Wellington Phoenix Men

Crowds - The thread of Australian whining

4604 replies · 379,731 views
about 13 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

Ticketek really are a shambles. From what they said to me on Twitter, I think they treated this as a 'members pre-sale' rather than as special pricing for members. Shambles.


I thought these prices were just for everyone? Which is probably what we should be doing...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

I just tried the password and it let me pick my tickets.


Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Steve-O wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

Ticketek really are a shambles. From what they said to me on Twitter, I think they treated this as a 'members pre-sale' rather than as special pricing for members. Shambles.


I thought these prices were just for everyone? Which is probably what we should be doing...

The Phoenix advertised them as a "friends and family" deal, so I assume it was their intention for season pass holders to bring along friends and family to the game. But I completely agree with you, it should be $10 for everyone. What's the harm in getting 10k people along for the final game on the cheap?

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Hard News wrote:

 I think that is the case.  It's just engaging the season members to get the word out.

I imagine that'd happen without the complication of a password which would put people off if they don't happen to know it. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

And now it seems to have switched back to needing the password, and unable to buy without the password. Shambles.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Oh. I understand now. You need this link here: http://premier.ticketek.co.nz/ppredirect.aspx?pp=QSPEC&sh=PHOENIXL12 which has some fancy redirecting going on that gives you the page to enter the password for cheap tickets. If you go to the Ticketek homepage and search for Phoenix, you won't be presented with the option to get the cheap tickets.


Should have just made it $10 for everyone.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

#shambles


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Tegal wrote:

#shambles

That the password?
Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

It works now. 

I received the email from the club today and going through all those links makes it work.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Hard News wrote:

 I think that is the case.  It's just engaging the season members to get the word out.

so once again we (the season members) are being expected to do the marketing for the event. why not, as many have suggested, make it $10 entry for all, plus a kid for free. Get 10-15k there with awesome weather, remove the stupid admin fee and we'll have a blast to see the season out.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Marketing managers's first job to sort this out

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

It also means either we have to pay and get the money back, or send the link and password onto others - basically just unnecessary stuff that could end up putting some people off. Why not make walk up tickets $10 as well?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Steve-O wrote:

It also means either we have to pay and get the money back, or send the link and password onto others - basically just unnecessary stuff that could end up putting some people off. Why not make walk up tickets $10 as well?

So much this. Didn't the Facebook info about this say that it was limited to the number of seats at Westpac? I mean really in that case just make it a free for all.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

theprof wrote:

Hard News wrote:

 I think that is the case.  It's just engaging the season members to get the word out.

so once again we (the season members) are being expected to do the marketing for the event. why not, as many have suggested, make it $10 entry for all, plus a kid for free. Get 10-15k there with awesome weather, remove the stupid admin fee and we'll have a blast to see the season out.


Good points made. Normal ticket prices should always include an admin fee, not have it on top so to speak. And when you buy at the stadium on the day, I don't think they should be charging it at all. Mind you i think every game should only be $20 and ST holders should only have to pay $15 per game played in NZ. But thats just my opinion. We want numbers of fans or a big empty yellow area?
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Lonegunmen wrote:

theprof wrote:

Hard News wrote:

 I think that is the case.  It's just engaging the season members to get the word out.

so once again we (the season members) are being expected to do the marketing for the event. why not, as many have suggested, make it $10 entry for all, plus a kid for free. Get 10-15k there with awesome weather, remove the stupid admin fee and we'll have a blast to see the season out.


Good points made. Normal ticket prices should always include an admin fee, not have it on top so to speak. And when you buy at the stadium on the day, I don't think they should be charging it at all. Mind you i think every game should only be $20 and ST holders should only have to pay $15 per game played in NZ. But thats just my opinion. We want numbers of fans or a big empty yellow area?
The owners want the team to break even.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Firstly, they have to gain a consistant crowd attendance to do this. But the low crowds are getting the club no where and finance is one of the main prohibiting causes - well that and stadium food and drink prices. They did a thing on it on Newstalkzb on Tuesday morning about it. Declining Wellington crowds at both, the football and the Rugby. And the two things i have just mentioned were the main complaints in the callers and e-mails that were sent in.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

ahmad wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

theprof wrote:

Hard News wrote:

 I think that is the case.  It's just engaging the season members to get the word out.

so once again we (the season members) are being expected to do the marketing for the event. why not, as many have suggested, make it $10 entry for all, plus a kid for free. Get 10-15k there with awesome weather, remove the stupid admin fee and we'll have a blast to see the season out.


Good points made. Normal ticket prices should always include an admin fee, not have it on top so to speak. And when you buy at the stadium on the day, I don't think they should be charging it at all. Mind you i think every game should only be $20 and ST holders should only have to pay $15 per game played in NZ. But thats just my opinion. We want numbers of fans or a big empty yellow area?
The owners want the team to break even.
They want the Phoenix to be sustainable, not to break even. Sustainable can still mean losing money, just at a rate that is acceptable.
Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

 and losing money one more game this season isn't gooing to be the deal breaker, I think the win here is to sell tickts at a reasonable price - minus the silly 7.50 booking fee and get 10-15k through the gates, hopefully the team wins and you have 10-15k looking forward to the start of the next season.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Flagging the booking fee for the game can't happen. That's how ticketek make money, they're hardly going to flag it and offer a free service just so the Phoenix can get a few more through the gate (and create more work for no money)


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

the key thing for me is they don't offer any service, especialyl for tickets bought at the stadium....and a $7.50 booking fee for a $10.00 ticklet is obscene - if anytthing the service fee should be a precentage, not a flat fee.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Of course they offer a service. They provide ticketing for the event. Something which they are still doing even if the tickets are free. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

theprof wrote:

the key thing for me is they don't offer any service, especialyl for tickets bought at the stadium....and a $7.50 booking fee for a $10.00 ticklet is obscene - if anytthing the service fee should be a precentage, not a flat fee.

Why? The club have obviously made the call to drop the price to $10, not Ticketek. So why should they lose out on their end of the bargain by reducing their booking fees? That wouldnt be very good business sense on Ticketek's part
Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

do the math AJ, if you were not currently going to the last game of the season, saw the offering at $10, then went to ticketek to make the purchase cos hey 90 minutes fun for $10 aint too bad, would you really be happy to pay another $7.50 on top of it ?!? I object to paying a booking fee for renewing my season pass online, when ticketek do nothing except fulfill the order - usually incorrectly and late. $7.50 for a $10 ticket is highway robbery - if  was a bank charging you this as a dishonour fee you'd be going to your lawyer.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History

But thats like saying 'A comedian does nothing but tell a few jokes'

their entire service is to 'fulfill the order' I don't understand why you think that is doing nothing, they clearly provide a service (whether or not you think they provide good service is a different issue entirely), and I also don't see why you think they should do it for free. Or lower their fee just because the phoenix lowered theirs, the nix ticket price has nothing to do with ticketek.

That sort of weird reasoning and outrage is exactly why they need to just incorporate it into the cost of each ticket, instead of showing it separately as they do now. 

The bank example is also a bad one...In this case it is one company charging you for one service, and another company charging you for a separate service...With the bank it is the same company in both instances. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

It's keeping people employed.  But would be better if the total price is advertised.  It is like going to America and seeing a price on a menu, then when you pay they add on the tax and you have to tip.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Tegal wrote:

But thats like saying 'A comedian does nothing but tell a few jokes'

their entire service is to 'fulfill the order' I don't understand why you think that is doing nothing, they clearly provide a service (whether or not you think they provide good service is a different issue entirely), and I also don't see why you think they should do it for free. Or lower their fee just because the phoenix lowered theirs, the nix ticket price has nothing to do with ticketek.

That sort of weird reasoning and outrage is exactly why they need to just incorporate it into the cost of each ticket, instead of showing it separately as they do now. 

The bank example is also a bad one...In this case it is one company charging you for one service, and another company charging you for a separate service...With the bank it is the same company in both instances. 


I think the issue is that the cost is clearly arbitrary nad in any reasonable analysis doesn't reflect the value of the service you receive.  Why is the fee the same on one ticket as opposed to 10 tickets?  If they print and send you tickets in the post - yes I can understand why there is a cost for that.  But why is the cost the same for that option as to print a paper ticket yourself?  Or the same when you buy a ticket at the stadium?  It has to be sorted out - it's just wrong.  Why can't the club ticket the event itself?

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History

Why ticket the event yourself, when you can get a ticketing company who already has the resources to do it Cheaper? The cost is hardly in them printing out a ticket for you, so I hardly see how thats relevant. Its not you paying $5 to use your own printer at all, there is more behind it than them sending an email and you printing a ticket is there not? 

When you see a football match, you are purchasing 2 services, the football, and the ticketing. Again, if they simply incorporated the fee into the price of the ticket, you wouldn't be complaining. Could you imagine the money they'd miss out on if they charged a flat rate from people doing mass bookings to avoid individual fees?  

Effectively, what you are charged by ticketek, is actually what the nix are getting charged for using their service. If ticketek did it for free, the nix would simply charge $5 more because that's obviously the price you're willing to pay. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

james dean wrote:

Tegal wrote:

But thats like saying 'A comedian does nothing but tell a few jokes'

their entire service is to 'fulfill the order' I don't understand why you think that is doing nothing, they clearly provide a service (whether or not you think they provide good service is a different issue entirely), and I also don't see why you think they should do it for free. Or lower their fee just because the phoenix lowered theirs, the nix ticket price has nothing to do with ticketek.

That sort of weird reasoning and outrage is exactly why they need to just incorporate it into the cost of each ticket, instead of showing it separately as they do now. 

The bank example is also a bad one...In this case it is one company charging you for one service, and another company charging you for a separate service...With the bank it is the same company in both instances. 


I think the issue is that the cost is clearly arbitrary nad in any reasonable analysis doesn't reflect the value of the service you receive.  Why is the fee the same on one ticket as opposed to 10 tickets?  If they print and send you tickets in the post - yes I can understand why there is a cost for that.  But why is the cost the same for that option as to print a paper ticket yourself?  Or the same when you buy a ticket at the stadium?  It has to be sorted out - it's just wrong.  Why can't the club ticket the event itself?

I'm pretty sure it is the venue that generally holds the ticketing contract with the ticketing agency, not the event promoter.  Agree with the rest of your post though.
Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Ticketmaster do not charge anything for their e-tickets, so I don't see why Ticketek do. $5 to send an e-mail (which is automated) is ridiculous.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History

Steve-O wrote:

Ticketmaster do not charge anything for their e-tickets, so I don't see why Ticketek do. $5 to send an e-mail (which is automated) is ridiculous.

Ticketmaster do charge an $8 "Order Processing Fee", so I don't see why you think they don't.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Ticketek are also charging a credit card payment fee.  

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

Steve-O wrote:

Ticketmaster do not charge anything for their e-tickets, so I don't see why Ticketek do. $5 to send an e-mail (which is automated) is ridiculous.

Ticketmaster do charge an $8 "Order Processing Fee", so I don't see why you think they don't.

Because, as I've been saying, they charge their fee in a more clever way. Whereas ticketek do it in a way that makes people feel like they're getting charged to use their printer ($5), and then again to use their credit card ($3), which works out at $8. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Tegal wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

Steve-O wrote:

Ticketmaster do not charge anything for their e-tickets, so I don't see why Ticketek do. $5 to send an e-mail (which is automated) is ridiculous.

Ticketmaster do charge an $8 "Order Processing Fee", so I don't see why you think they don't.

Because, as I've been saying, they charge their fee in a more clever way. Whereas ticketek do it in a way that makes people feel like they're getting charged to use their printer ($5), and then again to use their credit card ($3), which works out at $8. 

Indeed. Steve-O got tricked by the better system. Ticketek would be much better to say 'Free Printing!!!' and 'Courier costs $3', and then whack a $5 service fee onto everything, that way people would understand what they are actually paying for.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

TicketDirect probably have the best and most transparent way of doing it though. They charge a $1.50 fee per ticket, which is clearly labelled when selecting which tickets you want to purchase. Free to print them out, and an extra cost for courier etc. It's a much more transparent way of doing things.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Ticket direct strikes a better balance IMO. At the event organisers' request they can provide a zero additional ticketing fee on ticket prices. 

The first Nix game had a ~$2 fee per ticket on top of the advertised $25 ticket price. I raised this with them and while I didn't get any direct response, subsequent Nix games have had "no ticketing fee". Courier and CC fees additional of course. There is no way Ticket Direct were just being charitable though. The fee was somehow included/absorbed into the $25 inclusive of fees ticket costs for the next 2 Nix matches. It meant people didn't feel mislead when they arrived at the gate with $25 exactly though. 

The All Whites at the same venue with the same ticketing agency are charging an additional fee ($2.50 per ticket) as well as a $5 additional game day surcharge (technically the pre-sales are being "discounted"). So this tells us that it is up to the event holder to decide when it comes to TD. I'm not sure if Ticketek has the ability to absorb fees into ticket costs - I've never seen this happen for their events though 

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

I think more expensive tickets at the gate are more of a ploy to get people to buy before the event. To both increase ticket sales in total, and to decrease queues of people outside the ground trying to get a ticket and get in at the last minute. They have in the past been quite poor at advertising this however, which rightfully pisses people off when they suddenly have to pay more. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Tegal wrote:

I think more expensive tickets at the gate are more of a ploy to get people to buy before the event. To both increase ticket sales in total, and to decrease queues of people outside the ground trying to get a ticket and get in at the last minute. They have in the past been quite poor at advertising this however, which rightfully pisses people off when they suddenly have to pay more. 


Exactly, I remember turning up at the cricket last year and tickets were $15 more expensive at the gate, and this was mentioned nowhere on the website (hadn't prebought as we were unsure of numbers until the morning off).  That's when it pisses you off.
Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History

patrick478 wrote:

Steve-O wrote:

Ticketmaster do not charge anything for their e-tickets, so I don't see why Ticketek do. $5 to send an e-mail (which is automated) is ridiculous.

Ticketmaster do charge an $8 "Order Processing Fee", so I don't see why you think they don't.


Because the pick up / posting costs more on top of that $8 fee you quote.  So, I'm not saying their admin costs nothing, I am saying their e-tickets cost nothing to 'deliver', because they don't.

edit - though having gone through Ticketek pricing just now, I see that $5.25 is all they add on.  So yes, they'd be better calling the $5.25 a 'service charge' (although it's quite a lot really, 20% of your average ticket for not much work) and saying Ezytickets are free.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Completely agree with your edit. The wording on the Ticketek site is not very good at all. 


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink