Isnt Leo's hair something to do with the male prostate cancer awareness thing? the blue bit?
Permalink
Permalink
Argh - better play but we finally had 3 players in the box and we didn't cross it
a.haak
Permalink
Permalink
Isnt Leo's hair something to do with the male prostate cancer awareness thing? the blue bit?
yesPlus I guess he likes it :)
Permalink
Permalink
game has got boring after what was a pretty good start!
Permalink
Permalink
So frustrating. We just f**k around with the ball and then hoof it up or do a little chip that goes straight to Sydney
Has been sleep inducing to be honestvaleo2010-09-11 20:01:03
Has been sleep inducing to be honestvaleo2010-09-11 20:01:03
a.haak
Permalink
Permalink
Hearfield doing well to get up but has he beat the first man with a cross yet?
We're defending well but every attack starts with Lochy or Hearfield trying to chip it up to Leo/Ifill and Greenie and most of the time we lose it. Kind of painfulvaleo2010-09-11 20:04:56
We're defending well but every attack starts with Lochy or Hearfield trying to chip it up to Leo/Ifill and Greenie and most of the time we lose it. Kind of painfulvaleo2010-09-11 20:04:56
a.haak
Permalink
Permalink
We should be using the middle of the park more and pass through sydney a little bit, not hoof it aimlessly.
Ifil and greeny also need to come to the ball and not make only forward runs... makes it harder on the flanks to do anything but knowck it sometimes.
Permalink
Permalink
No wonder there is stuiff all people there..not good to watch. Bereft of talent to unlock a defence. Need Daniel I think for Ifill..and how to get Pav on. I long for Smeltzs runs into the box with ball at feet...Greenacre just doesnt do it for me as a player. Layoffs and maybe the odd poached goal. Need another striker....and not one that is 6 foot plus. 0-0 written all over it.
A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen
Permalink
Permalink
Looks to me like they are targeting the Sydney left back, lots of early long balls in behind him
Permalink
Permalink
We're playing better than Sydney but that is not saying much.
Dura looks like he'll need to go off and we have no defensive cover..
Dura looks like he'll need to go off and we have no defensive cover..
a.haak
Permalink
Permalink
Just need a goal to give us some confidence. de Jong said it right - "both teams playing not to lose at the moment"
Permalink
Permalink
We're playing better than Sydney but that is not saying much.
Dura looks like he'll need to go off and we have no defensive cover..
Dura looks like he'll need to go off and we have no defensive cover..
Manny for centreback!
A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen
Permalink
Permalink
Then who will play DM? Daniel on and Brown drops back? He's the only one getting in the box.valeo2010-09-11 20:11:38
a.haak
Permalink
Permalink
I hope the ABs give me something to cheer about...
A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen
Permalink
Permalink
Then who will play DM? Daniel on and Brown drops back? He's the only one getting in the box.
Ward looks like he is playing at the base of the midfield just in front of the back 4
Permalink
Permalink
Our choices are limited with Pav and Big Mac both on teh bench..madness. Daniel is going to have to run his socks off.
A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen
Permalink
Permalink
I would be more inclined to think more about how we can attack more. Someone said both sides look like they are trying not to lose. Its our home game, go for it I say
Permalink
Permalink
Ward's doing OK, quite promising. I like that 3 man midfield - they're all doing solid work but apart from Ifill we're still a bit toothless up front.
Permalink
Permalink
Then who will play DM? Daniel on and Brown drops back? He's the only one getting in the box.
Ward looks like he is playing at the base of the midfield just in front of the back 4
Manny is unless they both are. Ward has been a lot further forward.
valeo2010-09-11 20:16:36
a.haak
Permalink
Permalink
Ward's doing OK, quite promising. I like that 3 man midfield - they're all doing solid work but apart from Ifill we're still a bit toothless up front. [/QUOTE]
The problem with the 3 man mid field is the trade off with not having another striker up front
[QUOTE=hepatitis] De Jong� >> Dewhurst
The problem with the 3 man mid field is the trade off with not having another striker up front
[QUOTE=hepatitis] De Jong� >> Dewhurst
Hell novaleo2010-09-11 20:19:18
a.haak
Permalink
Permalink
Means Brown can get forward more though...
Permalink
Permalink
I'd like to see more of Pavlovic. He's raw but he's aggressive, runs at defences and wants to make things happen. Greenacre, Leo and Brown are just not going to frighten any defence.
Permalink
Permalink
[QUOTE=StopOut] Ward's doing OK, quite promising. I like that 3 man midfield - they're all doing solid work but apart from Ifill we're still a bit toothless up front.
The problem with the 3 man mid field is the trade off with not having another striker up front
/QUOTE]
HUH?? 3 man midfield, 4 man defense so that leaves 3 forward??. We have both Bertos and Ifil getting well forward with Greenacre
Permalink
Permalink
[QUOTE=StopOut] Ward's doing OK, quite promising. I like that 3 man midfield - they're all doing solid work but apart from Ifill we're still a bit toothless up front.
The problem with the 3 man mid field is the trade off with not having another striker up front
/QUOTE]
HUH?? 3 man midfield, 4 man defense so that leaves 3 forward??. We have both Bertos and Ifil getting well forward with Greenacre
No, Leo and Ifill have been hugging the touchline leaving Greenie isolated up front
Difference between '3 forward' and '3 strikers'valeo2010-09-11 20:25:52
a.haak
Permalink
Permalink
[QUOTE=StopOut] Ward's doing OK, quite promising. I like that 3 man midfield - they're all doing solid work but apart from Ifill we're still a bit toothless up front.
The problem with the 3 man mid field is the trade off with not having another striker up front
/QUOTE]
HUH?? 3 man midfield, 4 man defense so that leaves 3 forward??. We have both Bertos and Ifil getting well forward with Greenacre
No, Leo and Ifill have been hugging the touchline leaving Greenie isolated up front
Difference between '3 forward' and '3 strikers'
What game are you watching?? Count the players in the box when either Ifil or Berots or Hearfield or Lockhead have delivered crosses
Permalink
Permalink
Bertos and Greenacre both in the box for that last cross
Permalink
Permalink
Bertos attacks within the width of the penalty box and Greenacre in the box.....
Permalink
Permalink
Yessss
Lucky but i'll take it
Lucky but i'll take it
a.haak
Permalink
Permalink
Finally..soft tho
A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen
Permalink
Permalink
Troy's crossing has been hilarious :P
a.haak
Permalink
Permalink
Hearfield sends a poor cross, 3 players in the box
Permalink
Permalink