

Eh?
E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

theprof wrote:

couple of paragraphs in this article say it all really.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/a-league/10...

"We've been talking to Darije for the last few weeks about what he wanted to do next year and we came to the conclusion that there was no way the club and Darije were going to agree on a few important aspects that Darije wanted to continue with or changes at the club he wanted to make. So we agreed it was best for both that we go our separate ways."

In terms of the decision to appoint Kalezic in the first place - a coach who had been sacked from four clubs in five years before arriving at the Phoenix - Dome said, in hindsight, it may have been a mistake."It's one of those things. You don't always get all these decisions right. We'll take that on the chin and say it didn't work out in this particular instance and we have to look forward now.

same old rhetoric with no substantial indication they will make the right changes.

Can anyone hazard a guess at what specifically these 'important aspects' might be? Some have suggested that the release of more money for players might've been one, but this seems unlikely to me. I would be interested to hear from Dome exactly what Welnix's vision for the club is in regard to it's coach. And if we don't get to hear it I hope to hell they make it abundantly clear to the next guy to enter through the revolving door.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Can't say I'm sad, wanted to see him out the door along with a lot of the players coming off contract this year. WelNix better get a new coach in asap to look at players and start recruiting for next year

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

theprof wrote:

Dura would have been one of the players on the chopping block - maybe the player power base saw their time was up and made a move to oust the coach?

Wouldn't be the first time. This sort of crap from so called professional footballers , if true , really gets me fudgeing angry. I wasn't a massive Darije fan and maybe he had to go. But reading between the lines when Ernie left , the impression was that the senior players had stopped being receptive to his coaching ( my interpretation).  Durante, McGlinchey, Doyle , maybe Krishna. So how are we better off with those staying? Dura just physically isn't up to it any more, McGlinchey has been basically crap for 2 years now, Doyle admittedly does put in a shift and We're still not sure where Krishna's head at, although he has re-signed. I guess they've scored another coaches scalp. So bring in Vidmar or whoever , and see how long he lasts. 

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

I haven't hear any Dome interviews but have heard comment on the radio that he said the Nix and DK had a different view on how to go forward. Have those differences been stated? I'd love some honesty from Welnix so I can once and for all decide on whether I want to remain a fan or not.

Permalink Permalink

This topic is locked.