Wellington Phoenix Men

Phoenix Ownership - Rob says FTFFA (Part 2)

3353 replies · 782,129 views Locked
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

Posted by Liam Hyslop on Twitter

From a Wellington Phoenix job ad: 2017/18 KPIs: 

Sky Viewership numbers: 35,000 

Season membership 6,000 

Average home gate 10,000 

5% growth in social media numbers

https://thejourneyfan.blogspot.co.nz/

New Zealand Football Media Association Website of the year 2015 & 2016

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

Posted by Liam Hyslop on Twitter

From a Wellington Phoenix job ad: 2017/18 KPIs: 

Sky Viewership numbers: 35,000 

Season membership 6,000 

Average home gate 10,000 

5% growth in social media numbers

#metrics

I think with a winning team, this is pretty easy. 



Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

I think the membership would be difficult but you are right, if the story is good the other numbers are easily manageable.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Hard News wrote:

I think the membership would be difficult but you are right, if the story is good the other numbers are easily manageable.

Apart from our first season we haven't average above 10k at home for any other season (all games incl. home away from home games). That would be tough to achieve with what seems like general sporting attendance decline
Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

That’s an average though. So you’d get your usual crowd at the beginning of the season, then if it’s a good season the crowds will jump on the bandwagon toward the end of the season and bump the average up to around 10k (maybe with the help of a good well timed Auckland crowd) 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Blew.2 wrote:
patrick478 wrote:

I'd suggest that Rob is far more circumspect than old Gareth and I know who I think you're most likely to get the truth out of [however painful it might be for you Patrick and others].

This requires starting wit the assumption that Gareth actually knows what the truth is.

If Rob was not committed to the Nix long term why would he be jetting off to FFA headquarters regularly to discuss  APFC plans for the future(Most likely at his cost). Also why would the APFC have him as a major part of the group if they did not want Wgtn in. 

Easy to ask questions to get the info to back anyone's slant on a topic. Just ask the RBB :-)

Most likely at his own cost.... I doubt it, it will be a legitimate business expense and if they are running the club at a loss, then you and I as tax payers are subsidising all of this.
Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
patrick478 wrote:

I'd suggest that Rob is far more circumspect than old Gareth and I know who I think you're most likely to get the truth out of [however painful it might be for you Patrick and others].

This requires starting wit the assumption that Gareth actually knows what the truth is.

Well Gareth is an owner and is likely to know a great deal more about the club than you and I or anyone else that is not an owner or Dome.
Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

Whats funny is you have NZ stakeholders pushing for change of an Australian administered competition.. Our national league must be perfect then!

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

Why does being from NZ exclude someone from pushing for change in a competition of which they are a stakeholder?

Pushing for change in one competition also doesn’t stop someone from pushing for change in another competition. You can push for both to be better. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Blew.2 wrote:
patrick478 wrote:

I'd suggest that Rob is far more circumspect than old Gareth and I know who I think you're most likely to get the truth out of [however painful it might be for you Patrick and others].

This requires starting wit the assumption that Gareth actually knows what the truth is.

If Rob was not committed to the Nix long term why would he be jetting off to FFA headquarters regularly to discuss  APFC plans for the future(Most likely at his cost). Also why would the APFC have him as a major part of the group if they did not want Wgtn in. 

Easy to ask questions to get the info to back anyone's slant on a topic. Just ask the RBB :-)

Most likely at his own cost.... I doubt it, it will be a legitimate business expense and if they are running the club at a loss, then you and I as tax payers are subsidising all of this.

An accountant may correct me here but I thought it was established that WelNix / Investnix are an LP which severely limits the owners ability to claim losses but reduces their liabilities.

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Tegal wrote:

Why does being from NZ exclude someone from pushing for change in a competition of which they are a stakeholder?

Pushing for change in one competition also doesn’t stop someone from pushing for change in another competition. You can push for both to be better. 

Just an observation, imagine if the shoe was on the other foot.

Its more that something must be really rotten in Australia if the only party benefiting out of the A-league is FFA while the clubs keep bleeding.

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Bullion wrote:
Hard News wrote:

I think the membership would be difficult but you are right, if the story is good the other numbers are easily manageable.

Apart from our first season we haven't average above 10k at home for any other season (all games incl. home away from home games). That would be tough to achieve with what seems like general sporting attendance decline

Afraid its this 10000 figure i really struggle with.I just dont get what has shown them that this is the figure they need to strive for.Thats the figure they need to break even. Nothing in past should give them the impression that they can expect those attendances. For christ sake until recently the Hurricanes couldnt even get those numbers why they think we can get them i just dont get.

Also dont get why some pretty savy business men  seem to think they can do something with a sports club that just donsnt happen in many parts of the world and thats be self sufficient. Especially in a market dominated by other sports.


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Ryan wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:
patrick478 wrote:

I'd suggest that Rob is far more circumspect than old Gareth and I know who I think you're most likely to get the truth out of [however painful it might be for you Patrick and others].

This requires starting wit the assumption that Gareth actually knows what the truth is.

If Rob was not committed to the Nix long term why would he be jetting off to FFA headquarters regularly to discuss  APFC plans for the future(Most likely at his cost). Also why would the APFC have him as a major part of the group if they did not want Wgtn in. 

Easy to ask questions to get the info to back anyone's slant on a topic. Just ask the RBB :-)

Most likely at his own cost.... I doubt it, it will be a legitimate business expense and if they are running the club at a loss, then you and I as tax payers are subsidising all of this.

An accountant may correct me here but I thought it was established that WelNix / Investnix are an LP which severely limits the owners ability to claim losses but reduces their liabilities.

Welnix is a Limited Liability Co, whose shares are owned by Investnix Ltd, with Rob Morrison as sole shareholder (presumably he holds them as a trustee for the others)

It would be a surprise if they have not somehow structured for shareholders to offset losses in some manner

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
sthn.jeff wrote:
Ryan wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:
patrick478 wrote:

I'd suggest that Rob is far more circumspect than old Gareth and I know who I think you're most likely to get the truth out of [however painful it might be for you Patrick and others].

This requires starting wit the assumption that Gareth actually knows what the truth is.

If Rob was not committed to the Nix long term why would he be jetting off to FFA headquarters regularly to discuss  APFC plans for the future(Most likely at his cost). Also why would the APFC have him as a major part of the group if they did not want Wgtn in. 

Easy to ask questions to get the info to back anyone's slant on a topic. Just ask the RBB :-)

Most likely at his own cost.... I doubt it, it will be a legitimate business expense and if they are running the club at a loss, then you and I as tax payers are subsidising all of this.

An accountant may correct me here but I thought it was established that WelNix / Investnix are an LP which severely limits the owners ability to claim losses but reduces their liabilities.

Welnix is a Limited Liability Co, whose shares are owned by Investnix Ltd, with Rob Morrison as sole shareholder (presumably he holds them as a trustee for the others)

It would be a surprise if they have not somehow structured for shareholders to offset losses in some manner

The get their academy funded through some random trust set up a while back

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
sthn.jeff wrote:
Ryan wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:
patrick478 wrote:

I'd suggest that Rob is far more circumspect than old Gareth and I know who I think you're most likely to get the truth out of [however painful it might be for you Patrick and others].

This requires starting wit the assumption that Gareth actually knows what the truth is.

If Rob was not committed to the Nix long term why would he be jetting off to FFA headquarters regularly to discuss  APFC plans for the future(Most likely at his cost). Also why would the APFC have him as a major part of the group if they did not want Wgtn in. 

Easy to ask questions to get the info to back anyone's slant on a topic. Just ask the RBB :-)

Most likely at his own cost.... I doubt it, it will be a legitimate business expense and if they are running the club at a loss, then you and I as tax payers are subsidising all of this.

An accountant may correct me here but I thought it was established that WelNix / Investnix are an LP which severely limits the owners ability to claim losses but reduces their liabilities.

Welnix is a Limited Liability Co, whose shares are owned by Investnix Ltd, with Rob Morrison as sole shareholder (presumably he holds them as a trustee for the others)

It would be a surprise if they have not somehow structured for shareholders to offset losses in some manner

Doesn't the fact that WelNix is actually known as WelNix GP (as in General Partner) actually indicate that it's an LP though?

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Blew.2 wrote:
Midfielder wrote:

Brave interview .... don't think this will win any pink bats in Australia ... more over will increase calls for Welly Out...

Have we got a clear coherent run down on CCM in that thread from you. Or are they making friends in the FFA.

EDIT: Gareth is as hes says a "Reluctant Owner"  he has for some years now. But stays involved because they stay to save it for Wellington.  Cost neutral is all the Clubs want. 

FMD please go and find a post I made that has said we are safe..... in fact I have said the Mariners don't deserve to be in Hal at the moment on the Mariners forum... We are F...ed as well .... unless we change .... and on this forum I have said that before...

Just so you understand we are F.... ed as well ... we have a Little more history, 3 grand final appearances, two championships, winner pre-season competition...14 I think players after they played for us becoming Socceroos the current captain and three others in the starting line up.... the COE ... but we are still F....ed with our curent owner unless meaningful change is made.

Listen to what your owners said he trashed everything .... I hold by what I said it was a very brave interview ..

Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

It was just Gareth Morgan being Gareth Morgan I wouldn't say it was brave because that's just how he is.

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Ryan wrote:
sthn.jeff wrote:
Ryan wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:
patrick478 wrote:

I'd suggest that Rob is far more circumspect than old Gareth and I know who I think you're most likely to get the truth out of [however painful it might be for you Patrick and others].

This requires starting wit the assumption that Gareth actually knows what the truth is.

If Rob was not committed to the Nix long term why would he be jetting off to FFA headquarters regularly to discuss  APFC plans for the future(Most likely at his cost). Also why would the APFC have him as a major part of the group if they did not want Wgtn in. 

Easy to ask questions to get the info to back anyone's slant on a topic. Just ask the RBB :-)

Most likely at his own cost.... I doubt it, it will be a legitimate business expense and if they are running the club at a loss, then you and I as tax payers are subsidising all of this.

An accountant may correct me here but I thought it was established that WelNix / Investnix are an LP which severely limits the owners ability to claim losses but reduces their liabilities.

Welnix is a Limited Liability Co, whose shares are owned by Investnix Ltd, with Rob Morrison as sole shareholder (presumably he holds them as a trustee for the others)

It would be a surprise if they have not somehow structured for shareholders to offset losses in some manner

Doesn't the fact that WelNix is actually known as WelNix GP (as in General Partner) actually indicate that it's an LP though?

nope. It is known as Welnix GP Ltd., Registered as a company under the companies act 1993. The GP could stant for anything
Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

GM ranting again really isnt doing anything to strengthen our cause. Who would but the club when our existence in the league is under threat. So fudgeed off with the ownership right now. They bailed the club out when we were dying with the promise of a resurgence. This has never happened - not even close!!!

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
theprof wrote:

GM ranting again really isnt doing anything to strengthen our cause. Who would but the club when our existence in the league is under threat. So fudgeed off with the ownership right now. They bailed the club out when we were dying with the promise of a resurgence. This has never happened - not even close!!!

To be fair 14-15 was close.

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Ryan wrote:
theprof wrote:

GM ranting again really isnt doing anything to strengthen our cause. Who would but the club when our existence in the league is under threat. So fudgeed off with the ownership right now. They bailed the club out when we were dying with the promise of a resurgence. This has never happened - not even close!!!

To be fair 14-15 was close.

I don't class 4th close and without Burns we would have finished a lot lower.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Leggy wrote:
Ryan wrote:
theprof wrote:

GM ranting again really isnt doing anything to strengthen our cause. Who would but the club when our existence in the league is under threat. So fudgeed off with the ownership right now. They bailed the club out when we were dying with the promise of a resurgence. This has never happened - not even close!!!

To be fair 14-15 was close.

I don't class 4th close and without Burns we would have finished a lot lower.

Luckily I was stating my opinion then and not yours.

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Leggy wrote:
Ryan wrote:
theprof wrote:

GM ranting again really isnt doing anything to strengthen our cause. Who would but the club when our existence in the league is under threat. So fudgeed off with the ownership right now. They bailed the club out when we were dying with the promise of a resurgence. This has never happened - not even close!!!

To be fair 14-15 was close.

I don't class 4th close and without Burns we would have finished a lot lower.

 

But we did have Burns. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

4th is ok, but since then we have simply been embarrassing.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
theprof wrote:

4th is ok, but since then we have simply been embarrassing.

Prof,

Is that not what all Gooners say. :)

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Leggy wrote:
theprof wrote:

4th is ok, but since then we have simply been embarrassing.

Prof,

Is that not what all Gooners say. :)

well played sir, well played.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

My first reaction to that Gareth interview was pretty negative.

But even if they just get the international windows, that will make a big difference.

Right now we develop kids and almost immediately loose the best of them to international call ups.  All the hard work that goes into that actually handicaps us.

If we get to have them reliably playing for us AND making the NZ squad, then that's quite a big turnaround.  It makes our natural advantage of being able to play kiwis work for us, not against us.

There is the potential for that to snowball.  Better results.  More local heros.  Bigger crowds.  Better finances and metrics.  Easier to attract other good players.  More 'Nix players in the international shop window, improves the pro pathway for Nix kids. Maybe even helps improve our relationship with NZF.

#rosetintedbutwouldmakeadecentdifference

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

The answer is simple, we all buy Allbirds. Then, we all get our friends and family to buy Allbirds. The chain reaction starts, and soon everybody is wearing Allbirds. Allbirds becomes one of the world's most iconic shoe brands, and the company gets listed on the fortune 500. Tim Brown is now swimming in money, buy's the Nix off Gareth & co in a passion-fueled impulse purchase. He spends big on players, and entices two big name marquee signings to the club via the launch of the new Allbirds football boot range (surely would be the most comfortable boot in the world right), which has an exclusive deal with the Nix. Then we have a fantastic season, averaging crowds of 20,000. We win the grand-final against the Victory at a packed out Westpac, Siggy celebrates the final whistle by kicking Muscat in the head. Sarpreet Singh gets signed by Barcelona. Jacinda Ardern gives the go ahead for a golden statue of Brown outside the Beehive. Honestly it will be weird if this doesn't happen

Annual finals disappointment enthusiast.

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

Can you get them to sell whatever your drinking or smoking at the ROF might help to watch the Nix till Tim buys them.


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

The answer is simple, we all buy Allbirds. Then, we all get our friends and family to buy Allbirds. The chain reaction starts, and soon everybody is wearing Allbirds. Allbirds becomes one of the world's most iconic shoe brands, and the company gets listed on the fortune 500. Tim Brown is now swimming in money, buy's the Nix off Gareth & co in a passion-fueled impulse purchase. As a fitting expression of gratitude he guarantees YF members free craft beer for life. He spends big on players, and entices two big name marquee signings to the club via the launch of the new Allbirds football boot range (surely would be the most comfortable boot in the world right), which has an exclusive deal with the Nix. Then we have a fantastic season, averaging crowds of 20,000. We win the grand-final against the Victory at a packed out Westpac, Siggy celebrates the final whistle by kicking Muscat in the head. Sarpreet Singh gets signed by Barcelona. Jacinda Ardern gives the go ahead for a golden statue of Brown outside the Beehive. Honestly it will be weird if this doesn't happen

The missing bit was glaring so I added it in

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
theprof wrote:

GM ranting again really isnt doing anything to strengthen our cause. Who would but the club when our existence in the league is under threat. So fudgeed off with the ownership right now. They bailed the club out when we were dying with the promise of a resurgence. This has never happened - not even close!!!

Actually, they've poured quite a bit of money in by all accounts, and our performances and crowd attendance figures have not repaid that faith.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
valeo wrote:
theprof wrote:

GM ranting again really isnt doing anything to strengthen our cause. Who would but the club when our existence in the league is under threat. So fudgeed off with the ownership right now. They bailed the club out when we were dying with the promise of a resurgence. This has never happened - not even close!!!

Actually, they've poured quite a bit of money in by all accounts, and our performances have not repaid that faith. Poor Crowd attendance figures are a direct result of that poor performance.

FIFY
Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Ryan wrote:
sthn.jeff wrote:
Ryan wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:
patrick478 wrote:

I'd suggest that Rob is far more circumspect than old Gareth and I know who I think you're most likely to get the truth out of [however painful it might be for you Patrick and others].

This requires starting wit the assumption that Gareth actually knows what the truth is.

If Rob was not committed to the Nix long term why would he be jetting off to FFA headquarters regularly to discuss  APFC plans for the future(Most likely at his cost). Also why would the APFC have him as a major part of the group if they did not want Wgtn in. 

Easy to ask questions to get the info to back anyone's slant on a topic. Just ask the RBB :-)

Most likely at his own cost.... I doubt it, it will be a legitimate business expense and if they are running the club at a loss, then you and I as tax payers are subsidising all of this.

An accountant may correct me here but I thought it was established that WelNix / Investnix are an LP which severely limits the owners ability to claim losses but reduces their liabilities.

Welnix is a Limited Liability Co, whose shares are owned by Investnix Ltd, with Rob Morrison as sole shareholder (presumably he holds them as a trustee for the others)

It would be a surprise if they have not somehow structured for shareholders to offset losses in some manner

Doesn't the fact that WelNix is actually known as WelNix GP (as in General Partner) actually indicate that it's an LP though?

Yes, it's obviously an LP.  All an LP means is that the partners pay their own tax so any losses flow through to the investors.  An LP is a look-through for tax.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

For a simple lad  - LP = ?

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Blew.2 wrote:

For a simple lad  - LP = ?

Limited partnership

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

Wellington "Expensive Hobby" Phoenix. 

Mr Positive

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
james dean wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:

For a simple lad  - LP = ?

Limited partnership

Thanks - Now googled to see how it works.

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Blew.2 wrote:
james dean wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:

For a simple lad  - LP = ?

Limited partnership

Thanks - Now googled to see how it works.

Try googling "how to run a football club properly"
Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History
Blew.2 wrote:
james dean wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:

For a simple lad  - LP = ?

Limited partnership

Thanks - Now googled to see how it works.

Try googling "how to run a football club properly"

  To much information, To many different opinions, To many untrained responders  

Google Result: About 1,470,000 results (0.65 seconds) 

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 8 years ago · edited about 5 years ago · History

You could luck up ill-informed and dullard as well.


Permalink Permalink

This topic is locked.