Manchester United (Part 1)

3999 replies · 865,984 views Locked
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
dreaming Michael
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
2ndBest wrote:
He got a bet on 0-0 draw.
Oh I see
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Why are the refs so stupid.

Clear penalty.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
btw whats with all the green and yellow scarfs
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Michael wrote:
Why are the refs so stupid.

Clear penalty.


Got the ball.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Scarfs are Glazer protests. They're the club's old old colours.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
1 each on pens now I suppose.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
if you are assuming the Man U one was a pen..which it wasn't
2ndBest2010-04-04 01:21:58
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
I'm not a fan of Macheda but I think we need him on. Berb's playing supporting striker [:l].
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
How come can the assistant ignore sh*t like that?
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Scholes should be off. Dirty little c**t never tackles properly.

Utd playing like sh*t too.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Buffon II wrote:
Scholes should be off.
Come off it.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
He can't tackle properly Michael. He just lunges in every time he sees the ball within a few yards of him.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Sounds like how every use to tackle Ronaldo.

I now judge all tackles against how he use to get chopped down.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Cue Michael's penalty claim in 3,2,1
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Michael wrote:
Sounds like how every use to tackle Ronaldo.

I now judge all tackles against how he use to get chopped down.


Two wrongs don't make a right.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Nah, not even I can expect a ref to call that in real time. :l
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Buffon II wrote:

Michael wrote:
Sounds like how every use to tackle Ronaldo.

I now judge all tackles against how he use to get chopped down.
Two wrongs don't make a right.


Its not two wrongs, last year set a precedent on how tackles can be made. Two wrongs would be going in for revenge which isn't what I'm saying.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
All I can say is someone's about to get a boot kicked in their face.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Nah it is two wrongs mate. You're saying just because poor old Ronnie got chopped a few times that it's ok for Scholes or anyone else to do it.

Tell you what kid, in a few years you'll look back on something like this and realize how immature your views were.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Buffon II wrote:
Nah it is two wrongs mate. You're saying just because poor old Ronnie got chopped a few times that it's ok for Scholes or anyone else to do it.Tell you what kid, in a few years you'll look back on something like this and realize how immature your views were.


Well no that's not how it works at all. Since Ronnie got chopped down a million times every game then it must be a fair thing to do that's within the rules.

Thanks.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

 

the chopping ronaldo frequently received was quite disgusting, defenders would get so frustrated with that tricky little f*ckstain
 
 
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
And if you wonna see childish go review your mates broken leg thread. (@Buf)Michael2010-04-04 01:41:05
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
I suggest you learn how to spell before telling me what to do.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Hopefully Ferg rarks them up a bit at half time. Wouldn't mind seeing Nani and macheda this half. Good to see Park as energetic and enthusiastic as usual
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Buffon II wrote:
I suggest you learn how to spell before telling me what to do.
So we're not allowed to use a bit of slang on internet forums now? Shot man.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Since when has wonna been slang? It's bad spelling and nothing more.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Both as stupid as each other.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Buffon II wrote:
Since when has wonna been slang? It's bad spelling and nothing more.
"Wonna" is "relaxed prronunciation" which is perfectly acceptable on an internet forum.

And I'm pretty sure I'm higher educated than you were at my age.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Michael wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
Since when has wonna been slang? It's bad spelling and nothing more.
"Wonna" is "relaxed prronunciation" which is perfectly acceptable on an internet forum.

And I'm pretty sure I'm higher educated than you were at my age.


LOL.

You weren't Michael.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Buffon II wrote:

Michael wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
Since when has wonna been slang? It's bad spelling and nothing more.
"Wonna" is "relaxed prronunciation" which is perfectly acceptable on an internet forum.

And I'm pretty sure I'm higher educated than you were at my age.
LOL.You weren't Michael.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Michael wrote:
Buffon II wrote:

Michael wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
Since when has wonna been slang? It's bad spelling and nothing more.
"Wonna" is "relaxed prronunciation" which is perfectly acceptable on an internet forum.

And I'm pretty sure I'm higher educated than you were at my age.
LOL.You weren't Michael.


Yeah, the grammar in your above post is laughable isn't it.


Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Buffon II wrote:

Michael wrote:
Buffon II wrote:

Michael wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
Since when has wonna been slang? It's bad spelling and nothing more.
"Wonna" is "relaxed prronunciation" which is perfectly acceptable on an internet forum.

And I'm pretty sure I'm higher educated than you were at my age.
LOL.You weren't Michael.
Yeah, the grammar in your above post is laughable isn't it.
Google "typing error" then Google "grow up because you're apparently 40 or something" then follow that up with a good spell checker because Christ if you ever make the slightest mistake am I going to rip you for it.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Michael wrote:
Google "typing error" then Google "grow up because you're apparently 40 or something" then follow that up with a good spell checker because Christ if you ever make the slightest mistake am I going to rip you for it.


Yeah that's not going to happen though, is it Michael?

The funniest thing about this "argument" (i wouldn't personally refer to it as that, arguments usually present well made points from both sides), is that 1) You think you're smarter than me and 2) I've distracted you from one of your teams most important matches of the season over some basic spelling and grammatical errors.


Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Buffon II wrote:

Michael wrote:
Google "typing error" then Google "grow up because you're apparently 40 or something" then follow that up with a good spell checker because Christ if you ever make the slightest mistake am I going to rip you for it.
Yeah that's not going to happen though, is it Michael?The funniest thing about this "argument" (i wouldn't personally refer to it as that, arguments usually present well made points from both sides), is that 1) You think you're smarter than me and 2) I've distracted you from one of your teams most important matches of the season over some basic spelling and grammatical errors.


See mate, its the beauty of dual monitors. I haven't missed a single second. Add that on with the fact I'm touch typing and don't really give a sh*t, hence the lack of anything constructive.

Secondly, what did you leave high school with then mate?

A simple search of your recent posts brings up plenty of errors btw. Including starting sentences without capitals. Jump off the high ground mate.Michael2010-04-04 02:10:09
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
You guys finished yet, or do you want me to give both of you some time out?
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Sub time.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Michael wrote:
Buffon II wrote:

Michael wrote:
Google "typing error" then Google "grow up because you're apparently 40 or something" then follow that up with a good spell checker because Christ if you ever make the slightest mistake am I going to rip you for it.
Yeah that's not going to happen though, is it Michael?The funniest thing about this "argument" (i wouldn't personally refer to it as that, arguments usually present well made points from both sides), is that 1) You think you're smarter than me and 2) I've distracted you from one of your teams most important matches of the season over some basic spelling and grammatical errors.


See mate, its the beauty of dual monitors. I haven't missed a single second. Add that on with the fact I'm touch typing and don't really give a sh*t, hence the lack of anything constructive.

Secondly, what did you leave high school with then mate?

A simple search of your recent posts brings up plenty of errors btw. Including starting sentences without capitals. Jump off the high ground mate.


I left high school with NCEA Level 3 Achieved with Merit and University Entrance. Went to University and completed a belated (due to injury stalling my progress in between) two year Travel and Tourism course with extra credit and distinction (only 2% of the students were allowed to go for it within this particular course).

Please don't try me on in a battle of wits. I am blessed with natural academic brilliance.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Last warning.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Buffon II wrote:

Michael wrote:
Buffon II wrote:

Michael wrote:
Google "typing error" then Google "grow up because you're apparently 40 or something" then follow that up with a good spell checker because Christ if you ever make the slightest mistake am I going to rip you for it.
Yeah that's not going to happen though, is it Michael?The funniest thing about this "argument" (i wouldn't personally refer to it as that, arguments usually present well made points from both sides), is that 1) You think you're smarter than me and 2) I've distracted you from one of your teams most important matches of the season over some basic spelling and grammatical errors.


See mate, its the beauty of dual monitors. I haven't missed a single second. Add that on with the fact I'm touch typing and don't really give a sh*t, hence the lack of anything constructive.

Secondly, what did you leave high school with then mate?

A simple search of your recent posts brings up plenty of errors btw. Including starting sentences without capitals. Jump off the high ground mate.
I left high school with NCEA Level 3 Achieved with Merit and University Entrance. Went to University and completed a belated (due to injury stalling my progress in between) two year Travel and Tourism course with extra credit and distinction (only 2% of the students were allowed to go for it within this particular course).Please don't try me on in a battle of wits. I am blessed with natural academic brilliance.


Noticed I said "at my age" Which means I win. I got L1 and L2 Exc and this year will be doing scholarship in four different subjects. (Physics, Calc, Stats and Eco) <3 (Note not English, which I freely admit)

Congrats on your Tourism course man.Michael2010-04-04 02:20:32
Permalink Permalink

This topic is locked.