I heard or read somewhere recently that the Phoenix were an Australian club based in NZ but now they are registered as a NZ club playing in Australia.
At the fan Forum the other week, Rob Morrison constantly referred to the Club as an NZ club!
I heard or read somewhere recently that the Phoenix were an Australian club based in NZ but now they are registered as a NZ club playing in Australia.
At the fan Forum the other week, Rob Morrison constantly referred to the Club as an NZ club!
We're the WELLINGTON Phoenix
And this is our Home

I don't know what you guys are watching or reading [if at all] because I consider that I have a pretty good knowledge of what is happening with Kiwi sports people throughout the world. Admittedly I don't glean all of that information from the front of the newspaper or the TV [in fact I rarely watch the TV news now] but I am interested enough to either seek out the information or recognise it as being of interest if it comes across me in the more mainstream media. The point of this post is not to demonstrate how amazing I am but more to put forward that I think those that are interested will look for that information. I certainly don't expect the mainstream media to report on how a Kiwi is playing in the German 3rd division or even that there are kiwis playing there. Mainstream media is essentially a paid for service and they will provide what the general populace want, sometimes they will generate a story if they think it will benefit them or ignite public interest but they are looking for the biggest bang for the buck.
We can't sit there and moan because there is not enough coverage of football in the NZ media when we can only get 6 or 7 thousand to the top level of the game at the Cake Tin. We can rant and rave about how many people play the game but how much of that is real interest? the type of interest that gets people along to games, watch it on TV, read it in the paper etc? Like I paly pool when I'm at the pub, yet I don't pore over the snooker results in the paper nor watch Pot Black or the World Snooker Championships.
People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.
I don't know what you guys are watching or reading [if at all] because I consider that I have a pretty good knowledge of what is happening with Kiwi sports people throughout the world. Admittedly I don't glean all of that information from the front of the newspaper or the TV [in fact I rarely watch the TV news now] but I am interested enough to either seek out the information or recognise it as being of interest if it comes across me in the more mainstream media. The point of this post is not to demonstrate how amazing I am but more to put forward that I think those that are interested will look for that information. I certainly don't expect the mainstream media to report on how a Kiwi is playing in the German 3rd division or even that there are kiwis playing there. Mainstream media is essentially a paid for service and they will provide what the general populace want, sometimes they will generate a story if they think it will benefit them or ignite public interest but they are looking for the biggest bang for the buck.
We can't sit there and moan because there is not enough coverage of football in the NZ media when we can only get 6 or 7 thousand to the top level of the game at the Cake Tin. We can rant and rave about how many people play the game but how much of that is real interest? the type of interest that gets people along to games, watch it on TV, read it in the paper etc? Like I paly pool when I'm at the pub, yet I don't pore over the snooker results in the paper nor watch Pot Black or the World Snooker Championships.
interestingly enough doesn't elaborate on what this incident was and what was he doing that might cause someone watching to say he actually did something?
because it defeats the purpose of being anonymous if you state which incident you were pinged for (at least it was signed off anon).
and telling the truth would be a quick way to getting a permanent ban by the FFA.
off topic much
Nah it fits the Fudge the FFA portion of the topic.
It also fits the topic by illustrating the part played by the media in the FFA vs the fans / the clubs debacle.
Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days
interestingly enough doesn't elaborate on what this incident was and what was he doing that might cause someone watching to say he actually did something?
because it defeats the purpose of being anonymous if you state which incident you were pinged for (at least it was signed off anon).
and telling the truth would be a quick way to getting a permanent ban by the FFA.
bollocks.

interestingly enough doesn't elaborate on what this incident was and what was he doing that might cause someone watching to say he actually did something?
because it defeats the purpose of being anonymous if you state which incident you were pinged for (at least it was signed off anon).
and telling the truth would be a quick way to getting a permanent ban by the FFA.
I'm a big tin-foil hat conspiracy guy but you are reaching.
Unless of course you have evidence that the FFA killed Kennedy?

interestingly enough doesn't elaborate on what this incident was and what was he doing that might cause someone watching to say he actually did something?
because it defeats the purpose of being anonymous if you state which incident you were pinged for (at least it was signed off anon).
and telling the truth would be a quick way to getting a permanent ban by the FFA.
I'm a big tin-foil hat conspiracy guy but you are reaching.
Unless of course you have evidence that the FFA killed Kennedy?
Nothing to do with Westfield - that was Lee Harvey Norman.
"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...
I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...
Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...
Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."
interestingly enough doesn't elaborate on what this incident was and what was he doing that might cause someone watching to say he actually did something?
because it defeats the purpose of being anonymous if you state which incident you were pinged for (at least it was signed off anon).
and telling the truth would be a quick way to getting a permanent ban by the FFA.
I'm a big tin-foil hat conspiracy guy but you are reaching.
Unless of course you have evidence that the FFA killed Kennedy?
Which bit was reaching? That giving a specific event would allow someone to figure out who the individual was?
Or that the FFA might do something a wee bit unethical?
Phoenix, Firebird, what's the frigging difference, honestly.
And some days they do play like a bunch of girls.
Well, that's why I am not a millionaire either.
Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days
This topic is locked.